1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsPrincipia Compute Grants is sponsored by Principia Labs. Supports researchers and engineers working on AI for mathematical reasoning with compute credits.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Principia Labs” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
How to apply for and get compute grants (for students) · Idle Words Thoughts on research, life, etc How to apply for and get compute grants (for students) Every PhD student has complained about compute sometime in their lives. At this point, it’s the academic equivalent of complaining about not having enough time – treated as an immutable fact of life, rather than a problem that could actually feasibly be solved.
Unlike time however, compute exists in (relative) abundance, if one is willing to look for it. In the past year or so, some friends and I have been applying for compute grants for various projects. Altogether, with around 2-3 weeks of effort across our grants, we have accumulated 100k+ GPU hours (as exchanged for A100s), which is roughly equivalent to having a single 8-GPU node running uninterrupted for 2.
5 years. Of course, you can divide this if you plan on doing multi-node training or running many experiments simultaneously, but it’s not bad for writing a few pitches. Surprisingly, I don’t think many students consider this as an option, but it’s actually pretty simple.
I also don’t consider myself a particularly persuasive writer (I almost never convince reviewers to raise their scores during rebuttal despite my best efforts, to give you some idea), so I think this process is probably replicable and will give a high return on investment to most people who are willing to put in the work.
If you’re still reading this, you’re probably somewhat sold on the idea of writing compute grants, so let’s get into the details: There are generally two types of grants: HPC allocations - hours on shared supercomputing clusters Cloud credits - dollar-value credits on commercial providers such as AWS or Azure Of these two, I generally think that HPC allocations are more worth pursuing, with a caveat.
This is because cloud credits evaporate quickly at commercial GPU rates, whereas HPC allocations typically translate to far more actual compute for equivalent writing effort. However, the one caveat is that for HPC allocations, you will be on shared infrastructure, so in other words subject to queue times and generally more affected by the state of the cluster.
Personally, I don’t mind waiting that much given that CMU already has a large shared cluster, but if you need experiments done ASAP for a deadline, it may be good to have some credits on hand for emergencies. Note : These allocations are for US institutions primarily, but international students at US institutions can also apply (I am an international student).
International collaborators are also allowed as far as I can tell, as long as the submitter is at a US institution. EuroHPC is an alternative for Europeans. NSF ACCESS ⭐ — I consider this to be the best place to start and most worth it for PhD students.
There are four tiers of increasing scale and effort: Explore (no proposal, fastest) Discover (1 page proposal) Accelerate (3 page proposal, panel review) Maximize (10 page proposal, panel review) The PI for Accelerate and Maximize proposals must be post-PhD (at least a postdoc), whereas grad students can be the main PI on Explore and Discover grants.
Of the available compute clusters, I recommend NCSA Delta/DeltaAI , which has a mix of A100, H100, and H200 nodes. NAIRR Pilot — NSF-backed, AI-focused counterpart to ACCESS. Requires a 3-page proposal; grad students eligible with advisor letter.
Also has a lighter Start-Up track (2-week turnaround) good for getting started. — Proposal-based, and not always open (check if there is a call for proposals). Requires a faculty PI, but PhD students can be involved.
Unlike most cloud credits, this gives GPU hours on Nvidia cloud infra (e.g. use of an 8xA100 node for 6 months). Lambda Labs — This is a very straightforward application, the credit amounts seem to be lower (e.g. ~2k) but it’s very low friction to apply. Google TPU Research Cloud — Access to TPUs for ML research.
Best fit if your stack is JAX/PyTorch XLA. Google Cloud Research Credits — Note that this is separate from the above. This has rolling applications and low friction.
Up to 5k for faculty/postdocs, 1k for PhD students. Covers GPUs and TPUs on GCP. — Application-based cloud credits.
More involved process than Lambda. Microsoft Azure Research Credits — Similar to AWS/GCP credits, proof-of-concept focused. Also contributes resources through NAIRR so there’s some overlap if you’re applying there too.
NOTE: the form may be closed if you don’t see anything on this page. The application process is slightly different for each grant, so you should probably read the instructions carefully if you plan on applying for one. One thing is that you should probably come up with a project first and have some potential collaborators ready, since you need to write a proposal and detail the preparedness of your team.
This tends to be easier to do if you already have a pretty good idea of what you want to do, and also a team. Some grants require a faculty member or postdoc to submit them, so you should probably try to get one on your team. A useful framework for structuring your proposal is the Heilmeier Catechism , a set of questions that any good research proposal should be able to answer.
It’s worth going through before you start writing. Finally, the best thing you can do before writing is to find a past accepted proposal for the grant you’re targeting. Most programs have examples floating around if you ask around or search a bit, and they give you a much clearer sense of what to write about and can serve as good templates.
Underrated life hack: working outdoors The Promises and Pitfalls of AI Scientists I'm an NLP Researcher. I didn't check Twitter for a year. It was fine.
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: PhD candidates, postdocs, advanced undergraduates, and researchers with equivalent standing. Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates $1,000–$10,000 Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.
Digital Cities' Innovation Accelerator Small Grant Program is sponsored by U.S. State Department's Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy (CDP). These small grants activate the private sector to deliver novel and innovative solutions to civic challenges. Projects must address a sub-national public service or infrastructure need AND incorporate trusted U.S. digital based solutions, empowering municipalities to improve public service delivery.
This NOFO provides an opportunity to all FY 2018 NIST SBIR Phase I awardees to submit a Phase II application following completion of Phase I. This NOFO provides instructions for FY 2019 NIST SBIR Phase II application preparation and submission requirements. In Phase II, work from Phase I that exhibits potential for commercial application is further developed. Phase II is the R&D or prototype development phase. To apply for a Phase II award, each Phase I awardee will be required to submit a comprehensive application outlining the proposed research and a detailed plan to commercialize the final product. Each NIST Phase II award is for up to $400,000 and up to a 24-month period of performance. One year after completing the Phase II R&D activity, the awardee shall be required to report on its commercialization activities. Up to an additional $6,500 may be requested for Technical and Business Assistance (TABA); see Section 5.11 for more information about TABA. Funding Opportunity Number: 2019-NIST-SBIR-02. Assistance Listing: 11.620. Funding Instrument: CA. Category: ST. Award Amount: Up to $400K per award.
Research on Circular Economy, Smart Manufacturing, and Energy-Efficient Microelectronics is sponsored by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Materials & Manufacturing Technologies Office (AMMTO). This funding opportunity supports innovative technology R&D across the manufacturing sector with a focus on circular economy, smart manufacturing, and energy-efficient microelectronics. While the stated deadline for full applications has passed, AMMTO frequently issues similar solicitations, and this highlights a relevant area of interest for the DOE.