1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
AI and Education Initiative (Vision Grant Program & Racial Equity Program) is sponsored by The Spencer Foundation. This initiative funds research on AI, education, and learning that supports equitable educational use, development, and understanding of AI technologies. It also aims to cultivate dialogue between researchers, the tech industry, policymakers, and education practitioners.
The initiative supports novel research on AI, equity, and education, with additional funds designated for AI-focused work within their Vision Grant Program and Racial Equity Program.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “The Spencer Foundation” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Spencer Initiative on AI and Education As widespread technological transformation poses both new opportunities for advancement and great risks for deepening inequities, the Spencer Foundation is launching a new initiative on AI and Education to re-envision possibilities for education and for learning across the lifespan.
The initiative, which grew out of a Spencer Convening on AI and Education held in Spring 2024, will support novel research on key, forward-leaning topics on AI, equity, and education. Ultimately, the initiative aims to offer evidence-based guidance that centers the needs of young people so that the technology solutions, systems, and policy directions we are utilizing and building contribute to the learning and thriving of all students.
Why focus on AI and Education? Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fundamentally reshaping the educational landscape, influencing how educators teach, how students learn, and how educational institutions from early childhood to higher education adapt to new technologies.
As AI-driven tools and applications continue to evolve, it is essential to foster responsible innovation and collaboration within educational settings to harness AI's potential for enhancing teaching and learning experiences. Within educational research, conversations about AI are wide-ranging.
There are very real concerns and open questions regarding how AI will impact learners, teachers, and system leaders in our most underserved communities. These concerns range from worries about a widening digital divide if students are “left out” to the harms that AI can propagate, such as algorithmically driven bias and discrimination as well as the energy and environmental costs of computationally demanding AI systems.
There is also significant excitement and support, with research beginning to explore the promise of AI-powered learning tools, and possibilities for technology to support teacher professional learning or reduce the administrative burden of classroom tasks for educators.
Rigorous research is necessary to properly weigh these concerns while remaining open to the potential for AI to positively transform educational systems from early childhood to higher education. We believe the education research community has a tremendous opportunity and responsibility to take a balanced approach to AI and education, rooted in evidence and data.
Towards these ends, our AI initiative focuses on leveraging the potential of artificial intelligence technologies for equitable teaching and learning, while attending seriously to the potential harms, privacy and data security risks, and potential adverse impacts on education systems. What will the initiative do?
The initiative will fund research on AI, education, and learning that supports equitable educational use, development, and understanding of AI technologies.
We will also work to cultivate dialogue between researchers, the tech industry, policymakers, and education practitioners to enrich the collaboration and work happening across scholarly and other communities and to enrich public understanding around how AI technologies can support (or hinder) our equity aims. We will fund new research through two existing grant programs: Our Vision Grant Program and our Racial Equity Program.
While these programs remain open to all topics, we have designated additional funds within each program for work focused on AI. We also welcome AI focused work across our entire portfolio of research grant programs, including our Small Research Grants on Education Program, our Large Research Grants on Education Program, and our Research-Practice Partnership Program.
The initiative will focus on three core activities: Advancing Cutting-Edge Research on AI and Education in Four Key Areas How AI Will Transform Educational Research Cultivating Connections and Collaboration Between Researchers, Tech Industry, Policymakers, and Practitioners Fostering collaborations that bridge gaps between the AI sector and educational institutions Building deeper networks for knowledge sharing and innovation in AI Enriching Public Discourse on AI and Education Working with journalists and policymakers to strengthen scientific insights in the public discourse on AI and education Deepening the equity lens in discussions about the role of AI in education Balancing conversations to consider both the opportunities and risks associated with AI technologies Funding Priorities for Scholarship How can AI tools be more culturally relevant, and how can we leverage recent advances in learning sciences to build more sophisticated tools for classrooms that are in line with what we know from cognitive science and learning sciences to better serve all students?
In PK-12 this might include tool and program development, but also studying existing products, and the pedagogical issues around teaching and learning with AI tools. In higher education, this might include learning products but also supports for student services, course enrollment and management, and advising supports.
This may also take the form of historical or philosophical inquiry into the theories of learning of AI and how these theories could be adapted to align with culturally relevant pedagogy and other advances in the learning sciences. Finally, in what ways might AI technologies be leveraged outside of school to enable learning for children and adults?
What are we learning from current local, state, federal and international policy implementations? What is the role of the federal government around AI policy and regulation in coming years? What might be the best regulatory practices when new AI technologies emerge for public use?
In PK-12, this might include research on the procurement of AI platform technologies in schools. In higher education, this might include studies of college and university policies, and the implications of state and local policy on uptake and use of AI in higher education settings.
While there has been significant attention to ethics in AI more generally, especially related to questions of fairness, accountability, transparency, and equity, there has been far less attention to these concerns in education. There are critical questions of data and data sovereignty, privacy, bias, representation, and digital literacy.
There are questions about how AI is and should/could be specifically impacting underserved students, families, and communities. How might current patterns of inequity be disrupted or reinforced with/through AI? How AI will Transform Educational Research AI also raises important questions with respect to how we conduct research in education, and opens up new possibilities for data and research methods.
Studies might take up questions on the philosophy of science and technology of AI. How are questions of objectivity, validity, reliability, causality, and replicability addressed, if retained at all?
What are the various potential applications of AI for social science research such as for qualitative data analysis, measurement of traditionally non-quantitative phenomena, incomplete case analysis, matching methods, meta-reviews of research literature, and psychometrics and assessment? What might be the recommended practices or standards for accountability for responsible AI use in education research?
The Spencer Foundation invests in education research that cultivates learning and transforms lives. Learn about Opportunities to Join our Staff Find Out More About Our Legacy Lyle M. Spencer established the Spencer Foundation in 1962 to investigate ways education, broadly conceived, might be improved.
We support high-quality, innovative research on education, broadly conceived. Field-Initiated Research Grant Programs Fellowships for Scholars and Journalists Meeting the Moment Together Spencer Releases Report on Preparing Scholars to Conduct Transformative Research in Education Browse Our Resources and Tools Resources and Tools For Applicants
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: Researchers and organizations focused on education research. Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates Not specified, funded through existing grant programs Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.
Past winners and funding trends for this program