1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) is a grant from the Washington State Department of Commerce, funded through DOJ Byrne SCIP dollars, that supports strategies to reduce firearm violence by improving implementation and enforcement of court-ordered firearm surrender and prohibition laws.
The program focuses on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), domestic violence firearm removal protocols, and notifications to victims when firearms are returned. Eligible applicants include government agencies, nonprofit organizations, consultants, and researchers serving Washington State. At least 40% of awarded funds must be directed to local and tribal governments.
Total funding available is $3,000,000.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Washington State Department of Commerce (via DOJ Byrne SCIP funding)” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) – Washington State Department of Commerce 简体中文 ( Chinese (Simplified) ) 繁體中文 ( Chinese (Traditional) ) Tiếng Việt ( Vietnamese ) State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) Funding strategies to improve implementation and enforcement of laws for court-ordered firearm surrender and prohibitions.
The DOJ Byrne State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) is a comprehensive grant program that focuses on mitigating firearm violence-related risks and identifying connections between firearms and intimate partner abusers and mass violence, community violence and violence against law enforcement.
In recent years, the Washington Legislature has adopted and strengthened laws to address the possession of firearms by persons who are at risk to themselves or others: Authorizing Extreme Risk Protection Orders allowing family and household members or law enforcement to petition a court to temporarily remove firearms from a person who is a threat to self or others Requiring firearm dealers to notify law enforcement when an individual prohibited from firearm possession attempts to purchase firearms Mandating temporary removal of firearms and presenting firearms licensing and purchase history to the court when there is a 911 response to a domestic violence incident Requiring notification of victims before firearms are returned to a person formerly subject to an order or prohibition Strengthening firearms prohibitions and procedures for all types of civil protection orders These measures are constructed to safeguard the constitutional rights of an individual subject to their application.
Sustainable, comprehensive, and consistent implementation and enforcement of these laws is essential to their effectiveness. This requires concerted, coordinated, and timely actions taken by courts, law enforcement, victim advocates, prosecutors, and others working in and with the civil and criminal legal systems.
Research has increasingly identified connections between armed intimate partner abusers and mass violence, community violence, and violence against law enforcement. Suicides constitute almost 75% of firearm fatalities in Washington. For all of these types of lethal risks, one of the most important harm reduction measures is court orders that prohibit firearm possession by individuals who present a heightened risk of harm.
We know there are steps that can be taken to more effectively, timely, and uniformly issue, serve, and enforce those orders.
In SFY 2023, OFSVP distributed $1 million in state funds to support a suite of initial, time-limited projects to identify steps needed to improve the implementation and enforcement of Washington laws related to removing firearms from individuals and to issue, serve, and enforce court orders that prohibit firearm possession by individuals who present a heightened risk of harm to themselves or others such as Orders to Surrender and Prohibit Weapons (OTSWs) and Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs).
This initial investment confirmed that Washington needs to expand and invest in the adoption of best practices in training, policies, and implementation of firearm relinquishment programs and in making sure system partners and families have access to accurate and accessible information.
Building on the foundational analysis and recommendations developed with the state funding, in the coming years, OFSVP will invest in next steps to improve the implementation and enforcement of Washington laws related to firearms relinquishment and prohibitions using U.S. Department of Justice funding from the Byrne State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) created under the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act adopted by Congress in 2022.
SCIP is designed to assist state, local, and tribal efforts to prevent or reduce crime and violence, with a particular focus on gun violence and the implementation of extreme risk protection orders in particular.
This federal opportunity provides our state with a timely and badly needed opportunity to improve on current efforts to mitigate firearm-related risks through improved use of court orders that prohibit firearm possession by individuals who present a heightened risk of harm. The SCIP program will run for at least five years.
Through grant processes, subawards will be made from the Department of Commerce to government agencies, nonprofit organizations, consultants, researchers, and other qualifying entities, building on efforts already started in the state. At least 40% of the funding will be passed through to local and tribal governments. Washington has been awarded $5.
2 million for FFY 22-23, and an additional $3 million for FFY 24. The state is expected to receive an additional $3 million in FFY 25 and FFY 26 respectively. Under the guidance of an advisory committee, this funding will be directed at improving the implementation of our protection order laws, and — specifically — carrying out the recommendations coming out of FFY 2023 efforts.
In the state of Washington, SCIP funding will be specifically focused on improving the implementation and enforcement of protection order laws that can keep firearms out of the hands of those who pose a threat to themselves or others.
Washington’s Byrne SCIP is designed around the following five program areas: SCIP allocates funding across five key program areas to promote public safety, support community collaboration, and ensure the success of gun violence prevention efforts. While exact funding amounts may vary with the onboarding of new organizations, each area is resourced to make meaningful progress toward its goals. Policies and training using best practices.
Public and system partner education, outreach and tools. Multi-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional approaches. Securing, storing, and tracking relinquished firearms.
Research, data collection, and evaluation.
Policies and training using best practices One of the most important ways that criminal and civil legal systems and communities can effectively reduce lethal violence and other threats of harm is by using best practices to remove firearms from domestic violence scenes and to issue, serve, and enforce court orders that prohibit firearm possession by individuals who present heightened risk of harm such as Orders to Surrender and Prohibit Weapons and Extreme Risk Protection Orders.
Additional training across system partners – particularly law enforcement agencies, courts, and prosecutors’ offices – is important to successful implementation and enforcement of laws, including swift and comprehensive relinquishment of weapons.
Public and system partner education, outreach, and tools Subject matter experts and communications specialists can help to develop and distribute current, consistent, accurate, and easy to use information and online tools; develop public service announcements and public education campaigns using trusted messengers to increase public understanding about and use of laws and change behavior; and provide technical assistance.
Audiences include petitioners, respondents, health care professionals, educators and school personnel, crisis responders, dispatchers handling 988 calls, victims service providers, advocates, court personnel, law enforcement or others involved in increasing awareness of, explaining, seeking, serving and complying with or enforcing Washington’s civil laws involving court-ordered firearm relinquishment.
Multi-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional approaches Some Washington state jurisdictions have implemented multi-disciplinary and/or multi-jurisdictional approaches to issue, serve, and enforce firearm relinquishment orders. Some law enforcement agencies have created specialized units with expertise, training and designated personnel assigned to serve and enforce the orders.
Some courts have created protection order and compliance calendars focused on these cases or added use of system navigators. These models, or aspects or variations of these models, can be scaled up, replicated or modified in additional communities across the state to incorporate reforms in state law and help meet local needs.
Securing, storing, and tracking relinquished firearms This program area builds on programs to safely secure, store, track and return relinquished guns and programs to support gun storage.
Research, data collection, and evaluation This program area focuses on research, data collection, and evaluation of processes and outcomes to improve the understanding and effectiveness of the implementation and enforcement of court-ordered firearm relinquishment. There is a need for better quality data and infrastructure to support comprehensive and consistent reporting that will better support research and evaluation efforts.
Research can also help inform the future distribution of SCIP funds and recommendations for additional systemic improvements in the implementation and enforcement of laws involving firearm relinquishment. Documents and publications Department of Justice resources DOJ SCIP FAQ Document (PDF) DOJ SCIP Presentation (PDF) – Dec.
9, 2022 Documents and information Washington state Protection Orders Resource Website Protection orders and victim support , King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office Extreme Risk Protection Order Support, King County Prosecuting Attorney Office File for a Protection Order | Printable Packet , Northwest Justice Project Protection Orders | Snohomish County, WA Understanding Protection Orders, Washington Courts Extreme Risk Protection Order Resources (jhu.
edu) Washington-specific ERPO Resource (jhu. edu) Washington Domestic Violence Firearm Prohibition Resources (disarmdv. org) The National ERPO Resource Center – Primary Page The National ERPO Resource Center – Washington state News stories and academic articles The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, 1 Year Later Firearm Restrictions in Domestic Violence Protection Orders Red Flag Laws Are Saving Lives.
They Could Save More . Stateline, Matt Vasilogambros – Oct.
5, 2021 Research Needs Related To Firearm Rights Restoration , Commentary, Kafka, et al – Jan 5, 2024 Suicide-related behavior and firearm access among perpetrators of domestic violence subject to domestic violence protection order, Prevention Medicine Reports, Dalve et al – Jan 2024 SCIP Advisory Board Members Kathleen Harvey, Executive Director of OFSVP, co-Chair Judge Anne Levinson, (Ret.)
, co-Chair Judge Jackie Shea Brown, Benton-Franklin Superior Court Adam Cornell, Snohomish Co. Prosecuting Attorney (Ret.)
Robert Goetz, Police Chief, City of Everett Police Department Melisa Evangelos, JD, Assistant Director Tacoma Probono Community Lawyers Renee Hopkins, CEO Alliance for Gun Responsibility Jolaine Joseph, Educational Psychologist and Survivor Ali Rowhani-Rahbar, MD, PhD, MPH, UW Professor of Epidemiology Chief Judge Cindy K.
Smith, Suquamish Tribal Court Kim Wyatt, ERPO Prosecuting Attorney, Regional Domestic Violence Firearms Enforcement Unit, King Co. Publicsafetyteam@commerce. wa.
gov
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: Government agencies, nonprofit organizations, consultants, researchers, and other qualifying entities serving Washington State; at least 40% must be directed to local and tribal governments. Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates $3,000,000 Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.