Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
Quick Facts
- Agency
- National Science Foundation
- Funding
- $150,000 - $1,500,000
- Deadline
- Rolling (Rolling / Open)
- Status
- Active
- Eligibility
- Universities, colleges, and higher education institutions
About This Grant
Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation is sponsored by National Science Foundation. Funds fundamental research in mechanical systems, manufacturing processes, and design engineering to advance innovation. Open to university researchers. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit.
For planning purposes, treat rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability.
Current published award information indicates $150,000 - $1,500,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration.
Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: Universities, colleges, and higher education institutions If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk.
A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation.
Official Opportunity Details
Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (ENG/CMMI) | NSF - U. S. National Science Foundation An official website of the United States government Official websites use .
gov A . gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. Secure .
gov websites use HTTPS. or https:// means you've safely connected to the . gov website.
Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Research Experiences for Undergraduates For Early-Career Researchers Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) How We Make Funding Decisions Request a Change to Your Award Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) NSF Public Access Repository Who to Contact With Questions Facilities and Infrastructure Updates on NSF Priorities Our Directorates & Offices Biological Sciences (BIO) Computer & Information Science & Engineering (CISE) Integrative Activities (OIA) International Science & Engineering (OISE) Mathematical & Physical Sciences (MPS) Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences (SBE) Technology, Innovation & Partnerships (TIP) National Center for Science & Engineering Statistics (NCSES) National Science Board (NSB) Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (ENG/CMMI) View image credit & caption Directorate for Engineering (ENG) Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (ENG/CMMI) Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (ENG/CMMI) Programs and Funding Opportunities Search Funding Opportunities ENG Data Management Plan Guidance Share on X (formerly known as Twitter) The U.
S. National Science Foundation Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI) invests in potentially transformative research that advances civil, design, mechanical, industrial, systems, manufacturing and materials engineering. CMMI supports research, education and innovation in: Manufacturing capabilities and methods.
Engineered materials and building technologies. Infrastructure resilience and sustainability. Tools and socio-technical systems for decision-making, robotics and controls.
ENG Newsletter: Improving disaster resilience ENG Newsletter: Supporting exciting engineering ideas and impacts on AI, health and more Recent funding opportunities Smart Health and Biomedical Research in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Data Science (SCH) Infrastructure Systems and People (ISP) Next Required Due Date: Proposals Accepted Anytime NSF/CASIS Transport Phenomena Research at the International Space Station to Benefit Life on Earth Next Required Due Date: March 4, 2026 Designing Materials to Revolutionize and Engineer our Future (DMREF) View all CMMI opportunities Podcast: The unnatural nature of metamaterials Using machine learning to speed up discovery for drug delivery and disease treatment Biofabricating human tissues enhanced through use of gallium Our Directorates & Offices Budget, Performance & Financial Reporting
Eligibility Requirements
- Universities, colleges, and higher education institutions
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can apply for Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation?
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: Universities, colleges, and higher education institutions Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
What is the typical funding level for Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation?
Current published award information indicates $150,000 - $1,500,000 Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
When is the deadline for Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation?
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Related Grants
NSF 25-519: Engineering Design (ED)
NSF 25-519: Engineering Design (ED) is sponsored by National Science Foundation. Supports fundamental research in engineering design methods, tools, and processes, including biomimetic and bio-inspired design systems for industrial applications. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat January 16, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $200,000 - $1,500,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: Universities, colleges, nonprofits with 501(c)(3) status If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with NSF 25-519: Engineering Design (ED).
NSF 25-558: Environmental Sustainability
NSF 25-558: Environmental Sustainability is sponsored by National Science Foundation. Funds research on sustainable engineering designs, with emphasis on biomimetic approaches mimicking natural systems for industrial efficiency. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat February 28, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $300,000 - $1,200,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: Academic institutions, nonprofits If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with NSF 25-558: Environmental Sustainability.
NSF 25-572: Biophotonics
NSF 25-572: Biophotonics is sponsored by National Science Foundation. Funds research at the intersection of photonics and biology, applicable to biomimetic optical systems and industrial design inspired by biological light manipulation. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat March 5, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $500,000 - $2,000,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: U.S. universities, colleges, nonprofits If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with NSF 25-572: Biophotonics.