1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsCompliance and Monitoring is sponsored by Mississippi Department of Education. Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Funds <li class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-2144 kingster-normal Category: Education.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Mississippi Department of Education” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
# Compliance and Monitoring – Federal Programs [](https://mdek12.
org/federalprograms/compliance-and-monitoring/#kingster-mobile-menu) * Help Your Child Become a Strong Reader * Know Your K-3 Child’s Reading Score * Graduation Requirements * School and District Report Cards * Accreditation Standards * District and School Performance * MS Student Information System (MSIS) Overview * Mississippi College and Career and Readiness Standards * Professional Development # Compliance and Monitoring The Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965, as amended by Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 requires State Educational Agencies (SEAs) to monitor the implementation of program requirements and the expenditure of federal funds.
Monitoring is conducted at local educational agencies (LEAs) to ensure compliance with regulations as well as to assure that the quality of the program and instructional delivery is of high regard. Monitoring emphasizes accountability for using resources wisely. The monitoring process for programs administered by the Office of Federal Programs consist of the monitoring of expenditures, Single Audits, On-Site monitoring, and Desk Audits.
The Monitoring and Compliance Division conducts an annual risk assessment of all subrecipients, to determine their potential risk of noncompliance. Based on the outcome of the risk assessment, subrecipients are assigned a risk level of low, medium, or high. The risk assessment includes weighted risk indicators derived from multiple sources.
The Monitoring and Compliance Division updates the risk assessment model annually to ensure risk indicators and weights accurately reflect the potential risk posed to the agency in awarding funds to each subrecipient. This assessment is used in practical terms to take a thorough look at how OFP monitors subrecipients. The assessment tool assists in the identification of conditions, situations and processes that may cause problems.
Purpose of the Annual Risk Level The risk assessment determines the likelihood that a subrecipient may fail to comply with applicable rules. If an organization is assigned a high-risk level, it does not indicate the organization has failed to comply with the requirements of a federal grant(s). Similarly, a low-risk level does not indicate an organization is compliant with the specific requirements of federal grant programs.
Only an independent auditor or an MDE monitor can determine if an organization is compliant or noncompliant. The risk assessment is conducted annually, so an organization’s risk level can change from year to year. A subrecipient assigned a high-risk level for the current year may be assigned a medium or low-risk level the next year.
**Effect of Different Risk Levels** An organization’s risk level will be used by MDE in the following ways: * **_Focused Technical Assistance. _** The MDE uses a differentiated support approach for federal grant applications through the risk assessment. Organizations with a medium or high-risk level are subject to special grant conditions and more focused technical support than those with a low-risk level.
* **_Subrecipient Monitoring. _** Each year, the MDE selects subrecipients for fiscal monitoring, according to their risk levels. The higher your organization’s risk level, the more likely you are to be selected for on-site and virtual monitoring.
* **Categories for Risk assessment** * **Risk Assessment****Criteria** * Low Risk Risk Score 15 or Less * Medium Risk Risk Score between 20 & 25 * High Risk Risk score greater than 25 * Committee of Practitioners * Compliance and Monitoring * Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Funds * Emergency Assistance to Non-Public Schools (EANS I) Program * Evidence-based Programs * Federal Award Notifications * Parent and Family Engagement * Title I, Part A (Basic) * Title I, Part C: Migrant Education Program * Title I, Part D (Delinquent) * Title I Part A (Neglected) * Title II, Part A (Effective Instruction) * Title III, Part A (English Learners and Immigrant Children and Youth) * Title IV, Part A Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants * Title IV, Part B (Nita M.
Lowey 21st Century Community Learning Centers Grant Program) * Title V, Part B (Rural Education) * Title IX, Part A (Homeless) * Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) * Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) * Federal Programs Navigator – SharePoint Online * Supplement Not Supplant Calculator ###### District Resources 2025-26 Administrator Calendar: Dates to Remember July 2025 - June 2026 2025-26 MDE Services Guidebook RFP/RFQ/RFA/Invitation to Bid No-Cost Contract Bid Opportunities MS Instructional Materials Matter Strong Readers Strong Leaders Report Fraud, Waste & Abuse * **Mississippi Department of Education** Educator Licensure: 601-359-3483 General Information: 601-359-3513
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: See the Mississippi grants portal for complete eligibility requirements. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Compliance and Monitoring is funded by Mississippi Department of Education. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Mississippi. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Educational Technology, Media, and Materials for Individuals with Disabilities Program (Stepping-up Technology Implementation competition) is sponsored by U.S. Department of Education. This program aims to improve results for students with disabilities by promoting the development, demonstration, and use of technology; supporting educational activities of value in the classroom for students with disabilities; providing captioning and video description; and ens…
The Robotics Grant Program is a grant from the Alabama State Department of Education (ALSDE) that funds school-based robotics programs for elementary, middle, and high school students. Awarded through a competitive application process, the program provides up to $3,500 to eligible local education agencies (LEAs) in Alabama. Applicants must be public school systems submitting on behalf of schools with K–12 students. The grant supports the purchase of robotics equipment and program development aligned with AMSTI guidelines. Applications are submitted online through the AMSTI Robotics Grant portal. The Fiscal Year 2026 application deadline was September 30, 2025. Questions should be directed to robotics@amsti.org. The program is managed by the Alabama State Department of Education under State Superintendent Eric G. Mackey.
The Department of Education's IES SBIR program is one of the most overlooked non-dilutive funding sources for education-technology startups. It funds prototypes at $250K and proven products at $1M with no equity taken. Here is how the FY2026 tracks work, what reviewers reward, and why the June 29 deadline is tighter than it looks.
Read articleNSF's CAREER program — a minimum $400,000 over five years for pre-tenure faculty — has a single annual deadline on July 22, 2026. It rewards the integration of research and education, not research alone, and that is exactly where most proposals fail. Here is the eligibility math, the integration trap, and how to position in a tightening federal funding climate.
Read articleFederal appropriators added $15 billion in new Pell Grant funding to the FY 2026 appropriations package on top of the standard appropriation level — a response to a structural shortfall that CBO scored at $5.4 billion in FY 2026 and $11.5 billion in FY 2027. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget projects a cumulative gap of $61 billion to $97 billion through 2035 even after the one-time fix. Meanwhile, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act expanded eligibility to short-term Workforce Pell programs, adding $2 to $6 billion in new costs. The Pell program is the foundation of need-based federal student aid, but the structural mismatch between rising costs and appropriations is a permanent feature now. Here is what that means for institutions, foundations, and state higher-ed agencies.
Read article