1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
Portal opens Feb 24, 2026. Proposal deadline Mar 31, 2026 5PM PT. Award notification Apr 2026. Research period Apr-Nov 2026.
Microsoft's AI Economy Institute (AIEI) invites proposals for its third global research cohort, focused on how frontier firms adopting and deploying AI are transforming work, productivity, and economic structures. Awards of $75,000 support independent, policy-relevant scholarship by researchers at accredited universities or research institutions worldwide.
The research period runs April through November 2026, culminating in a book publication in January 2027. Eligible principal investigators must hold a PhD or equivalent terminal degree for at least three years. Up to two PIs are accepted per proposal.
Deadline: March 31, 2026.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Microsoft AI Economy Institute” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
AI Economy Institute - Microsoft Research: Aiei Open Call 3 AIEI Corporate Social Responsibility AI Economy Institute Cohort 3 Open Call Launched in 2025, Microsoft’s AI Economy Institute (AIEI) supports independent, policy-relevant research on how artificial intelligence is reshaping productivity, labor markets, education systems, and economic opportunity, worldwide.
AIEI advances rigorous scholarship that informs policymakers, educators, employers, and workers as societies adapt to the rapid diffusion of generative AI. The institute emphasizes scholarship that is immediately translatable top policy, decision-making, and investment. All research supported by AIEI is conducted independently.
Findings, interpretations, and conclusions are those of the authors and do not represent the views of Microsoft. Since its launch, the AI Economy Institute has convened two research cohorts through open and targeted Calls for Proposals, supporting independent scholarship across a range of topics related to AI’s economic and societal impacts.
Previous cohorts have focused on studying: AI’s impact on education pathways, workforce entry, and skills development Adoption of AI in K–12, higher education, and technical and vocational education systems National and regional approaches to AI diffusion, governance, and workforce preparedness The role of AI in addressing environmental and sustainability challenges Findings and outputs from prior cohorts, including published research and policy-relevant insights, are available on the AIEI website.
Submission portal opens: February 24, 2026 Proposal deadline: March 31, 2026 (5:00 PM Pacific) Award notification: April 2026 Research period: April- November 2026 Book chapter submission: July 2026 In-person workshop: October 2026 Manuscript submission: November 2026 Book publication: January 2027 Cohort 3: AIEI Senior Fellows Cohort 3 is open to researchers affiliated with accredited universities or research institutions worldwide.
Up to two Principal Investigators (PIs) are accepted per proposal, and PIs must hold a PhD or equivalent terminal degree (e.g., MD, JD, DrPH) and must have held that degree for at least three years at the time of application.
Application details and requirements AIEI 3 rd CFP: Frontier Firms and the Transformation of Work in the AI Economy The Microsoft AI Economy Institute (AIEI) invites proposals for its third global research call, centered on understanding how frontier firms – those firms adopting and deploying AI at scale – are reshaping the organization of work and the broader economic landscape.
These firms sit at the leading edge of technological diffusion, providing early evidence of how AI changes job design, skill demands, productivity, and regional economic development. Analyzing frontier firms allows researchers to examine both upstream, firm level transformations and downstream, economywide impacts.
Upstream, these firms are adapting internal structures, from workforce skills and job design to innovation processes and decision-making workflows, to fully leverage AI. Downstream, their adoption of AI influences labor markets, industry standards, supply chains, and regional economic patterns, offering early signals of broader structural change.
We welcome research offering empirical rigor, comparative insight, and practical guidance for policymakers, educators, employers, and workers. We especially welcome studies that document firm level experimentation, labor market adjustments, and early indicators of broader structural change.
Priority will be given to studies examining organizational change, occupational restructuring, and identifying the early signals that precede broader labor market transformation.
We invite proposals addressing any of the following themes: Productivity at the Frontier and Firm-Level Transformation: How AI Is Reshaping Production and Organizational Design How are frontier firms restructuring tasks, workflows, roles, teams, and organizational structures, including managerial systems to integrate AI into processes whether internal or production?
Which occupations or tasks show the earliest measurable productivity gains, and under what organizational or technological conditions? What strategies help firms mitigate “workslop,” where individual productivity gains create collective losses? What complementary investments—across talent, governance, culture, data infrastructure, process redesign, and compute—are necessary for firms to fully realize productivity improvements?
And how is the integration of AI transforming collaboration dynamics, team structure, and decision‑making, and do these shifts lead to measurable improvements in business performance? Are frontier firms exhibiting shifts in productivity – positive or negative – that may not yet appear in aggregate statistics, and how should these effects be measured to determine whether a modern productivity paradox is emerging?
What indicators reliably signal movement along the J curve from early friction to sustained lift? Occupational Change, Leadership Expectation, and Workforce Transformation How are frontier firms reorganizing work – tasks, team structures, cross functional responsibilities, and required‑functional responsibilities, and required skill mixes – when integrating AI into their operations?
And how do these patterns differ between “legacy” firms transitioning into frontier status and “AI native” firms that were “frontier-native” firms that were frontier from inception? How does AI adoption alter the task structure of occupations, particularly in software engineering and other technical fields, and what shifts are emerging in the composition, allocation, and sequencing of work?
How is AI reshaping entry-level work (roles, tasks, and expectations) and what does this mean for career ladders, early career mobility, and the development of core judgment and domain expertise? What evidence do we have on which training pathways most effectively support early career workers in this transition? What new hybrid roles or AI-augmented occupations are emerging inside frontier firms?
Economic Geography and Diffusion: Regional and Market Level Spillovers How does the presence of frontier firms shape emerging regional patterns, such as new AI hubs, talent clustering, job and startup growth, and risks of geographic inequality, and which place based strategies can support more inclusive diffusion of AI capabilities and opportunities?
What risks of regional divergence arise as AI activity concentrates in specific metropolitan areas, and which place based strategies (infrastructure, education, incentives) most effectively broaden the diffusion of AI capabilities and opportunities?
How do frontier firms shape their sectors—through the standards they set, the capabilities they diffuse, and/or the competitive dynamics they influence across supply chains and partner ecosystems? Are there observable global diffusion patterns – for example, rapid advancements in markets like China (e.g., the DeepSeek phenomenon) – that illuminate how frontier capabilities spread internationally?
What downstream effects are visible in labor markets (job postings, wage adjustments, internal mobility, separations)? When History Rhymes: GPT Analogues and Structural Shifts Are we seeing parallels to earlier general-purpose technologies (electricity, PCs, the internet), where productivity improvements first appear locally before diffusing more broadly?
How does today’s AI frontier resemble or differ from earlier technology shifts such as electrification, the semiconductor revolution, personal computing, or the internet? Under what historical conditions did general purpose technologies expand economic activity, jobs, and wages, and are those conditions present with AI?
What can be learned from recent industry restructuring (mergers, alliances, and the emergence of new entrants) about the trajectory of AI-driven transformation? Which historical analogues best guide expectations for labor market adjustment, occupational evolution, or firm reorganization today?
Forecasting the Frontier: Capabilities, Diffusion, and Labor Market Signals How can we model likely trajectories of AI capability improvement—both rate (“how fast”) and functional ceiling (“how good”)—to anticipate productivity, growth, and labor market impacts?
What empirically grounded forecasts (performance curves, scaling laws, cost curves) can be incorporated into economic models of task substitution, task creation, or occupational redesign? Which labor market signals adjust first when AI diffuses: job postings, hiring flows, separations, wage offers, hours, or contracted types? What features of these market signals change first and how do they relate to labor market signals?
How can we measure and forecast AI’s evolving task level capabilities across occupations, and which metrics best link these capability changes to projected organizational redesign, sectoral transformation, and institutional adaptation? About the AIEI Senior Fellows Program This section describes the structure, expectations, and opportunities associated with participation in the AIEI Senior Fellows Program.
The AIEI Senior Fellows experience The Senior Fellows Program follows a structured, cohort‑based model designed to support rigorous research, peer exchange, and public dissemination.
Participate in bi‑weekly virtual workshops with fellow researchers and subject‑matter experts Engage in a multi‑day, in‑person workshop with Microsoft subject matter experts and AIEI leadership Contribute a chapter to an edited trade book on the AI economy Submit a research manuscript to a high‑quality, open‑access academic journal Researchers are recognized as AIEI Senior Fellows and may be invited to present their findings at industry and policy forums.
The experience outlined above unfolds through a structured, multi‑phase program model, outlined below. Program structure and timeline (general) The AIEI Senior Fellows Program follows a structured, cohort‑based model spanning approximately 12 months. The program is organized into three sequential phases designed to support rigorous research, peer exchange, and public dissemination.
Phase 1: Proposal and selection During the first phase, AIEI issues a Call for Proposals outlining priority research questions. Submitted proposals are reviewed by academic and industry subject‑matter experts, and selected Principal Investigators are invited to join the Senior Fellows cohort.
Phase 2: Cohort engagement and draft development Senior Fellows participate in bi‑weekly virtual convenings and an in‑person workshop with fellow researchers and AIEI and Microsoft leadership. During this phase, Fellows refine their research questions and methods while concurrently developing an initial draft of a chapter for an edited volume on the AI economy.
Phase 3: Revision, publication, and research completion In the final phase, Fellows revise their chapter based on peer and editorial feedback, contribute to the publication and public launch of the edited volume, and complete their research projects, culminating in submission of a manuscript to a high‑quality academic journal.
All else equal, preference will be given to proposals that: Are cross‑, multi‑, or interdisciplinary Apply novel methods, including AI‑enabled approaches Use existing datasets or leverage established relationships to collect data efficiently Compare or contrast country and/or regional perspectives Deliver actionable insights to help people and institutions Qualitative, quantitative, theoretical, and mixed methods approaches are all acceptable, provided proposals align with the stated research priorities.
The following sections outline eligibility requirements, application materials, review criteria, funding Open to researchers affiliated with accredited universities or research institutions worldwide Up to two Principal Investigators (PIs) per proposal – only one awardee; interdisciplinary teams encouraged. All PIs must meet eligibility requirements.
PIs must hold a PhD or equivalent terminal degree (e.g., MD, JD, DrPH) and must have held that degree for at least three years at the time of application.
Each selected proposal will receive a single $75,000 research grant Each selected proposal is eligible for one travel allowance to support attendance at the in‑person workshop: $7,500 for awardees based in the United States, Canada, or Mexico $20,000 for all other awardees Applications consist of two parts: Applicant Biosketch (11-point font) Personal statement (≤300 words) One page professional summary Up to three contributions to science Current research support and citation metrics (H-index, total number of citations, and I-index) Project Overview (≤1 page, 11-point font) Research question, methods, and contribution Policy relevance and applicability Up to three target journals Proposals will be evaluated on four equally weighted criteria: Scientific strength (25%) – Rigor, appropriateness, and quality of methods; replicability and generalizability where applicable.
Feasibility (25%) – Likelihood the project can be completed within the proposed timeline and scope. Pragmatic applicability (25%) – Potential to generate actionable insights relevant to AI-driven economic transformation. PI productivity (25%) – Evidence the PI can successfully execute and publish the proposed research.
Scoring criteria used to review proposals for this grant.
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: Researchers affiliated with accredited universities or research institutions worldwide. Up to two PIs per proposal. PIs must hold PhD or equivalent terminal degree (MD, JD, DrPH) for at least 3 years at time of application. Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates $75,000 Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is March 31, 2026. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.