1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) is a grant from the Washington State Department of Commerce, funded through DOJ Byrne SCIP dollars, that supports strategies to reduce firearm violence by improving implementation and enforcement of court-ordered firearm surrender and prohibition laws.
The program focuses on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), domestic violence firearm removal protocols, and notifications to victims when firearms are returned. Eligible applicants include government agencies, nonprofit organizations, consultants, and researchers serving Washington State. At least 40% of awarded funds must be directed to local and tribal governments.
Total funding available is $3,000,000.
Get alerted about grants like this
Get emailed when new opportunities from “Washington State Department of Commerce (via DOJ Byrne SCIP funding)” or related funders appear. Free, weekly, unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) – Washington State Department of Commerce 简体中文 ( Chinese (Simplified) ) 繁體中文 ( Chinese (Traditional) ) Tiếng Việt ( Vietnamese ) State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) Funding strategies to improve implementation and enforcement of laws for court-ordered firearm surrender and prohibitions.
The DOJ Byrne State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) is a comprehensive grant program that focuses on mitigating firearm violence-related risks and identifying connections between firearms and intimate partner abusers and mass violence, community violence and violence against law enforcement.
In recent years, the Washington Legislature has adopted and strengthened laws to address the possession of firearms by persons who are at risk to themselves or others: Authorizing Extreme Risk Protection Orders allowing family and household members or law enforcement to petition a court to temporarily remove firearms from a person who is a threat to self or others Requiring firearm dealers to notify law enforcement when an individual prohibited from firearm possession attempts to purchase firearms Mandating temporary removal of firearms and presenting firearms licensing and purchase history to the court when there is a 911 response to a domestic violence incident Requiring notification of victims before firearms are returned to a person formerly subject to an order or prohibition Strengthening firearms prohibitions and procedures for all types of civil protection orders These measures are constructed to safeguard the constitutional rights of an individual subject to their application.
Sustainable, comprehensive, and consistent implementation and enforcement of these laws is essential to their effectiveness. This requires concerted, coordinated, and timely actions taken by courts, law enforcement, victim advocates, prosecutors, and others working in and with the civil and criminal legal systems.
Research has increasingly identified connections between armed intimate partner abusers and mass violence, community violence, and violence against law enforcement. Suicides constitute almost 75% of firearm fatalities in Washington. For all of these types of lethal risks, one of the most important harm reduction measures is court orders that prohibit firearm possession by individuals who present a heightened risk of harm.
We know there are steps that can be taken to more effectively, timely, and uniformly issue, serve, and enforce those orders.
In SFY 2023, OFSVP distributed $1 million in state funds to support a suite of initial, time-limited projects to identify steps needed to improve the implementation and enforcement of Washington laws related to removing firearms from individuals and to issue, serve, and enforce court orders that prohibit firearm possession by individuals who present a heightened risk of harm to themselves or others such as Orders to Surrender and Prohibit Weapons (OTSWs) and Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs).
This initial investment confirmed that Washington needs to expand and invest in the adoption of best practices in training, policies, and implementation of firearm relinquishment programs and in making sure system partners and families have access to accurate and accessible information.
Building on the foundational analysis and recommendations developed with the state funding, in the coming years, OFSVP will invest in next steps to improve the implementation and enforcement of Washington laws related to firearms relinquishment and prohibitions using U.S. Department of Justice funding from the Byrne State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) created under the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act adopted by Congress in 2022.
SCIP is designed to assist state, local, and tribal efforts to prevent or reduce crime and violence, with a particular focus on gun violence and the implementation of extreme risk protection orders in particular.
This federal opportunity provides our state with a timely and badly needed opportunity to improve on current efforts to mitigate firearm-related risks through improved use of court orders that prohibit firearm possession by individuals who present a heightened risk of harm. The SCIP program will run for at least five years.
Through grant processes, subawards will be made from the Department of Commerce to government agencies, nonprofit organizations, consultants, researchers, and other qualifying entities, building on efforts already started in the state. At least 40% of the funding will be passed through to local and tribal governments. Washington has been awarded $5.
2 million for FFY 22-23, and an additional $3 million for FFY 24. The state is expected to receive an additional $3 million in FFY 25 and FFY 26 respectively. Under the guidance of an advisory committee, this funding will be directed at improving the implementation of our protection order laws, and — specifically — carrying out the recommendations coming out of FFY 2023 efforts.
In the state of Washington, SCIP funding will be specifically focused on improving the implementation and enforcement of protection order laws that can keep firearms out of the hands of those who pose a threat to themselves or others.
Washington’s Byrne SCIP is designed around the following five program areas: SCIP allocates funding across five key program areas to promote public safety, support community collaboration, and ensure the success of gun violence prevention efforts. While exact funding amounts may vary with the onboarding of new organizations, each area is resourced to make meaningful progress toward its goals. Policies and training using best practices.
Public and system partner education, outreach and tools. Multi-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional approaches. Securing, storing, and tracking relinquished firearms.
Research, data collection, and evaluation.
Policies and training using best practices One of the most important ways that criminal and civil legal systems and communities can effectively reduce lethal violence and other threats of harm is by using best practices to remove firearms from domestic violence scenes and to issue, serve, and enforce court orders that prohibit firearm possession by individuals who present heightened risk of harm such as Orders to Surrender and Prohibit Weapons and Extreme Risk Protection Orders.
Additional training across system partners – particularly law enforcement agencies, courts, and prosecutors’ offices – is important to successful implementation and enforcement of laws, including swift and comprehensive relinquishment of weapons.
Public and system partner education, outreach, and tools Subject matter experts and communications specialists can help to develop and distribute current, consistent, accurate, and easy to use information and online tools; develop public service announcements and public education campaigns using trusted messengers to increase public understanding about and use of laws and change behavior; and provide technical assistance.
Audiences include petitioners, respondents, health care professionals, educators and school personnel, crisis responders, dispatchers handling 988 calls, victims service providers, advocates, court personnel, law enforcement or others involved in increasing awareness of, explaining, seeking, serving and complying with or enforcing Washington’s civil laws involving court-ordered firearm relinquishment.
Multi-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional approaches Some Washington state jurisdictions have implemented multi-disciplinary and/or multi-jurisdictional approaches to issue, serve, and enforce firearm relinquishment orders. Some law enforcement agencies have created specialized units with expertise, training and designated personnel assigned to serve and enforce the orders.
Some courts have created protection order and compliance calendars focused on these cases or added use of system navigators. These models, or aspects or variations of these models, can be scaled up, replicated or modified in additional communities across the state to incorporate reforms in state law and help meet local needs.
Securing, storing, and tracking relinquished firearms This program area builds on programs to safely secure, store, track and return relinquished guns and programs to support gun storage.
Research, data collection, and evaluation This program area focuses on research, data collection, and evaluation of processes and outcomes to improve the understanding and effectiveness of the implementation and enforcement of court-ordered firearm relinquishment. There is a need for better quality data and infrastructure to support comprehensive and consistent reporting that will better support research and evaluation efforts.
Research can also help inform the future distribution of SCIP funds and recommendations for additional systemic improvements in the implementation and enforcement of laws involving firearm relinquishment. Documents and publications Department of Justice resources DOJ SCIP FAQ Document (PDF) DOJ SCIP Presentation (PDF) – Dec.
9, 2022 Documents and information Washington state Protection Orders Resource Website Protection orders and victim support , King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office Extreme Risk Protection Order Support, King County Prosecuting Attorney Office File for a Protection Order | Printable Packet , Northwest Justice Project Protection Orders | Snohomish County, WA Understanding Protection Orders, Washington Courts Extreme Risk Protection Order Resources (jhu.
edu) Washington-specific ERPO Resource (jhu. edu) Washington Domestic Violence Firearm Prohibition Resources (disarmdv. org) The National ERPO Resource Center – Primary Page The National ERPO Resource Center – Washington state News stories and academic articles The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, 1 Year Later Firearm Restrictions in Domestic Violence Protection Orders Red Flag Laws Are Saving Lives.
They Could Save More . Stateline, Matt Vasilogambros – Oct.
5, 2021 Research Needs Related To Firearm Rights Restoration , Commentary, Kafka, et al – Jan 5, 2024 Suicide-related behavior and firearm access among perpetrators of domestic violence subject to domestic violence protection order, Prevention Medicine Reports, Dalve et al – Jan 2024 SCIP Advisory Board Members Kathleen Harvey, Executive Director of OFSVP, co-Chair Judge Anne Levinson, (Ret.)
, co-Chair Judge Jackie Shea Brown, Benton-Franklin Superior Court Adam Cornell, Snohomish Co. Prosecuting Attorney (Ret.)
Robert Goetz, Police Chief, City of Everett Police Department Melisa Evangelos, JD, Assistant Director Tacoma Probono Community Lawyers Renee Hopkins, CEO Alliance for Gun Responsibility Jolaine Joseph, Educational Psychologist and Survivor Ali Rowhani-Rahbar, MD, PhD, MPH, UW Professor of Epidemiology Chief Judge Cindy K.
Smith, Suquamish Tribal Court Kim Wyatt, ERPO Prosecuting Attorney, Regional Domestic Violence Firearms Enforcement Unit, King Co. Publicsafetyteam@commerce. wa.
gov
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Government agencies, nonprofit organizations, consultants, researchers, and other qualifying entities serving Washington State; at least 40% must be directed to local and tribal governments. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows $3,000,000. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
State Crisis Intervention Program (SCIP) is funded by Washington State Department of Commerce (via DOJ Byrne SCIP funding). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Washington. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
The Department of Defense FY2026 Defense University Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) provides funding for U.S. universities to acquire research equipment and instrumentation in areas important to national defense, including AI and machine learning hardware. The program is administered jointly by the Army Research Office (ARO), Office of Naval Research (ONR), and Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR), with approximately $34 million available and 95 awards anticipated. DURIP funds the acquisition of specialized computing hardware for AI/ML research (GPU clusters, TPUs, neuromorphic processors), robotics and autonomous systems testbeds, sensor arrays and data collection systems for machine learning training, high-performance computing infrastructure for defense-relevant AI research, and laboratory equipment for human-AI interaction studies. The program specifically supports equipment that enhances research-related education in DoD-priority disciplines. While general-purpose computing is not eligible, computing equipment directly supporting DoD-relevant AI research programs qualifies. No cost sharing is required.
Vinnova, Sweden's national innovation agency, funds projects developing applied AI solutions for Swedish industry through its Advanced Digitalization Programme. Each project can apply for between 2 and 10 million SEK (approximately $190,000 to $950,000 USD) covering up to 50% of eligible project costs. The total call budget is 60 million SEK. Projects run for 12-24 months and focus on two key areas: Intelligent Edge (AI for real-time application in the sensor chain) and AI-based decision support. All projects must address industrial needs and integrate gender equality and climate change perspectives. Scientific publications must be open access. A parallel call also funds AI and cybersecurity projects at 1-10 million SEK per project with a 50 million SEK total budget.
In January 2026, DOE Policy Flash PF-2026-30 wiped out every 15% and 10% indirect cost cap the administration had imposed in 2025 — because H.R. 6938 ordered it to. The same law froze indirect policy at NSF, Commerce and NASA. But OMB's sweeping new grants rule quietly reopens the fight through the back door. Here is what changed, what money recipients can claw back, and how to protect your indirect recovery going forward.
Read articleThe DOJ Bureau of Justice Assistance FY2026 Project Safe Neighborhoods formula program anticipates $19 million with a $1 million award ceiling and a requirement that 30% of funds support gang task forces. With a Grants.gov deadline of August 20, 2026, here is how the formula pass-through actually works, why the U.S. Attorney and the state administering agency both matter, and how community-based partners get funded.
Read articleThe Justice Department's new Model Cities Initiative will hand 2 to 4 American cities roughly $300 million in 36-month cooperative agreements to rebuild public safety from the ground up. Applications are due September 1, 2026. The catch that will decide who wins: this is not a police grant, a prosecutor grant, or a behavioral-health grant. It is a single citywide proposal that has to braid all of them together. Here is who is eligible, what the money actually funds, and how a mayor's office should build a proposal that survives DOJ review.
Read article