TRADE community reentry program is sponsored by Center for People in Need. This program helps current and formerly incarcerated individuals in Nebraska find employment and reestablish themselves in the community.

A **. gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

* How to Apply for Grants * **Applicant Resources** * Adobe Software Compatibility * Submitting UTF-8 Special Characters * Encountering Error Messages * Grantor Standard Language * Submitting UTF-8 Special Characters * **Applicant System-To-System** * Reference Implementation * **Grantor System-To-System** * Reference Implementation * SF-424 Individual Family * SF-424 Mandatory Family * SF-424 Short Organization Family * Post-Award Reporting Forms * Country and State Lists Updates * **Manage Subscriptions** * Program Management Office * Grants.

gov Maintenance Calendar Community Reentry Settings Initiative National Institute of Corrections Document Type:Grants Notice Funding Opportunity Number:26CS06 Funding Opportunity Title:Community Reentry Settings Initiative Opportunity Category:Other Opportunity Category Explanation:Establish a process evaluation framework tailored for state Department of Corrections agencies to facilitate a systematic and in-depth examination of the decision-making involved in releasing incarcerated individuals to halfway houses and reentry centers.

Funding Instrument Type:Cooperative Agreement Category of Funding Activity:Other (see text field entitled "Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity" for clarification) Category Explanation:Establish a process evaluation framework specifically tailored for state Department of Corrections (DOC) agencies to facilitate a systematic and in-depth examination of the decision-making processes involved in releasing incarcerated individuals to halfway houses and reentry centers.

Expected Number of Awards:1 Assistance Listings:16.

602 -- Corrections Research and Evaluation and Policy Formulation Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement:No Last Updated Date:Mar 06, 2026 Original Closing Date for Applications:May 04, 2026 Current Closing Date for Applications:May 04, 2026 Archive Date:Jun 03, 2026 Estimated Total Program Funding:$ 100,000 Eligible Applicants:Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification) Additional Information on Eligibility:NIC invites applications from nonprofit organizations (including faith-based, community, and tribal organizations), for-profit organizations (including tribal for-profit organizations), and institutions of higher education (including tribal institutions of higher education).

Recipients, including for-profit organizations, must agree to waive any profit or fee for services. Foreign governments, international organizations, and non-governmental international organizations/institutions are not eligible to apply. Proof of 501(c) (3) status as determined by the Internal Revenue Service or an authorizing tribal resolution is required.

NIC welcomes applications that involve two or more entities; however, one eligible entity must be the applicant, and the others must be proposed as subrecipients. The applicant must be the entity with primary responsibility for administering the funding and managing the entire program. Only one application will be accepted from a submitting organization.

## Additional Information Agency Name:National Institute of Corrections Description:The release decision-making process is crucial to the criminal justice system and should be intentional and deliberate. Reentry decisions should consider factors such as the inmate’s risk, needs and responsivity (RNR) principles and community safety concerns.

There has been some attention surrounding the utilization of halfway houses but, additional assessment and review is needed to understand the current state of halfway house utilization and make transformational changes that supports successful reentry outcomes in halfway houses. The questions to explore are simple and complex.

For example, what and how is criteria (risk assessments, protective factors, etc.) used in the decision-making process from prison to halfway house; how are case managers planning for halfway house release with their residents; what does the “hand-off” from prisons officials to halfway house organizations entail; how are the community, business, education and other public or non-profit entities involved in this release process to halfway house and; what is the continuum of support/care provided during their reentry/transition period at half-way houses (e.g., employment, life skills, mental health, substance use).

These are some of the broad questions this work seeks to answer. One notable dynamic to explore in the decision-making processes involves the tension between discretionary authority and standardized procedures. Multiple sources highlight that release decisions involve "discretionary judgment", and key actors like wardens, community corrections managers, and case managers are the final decision makers.

How each of these actors makes decisions varies, leaving the possibility of subjective judgment in the process. Simultaneously, there are explicit legal mandates, state statutes, and zoning requirements that outline specific criteria, timelines, and procedures for release to halfway houses.

While policies and assessment tools aim for consistency, fairness, and evidence-based decision making, the space where discretion exists can lead to variations in which individuals are being considered for release. This human factor introduces the potential for inconsistencies in eligibility determinations, or deviations from the policy and program criteria/design or inconsistent application of policy and procedures.

This points to the dilemma between discretionary release practices versus standardized releasing decision-making. Therefore, a process evaluation created should be conducted to understand currently how discretion is applied within defined policy parameters.

Dynamics to understand include: are policies consistently applied across different unit teams, case managers, or community corrections boards; are there informal norms or unwritten rules that influence decisions more than formal policy; what are the perceived trade-offs between strict adherence to policy and the flexibility needed for individualized case management?

The primary objective is to systematically examine the current decision-making point governing the process of prison residents release to halfway houses. This process evaluation should aim to illuminate the operational realities and challenges in order for NIC to discern how those underlying factors can be changed and improved upon.

By focusing on the “why” and “how” of this decision point, we will better understand halfway house placement implementation. Please note, this is NOT a funding opportunity to plan, establish, revise, fund, staff or build a halfway house in any community.

Link to Additional Information:NIC Website Grantor Contact Information:If you have difficulty accessing the full announcement electronically, please contact: Grant Management Specialist Form and application information #### Health & Human Services * Frequently Asked Questions ## Your session will expire in 3 minutes. To continue working, click on the "OK" button below. This is being done to protect your privacy.

Unsaved changes will be lost.