1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsSmall Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Opportunities - Modular Payloads for Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is sponsored by U.S. Army. This funding opportunity seeks to revolutionize UAS capabilities through modular payloads compatible with the Picatinny Common Lethality Interface Kit.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “U.S. Army” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Modular Payloads for UAS – Army SBIR|STTR Program Sensors, Army SBIR | Army STTR, Phase I Modular Payloads for UAS Topic Number: ARM26BX01-NV002 Application Due Date: 06/03/2026 The objectives for this effort are to enhance and refine various payload types and integrate them using a modular specification for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS).
Experimentation, testing, and evaluation for this effort will use a Soldier-centered iterative design process. Current UAS and payloads are often proprietary and designed to be mission-specific. Some systems offer swappable payloads; however, these payloads aren’t interchangeable across UAS manufacturers, and additional capabilities depend on the same manufacturer developing new payloads.
To maximize battlefield usability, the Army needs the ability to swap payloads using common connections. This solicitation supports a directed requirement for brigade-level UAS by developing payload technologies that will inform future UAS requirements and unit-level tactics, techniques, and procedures.
The intent is to explore, test, refine, and advance modular payload technologies as an industry-government team, experimenting iteratively through Soldier touchpoints. The selected vendor will deliver a modular payload and integrate the payload with one or more government-provided UAS platforms.
Desired types of modular payloads include the following: Electro-optical (EO) and infrared (IR) laser rangefinder and designator Communications relay (voice and data) Cargo resupply up to 20lb Other novel payloads that can provide Soldiers an offensive or defensive advantage In this effort, awardees are asked to adapt their payload technology for compatibility with the Picatinny Common Lethality Interface Kit (CLIK) specification developed by DEVCOM Armaments Center.
The Picatinny CLIK specification defines a physical interface, electrical connection, and signals to enable the integration of lethal and nonlethal payloads with small UAS. The references section of this solicitation contains a link to the Army Applications Laboratory topic page that links to the Picatinny CLIK specification.
Vendors will also have the option to collaborate with DEVCOM Armaments Center to continue to refine the Picatinny CLIK specification. Awardees will collaborate with UAS vendors to integrate their payloads with one or more government-provided UAS and demonstrate interoperability. The UAS platform provided by the government will have capabilities of upper Group 2 or lower Group 3 UAS, with payload capacity of at least 20 lb.
Once awardees have integrated their payloads using Picatinny CLIK, they will provide their payloads for unit field experimentation and further refine their payload technology. The vendor should specify in their proposal how they intend to enhance their technology throughout the period of performance using the feedback provided through the Soldier-centered iterative design process.
Examples of desirable technology improvements include, but are not limited to: Reducing size, weight, power, and cost (SWaP-C) of the payload Working toward compliance with relevant standards, airworthiness, and packaging requirements Improving user interface and autonomous behaviors Compatibility with a broader variety of UAS and controllers, including common controllers such as UVC (Uncrewed Vehicle Control) This topic is for Phase I submission only.
The Department of the Army will accept Phase I proposals for a cost of up to $150,000 for a 3-month period of performance. In Phase I, awardees will collaborate with government stakeholders and UAS vendors to plan for the integration of their payloads using Picatinny CLIK, along with developing plans for technology improvements to their payloads.
Phase I deliverables will include: Technical designs for integration of the awardee’s payload with one or more government-provided UAS and for technology improvements to the payload Initial Safety Assessment Report (SAR), technical documentation, test plans, and other information required to obtain approval for hands-on Soldier touchpoints and experimentation Participation in a virtual kickoff and in-person final presentation, along with virtual touchpoints Monthly reports that document technical progress A Phase II proposal, if desired by the vendor Phase II is anticipated to have a 12-month period of performance.
In Phase II, awardees will deliver prototypes of their modular payloads adapted to use the Picatinny CLIK specification and will support hands-on experimentation to make iterative improvements to their technology.
Phase II deliverables will include: A quantity of at least 2 of the modular payloads, to be left behind with units at the conclusion of the period of performance Integration of the modular payload with one or more government-provided UAS using the Picatinny CLIK specification Support for Soldier experimentation touchpoints at unit locations to perform Soldier-centered iterative design.
Proposers should budget for a total of 5 trips with a duration of 1 week per trip to unit locations or experiment sites within the continental U.S. Proposals should include all anticipated personnel, travel costs, and support equipment Integration of experimentation results into technology improvements to the payload Monthly reports that document lessons learned from experimentation and their application to technology development Proposal for a sequential award, if desired by the vendor, to continue technology development based on lessons learned from experimentation The following timeline illustrates the concept of execution during the Phase II period of performance.
Awardees should anticipate timeline changes during execution due to technology development risk, unit availability for experimentation, and scheduled experimentation events. Applicants may propose timelines that follow the general model below. Month 1-2: Adapt the payload to use the Picatinny CLIK specification based on plans developed during Phase I.
Collaborate with UAS vendors to integrate the payload with government-provided UAS. Continue touchpoints with Soldiers and Army organizations. Deliver an updated Safety Assessment Report (SAR) and other documentation to support safety releases for Soldier testing.
Month 3-10: Deliver quantity 2 of the modular payload adapted to use the Picatinny CLIK specification. Train Soldiers to use the modular connection and payload. Support experimentation touchpoints and use Soldier-centered iterative design to improve the payload technology.
Month 11-12: Deliver the final payload prototypes to the unit. Attend a culminating training event or experiment with the unit to further experiment with and develop the payload technology. Demonstrate interoperability of the payload with government-provided UAS using the Picatinny CLIK specification.
Finalize and document payload technology improvements and lessons learned. Law enforcement sensing and surveillance Submit full proposals via the DSIP Portal . For assistance, contact the SBIR|STTR Help Desk at usarmy.
sbirsttr@army. mil . Army Applications Laboratory.
Modular Payloads for UAS (Topic Page). Contains a link to information about the Picatinny CLIK specification. https://aal.
mil/modular-payloads-uas/ Continuous Transformation: Transformation in Contact. Military Review. Gen. James E.
Rainey, U.S. Army. https://www. armyupress.
army. mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2024-OLE/Transformation-in-Contact/ Aviation Today. “Army Looks To Field Brigade UAS.
” https://www. aviationtoday. com/2025/08/21/after-ftuas-cut-army-looks-to-field-brigade-uas-in-fy-26-to-replace-shadow-drones/ KEYWORDS: UAS, UAV, Payloads, Modularity, Communications, Electronic Warfare, Signals Intelligence, Cargo The objectives for this effort are to enhance and refine various payload types and integrate them using a modular specification for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS).
Experimentation, testing, and evaluation for this effort will use a Soldier-centered iterative design process. Current UAS and payloads are often proprietary and designed to be mission-specific. Some systems offer swappable payloads; however, these payloads aren’t interchangeable across UAS manufacturers, and additional capabilities depend on the same manufacturer developing new payloads.
To maximize battlefield usability, the Army needs the ability to swap payloads using common connections. This solicitation supports a directed requirement for brigade-level UAS by developing payload technologies that will inform future UAS requirements and unit-level tactics, techniques, and procedures.
The intent is to explore, test, refine, and advance modular payload technologies as an industry-government team, experimenting iteratively through Soldier touchpoints. The selected vendor will deliver a modular payload and integrate the payload with one or more government-provided UAS platforms.
Desired types of modular payloads include the following: Electro-optical (EO) and infrared (IR) laser rangefinder and designator Communications relay (voice and data) Cargo resupply up to 20lb Other novel payloads that can provide Soldiers an offensive or defensive advantage In this effort, awardees are asked to adapt their payload technology for compatibility with the Picatinny Common Lethality Interface Kit (CLIK) specification developed by DEVCOM Armaments Center.
The Picatinny CLIK specification defines a physical interface, electrical connection, and signals to enable the integration of lethal and nonlethal payloads with small UAS. The references section of this solicitation contains a link to the Army Applications Laboratory topic page that links to the Picatinny CLIK specification.
Vendors will also have the option to collaborate with DEVCOM Armaments Center to continue to refine the Picatinny CLIK specification. Awardees will collaborate with UAS vendors to integrate their payloads with one or more government-provided UAS and demonstrate interoperability. The UAS platform provided by the government will have capabilities of upper Group 2 or lower Group 3 UAS, with payload capacity of at least 20 lb.
Once awardees have integrated their payloads using Picatinny CLIK, they will provide their payloads for unit field experimentation and further refine their payload technology. The vendor should specify in their proposal how they intend to enhance their technology throughout the period of performance using the feedback provided through the Soldier-centered iterative design process.
Examples of desirable technology improvements include, but are not limited to: Reducing size, weight, power, and cost (SWaP-C) of the payload Working toward compliance with relevant standards, airworthiness, and packaging requirements Improving user interface and autonomous behaviors Compatibility with a broader variety of UAS and controllers, including common controllers such as UVC (Uncrewed Vehicle Control) This topic is for Phase I submission only.
The Department of the Army will accept Phase I proposals for a cost of up to $150,000 for a 3-month period of performance. In Phase I, awardees will collaborate with government stakeholders and UAS vendors to plan for the integration of their payloads using Picatinny CLIK, along with developing plans for technology improvements to their payloads.
Phase I deliverables will include: Technical designs for integration of the awardee’s payload with one or more government-provided UAS and for technology improvements to the payload Initial Safety Assessment Report (SAR), technical documentation, test plans, and other information required to obtain approval for hands-on Soldier touchpoints and experimentation Participation in a virtual kickoff and in-person final presentation, along with virtual touchpoints Monthly reports that document technical progress A Phase II proposal, if desired by the vendor Phase II is anticipated to have a 12-month period of performance.
In Phase II, awardees will deliver prototypes of their modular payloads adapted to use the Picatinny CLIK specification and will support hands-on experimentation to make iterative improvements to their technology.
Phase II deliverables will include: A quantity of at least 2 of the modular payloads, to be left behind with units at the conclusion of the period of performance Integration of the modular payload with one or more government-provided UAS using the Picatinny CLIK specification Support for Soldier experimentation touchpoints at unit locations to perform Soldier-centered iterative design.
Proposers should budget for a total of 5 trips with a duration of 1 week per trip to unit locations or experiment sites within the continental U.S. Proposals should include all anticipated personnel, travel costs, and support equipment Integration of experimentation results into technology improvements to the payload Monthly reports that document lessons learned from experimentation and their application to technology development Proposal for a sequential award, if desired by the vendor, to continue technology development based on lessons learned from experimentation The following timeline illustrates the concept of execution during the Phase II period of performance.
Awardees should anticipate timeline changes during execution due to technology development risk, unit availability for experimentation, and scheduled experimentation events. Applicants may propose timelines that follow the general model below. Month 1-2: Adapt the payload to use the Picatinny CLIK specification based on plans developed during Phase I.
Collaborate with UAS vendors to integrate the payload with government-provided UAS. Continue touchpoints with Soldiers and Army organizations. Deliver an updated Safety Assessment Report (SAR) and other documentation to support safety releases for Soldier testing.
Month 3-10: Deliver quantity 2 of the modular payload adapted to use the Picatinny CLIK specification. Train Soldiers to use the modular connection and payload. Support experimentation touchpoints and use Soldier-centered iterative design to improve the payload technology.
Month 11-12: Deliver the final payload prototypes to the unit. Attend a culminating training event or experiment with the unit to further experiment with and develop the payload technology. Demonstrate interoperability of the payload with government-provided UAS using the Picatinny CLIK specification.
Finalize and document payload technology improvements and lessons learned. Law enforcement sensing and surveillance Submit full proposals via the DSIP Portal . For assistance, contact the SBIR|STTR Help Desk at usarmy.
sbirsttr@army. mil . Army Applications Laboratory.
Modular Payloads for UAS (Topic Page). Contains a link to information about the Picatinny CLIK specification. https://aal.
mil/modular-payloads-uas/ Continuous Transformation: Transformation in Contact. Military Review. Gen. James E.
Rainey, U.S. Army. https://www. armyupress.
army. mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2024-OLE/Transformation-in-Contact/ Aviation Today. “Army Looks To Field Brigade UAS.
” https://www. aviationtoday. com/2025/08/21/after-ftuas-cut-army-looks-to-field-brigade-uas-in-fy-26-to-replace-shadow-drones/ KEYWORDS: UAS, UAV, Payloads, Modularity, Communications, Electronic Warfare, Signals Intelligence, Cargo Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology ASA(ALT) releases contract opportunities on an ad-hoc basis to meet Army research and development needs.
Army Futures Command (AFC) releases topics during three specific solicitation periods throughout the fiscal year to address the Army’s current and anticipated war-fighting technology needs. Army STTR follows AFC’s topic release schedule but partners with a university, federally funded research and development center, or a qualified non-profit research institution as part of their contract.
Is the opportunity to establish the scientific, technical, commercial merit and feasibility of your proposed innovation. Is focused on the development, demonstration and delivery of your innovation from Phase I. Represents the commercialization phase of the program in which the company can market their products or services developed in Phase II, either to the government or in the commercial sector.
Allows small businesses to submit to Direct to Phase II applications if they performed the Phase I research through other funding sources. Provides funding to projects that require additional funding during their open Phase II contract. A Phase II Awardee may receive one additional, sequential Phase II award to continue the work of an initial Phase II award.
The sequential Phase II award has the same guideline amounts and limits as an initial Phase II award.
Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (supply chain management, logistics coordination, target identifications and simulation) Advanced Materials and Manufacturing (additive manufacturing) Autonomy (unmanned systems, drones, ground vehicle capabilities) Chemical and Biological (detection, defense) Cyber (biometric authentication, secure communications) Electronics (microelectronics, Very-Large-Scale Integration (VLSI)) Electronic Warfare (jamming, spoofing) Human Performance (wearables) Immersive (augmented reality, virtual reality, mixed reality) Network Technologies (antennas, radio frequency, communications systems) Position, Navigation, and Timing (GPS) Power (batteries, generators) Software Modernization (high performance computing, data management and visualization) Sensors (infrared sensing) Weapons Systems (hypersonics, munitions and projectiles, directed energy)
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: Small businesses meeting SBIR eligibility requirements. Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates Up to $150,000 (Phase I) Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is May 13, 2026. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.
Army FUZE Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Initiatives is sponsored by U.S. Army. The U. S. Army has announced five distinct funding opportunities for small businesses through its Army FUZE SBIR and STTR initiatives, focusing on areas such as affordable Ka-Band radar solutions and Li-ion 6T battery innovations.
Affordable Ka-Band Metamaterial-Based Electronically Scanned Array Radar for Test and Training is sponsored by U.S. Army (Army FUZE SBIR/STTR Program). This Army SBIR topic seeks low-cost Ka-Band radar solutions through advancements in metamaterials to mimic the performance of an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA). This is relevant to XRComm Inc.'
Affordable Ka-Band Metamaterial-Based Electronically Scanned Array Radar for Test and Training (A254-049) is sponsored by U.S. Army (Army FUZE Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)). This topic seeks low-cost Ka-Band radar solutions through advancements in metamaterials to mimic the performance of an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) without the high cost. Software-related technologies and any other applicable advanced technologies should be analyzed and utilized.
ONR GlobalX AI for Advancing Maritime Security is a research and development solicitation from the Office of Naval Research that funds the development of artificial intelligence solutions for maritime security applications. The program seeks innovative AI technologies that can advance the state-of-the-art in naval and maritime threat detection, domain awareness, and autonomous systems for defense applications. Eligible applicants include commercial firms, academic institutions, and nonprofits capable of developing qualifying AI solutions; both US and international organizations may apply in some cases. Award amounts vary by project scope and are determined through BAA or NOFO solicitation review. There is no fixed deadline; solicitations are released periodically through ONR's Broad Agency Announcement process.
Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) is a federal grant program administered by FEMA through the Office of the Governor's Public Safety Office that funds enhanced border security cooperation among Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Border Patrol, and state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies. The program supports joint operations to secure land and water border routes, improve intelligence sharing, and expand 287(g) screening operations within correctional facilities. In 2025, the national priority is Supporting Border Crisis Response and Enforcement, covering training, operational coordination, and risk management. Eligible expenses include operational overtime costs, staffing support for screening activities, and training programs in immigration law, civil rights protections, and 287(g) procedures.