1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsMaternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Innovation Award – General Data/Technology Innovations (Track One) is sponsored by Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA). This award supports innovation in the MIECHV program, specifically focusing on general data and technology innovations.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA)” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
A **. gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
* How to Apply for Grants * **Applicant Resources** * Adobe Software Compatibility * Submitting UTF-8 Special Characters * Encountering Error Messages * Grantor Standard Language * Submitting UTF-8 Special Characters * **Applicant System-To-System** * Reference Implementation * **Grantor System-To-System** * Reference Implementation * SF-424 Individual Family * SF-424 Mandatory Family * SF-424 Short Organization Family * Post-Award Reporting Forms * Country and State Lists Updates * **Manage Subscriptions** * Program Management Office * Grants.
gov Maintenance Calendar Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program – Innovation Awards Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration Document Type:Grants Notice Funding Opportunity Number:HRSA-16-025 Funding Opportunity Title:Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program – Innovation Awards Opportunity Category:Discretionary Opportunity Category Explanation: Funding Instrument Type:Cooperative Agreement Category of Funding Activity:Health Category Explanation:https://grants.
hrsa. gov/2010/Web2External/Interface/FundingCycle/ExternalView. aspx?
fCycleID=68f1689a-6096-4db6-ab76-bc41eb1dc41e Expected Number of Awards:10 Assistance Listings:93.
870 -- Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting Grant Program Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement:No Last Updated Date:May 03, 2016 Original Closing Date for Applications:May 17, 2016 Current Closing Date for Applications:May 17, 2016 Archive Date:Jul 16, 2016 Estimated Total Program Funding:$ 18,000,000 Eligible Applicants:Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification) Additional Information on Eligibility:Eligible applicants include the following entities currently funded in FY 2015 under the MIECHV program: 47 states; three (3) nonprofit organizations serving Florida, North Dakota, and Wyoming; and six (6) territories and jurisdictions (i.e., the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa).
NOTE: Multiple applications from an organization are not allowable. Any eligible applicant can submit only one application in response to this FOA. Where appropriate, eligible applicants may elect to collaborate with each other to jointly develop, implement, and evaluate proposed innovation.
HRSA supports such an approach when it appropriately increases efficiency and scale of proposed innovations. In these cases, the application must be submitted by one eligible applicant that proposes to contract with other eligible applicant(s) to jointly develop, implement, and evaluate innovation.
These collaborative proposals must include innovations that are expected to benefit and contribute to the project objectives of every collaborating eligible applicant. It is feasible that one eligible applicant may apply for funds to develop, implement and evaluate the innovation and appear as a proposed subcontractor on a separate application for a different proposed innovation.
NOTE: No two applications should intentionally propose identical projects. Applicants must not submit an application with a budget request exceeding $2,000,000 for the single eligible applicant to develop, implement, and evaluate innovation.
However, if the proposal reflects a collaboration of two or more eligible applicants (wherein one eligible applicant proposes to contract with other eligible applicant(s) to jointly develop, implement, and evaluate innovation), the applicant may not submit an application with a budget request exceeding $4,000,000.
## Additional Information Agency Name:Health Resources and Services Administration Description:The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), Division of Home Visiting and Early Childhood Systems is accepting applications for federal fiscal year (FY) 2016 competitive funds for innovation through the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program.
The purpose of this limited competition is to fund the development, implementation, and evaluation of innovations by MIECHV awardees (recipients) that strengthen and improve the delivery of MIECHV-funded coordinated and comprehensive high-quality voluntary early childhood home visiting services to eligible families.
For the purpose of this FOA, an innovation is defined as a process, product, strategy, or practice that improves (or is expected to improve) significantly upon the outcomes reached with current/status quo options and that can ultimately reach widespread effective usage. Approximately $18,000,000 is expected to be available to fund approximately 10 recipients.
Applicants may apply for a ceiling amount of up to $2,000,000 for a single eligible applicant to develop, implement, and evaluate innovation. If the proposal reflects a collaboration of two or more eligible applicants (wherein one eligible applicant proposes to contract with other eligible applicant(s) to jointly develop, implement, and evaluate innovation), the applicant may apply for a ceiling amount of up to $4,000,000.
Innovations proposed and/or implemented under this FOA must not compromise or conflict with the recipient’s compliance with program requirements to ensure fidelity of implementation of evidence-based or promising approach home visiting service delivery models.
Applicants must secure written prior approval from the national model developer(s) in order to ensure that any proposed innovation does not alter model core components (submit as Attachment 7) and is eligible for funding under this FOA.
Fidelity is defined as a recipient’s adherence to model developer requirements for high-quality implementation as well as any applicable affiliation, certification, or accreditation required by the model developer, if applicable.
Prior to implementation, the model developer and HRSA must determine that the enhancement does not alter the core components related to program outcomes, and HRSA must determine it to be aligned with MIECHV program requirements.
Goals The goals of the MIECHV program are to: (1) strengthen and improve the programs and activities carried out under Title V of the Social Security Act; (2) improve coordination of services for at-risk communities; and (3) identify and provide comprehensive services to improve outcomes for eligible families[1] who reside in at-risk communities.
The goal of this funding opportunity is to develop, implement and evaluate innovations that strengthen and improve the delivery of MIECHV-funded coordinated and comprehensive high-quality voluntary early childhood home visiting services to eligible families, subject to the limitations described in this announcement.
Objectives The objectives of this MIECHV program competitive funding opportunity are to: Develop and implement innovations[2] that strengthen and improve the delivery of MIECHV-funded coordinated and comprehensive high-quality voluntary early childhood home visiting services to eligible families and that are expected, based on evidence of promise[3] or strong theory,[4] to demonstrate improvement in one or more of the following program priority areas: Recruitment, engagement, and retention of eligible families to MIECHV-funded home visiting programs, Development and retention of a trained, highly skilled MIECHV-funded home visiting workforce, Coordination of MIECHV-funded home visiting programs with community resources and supports,[5] including comprehensive statewide and/or local early childhood systems,[6] such as child health, behavioral health, and human services systems, and Implementation of effective continuous quality improvement processes in MIECHV-funded home visiting programs.
Contribute to advances in knowledge about the development and implementation of innovations that enable delivery of coordinated and comprehensive high-quality voluntary early childhood home visiting services to eligible families through: Evaluation, and Dissemination of knowledge gained to all MIECHV formula recipients.
[1] Under Social Security Act, Title V, Section 511(k)(2), “[t]he term “eligible family” means— (A) a woman who is pregnant, and the father of the child if the father is available; or (B) a parent or primary caregiver of a child, including grandparents or other relatives of the child, and foster parents, who are serving as the child’s primary caregiver from birth to kindergarten entry, and including a noncustodial parent who has an ongoing relationship with, and at times provides physical care for, the child.
[2] For the purpose of this FOA, an innovation is defined as a process, product, strategy, or practice that improves (or is expected to improve) significantly upon the outcomes reached with current/status quo options and that can ultimately reach widespread effective usage. (See Appendix B for citation.)
[3] Evidence of promise means there is empirical evidence to support the theoretical linkage between at least one critical component and at least one relevant outcome presented in the logic model for the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice. (See Appendix B for citation.) [4] Strong theory means a rationale for the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice that includes a logic model.
Additionally, the rationale should reflect a theory of change, which is a detailed hypothesis about specific changes we expect will result from implementing a new strategy. Carefully articulated theories of change provide roadmaps, which can continue to be refined and tested, for guiding decisions about program design and evaluation.
They also help innovators test and identify what works for certain populations and not for others, which can inform both the scaling of specific strategies and the search for new ideas. (See Appendix B for citation.) [5] Social Security Act, Title V, Section 511(d)(3)(B).
[6] An early childhood system brings together health, early care and education, and family support program partners, as well as community leaders, families, and other stakeholders to achieve agreed-upon goals for thriving children and families.
An early childhood system aims to: reach all children and families as early as possible with needed services and supports; reflect and respect the strengths, needs, values, languages, cultures, and communities of children and families; ensure stability and continuity of services along a continuum from pregnancy to kindergarten entry; genuinely include and effectively accommodate children with special needs; support continuity of services, eliminate duplicative services, ease transitions, and improve the overall service experience for families and children; value parents and community members as decision makers and leaders; and catalyze and maximize investment and foster innovation.
Link to Additional Information:[](https://www. grants. gov/search-results-detail/282336) Grantor Contact Information:If you have difficulty accessing the full announcement electronically, please contact: Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Contact Lisa R.
King, MA at (301)443-9739 or email Lking@hrsa. gov #### Health & Human Services * Frequently Asked Questions ## Your session will expire in 3 minutes. To continue working, click on the "OK" button below.
This is being done to protect your privacy. Unsaved changes will be lost.
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: All states and six territories and jurisdictions (District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, U. S. Virgin Islands, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa). Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates See official notice Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.