1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
Emerging Challenges Fund is sponsored by Longview Philanthropy (managed with Giving What We Can). Emerging Challenges Fund is a pooled grant fund from Longview Philanthropy, managed with Giving What We Can, that funds organizations working to address global catastrophic risks from emerging technologies, including advanced AI systems with misaligned goals, nuclear risks, and …
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Longview Philanthropy (managed with Giving What We Can)” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Emerging Challenges Fund - Longview Philanthropy Through the Emerging Challenges Fund, we offer anyone the opportunity to contribute to a pooled, thesis-driven fund that our expert grantmaking teams will direct to outstanding organizations where additional funding can quickly make a major difference. Over the next decade, emerging technologies will pose significant challenges to global security.
Rapid advances in artificial intelligence could create advanced AI systems with goals that diverge from human interests and grant authoritarians unprecedented means of control. We face rising nuclear and biological risks as advances accelerate and automate elements of nuclear decision-making and lower the barriers for malicious actors to execute large-scale biological attacks. We aim to prepare the world for these challenges.
In selecting projects, the ECF considers Longview’s usual grantmaking criteria and two further tests: Does the project have a legible theory of impact? ECF grantees must have a compelling, transparent, and public case for how their activities will have an impact that appeals to a wide range of donors. Will the project benefit from diverse funding?
Policy organizations sometimes benefit from the support of the ECF’s 2000+ donors when demonstrating their independence from major funders and industry actors. ECF grantees often, though not always, pass this test. In 2025, ECF donors supported organizations advancing both policy and research.
On the policy side, grantees worked to shape frontier AI governance in the US and Europe, including by building government capacity through talent pipelines and facilitating discussions on AI and arms control between the US and China. On the research side, we funded groups evaluating AI system capabilities, their potential misuse by malicious actors, and the broader societal implications of rapid AI progress.
For those seeking to invest in a safer future, this fund provides unique expertise across beneficial AI, biosecurity, and nuclear weapons policy and fills critical funding gaps at organizations in need of rapid financial support and a diversity of donors. Longview’s focus—and the source of most of our impact—is helping major donors give. Give to our private funds.
For donors giving over $100K, we offer access to our private frontier AI, digital sentience, and nuclear weapons policy funds. Our private fund reports are sent directly to donors rather than distributed publicly, allowing us to use those funds to support confidential, risky, or large-scale projects. Please get in touch with our CEO, Simran Dhaliwal, at simran@longview.
org . Interpretability at Harvard University Looking inside modern AI systems Frontier AI models are a black box. Today we have almost no ability to understand why the most powerful AI systems make the decisions that they do, making AI systems unpredictable and difficult to align with human values.
A new lab at Harvard University is trying to change that through their work on “mechanistic interpretability”, a field of research to understand how networks function internally. On our recommended grant, Harvard researchers will progress their work to locate specific concepts and facts within a neural network.
Blueprint Biosecurity far-UVC work Testing technology for clean air Certain wavelengths of germicidal light called "far-UVC" inactivate pathogens in the air and on surfaces while appearing to be safe for humans. Could this be a powerful tool for reducing the spread of infectious disease, and even stop or slow the next outbreak which would become a pandemic?
This funding will be used to commission research into how much far-UVC is likely to reduce pathogen transmission, and its safety profile, making it possible to understand how best to deploy it.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Studying escalation pathways to nuclear war This recommendation was for a project aiming to develop a common understanding about escalation pathways to nuclear war and what policy interventions are most likely to contribute to risk mitigation.
Specifically, the project will involve research workshops whereby a diverse range of experts within fields relevant to nuclear security and risk analysis convene to analyze potential escalation pathways, attempt to estimate their likelihood, identify potential levers to reduce or mitigate this risk, and compare these various pathways and levers more holistically. We describe our 2025 grantmaking in our 2025 Annual Report .
For older grants, please consult the grant reports below. December 2023 Grants Report August 2023 Grants Report The Emerging Challenges Fund is managed by Longview Philanthropy, with support from Giving What We Can. Donations to the Emerging Challenges Fund through Giving What We Can’s website are donations to Giving What We Can.
All funds are disbursed based on recommendations by Longview Philanthropy. Simran coordinates Longview Philanthropy’s research, grantmaking, and advising work. Prior to joining, she was a research analyst at Goldman Sachs, working on a two-person team recognised as the best sell-side stockpickers in London in 2018.
While there, she also became a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) charterholder and was donating to high-impact charities. Simran read philosophy, politics, and economics at the University of Oxford, where she first came across the concept of using evidence and reason to do the most good at a Giving What We Can talk.
Nuclear Weapons Policy Programme Director Carl leads Longview’s programme on nuclear weapons policy and co-manages Longview’s Nuclear Weapons Policy Fund . For more than a decade, Carl led grantmaking in nuclear security at the Carnegie Corporation of New York , a philanthropic fund which grants over $30 million annually to strengthen international peace and security.
Carl previously worked with The Century Foundation and the Global Security Institute , where his extensive research spanned arms control, international security policy, and nonproliferation. Nuclear Weapons Policy Programme Officer Matthew conducts grant investigations for Longview’s programme on nuclear weapons policy and co-manages its Nuclear Weapons Policy Fund.
His prior work spanned emerging technology threat and policy assessment, focusing on how advancements in AI may shape influence operations, nuclear strategy, and cyber attacks. He has worked as a policy researcher with OpenAI, an analyst in the US Department of Defense’s Innovation Steering Group, and director of research and analysis at the US National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence.
Aidan conducts grant investigations in artificial intelligence (AI), with a particular focus in technical research on AI safety. Before joining Longview, he conducted research on machine learning and AI policy at GovAI, Epoch, Cornell University, AI Impacts, and the Center for AI Safety. He also spent three years leading the data science team at a fintech startup.
Alongside his work at Longview, Aidan is a DPhil candidate in AI at Oxford University. Zach conducts grant investigations in artificial intelligence (AI). He completed his PhD in economics at Stanford University, where he received support from the National Science Foundation, the Forethought Foundation for Global Priorities Research, and the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
Zach has conducted research covered by The New York Times, Reuters, Marginal Revolution, and Vox. Before that, he was a Research Analyst at Innovations for Poverty Action and the Global Poverty Research Lab at Northwestern University.
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: Organizations working to address global catastrophic risks from emerging technologies. Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates Variable Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.
Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR) Phase II is sponsored by Administration for Community Living. Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR) Phase II is a forecasted funding opportunity on Grants.gov from Administration for Community Living. Fiscal Year: 2026. Assistance Listing Number(s): 93.433. <p>The purpose of the Federal SBIR program is to stimulate technological innovation in the private sector, strengthen the role of small business in meeting Federal research or research and development (R/R&D) needs, and improve the return on investment from Federally-funded research for economic and social benefits to the nation. The specific purpose of NIDILRR's SBIR program is to improve the lives of people with disabilities through R/R&D products generated by small businesses, and to ...
The J.M.K. Innovation Prize is a grant from The J.M. Kaplan Fund recognizing early-stage social entrepreneurs working on environmental, heritage, and social justice challenges. The prize rewards individuals and organizations demonstrating innovative, entrepreneurial approaches to enduring problems. Applications for the 2025 prize were accepted February 11 through April 25, 2025 via an online portal. Spanish-language applications are welcomed, and a Spanish application form is available for download. The prize is biennial and open to a broad range of applicants across the United States working on forward-thinking solutions at the intersection of environment, community, and cultural heritage.