ACLS Digital Justice Seed Grants is a grant from the American Council of Learned Societies, made possible by the Mellon Foundation, that funds projects at the intersection of digital scholarship and racial and social justice.

Projects must critically engage with the interests and histories of people of color and other historically marginalized communities, advance justice and equity in digital scholarly practice, or contribute to public understanding of racial and social justice issues. Grants range from $10,000 to $25,000, with grant terms beginning between July 1 and December 31, 2026, lasting 12–18 months.

Applications are submitted through the ACLS online system.

ACLS Digital Justice Seed Grants - ACLS ACLS Digital Justice Seed Grants Deadline : Applications for the 2025-2026 Digital Justice Seed Grants are now closed. Amount: between $10,000 and $25,000 Grant terms must begin between July 1, 2026 and December 31, 2026, with a workplan that lasts from 12-18 months. Completed applications must be submitted through the ACLS online fellowship and grant administration system (ofa.

acls. org) no later than 9 PM Eastern Standard Time, November 20, 2025. Notifications will be sent via email in spring 2026.

Contact [email protected] with program inquiries For more information, see our FAQ . Supplementary materials, including example application components, are available here . The American Council of Learned Societies is pleased to invite applications for Digital Justice Seed Grants , which are made possible by the Mellon Foundation.

Through both their content and methods, projects funded by ACLS Digital Justice Seed Grants pursue the following activities: Critically engage with the interests and histories of people of color and other historically marginalized communities, including (but not limited to) Black, Latinx, and Indigenous communities; people with disabilities; and queer, trans, and gender nonconforming people through the ethical use of digital tools and methods.

Explore or experiment with new materials, methodologies, and research agendas by way of planning workshops, prototyping, and/or testing products. Cultivate greater openness to new sources of knowledge and strategic approaches to content building and knowledge dissemination.

Engage in capacity building efforts, including but not limited to: pedagogical projects that train students in digital humanities methods as a key feature of the project’s content building practice; publicly engaged projects that develop new technological infrastructure with community partners; trans-institutional projects that connect scholars across academic and cultural heritage institutions.

This program addresses inequities in access to tools and support for digital work among scholars across various fields, those working with under-utilized or understudied source materials, and those in institutions with less support for digital projects.

It promotes inclusion and sustainability by extending the opportunity to participate in the digital transformation of humanistic inquiry to a greater number of humanities scholars and projects at the beginning stages of development . Finally, ACLS Digital Justice Seed Grants offer scholars and project leaders general financial planning coaching from the Nonprofit Finance Fund .

Such an opportunity provides a foundation upon which grant recipients can envision the possible long-term financial options for supporting their digital projects. ACLS grants may not support projects whose sole or primary focus is the production of creative works (e.g., novels or films), textbooks, straightforward translations, or purely pedagogical projects. Institutional indirect costs will not be covered.

At least one of the project’s principal investigators must be a scholar in the humanities and/or the interpretative social sciences. Project must be within the start-up or prototyping phase of development. Projects must be made as widely available as intellectual property constraints allow, ideally with the most liberal open-source and Creative Commons license that is appropriate for the underlying content.

An institution of higher education in the United States must administer awarded grant funds. Peer reviewers in this program evaluate all eligible proposals on the following criteria: The project’s critical engagement with the interests and histories of people of color and/or other historically marginalized communities through the ethical use of digital tools and methods.

The feasibility of the project plans, as well as a realistic assessment of how risks and challenges will be managed. The proposal’s analysis of the various technological, financial, and/or institutional supports (or lack thereof) and how grant funds might complement, or in some cases, completely underwrite, these gaps in support.

The project’s potential to bolster the ecosystem of digital scholarship within and/or outside the project’s home institution, whether by (yet not limited to) its intellectual contributions, innovative use of existing technology, and/or networks of skills-building and sharing. The project’s clarity with respect to how it will engage its longstanding or new primary audiences and/or beneficiaries.

The strategic and intentional use of specific digital tools and methods, as well as the anticipated impact and clarity of the project’s digital deliverables.

Applications for Seed Grants contain the following components: Please provide an overview of the project that explains how the project’s primary lines of humanistic and social inquiry ethically engage and center the interests and histories of people of color and/or other historically marginalized communities. ( 350 words ) What digital tools and methods are at the center of the project?

Please detail how these tools and methods inform both the project’s intellectual contributions and its advancement of equity and justice. ( 350 words ) Please detail the project’s digital deliverables/outcomes as well its anticipated intellectual contributions. ( 250 words ) Who are the primary audiences and/or beneficiaries of this project?

How are they engaged and why? ( 250 words ) Does the project engage with any extramural community partners? If so, please describe the prior development and current status of those partnerships.

( 250 words ) What, if any, software, hardware, and staff support is available for the project at the team’s affiliated institution(s)? If applicable, please describe any significant resource constraints that might limit the project.

( 250 words ) How might grant funds support the project’s potential to bolster the ecosystem of digital scholarship within and/or outside the project’s affiliated institution(s), e.g. through its intellectual contributions, innovative use of existing technology, and/or networks of skill-building and sharing? ( 350 words ) Please describe the project’s approach to data ethics, including data management, security, and stewardship.

( 350 words ) Bibliography , no more than one page in Times New Roman 11-point font. The bibliography should reflect works cited throughout the application prompts and other key scholarship from the fields in which the project will intervene. Project Timeline , no more than one double-spaced page in Times New Roman 11-point font.

Applicants are free to use a narrative format and/or tables and other visuals to capture their project timeline. The project timeline should demonstrate a coherent plan for the development and execution of the project, including the sequence of tasks to be accomplished within the grant period. Budget, no more than one page, in Times New Roman 11-point font.

The budget should provide a detailed account of the proposed use of the grant funds, such as purchasing equipment or software, funding graduate or undergraduate research assistants, or planning conferences, round tables, or focus groups. Applicants are strongly encouraged to use the sample budget template provided by ACLS . Grant funds may not pay for institutional overhead.

However, direct administrative costs, such as office expenses and an honorarium for office assistance, are allowed. If applicable, the budget plan can include any proposed cost-sharing measures undertaken by the host institution or a third party. Budget Description, no more than one double-spaced page in Times New Roman, 11-point font.

Please include a narrative that summarizes why your proposed budget is appropriate for the project, as well as a discussion of some potential financial and non-financial resources (i.e. in-kind support, near-term partnerships on campus or off, etc.) that the project may be able to access. Project Staffing, no more than two double-spaced pages, in Times New Roman 11-point font.

Please provide a list of the names and institutional affiliations of members of the project team, along with a description of no more than 1-2 sentences of each member’s role(s) and capacities on the project. Institutional Verification , to be submitted separately via ACLS’s online portal.

The institutional statement should be submitted by a senior official of the principal investigator’s home institution or the institution hosting the project (i.e., a dean, provost, president, or other appropriate senior administrator). The institutional verification is not a formal letter of recommendation . It does not require administrators to assess the scholarly ambitions of the proposed project.

Rather, it is a form with a series of check boxes as well as a fill-in field for brief comments on the available technological resources at the institution, and how the activities supported by the grant would be counted for purposes of promotion and tenure at their respective institution. Intellectual Property Agreement , to be opted into as part of the program’s eligibility confirmation.

Applicants must commit to: (a) making any software developed with grant funds available pursuant to an open-source license located at www. opensource.

org and in a public repository (such as GitHub or Sourceforge); (b) making any digital content broadly available; and (c) no infringement of third-party rights with respect to the development, dissemination, and use of the software and/or digital content; (d) reporting to ACLS on whether and how they have complied with the commitments regarding intellectual property made in the proposal.

The creators of the software, digital products, and content created with support of ACLS grant funds will retain intellectual property ownership rights of those materials. Digital content should be made as widely available as intellectual property constraints allow, ideally with the most liberal Creative Commons license that is appropriate to the underlying content .

Statement of Support from Community Partner(s) (if applicable) , no more than one double-spaced page, to be uploaded along with other application components. If the project features extramural community partners, this statement of support should be written by a member of that organization with extensive contact with the project team who can speak to the organization’s involvement with the project.

Appendix (if applicable), no more than one page, specifically for those applicants who wish to share photos or other visuals related to their project, please include them in the appendix (and cite where relevant in the application prompt responses). Contact [email protected] with program inquiries. Digital-Justice-Sample-Budget-Templates ACLS Digital Justice Grants