Grants for Immigrants and Refugees is an Inside Philanthropy resource that identifies and profiles foundations and funders supporting nonprofits working with immigrant, refugee, and asylum seeker populations globally. The resource profiles major philanthropic funders including the Amalgamated Charitable Foundation, Marguerite Casey Foundation, Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr. Fund, Heising-Simons Foundation, Conrad N.

Hilton Foundation, and others. It provides funding intelligence, giving trends, and funder strategies not available from 990 data alone. Nonprofits delivering legal services, resettlement assistance, workforce integration, and advocacy for immigrants and refugees can use this resource to identify high-fit grant prospects across the immigration and refugee funding landscape.

How to get grants for immigration nonprofits & refugees | Inside Philanthropy You are here: Find a Grant / Grant Finder / Grants for Immigrants and Refugees Grants for Immigrants & Refugees Grant Finder gives you vetted prospects with funding intelligence you won’t find in 990s.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Marguerite Casey Foundation Greater Washington Community Foundation Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund Heising-Simons Foundation Conrad N.

Hilton Foundation National Council on Aging David and Lucile Packard Foundation Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation Silicon Valley Community Foundation Funding trends for movement giving Different from a migrant or immigrant, the UNHCR defines a refugee as “someone who has been forced to flee his or her country because of persecution, war or violence.

A refugee has a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group. ” What constitutes refugee or asylum seeker status varies between nation-states and expands or contracts based on geopolitical climate and global economic conditions.

In other words, a refugee applies for protective status from their home country and travels after they have been approved, while an asylum seeker requests their status after arriving in a country. While the two terms are often used interchangeably, they refer to different legal processes.

Philanthropic giving for immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers has been historically low in contrast to the increasing needs of people all over the world facing disaster, war and oppression. According to Candid data, between 2012 and 2024, U.S.-based funders made grants totaling about $4. 49 billion for immigrant rights, immigrant services, immigration and naturalization and immigration law, IP has reported .

Grantmaking by U.S. foundations for immigrants increased notably during the Trump presidency beginning in 2016, according to the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy . That said, it still represents a small sliver of overall philanthropy. Based on NCRP’s analysis, funding for the immigrant and pro-refugee movements only grew from 1.

3% of all foundation funding in 2011-2015 to 1. 8% in 2016-2020. Similarly, money for [pro-immigrant] movement “advocacy and organizing never exceeded 0.

4% of U.S. foundation funding,” reports the NCRP. Between 2016 and 2019, cash grant funding from about 3,000 U.S.-based funders, according to Philanthropy News Digest, has totaled about $1. 5 billion in support of immigrants’ rights or only 19.

2% of overall giving for immigrants’ rights. This rights-focused funding represented 19. 2% of overall giving for immigrants and migrants in the periods.

On the other hand, funding for refugees and asylum seekers — which largely collapsed during 2016–2020 due in part to Trump administration refugee and immigration policies that caused the closure of hundreds of refugee resettlement groups as quotas dropped dramatically — still represents a small fraction of overall philanthropic giving in this space.

Much of the However, giving is slowly increasing with the majority of funds related to refugees and asylum seekers since 2016–2021, going to national organizations that focus on global human rights. Areas of funding related to immigrants and refugees According to analyses conducted by Candid and the Human Rights Funders Network, global human rights funding in support of migrants and refugees increased from $277.

4 million in 2015 to $656. 9 million in 2020. Grants for immigration and refugees typically address a number of concentrated areas, such as immigration reform; refugee resettlement, jobs and rights; and legal aid, integration, human rights, labor rights and social services for immigrants, child migrants, undocumented people and others.

In the U.S., support for DACA recipients has held. While some funders give broadly to support immigrants and refugees, most focus on a particular area of concern, such as immigration policy reform in the United States, refugee resettlement, job skills, or emergency aid for refugees from a particular nation or region. What is philanthropy doing about climate migration?

Increasingly, more major funders are starting to invest in the intersection between the changing climate and migration. The Emerson Collective’s Climate Migration Council , which identifies displacement caused by climate disasters as a growing push factor for global refugee crises, has worked to bring climate migration to the forefront of conversations regarding both global security and climate change .

Related to these overlapping areas and further defining the concept of climate migration , Emerson’s 2023 report identifies ways that philanthropy can increase disaster relief and emergency response to address rapidly evolving needs to preserve human life.

Additionally, the Migration Policy Institute, along with several national and global security organizations, identifies climate migration as an increasing risk to security as countries race to deal with the fallout of multiple crises at once.

Gaps in funding for refugees and immigrants Legal, policy and international organizations are currently working to expand the limited definition of a refugee, which currently denies asylum status based on gender violence. As a result, a large gap exists between government and nongovernmental agencies seeking to fund migration issues.

In addition, since refugee status is so narrowly defined, the term “climate refugees,” or individuals fleeing due to persecution, war and violence caused by climate change pressures, does not yet exist in most laws as a protected group. However, a select group of funders is keeping track of developments facing refugee and immigration law in real time.

There is less funding going to pro-immigrant and pro-refugee movement and advocacy work than to direct services for immigrants and refugees, and the gap is especially large when it comes to Black, AAPI, Indigenous, refugee and LGBTQ migrant justice groups, the NCRP found . For example, Black migrant groups receive less than 2% of movement funding, LGBTQ migrant groups less than 0. 5%, and Indigenous migrant groups less than 0.

4%. According to the NCRP , funding is lower per capita across the U.S. South and in Florida, New Jersey, Hawaii, and Nevada than in relatively well-funded states such as New York and California. Funding for refugees tends to fluctuate according to humanitarian crises like wars or disasters; however, there are also several steadfast funders who consistently make grants for immigrants and refugees.

More than 100 funders are part of the network for Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrants and Refugees , a philanthropy-supporting organization that mobilizes resources on pressing issues facing immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers.

In light of the second Trump Administration’s continued attacks on migrants, refugees and asylum seekers in the U.S., IP has outlined several other funding approaches that funders can anticipate needs by providing: rapid response grants; support for immigrant rights’ education; place-based funding; fact-checking to combat disinformation around immigration.

As well, long-term funding approaches include investing in policy and advocacy for immigrants and refugees; narrative change about immigration ; movement and power building; and investing in issues that intersect with the well-being of all Americans, like education, labor protections, healthcare access, and affordable housing.

Evolving giving trends for movement giving The Ford Foundation , a big funder in this field, makes grants for migrants and refugees a part of a broader giving strategy centered on civic engagement; gender, racial and social justice; and creativity and free expression. Meanwhile, Unbound Philanthropy is one of the few foundations focused primarily on immigrants.

Funders seeking to support the U.S. immigrant justice movement and improve the lives of immigrants in the U.S. have pooled resources through the Four Freedoms Fund , hosted by intermediary NEO Philanthropy.

Funder collaboratives and networks, among the biggest sources of movement funding, are not only expanding alliances and increasing grantmaking but also working to invigorate immigrant and refugee justice work through intersectional and racial equity lenses.

As social movements articulate the ways in which immigrant and refugee justice intersects with other social and climate justice issues, more progressive funders are following suit and increasingly support movement-building and grassroots organizations. Despite the diversification of movement funding, this area of grantmaking is still vastly underfunded in light of multiplying geopolitical, climate and economic pressures.

However, in a 2018 report , “Philanthropic Strategies to Support Refugees and Asylum Seekers,” Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrants and Refugees identifies ways that funders can dramatically improve investment in this space.