Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I - Advanced Materials for Energy Technologies
Quick Facts
- Agency
- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
- Funding
- $200,000 - $1.1 million (Phases I/II)
- Deadline
- Rolling (Rolling / Open)
- Status
- Active
- Eligibility
- U.S. small businesses (<500 employees)
About This Grant
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I - Advanced Materials for Energy Technologies is sponsored by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Supports SMEs developing innovative materials for energy including perovskite-based circular PV pilots, recycling, and sustainable manufacturing processes. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit.
For planning purposes, treat rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability.
Current published award information indicates $200,000 - $1.1 million (Phases I/II) Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration.
Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: U.S. small businesses (<500 employees) If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk.
A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I - Advanced Materials for Energy Technologies.
Official Opportunity Details
Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
SBIR Funding Opportunity Announc... | U. S.
DOE Office of Science (SC) An official website of the United States government Official websites use . gov . gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure . gov websites use HTTPS ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the . gov website.
Share sensitive information only on official, U. S.
Department of Energy Office of Science Federal Advisory Committee President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) Argonne National Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Oak Ridge National Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Safety and Security Policy Operations Program Management User Facilities at a Glance Frequently Asked Questions Office of Sponsored Activities Topical Funding Opportunity Awards Award Search / Public Abstracts Early Career Research Program Digital Research Data Management Acknowledgements of Federal Support Artificial Intelligence for Science Biopreparedness Research Virtual Environment (BRaVE) Data Resources (PuRe Data) National Virtual Biotechnology Laboratory (NVBL) Quantum Information Science (QIS) Advanced Scientific Computing Research Biological and Environmental Research Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer Isotope R&D and Production (IRP) Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Tuesday, November 12, 2024 Webinar 1: Topics 1, 20-21, 32- 33 Slides Webinar 2: Topics 2-10 Slides Webinar 3: Topics 11-16 Slides Webinar 4: Topics 17-19 & 22-31 Slides Friday, December 27, 2024 Thursday, August 8, 2024 (Webinar) Slides Friday, August 9, 2024 (Q&A) Thursday, January 2, 2025 (Webinar) Slides Friday January 3, 2025 (Q&A) Letters of Intent (LOI) Due Tuesday, January 14, 2025 Non-responsive LOI Feedback Provided Monday, September 16, 2024 Wednesday, February 26, 2025 January 6 – July 25 Friday, August 29, 2025 (Delayed) Projected Grant Start Date Friday, September 26, 2025 October 22, 2025 (Delayed) Phase Shift I Kick-off (formerly I-Corps) *Registration link will be posted here, one week prior to the webinars.
To receive this link automatically via email, please join our Mail List.
**All dates subject to change Tuesday, October 15, 2024 Monday, August 11, 2025 (Delayed) Phase II Release 1 NOFO Webinar Wednesday, August 20, 2025 (Delayed) LOI (All Phase II applications) Due Wednesday, November 6, 2024 5:00pm ET Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:00pm ET (Delayed) Tuesday, December 3, 2024 11:59pm ET Tuesday, September 30, 2025 11:59pm ET (Delayed) Monday, January 26, 2026 (Delayed) Projected Grant Start Date Monday, March 2, 2026 (Delayed) **All dates subject to change SBIR/STTR Home Navigation Commercialization Resources Frequently Asked Questions Contact the DOE SBIR/STTR Programs Office U.
S. Department of Energy SC-29/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave. , SW sbir-sttr@science.
doe. gov Submit suggestions for improving the SBIR & STTR Programs here Footer Secondary Navigation Directives, Delegations & Leaving Office of Science The link you have requested will take you to a website outside the Office of Science. Please click the following link to continue: Thank you for visiting our site.
We hope your visit was informative and enjoyable.
Eligibility Requirements
- U.S. small businesses (<500 employees)
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can apply for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I - Advanced Materials for Energy Technologies?
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: U.S. small businesses (<500 employees) Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
What is the typical funding level for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I - Advanced Materials for Energy Technologies?
Current published award information indicates $200,000 - $1.1 million (Phases I/II) Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
When is the deadline for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I - Advanced Materials for Energy Technologies?
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Related Grants
Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Funding Opportunity Announcement
Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Funding Opportunity Announcement is sponsored by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office. Focuses on hydrogen production, storage, and applications in aerospace, suitable for developing safe hydrogen systems for ultra-high altitude aerostats. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat February 28, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $1,000,000 - $3,000,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: For-profits, nonprofits, universities, state/local governments If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Funding Opportunity Announcement.
Materials Science Research for Fossil Energy Applications
Materials Science Research for Fossil Energy Applications is sponsored by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Supports advanced materials research, including biomimetic structural designs for energy-efficient technologies. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat March 14, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $500,000 - $2,500,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: Universities, national labs, nonprofits If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Materials Science Research for Fossil Energy Applications.
Solar Energy Technologies Office Fiscal Year 2026
Solar Energy Technologies Office Fiscal Year 2026 is sponsored by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Funds R&D for next-generation PV technologies including perovskites, focusing on durability, manufacturing scale-up, stability, and performance improvements for circular economy applications. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $1 million - $5 million Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: U.S. universities, nonprofits, for-profits, national labs; DOE FOA processes If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Solar Energy Technologies Office Fiscal Year 2026.