1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsCharles Mitchell and George Washington Bush Study on Reparative Action is sponsored by Washington Department of Commerce. This opportunity supports mission-aligned projects and measurable outcomes.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Closed: Charles Mitchell and George Washington Bush Study on Reparative Action – Washington State Department of Commerce 简体中文 ( Chinese (Simplified) ) 繁體中文 ( Chinese (Traditional) ) Tiếng Việt ( Vietnamese ) Closed: Charles Mitchell and George Washington Bush Study on Reparative Action Request for Proposals (RFP) Issue Requests for Proposals: September 3, 2025 Questions and answer period: September 3 – 16, 2025 Proposals due: October 15, 2025, no later than 4 p.
m. PT Begin grant funded work: November 25, 2025 This funding opportunity is closed. Commerce seeks proposals from those qualified and interested in participating in a project to conduct the Charles Mitchell and George Washington Bush Study on Reparative Action.
This study will explore the historical injustices of U.S. chattel slavery and its enduring impacts on the direct descendants of victims. This study will focus on the legacy within Washington State laws, policies and economic structures. The study’s final deliverable will be a report due June 30, 2027.
It will presenting findings and recommendations to the Legislature, the Governor, and Washington State’s congressional delegation. In order to be eligible for this grant, applicants must be: Licensed to do business in Washington or submit a statement of commitment that it will become licensed in Washington within thirty (30) calendar days of being selected as the Apparent Successful contractor.
A research team who contributed to three peer-reviewed publications or policy reports on reparations or economic valuation for descendants of enslaved people.
Valuation of uncompensated slave labor U.S. chattel slavery and reparations doctrine Genealogical research related to direct lineage tracing Reparative justice and public policy development Required team composition and experience Experience producing peer-reviewed work or policy reports on economic reparations of enslaved persons. Includes an experienced genealogist. Capacity to perform economic valuation of historical injustices.
Have a diverse team reflective of the study population’s lived experience. Experience consulting on public policy reform. Proposals that do not clearly meet or exceed all minimum qualifications listed above are non-responsive and will not be evaluated.
A pre-proposal conference was held on Wednesday, September 10, 2025, at Noon p. m. PT.
Watch the meeting on September 10, 2025 (on Zoom) Download the Reparations Study pre-conference powerpoint presentation (PDF) Attendance is encouraged but not required. The conference will end once all questions have been addressed. Commerce is only bound by its written responses.
All questions from the conference or follow-up communications will be documented, answered in writing, and added to the FAQ. Updated November 10, 2025: Commerce is revising the Reparations Study RFP schedule to allow additional time for scoring. The Reparations Study RFP originally stated that Commerce would announce successful contractors and send out notifications from November 5 to November 10, 2025.
This deadline has been pushed out to November 18, 2025 to ensure scorers have the necessary time to review all submissions equally. Powerpoint presentation at Reparations Study pre-conference (PDF) Video recording of Reparations Study pre-conference - Passsword: . 4%cQ?
@f Questions and Answers about Reparations Study RFP (PDF) Michelle Griffin, Study Manager Michelle. Griffin@Commerce. wa.
gov
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: See the Washington state grants portal for complete eligibility requirements. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Charles Mitchell and George Washington Bush Study on Reparative Action is funded by Washington Department of Commerce. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Washington. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Violence Against Women Discretionary Grants for Indian Tribal Governments is sponsored by Department of Justice. To increase tribal capacity to respond to violent crimes against Indian women, and to develop and strengthen victim services in cases involving violent crimes against Indian women. This listing is currently active. Program number: 16.587. Last updated on 2024-11-26.
The NSF CISE Future Computing Research (Future CoRe) program supports research in computing and communication foundations, intelligent systems, and network systems. The program funds innovative research that advances the frontiers of computing including artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer vision, natural language processing, and robotics. This is one of NSF's largest computing research programs with $280 million in total budget. Projects can address fundamental computing challenges, novel AI architectures, scalable intelligent systems, and next-generation network infrastructure.
Meyer pulled $6.5 million from a $200 million endowment. Greater Washington has deployed $14.3 million and put more than $1 million into Bridge Grants for 21 organizations — explicitly including mergers and organizational sunsets. Boston is funding merger facilitation. Here is how to tell which product an RFP is offering, and how to apply for the one you actually want.
Read articleGates committed $540.2 million over a decade to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation — the largest gift in University of Washington history — while IHME's federal grant income falls from $7.3 million to a projected $4.8 million. The gift is a case study in the anchor-funder model: what it can do that federal money cannot, and the concentration risk it quietly underwrites.
Read articleIn January 2026, DOE Policy Flash PF-2026-30 wiped out every 15% and 10% indirect cost cap the administration had imposed in 2025 — because H.R. 6938 ordered it to. The same law froze indirect policy at NSF, Commerce and NASA. But OMB's sweeping new grants rule quietly reopens the fight through the back door. Here is what changed, what money recipients can claw back, and how to protect your indirect recovery going forward.
Read article