Defense University Research Instrumentation Program
Quick Facts
- Agency
- Department of Defense
- Funding
- $100,000 - $1,300,000
- Deadline
- March 1, 2026 (20 days remaining)
- Status
- Active
- Eligibility
- U.S. universities with DOD-funded engineering research programs
About This Grant
Defense University Research Instrumentation Program is sponsored by Department of Defense. Awards equipment grants to universities for research in engineering fields including design and prototyping. Enhances capabilities in defense-related engineering. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit.
For planning purposes, treat March 1, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability.
Current published award information indicates $100,000 - $1,300,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration.
Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: U.S. universities with DOD-funded engineering research programs If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk.
A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Defense University Research Instrumentation Program.
Official Opportunity Details
Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Search Results Detail | Grants. gov An official website of the United States government **Official websites use . gov** A **.
gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. **Secure . gov websites use HTTPS** A **lock** ( ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .
gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
* **Grants Learning Center** * How to Apply for Grants * **Applicant Resources** * Adobe Software Compatibility * Submitting UTF-8 Special Characters * Encountering Error Messages * Grantor Standard Language * Submitting UTF-8 Special Characters * **Applicant System-To-System** * Reference Implementation * **Grantor System-To-System** * Reference Implementation * SF-424 Individual Family * SF-424 Mandatory Family * SF-424 Short Organization Family * Post-Award Reporting Forms * Country and State Lists Updates * **Manage Subscriptions** * Program Management Office * Grants.
gov Maintenance Calendar Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Department of Defense (DoD) Defense University Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) Document Type:Grants Notice Funding Opportunity Number:N0001425SF001 Funding Opportunity Title:Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Department of Defense (DoD) Defense University Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) Opportunity Category:Discretionary Opportunity Category Explanation: Funding Instrument Type:Grant Category of Funding Activity:Science and Technology and other Research and Development Expected Number of Awards:95 Assistance Listings:12.
300 -- Basic and Applied Scientific Research Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement:No Last Updated Date:Mar 24, 2025 Original Closing Date for Applications:Apr 25, 2025 Current Closing Date for Applications:Apr 25, 2025 Archive Date:May 25, 2025 Estimated Total Program Funding: Eligible Applicants:Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification) Additional Information on Eligibility:This competition is open to accredited U.
S. institutions of higher education with degree granting programs in science, mathematics, and/or engineering except for-profit educational institutions. University Affiliated Research Centers (UARCs) are eligible to participate in this competition.
Federally Funded Research and Development Centers are not eligible to participate. Agency Name:Office of Naval Research Description:This announcement seeks proposals from universities to purchase equipment and instrumentation in support of research in areas of interest to the DoD.
DoD interests include the areas of research supported by the Army Research Office (ARO), the Office of Naval Research (ONR), and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR), hereafter generally referred to collectively as “we,” “our,” “us,” or “administering agency. ” We use “administering agency” to provide a generic reference to any of the administering agencies.
A central purpose of the DURIP is to provide equipment and instrumentation to enhance research related education in areas of interest and priority to the DoD. Therefore, your proposal must address the impact of the equipment or instrumentation on your institution’s ability to educate students through research in disciplines important to DoD missions.
Link to Additional Information:Link to all ONR funding opportunities Grantor Contact Information:If you have difficulty accessing the full announcement electronically, please contact: For additional questions related to this posting #### Health & Human Services * Vulnerability Disclosure Policy * Frequently Asked Questions Your session will expire in 3 minutes. To continue working, click on the "OK" button below.
This is being done to protect your privacy. Unsaved changes will be lost.
Eligibility Requirements
- U.S. universities with DOD-funded engineering research programs
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can apply for Defense University Research Instrumentation Program?
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: U.S. universities with DOD-funded engineering research programs Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
What is the typical funding level for Defense University Research Instrumentation Program?
Current published award information indicates $100,000 - $1,300,000 Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
When is the deadline for Defense University Research Instrumentation Program?
The current target date is March 1, 2026. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Related Grants
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I - Topic AF252-P1: High Altitude Platforms
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I - Topic AF252-P1: High Altitude Platforms is sponsored by U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) - Air Force. DOD SBIR funds small businesses for high-altitude platform innovations, explicitly including aerostats and buoyant systems for stratospheric operations. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat March 20, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $75,000 - $150,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: U.S. small businesses If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I - Topic AF252-P1: High Altitude Platforms.
DOD SBIR/STTR Open Topics - Autonomy and Unmanned Systems
DOD SBIR/STTR Open Topics - Autonomy and Unmanned Systems is sponsored by Department of Defense. Open solicitations for AI-driven autonomous swarms, drone tech dual-use for defense and civilian wildfire response. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $100,000-$1.8M per phase Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: US small businesses, STTR includes universities If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with DOD SBIR/STTR Open Topics - Autonomy and Unmanned Systems.
Defense Production Act Title III - Critical Materials Recycling
Defense Production Act Title III - Critical Materials Recycling is sponsored by U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). Funds domestic production and recycling of strategic materials, extendable to perovskite precursors and circular supply chains for energy security. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $1 million - $20 million Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: U.S. industry, nonprofits for defense-related materials If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Defense Production Act Title III - Critical Materials Recycling.