1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
Faith & Learning Collaboration Grants is sponsored by The de Vries Institute for Global Faculty Development at Calvin University. These grants provide resources to groups of Calvin University and Calvin Theological Seminary faculty to encourage enriching ongoing conversation about Christian faith in relation to teaching, curricular matters, group culture, and research.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “The de Vries Institute for Global Faculty Development at Calvin University” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Faith and Learning Collaboration Grants - The de Vries Institute | Calvin University Faith and Learning Collaboration Grants The de Vries Institute for Global Faculty Development invites Calvin University and Calvin Theological Seminary schools, departments, programs, committees, and ad hoc groups of faculty to consider applying for a Faith & Learning Collaboration Grant.
These grants of up to $7000 will provide resources to groups of Calvin faculty to encourage enriching ongoing conversation about Christian faith in relation to teaching, curricular matters, group culture, and research. Wise and meaningful integration of Christian faith with the work of higher education is often approached at the level of the individual faculty member.
For example, Calvin University asks each faculty member to devote careful ongoing reflection to how Christian faith commitments shape their work in teaching, research, and service. This reflection is a significant criterion for decisions about reappointment and tenure. At the same time, Calvin University and Calvin Theological Seminary are learning communities.
The richness of individual faculty reflection upon faith and learning depends upon the health of ongoing conversation within the communities in which faculty find themselves. And decisions about faculty status are made in communal contexts—departments, committees, the board—which are webbed into the mission of the university (or seminary) as a whole.
Moreover, the shaping role of Christian faith in the student experience depends not only upon choices that individual faculty members make in their courses, but also upon the decisions that departments and programs make as they shape institutional curriculum and culture. For these decisions to be good decisions requires ongoing, rigorous conversation within departments about faith and academic life.
Examples of projects that could qualify Two-day retreat for a department developing a new masters program to think carefully about the appropriate role of Christian faith in the new program. Funds used for meals, refreshments, meeting room rental, reading materials, and a modest stipend for participants. Departmental reading group on a crucial recent book on Christian faith and their discipline.
Funds used for books, refreshments, and stipends for participants. Series of extended working lunches in an early summer week for an intensive governance committee to review and revise its expectations related to faith integration. Funds used for meals and stipends.
Consultation between representatives of two closely affiliated departments (e.g., whose courses serve as cognates for one another’s programs) to discuss ways to align their approaches to faith integration.
Planning retreat for an interdisciplinary group of faculty who intend to apply for a major grant to fund a research project that intersects significantly with Christian faith (e.g., through CCCS internally or any number of external funding sources). Workshop with an external consultant for a department working through a specific faith integration issue or hoping to learn (e.g.) more about a specific theological area.
A department would like to do one of DVI’s Reflecting Faith faculty development courses, either online over a few weeks with an in-person debrief over a meal, or in compressed one- or two-day workshop form led by DVI staff Decision criteria includes: A clear goal for the group activity.
This can be a very specific goal (e.g., “We will re-map the faith integration touchpoints that occur throughout our curriculum so that it can be included in our reaccreditation documentation”). Or it can be a more general goal (e.g., “We realized that we seldom have departmental conversations about how Christian faith relates to our work, so we want to reboot those conversations by reading this book together”).
But there needs to be a goal. A persuasive case that the intended activity can be managed in the time allotted for it—and/or a specific plan for follow-up should the timeframe turn out to be insufficient. Any funds granted must be used by the end of the stated timeframe.
Reasons to believe that this activity will nurture the long-term health of the faith and learning conversation. Evidence of commitment on the part of nearly all relevant stakeholders to participate in the collaboration. A realistic plan and budget for the collaborative activity.
Some grant funds will be reserved for interdisciplinary proposals. The spirit of this opportunity is something like this: “This activity will help our school/department/program/research group/steering committee to have a conversation which is fundamental to our mission and well-being but which is often hard to organize or prioritize or fund or find time for.
” Many of the examples given would naturally take place in the summer (when there is often time and greater schedule flexibility to gather people for sustained work). Since faculty salaries technically do not cover summer work, stipends are included in most of the examples. DVI’s current amount for stipends for summer work is $200/person/full day.
Larger amounts can be justified for leaders in cases where significant prep work is required. Please stay in the vicinity of these amounts for your budgets.
In addition to days or weeks in the summer, we are also open to the possibility of time during the fall and spring semesters: evenings, Saturdays, or days within academic advising (for groups with less of an advising load who can afford to shift their advising to one of the two days). Stipends are also appropriate for these models. None of us should live under the illusion that money (in the form of small stipends) creates time.
Nevertheless, the provision of stipends is intended to honor the time, energy, and commitment required for a group to devote itself to this kind of conversation and collaboration.
It is also intended to underscore the importance of this kind of work, which can easily feel like uncompensated “extra” but is in fact crucial for the long-term health, well-being, vitality, and fidelity of Calvin University and Calvin Seminary and the myriad groups and individuals that make these institutions what they are.
Decisions about grant applications will be made by a small committee that will include the de Vries Institute director, the dean for faculty development and research initiatives, and one member of the most recent 4th year Faith & Learning Fellowship group. Applications will be considered on a rolling basis. A brief report must be submitted upon completion of the activity.
If you have questions about the program or would like to discuss a prospective project, please contact de Vries Institute director Matt Lundberg. Director, de Vries Institute for Global Faculty Development; Professor of Religion
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Calvin University and Calvin Theological Seminary schools, departments, programs, committees, and ad hoc groups of faculty. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows up to $7,000. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
Faith & Learning Collaboration Grants is funded by The de Vries Institute for Global Faculty Development at Calvin University. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program (ED/IES) is sponsored by U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences (IES). This program provides funding for small businesses to conduct research and development of innovative education technology products. It emphasizes rigorous research and the potential for commercialization to bring products to schools. Projects can leverage AI functionalities, interactive learning, and assistive technologies for students and educators. The program has an annual allocation of $10 million for new ed-tech products.
Educational Technology, Media, and Materials for Individuals with Disabilities Program (Stepping-up Technology Implementation competition) is sponsored by U.S. Department of Education. This program aims to improve results for students with disabilities by promoting the development, demonstration, and use of technology; supporting educational activities of value in the classroom for students with disabilities; providing captioning and video description; and ens…
Faculty founders face unique SBIR hurdles around conflict of interest, IP assignment, and primary employment. Here is how to navigate the rules without derailing your startup or your tenure.
Read articleDARPA and NSF launched a joint program on June 1 to fund university work on AI interpretability, control, and adversarial robustness. Awards run $750K to $3M+ per project, the forum launches this summer, and the universities listed in the AI Forge repository will sit closest to the money. The Request for Information closes June 22.
Read articleOn June 1, 2026, DARPA and the National Science Foundation announced AI Forge — a jointly governed forum that will fund, guide, and manage university-led research on AI interpretability, AI control, and adversarial robustness. The RFI on sam.gov closes June 22. The forum itself will be administered by a new nonprofit launching in summer 2026. The structure is what matters: this is not a one-off solicitation, it is a multi-year venue for university-government-industry research that operates outside the normal merit-review timelines of either agency. What university research teams should be doing in the seventeen-day window between the announcement and the RFI deadline — and what the forum model means for federal AI funding through FY 2028.
Read article