1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsFood Policy Program national policy evaluations is sponsored by Bloomberg Philanthropies' Food Policy Program. Bloomberg Philanthropies' Food Policy Program has invested over $435 million globally to combat poor diets, which contribute to an estimated 8 million deaths annually.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Food Policy Program | Bloomberg Philanthropies Public Health Promoting Healthy Food Choices Food Policy Program The Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Food Policy Program has committed over $435 million to help public health experts promote healthier diets. This is an urgent global challenge: 8 million deaths are attributed to poor diets annually. Between 1990 and 2019, there was a 128% increase in mortality from being overweight.
The good news is that the problem is preventable — and Bloomberg Philanthropies is supporting the enactment and evaluation of policy that aim to move people toward healthier diets in cities and countries around the world. The program focuses its work in Brazil, the Caribbean (Jamaica & Barbados), Colombia, Mexico, South Africa, and the United States, all of which have high rates of obesity and are taking action.
Additionally, the program supports the evaluation of promising policies in other low- and middle-income countries.
Building on Bloomberg Philanthropies’ extensive experience in tobacco control, the Food Policy Program works with civil society organizations and research institutions to promote strong, new policies supported by the best available evidence, including: Raising taxes on sugary beverages and junk food Limiting children’s and adolescents’ exposure to unhealthy food and beverage marketing through comprehensive marketing bans Promoting healthy food policies for the public sector, especially schools Introducing understandable and informative front-of-package nutrition labels The program invests in rigorous evaluation of policies and programs once they are implemented.
Ultimately, effective policies can be replicated in cities, states, and countries around the world.
To deepen impact and enhance existing work, the program has expanded to include new elements: Rapid response grants to support the adoption of healthy food policies in low- and middle-income countries A Legal Defense Fund to help governments defend strong, evidence-based healthy food measures against legal challenges brought by well-resourced companies or industry bodies Establishment of the Global Center for Legal Innovation on Food Environments at Georgetown Law School’s O’Neill Institute to help build capacity in healthy food law and provide legal support to countries A Healthy Food Policy Fellowship to support future leaders in building research and legal capacity in focus countries To date, our program partners have created and launched 172 evidence-based media campaigns reaching approximately 1.
5 billion people. The campaigns educate the public and policy makers on the negative health impact of sugary beverages and junk food and on potential policy solutions. Our partners are driving public discussion about diet-related diseases and healthy food policy solutions.
Our partners are advocating for policy changes that aim to reduce consumer demand for unhealthy foods and beverages, improve the food environment, and make healthier choices easier for everyone. Conducting Groundbreaking Research: Studies conducted by our partners are generating new evidence around the economic and health impacts of sugary beverage taxation and the magnitude of children’s exposure to food and beverage advertising.
As new policies are implemented, our partners will evaluate their impact.
Johns Hopkins’ Case Study on the Mexico Advocacy Campaign An Evaluation of Chile’s Law of Food Labeling and Advertising on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Purchases from 2015 to 2017: A Before-And-After Study Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages with Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting In Mexico, Evidence of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing a Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax See all of our Public Health program areas Top photo: Students in Mexico City benefit from new water fountains thanks to Bloomberg Philanthropies’ efforts to reduce sugary beverage consumption.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Research teams interested in pursuing funding are encouraged to read about the two-step application process to determine whether their policy meets program criteria. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Food Policy Program national policy evaluations is funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies' Food Policy Program. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
The AFID Infrastructure Grant program closes October 30, 2026. Awards top out at $50,000, they are reimbursable, and only a political subdivision can apply. The August round put $507,000 into 14 projects at an average of about $36,000.
Read articleNOT-OD-26-112 released a draft NIH Biosafety Policy for Research Involving Biohazards on August 19, 2026. It would replace the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules, extend IBC jurisdiction from engineered molecules to wild-type agents, toxins and prions, impose 24-hour incident reporting, and make the Biosafety Officer a federally defined role. Here is what actually changes and how to respond before the October 19, 2026 deadline.
Read articleThe U.S. Government Policy for Stopping High-Risk Life Sciences Research, released July 28, 2026 under EO 14292 and implemented at NIH through NOT-OD-26-101, replaces mitigation with prohibition. It bans dangerous gain-of-function research outright, gates potential DGOF behind government-wide review, and creates International Research of Concern — a research-security regime wearing biosafety clothing. Penalties run to five-year debarment and False Claims Act exposure.
Read article