1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsLiving Literature Reviews is sponsored by Coefficient Giving. Supports scholars in building and maintaining continuously updated collections of articles that synthesize research on a single topic, with a focus on topics related to policymaking.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Coefficient Giving” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Living Literature Reviews | Coefficient Giving Write a Living Literature Review with Support from the Abundance and Growth Fund *]:lg:col-start-1! [&>. wysiwyg:first-child_h2:first-child]:border-t-0 [&>.
wysiwyg:first-child_h2:first-child]:mt-0"> The number of academic papers doubles every 12 years. This wealth of new knowledge is exciting, but the pace of growth makes keeping up with the latest developments increasingly difficult. One response to this challenge is “living literature reviews.
” At the Abundance and Growth Fund, we define a living literature review as a continuously updated online collection of accessible articles that synthesize academic research on a specific topic. These reviews are primarily written by a single expert who is responsible for its quality and accuracy. Living literature reviews aim to be accessible to readers unfamiliar with a field while maintaining rigor.
Unlike news articles that often focus on single, sensational studies, these reviews provide a broader perspective, synthesizing findings from multiple sources. They differ from traditional academic literature reviews by avoiding paywalls, dense jargon, and lengthy formats that pose barriers to non-specialists.
Moreover, because they don’t assume familiarity with the assumptions of a field, living literature reviews aim to describe how conclusions were reached, not just what the conclusions are. This transparency allows readers to better understand the research methodology and form their own judgment on the strength of the findings.
Living literature reviews also help readers assess a field by relying on a single individual to provide a consistent voice, perspective, and expert curatorial taste. While these individuals collaborate with other experts in their fields, having one consistent author allows readers to gauge how much they trust the author’s judgment over time. Finally, living literature reviews leverage digital platforms for hosting and distribution.
Websites allow for post-publication corrections and updates, enabling a level of current relevance that traditional print reviews can’t match. Complementing these, email newsletters and podcasts extend the reach and convenience of learning about academic research. By making research accessible to a broader audience, living literature reviews can facilitate interdisciplinary connections and inform policy work.
They offer insights into work happening in adjacent fields, potentially inspiring collaborations and novel research directions. The Abundance and Growth Fund supports several living literature reviews. Some examples include: Building Abundance by Michael Wiebe.
On housing and infrastructure. Lauren Policy: Migration Literature Review by Lauren Gilbert. On migration, progress, innovation, growth, and development.
The Patentist by Gaétan de Rassenfosse. Providing a clear and non-technical introduction to patent rights, focusing on insights from the economic literature. Existential Crunch by Florian Jehn.
Thoughts about existential risk, history, climate, food security, and societal collapse. The Care Gap by Nalini Gulati and Vikas Dimble. At the intersection of gender and health in low- and middle-income countries.
AI Accountability Review by Nick Diakopoulos. Translates research to help bridge the gap between knowledge and practice for AI policymakers, practitioners, and researchers. The Price of Power by Nikhil Kalyanpur.
How money and influence flow through systems—across democracies and autocracies, in peace and war, from oligarchs to civil society. Monitoring Gene Drives by Felix Moronta Barrios. On Gene Drive Research.
Bridging Boundaries by Rachel George. On Interdisciplinarity. Scaling in Human Societies by Michael Goff.
How and why size matters. New Things Under the Sun by Matt Clancy. Social science research on science and innovation.
Reskilled by James Ransom. Helping people get back to work after their jobs disappear. We also have a live directory of Living Literature Reviews and related projects on our blog.
We are now seeking pre-proposals from individuals to write living literature reviews . We are particularly interested in reviews on neglected topics relevant to policymaking. Ideal candidates will have a Ph.
D. or equivalent expertise in their proposed area. Our support typically allows authors to dedicate a quarter to a third of their time to the project.
If you’re interested in launching your own living literature review, we encourage you to reach out. We review applications twice a year, in the summer and winter. To submit a pre-proposal, please email abundanceandgrowth@coefficientgiving.
org with a brief description of the topic you want to write about and your background. Please also feel free to contact that address for other questions related to this program. Abundance and Growth Fund
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: Scholars and researchers Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates Varies Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.
Constellation Astra Fellowship: Strategy and Governance Stream (Fall 2026) is sponsored by Constellation Astra (with mentor organizations including Forethought, AI Policy Network, and Coefficient Giving). A fully funded in-person fellowship to develop and pursue research projects focused on reducing catastrophic risks from AI, specifically on the strategy and governance side.
Farm Animal Welfare Fund: Request for Proposals — Humane Fish Slaughter Research/Prototypes is a grant from Coefficient Giving that funds technologies and prototypes designed to materially improve the welfare of fish at the point of capture and slaughter. Over 100 billion farmed fish are slaughtered annually, with fewer than 1% reliably stunned beforehand; this RFP seeks solutions that render pre-death insensibility instantaneous, long-lasting, verifiable, and scalable under the physical constraints of both aquaculture facilities and fishing vessels. Eligible applicants include individuals, universities, research institutions, companies of all sizes, and public sector research organizations. Total funding is approximately million. Qualifying LOI submissions receive a ,000 honorarium. The application deadline is July 1, 2026.
Improving Undergraduate STEM Education: Education & Human Resources (IUSE: EHR) Program is sponsored by National Science Foundation (NSF). This program promotes novel, creative, and transformative approaches to generating and using new knowledge about STEM teaching and learning to improve STEM education for undergraduate students. It supports projects that bring recent advances in STEM knowledge into undergraduate education, adapt, improve, and incorporate evidence-based practices, and lay the groundwork for institutional improvement in STEM education. Professional development for instructors to ensure adoption of new and effective pedagogical techniques is a potential topic of interest.
The National Leadership Grants for Libraries Program (NLG-L) supports projects that address critical needs of the library and archives fields and have the potential to advance practice and strengthen library and archival services for the American public. Successful proposals will generate results such as new models, tools, research findings, services, practices, and/or alliances that can be widely used, adapted, scaled, or replicated to extend and leverage the benefits of federal investment. Applications to IMLS should both advance knowledge and understanding and ensure that the federal investment made generates benefits to society. Specifically, the goals for this program are to generate projects of far-reaching impact that: • Build the workforce and institutional capacity for managing the national information infrastructure and serving the information and education needs of the public. • Build the capacity of libraries and archives to lead and contribute to efforts that improve community well-being and strengthen civic engagement. • Improve the ability of libraries and archives to provide broad access to and use of information and collections with emphasis on collaboration to avoid duplication and maximize reach. • Strengthen the ability of libraries to provide services to affected communities in the event of an emergency or disaster. • Strengthen the ability of libraries, archives, and museums to work collaboratively for the benefit of the communities they serve. Throughout its work, IMLS places importance on diversity, equity, and inclusion. This may be reflected in an IMLS-funded project in a wide range of ways, including efforts to serve individuals of diverse geographic, cultural, and socioeconomic backgrounds; individuals with disabilities; individuals with limited functional literacy or information skills; individuals having difficulty using a library or museum; and underserved urban and rural communities, including children from families with incomes below the poverty line. Application Process: The application process for the NLG-L program has two phases; applicants must begin by applying for Phase I. For Phase I, all applicants must submit Preliminary Proposals by the September 20th deadline listed for this Notice of Funding Opportunity. For Phase II, only selected applicants will be invited to submit Full Proposals, and only those Invited Full Proposals will be considered for funding. Invited Full Proposals will be due March 20, 2024. Funding Opportunity Number: NLG-LIBRARIES-FY24. Assistance Listing: 45.312. Funding Instrument: G. Category: AR,HU. Award Amount: $50K – $1M per award.
The California Department of Education (CDE) Early Education Division is making approximately .7 million available to expand California State Preschool Program (CSPP) services statewide, appropriated under the 2021 Budget Act. Eligible applicants are local educational agencies (LEAs), including school districts, county offices of education, community college districts, and direct-funded charter schools—both current CSPP contractors and new applicants. Funding supports full-day/full-year or part-day/part-year preschool services for income-eligible children beginning in FY 2024–25. Awards are allocated by county based on Local Planning Council priority areas and application scores, with redistribution provisions if county allocations are underutilized.