The World's Largest Grants + Funders Database

Search and apply for every grant in existence.

85,000+ grants from 144 sources across every U.S. state and 15+ countries

144 data sources50 states + DC133K foundations15+ countries

Free to start — no credit card required. Your data is never used to train AI. Security details →

Trusted by researchers and organizations at

MITStanford UniversityYale UniversityPrinceton UniversityCornell UniversityEmory UniversityNYU Langone HealthUniversity of PittsburghGeorge Washington UniversityFlorida State UniversityLSUMemorial Sloan KetteringChildren's Hospital Los AngelesDeloitteAmerican Red CrossWomen's World BankingChildFundTata Steel

How it works

Match, plan, and win — in one platform

01
Match & Research

Find the right funders in minutes, not months

AI matches your mission to 133K+ foundations across all 50 states. Deep profiles show financials, giving patterns, key contacts, and 990 data so you know exactly who to approach.

133Kfoundation profiles
79Kkey contacts
4-sourceIRS compliance check
Matched Funders
0 of 847 results
GF
Gates Foundation
HealthEducation
$2.4M avg
FF
Ford Foundation
Social JusticeArts
$850K avg
KF
Kresge Foundation
EnvironmentCities
$400K avg
MF
MacArthur Foundation
ClimateJustice
$1.1M avg

Platform at a Glance

One platform. Built around your mission.

Funder Matching

Personalized recommendations from 133K foundations

133K Funder Profiles

Financials, key people, 990 data

Grants Data Search

Historical grants by funder & recipient

Pipeline Tracker

Stage tracking, funnel, win rates

Prospect Lists

Named lists with CSV export

Grant Alerts

Personalized matches delivered to your inbox

AI LOI Writer

Personalized letters of inquiry

Grant Writing Coach

Section-by-section AI drafting

Compliance Monitoring

4-source IRS verification

Granted Review Board

Independent multi-perspective critique

Sector Analytics

Dashboards, maps, and charts

Data API

6 REST endpoints, OpenAPI spec

Trending Grants

Closing soon — don't miss these deadlines

Board of Forestry
CaliforniaActive

2026/27 Effectiveness Monitoring Committee Request for Research Proposals to test the California Forest Practice Rules and related regulations

2026/27 Effectiveness Monitoring Committee Request for Research Proposals to test the California Forest Practice Rules and related regulations is sponsored by Board of Forestry. The Effectiveness Monitoring Committee is an advisory body to the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, intended to fund robust scientific research aimed at testing the efficacy of the California Forest Practice Rules and other natural resource protection statutes, laws, codes, and associated regulations, which address natural resource issues including, but not limited to, watershed science, wildlife concerns, and wildfire hazard. The Effectiveness Monitoring Committee (EMC) is seeking project proposals that: (1) Address one or more of the EMC’s Research Themes and Critical Monitoring Questions and; (2) Address natural resource protection issues that are important for California forestlands. The critical monitoring questions are organized under 12 Research Themes. Six prioritized critical questions were determined by vote amongst the current EMC members at the beginning of the calendar year: Are the FPRs and associated regulations effective in... Question 1h … managing WLPZs to reduce or minimize potential fire behavior and rate of spread? Question 2a … minimizing management-related sediment delivery from forest management activities to watercourse channels at the watershed and sub-watershed level in managed watersheds? Question 6c … managing fuel loads, vegetation patterns and fuel breaks for fire hazard reduction? Question 6d … managing forest structure and stocking standards to promote wildfire resilience? Question 6e … achieving post-fire recovery and restoration? Question 12a … improving overall forest wildfire resilience and the ability of forests to respond to climate change (e.g., in response to drought or bark beetle; reducing plant water stress) and variability, and extreme weather events (evaluate ecosystem functional response to fuel reduction and forest health treatments)? FUNDING AVAILABILITY. Funding available for newly proposed projects is anticipated as follows: $1,111,459 over three FYs beginning in 2026/27, comprising: $261,459 in FY 2026/27; $425,000 in FY 2027/28; and $425,000 in FY 2028/29. AWARD LIMITATIONS. Applicants requesting more than the stated annual amount available for funding will not be considered. While the EMC may choose to fund projects that span multiple FYs up to the annual funding cap, the EMC generally prefers to fund multiple research projects annually. Proposers should keep this in mind when developing their project and annual budget requests. Longer-term projects (greater than three years) may re-apply for funding for additional years through the competitive grants process advertised in the EMC’s Request for Proposals. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES. Eligible projects will test one or more specific FPRs or other rule or regulation under the Board’s jurisdiction and which addresses one or more of the EMC’s Research Themes and Critical Monitoring Questions. Proposed projects must clearly apply to management activities on private timberlands in California. Projects on public land may be eligible for EMC funding provided they clearly apply to the activities and systems that also exist on non-federal timberland. ELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS. Eligible applicants are local, state, and federal agencies including federal land management agencies; institutions of higher education; special purpose districts (e.g., public utilities districts, fire districts, conservation districts, and ports); Native American tribes; private landowners; for-profit entities; and non-profit 501(c)(3) organizations.

Dependant on number of submissions received, application process, etc.Deadline: May 18, 2026

From donor appeals to federal grants

AI drafting that grounds every paragraph in your real data

Upload any RFP or grant guidelines. Our AI grant writing tool reads the full document, identifies every required section, and coaches you through the details it needs to draft a grounded, complete proposal.

NSF_CAREER_Draft.granted

0%
Specific Aims
Research Strategy
Broader Impacts
Data Management
Coach
What debris sizes can current sonar detect?
How will you validate field accuracy?
Who benefits outside your lab?
Where will data be archived?

Not a ChatGPT wrapper

Built different.

Other platforms search their database. Granted searches their database and the entire internet.

Granted
Others
Foundation database
133K with deep profiles
~10K basic listings
Search approach
Database + live internet search
Database only
Funder profiles
Financials, 990s, key contacts, giving patterns
Name and address
IRS compliance check
4-source verification
Single source or none
AI writing
Section-by-section coaching with coverage tracking
Generic text generation
Pre-submission peer review
Independent review + deliberation + consensus
Single AI check or N/A
Grant data
85K+ grants, 144 sources (50 states + 15 countries)
Varies widely
Foundation engagement
Claimed profiles + applicant insights
Static listings
Starting price
$29/month
$300-900/month

A professional grant writer charges $5,000–$15,000 per proposal.

See the architecture →

From match to draft, in one platform.

Join researchers, nonprofits, and community organizations moving from search to submission faster.

Backed by the Granted Guarantee — win a grant or get a full refund.