1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsWeighted Vote Calculation Guide is sponsored by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania state grant opportunity: Weighted Vote Calculation Guide.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Commonwealth of Pennsylvania” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
________________________________________________________________________ As a courtesy, the Governor’s Center for Local Government Services will make available to each Tax Collection District, model weighted vote calculation spreadsheets. The sheets will automatically calculate the weighted vote once the municipal and school district EIT revenues are entered in the designated columns on the spreadsheet.
The financial data needed for the calculation of the weighted vote will come from two sources: the Department of Community and Economic Development and the Department of Education. The Municipal Financial Data needed for the calculation of the weighted vote can be obtained from the Department of Community and Economic Development’s web site at the following link: http://munstatspa. dced.
state. pa. us/Reports.
aspx Under “Annual Financial Report”, look for “Statewide Municipal Financial Information:” and click on the link for “2008”. The Department of Community and Economic Development publishes prior year financial information in May of each year. You will need data from the following columns on the statewide financial spreadsheet: 1.
Earned Income Tax Revenues 2. Census Population Data* *Note that the Census Population data will not be updated until 2011. Therefore, there will be no change in census population data for the 2010 weighted vote calculation.
School District Financial Data The 2008-2009 School District financial data can be found at the Department of Education’s web site at the following link: http://www. portal. state.
pa. us/portal/server. pt/community/summaries_of_annual_financial_report_data/7673/afr_excel_data_fil es/509047 Under “2008-2009”, click on the link for “Act 1/Act 511/First Class SD Taxes”.
The Department of Education publishes prior year financial information in May of each year. You will need data from the following three columns on the spreadsheet: 1. Act 511 EIT 6151 2.
Act 1 EIT 6131 3.
1st Class EIT IA B C D E F G H I L BY IMunicipality Municipality Municipality Id County Name Reporting Year Total Revenue s Total E xc ess/Deficit Revenues Earned Income Name Class expenditures of Revenues Ta xOver 3 N BORO Borouqh 10033 ADAMS 2008 275657 270953 4704 64837 4 E BORO Borouqh 10063 ADAMS 2008 528516 412998 115518 69221 5 E BORO Borouqh 10093 ADAMS 2008 312414 310472 1942 50701 6 TWP Township 10125 ADAMS 2008 1231159 927421 303738 241842 7 BORO Borouqh 10153 ADAMS 2008 1133868 765889 367979 95766 8 E BORO Borouqh 10183 ADAMS 2008 470081 410486 59595 123555 Instructions for Updating the Weighted Vote Calculation Spreadsheet Download the 2008 Municipal Financial Data from the Municipal Statistics website at the following link: http://munstatspa.
dced. state. pa.
us/Reports. aspx Under “Annual Financial Report”, look for “Statewide Municipal Financial Information:” and click on the link for “2008”. Because the spreadsheet is so large, some of the columns were hidden in the screenshot below, in order to capture the columns needed for calculating the municipality portion of the weighted vote.
The spreadsheet is sorted alphabetically by county and then alphabetically by municipality within each county. You will only need the earned income tax revenue information for the municipalities listed on your model weighted vote spreadsheet. This information can be found in the column titled “Earned Income Tax” on the 2008 Statewide Municipal Financial Information download.
1 + ••························································· 7 ADAMS EAST BERLI\J SORO 8 ADAMS HAMILTON TVVP 9 ADAMS HUNTINGTOM TWP 10 ADAMS LATIMORE TVVP 11 ADAMS READING lWP 12 ADAMS YORK SPRINGS SORO 13 ••••••••••••••••• to Ni:WA M 'ilAlli:Y so.
> 14 ADAMS ABBOTTSTOWN SORO 15 ADAMS BERWICKl\'VP 16 ADAMS BONNEAUVILLE SORO 17 ADAMS CONEWAGO TWP 18 ADAMS HAMILTON TVVP 19 ADAMS MCSHERRYSTOWN SORO 20 ADAMS MT PLEASANT TWP 21 ADAMS NEW OXFORD SORO 22 ADAMS OXFORD l\l\lP 23 ADAMS STRABAN l\'VP 24 ADAMS TYRONE l\l\lP 25 ••••••••••••••••• F. AIRFill:Ul 4Rl1A S. I!
>> 26 ADAMS CARROLL VALLEY SORO 27 ADAMS FAIRFIELD EORO 28 ADAMS HAMILTONBAN TWP 29 ADAMS LIBERTY l\l\lP 31 ADAMS CUMBERLAtJD TWP 32 ADAMS FRANKLIN TWP 33 ADAMS FREEDOM TVVP " • • " t\ Sheetl ,( Sheet2 ,( Sheet3 / # •••••••••••••• ~11~tM~~•••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••• ·············· ..
··•::•· 1,365 22 2,233 2,528 5,106 574 905 1,818 238 5,709 2,022 2,691 2,581 1,696 4,876 227 341 3,291 486 2,216 1 Uh:I 5,718 4,590 844 #DIV/'O! 0. 75% #DIV/'O!
#DIV/'O! 0. 01% #DIV/'O!
#DIV/01 1. 22% #DIV/01 #DIV/'O! 138% #DIV/'O!
#DIV/'O! 2. 80% #DIV/'O!
#DIV/'O! 0. 31% #DIV/'O!
#DIV/'O! 0. 50% #DIV/'O!
#DIV/'O! 100% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O!
0. 13% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O!
3. 13% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O!
1. 11% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O!
1. 47% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O!
1. 41% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O!
0. 93% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O!
2. 67% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O!
0. 12% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O!
0. 19% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O!
180% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O! 0.
27% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O! 1.
21% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O! 0.
58% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O! 3.
13% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O! 2.
51% #DIV/'O! #DIV/'O! 0.
46% #DIV/'O! . l <i ll Dtaw • ~ 1AytoShapes- '-.
" D O ~ 4J ~) la] BH & • ,Ii:. • ,a • ;;;;;; §. :::; (j M - ---+---+----+----+--#DIV/'O!
0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/01 0 0 #DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O!
0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O!
0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O!
0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O!
0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O!
0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O!
0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0#DIV/'O!
0 0#DIV/'O! 0 0 The earned income tax revenue from the 2008 Statewide Municipal Financial Information download is placed in the “Municipal EIT Revenue” column of the model weighted vote spreadsheet for the corresponding county and municipality.
- + ••························································· 7 ADAMS EAST BERLIN SORO 8 ADAMS HAMILTON lWP 9 ADAMS HUNTINGTON lWP 10 ADAMS LATIMORE lWP 11 ADAMS READING lWP 12 ADAMS YORK SPRINGS SORO 13 ••••••••••••••••• to tli:WAG o. 'ilAlli:Y so.
:••' 14 ADAMS ABBOTTSTOWN SORO 15 ADAMS BERWICKlWP 16 ADAMS BONNEAUVILLE SORO 17 ADAMS CONEWAGO lWP 18 ADAMS HAMILTON lWP 19 ADAMS MCSHERRYSTOWN SORO 20 ADAMS MT PLEASANT lWP 21 ADAMS NEW OXFORD SORO 22 ADAMS OXFORD lWP 23 ADAMS STRABAN lWP 24 ADAMS TYRONE lWP 25 ••••••••••••••••• F. I\JRF. IEUl MEA S.
Ii > 26 ADAMS CARROLL VALLEY SORO 27 ADAMS FAIRFIELD SORO 28 ADAMS HAMILTONBAN lWP ••••••••••••••••••iwAivlS. :i J ~•••••••••••• ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, '= ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, •••••••••••••• ~i;i~li. if>A(it(~$ ••• ::..
••••••••••••••••••••••••••• I •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• '''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''' '' '•' •MONi t li"Al • •l •' •' •MONi t li"Al ••' • •' •• t 6. tAf. • •'' [~Ir.
v. ~! E.
'. J fj;j/ J. •..
JA(l~j(:I~,,£ •• j;j fop. o. jfriO NAl j;jfop.
o. jfri ONAl MUNiciP. :Al ...
-✓ ~~E ko. iiuilkifoti •• flf Piev. iitiuF f o piJtJAriorf v.
off $140 725 1,365 22 2,233 2,528 5,106 574 905 1,818 238 5,709 2,022 2,691 2,581 1,696 4,876 227 341 3,291 486 2,216 100. 00% 0. 75% 100.
75% 0. 00% 0. 01% 0.
01% 0. 00% 1. 22% 1.
22% 0. 00% 138% 138% 0. 00% 2.
80% 2. 80% 0. 00% 0.
31% 0. 31% 0. 00% 0.
50% 0. 50% 0. 00% 100% 100% 0.
00% 0. 13% 0. 13% 0.
00% 3. 13% 3. 13% 0.
00% 1. 11% 1. 11% 0.
00% 1. 47% 1. 47% 0.
00% 1. 41% 1. 41% 0.
00% 0. 93% 0. 93% 0.
00% 2. 67% 2. 67% 0.
00% 0. 12% 0. 12% 0.
00% 0. 19% 0. 19% 0.
00% 180% 180% 0. 00% 0. 27% 0.
27% 0. 00% 1. 21% 1.
21% 29 ADAMS LIBERTY lWP 1 rn:;ci 0. 00% 0. 58% 0.
58% 31 ADAMS CUMBERLAND lWP 5,718 0. 00% 3. 13% 3.
13% > 'Y"I Ar. A c::' ~OA Ml. ~Ll .
b. LTI J:V _D_ " • • • 'I Sheetl ,< Sheet2 ;( Sheet3 n nno ## ll Dtaw • ~ 1AytoShapes- '-. " D O ~ 4J ~) la] BH & • ,Ii:.
• ,a • ;;;;;; §. :::; (j M - ---+----f-----f----+--- 1•••••••••••••••••••• 50. 37% 0 00.
01% 0 00. 61% 0 00. 69% 0 01.
40% 0 00. 16% 0 00. 25% 0 00.
50% 0 00. 07% 0 01. 56% 0 00.
55% 0 00. 74% 0 00. 71% 0 00.
46% 0 0134% 0 00. 06% 0 00. 09% 0 00.
90% 0 00. 13% 0 00. 61% 0 00.
29% 0 0\ :::::::::::::::::: :::::::::: ::::::::: ::::: :::::::::::::: 1. 57% 0 0 The spread sheet will automatically calculate the numbers in the “Weighted Vote” column.
As you enter the revenues on the spreadsheet for each municipality in the “Municipal EIT Revenue” column of the model weighted vote spreadsheet, the numbers in the “Municipal Proportional EIT Revenue” column, the “Total Municipal Vote” column and the “Weighted Vote” column will change. This is because the formula in these columns is based on total revenue. See the screen shot below.
Questions Regarding the 2008 Municipal Financial Download The Department of Community and Economic Development releases municipality annual financial information by May of each year. For additional information, please contact: Karen O’Neill | Municipal Statistics Office, Governor’s Center for Local Government Services at 1-888-223-6837 or email: karoneill@state. pa.
us I I I1 st Class Act 5 11 Earned Earned Act 1 Earne d In co m e Incom e 1 A UN Sc hool Di st ri ct Coun ty Incom e 6131 61 51 6161 2 112011103 Bermudian Springs SD Adams $1 ,503 ,003 . 06 3 112011603 Conewago Valley SD Adams $5,148,928. 00 4 112013054 Fairfield Area SD Adams $1,651,577.
72 5 112013753 Gettysburg Area SD Adams $5,127,083. 34 G 112015203 Littlestown Area SD Adams $1,402,809 . 14 7 112018523 Upper Adams SD Adams $2.
298. 271 . 85 8 103020603 Allegheny Valley SD Allegheny $683,038.
60 9 103020753 A vonworth SD Allegheny $1 ,577 ,535 . 20 10 103021102 Baldwin-\1\Jhitehall SD Allegheny $3,111,931. 00 11 103021252 Bethel Park SD Allegheny $3 .
799 , 391 . 00 12 103021453 Brentwood Borough SD Alleghen y $707 ,31 6 . 82 13 103021603 Carlynton SD Allegheny $1 .
267 . 211 . 91 14 103021752 Chartiers Valley SD Allegheny $3,448,420.
99 15 103021903 Clairton City SD Allegheny $276,276. 00 16 103022103 Cornell SD Allegheny $31 9,597 . 00 School District Financial Data Download the 2008-2009 School District financial data from the PA Department of Education website at the following link: http://www.
portal. state. pa.
us/portal/server. pt/community/summaries_of_annual_financial_report_data/7673/afr_excel_data_fil es/509047 Under “2008-2009”, click on the link for “Act 1/Acti 511/First Class SD Taxes”. Because the spreadsheet is so large, some of the columns were hidden in the screenshot below, in order to capture the columns needed for calculating the school district portion of the weighted vote.
The spreadsheet is sorted alphabetically by county and then alphabetically by school district within each county. You will only need the revenue information for the school districts listed on your model weighted vote spreadsheet. The School District earned income revenue data is obtained from three columns on this spreadsheet: 1.
Act 1 Earned Income 6131 2. Act 511 Earned Income 6151 3. 1 st Class Earned Income 6161 1>-- ADAMS TCD 2 + .
••························································ •••••••••••••• ~lt:ltM~~•••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••• ················••1••············· ''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''' •• ••• )1tONi t 1i"Al •••• •••• )1tONi t 1i"Al •••• •••• t 6. ll\t• ••• Mti~id~,,F Mti~id~iJ •• P. ifofoiitiONAl P.
ifofoiitiONAl MUNiciP. Al ifrrRfYENUE P. O.
P:UlATI QN •• flTREV. ENUE P: O. P.
iJUriotf v. oft) 48 ADAMS BIGLERVILLE SORO 1,101 #OIV/'O! 0.
60% #OIV/'O! #OIV/'O! 0 049 ADAMS BUTLER lWP 2,678 #OIV/'O!
1. 47% #OIV/'O! #OIV/'O!
0 050 ADAMS MENALLEN lWP 2,974 #OIV/'O! 1. 63% #OIV/'O!
#OIV/'O! 0 051 ADAMS TYRONE lWP 1 ,932 #OIV/'O! 106% #OIV/'O!
#OIV/'O! 0 052 53 TO TAL S $0 91,292 #DIV/0! 50 % #DIV/0!
~ 1 ••·······························································•·N················· iWAl'iliittP••:····· . ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 55 i~llJ! 1!
ftD.! S1Ri¢TV 57 ADAMS BERMUDIAN SPRINGS SD 11 ,828 #OIV/'O! 6.
48% #OIV/'O! #OIV/'O! 0 058 ADAMS CONEWAGO VALLEY SD 23,104 #OIV/'O!
12. 65% #OIV/'O! #OIV/'O!
0 059 ADAMS FAIRFIELD AREA SD 7,056 #OIV/'O! 3. 86% #OIV/'O!
#OIV/'O! 0 060 ADAMS GETTYSBURG AREA SD 26,355 #OIV/'O! 14.
43% #OIV/'O! #OIV/'O! 0 061 ADAMS LITTLESTOWN AREA SD 12,840 #OIV/'O!
7. 03% #OIV/'O! #OIV/'O!
0 062 ADAMS UPPER ADAMS SD 10,109 #OIV/'O! 5. 54% #OIV/'O!
#OIV/'O! 0 063 ADAMS TCD SC HOO L DISTRICT 64 TO TAL S $0 91,292 #DIV/0! 50 % #DIV/0!
65 66 < ADAM ii t tli ! S. RAlilil t otAlii • •• < t(I !
iti9. 2 • •• #o. l'il J.
O. ! < i(lli,00 % iibiV ,~i #.
D. lil iO. !
•••••••••• 0,00 % OiO. O. % The total earned income tax revenue from the “2008-2009”, “Act 1/Act 511/First Class SD Taxes” School District financial information download is placed in the TCD School District section in the School District EIT Revenue column of the model weighted vote spreadsheet for the corresponding county and school district.
2 2 HHHHHHHi i, ! ,_ i, ! ,_ i, !
,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, i,_ i, 47 ADAMS BENDERSVILLE SORO 48 ADAMS BIGLERVILLE SORO 49 ADAMS BUTLER lWP 50 ADAMS MENALLEN lWP 51 ADAMS TYRONE lWP 52 53 54 55 56 57 ADAMS 58 ADAMS 59 ADAMS 60 ADAMS 61 ADAMS 62 ADAMS 63 ADAM S TCD MUNI CIPAL TO TAL S BERMUDIAN SPRINGS SD CONEWAGO VALLEY SD FAIRFIELD AREA SD GETTYSBURG AREA SD LITTLESTOWN AREA SD UPPER ADAMS SD ADAM S TCD SC HOO L DI STRI CT ADAMS TCD # ••••••• •••••••~1 i:~tM~ ~•••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••• '''''' ''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''' •• ••• •NIONi Cli"Al •••• •' •' •NIONi Cli"Al ••' • •'••tot At• Mti~i b~id Mti~i b~iL •• P.
i fofo ifri ONAl P. i fofo ifri ONAl MUNi ci P-'Al ifrt RfVetiiJE ko. iiutkn -0.
ii •• fJT:Re v. etiiJE i o P. uUr io t.
i v. o ft •576 0. 32'¾ 0.
00% 0. 32% 1,101 0. 00% 0.
60% 2,678 0. 00% 1. 47% 2,974 0.
00% 1. 63% 1,932 0. 00% 106% # .
, ••••••••••• ~~ ~fttMli{r~& ~•···· •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• [$1 234 707 11 ,828 23,104 7,056 26,355 12,840 10,109 100. 00% 0. 00% 0.
00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0.
00% 6. 48% 106. 48% 12.
65% 12. 65% 3. 86% 3.
86% 14. 43% 14. 43% 7.
03% 7. 03% 5. 54% 5.
54% 64 TO TAL S $1 ,234,7 07 91 ,292 100 % 50% 150% 65 0. 16% 0 00. 30% 0 00.
73% 0 00. 81% 0 00. 53% 0 053.
24% 0 06. 33% 0 01. 93% 0 07.
22% 0 03. 52% 0 02. 77% 0 066 < ADAM ii t t li !
S. RAJilil t otAl ii • •• $ 1:2M 1. 07: !
it i ! i i • •• l~li,o~ \I < l~li,o~ \I ~li,o~ \k 100,00 % •••••••••• ~,00 % 0:0. 0.
% The spread sheet will automatically calculate the numbers in the Weighted Vote column. As you input the revenues for each school district in the TCD School Districts section – “School District EIT Revenue” column of the model weighted vote spreadsheet, the numbers in the “School District Proportional EIT Revenue” column, the “Total School District Vote” column and the “Weighted Vote” column will change.
This is because the formula in these columns is based on total revenue. See the screen shot below. Questions Regarding 2008-2009 School District Financial Download The Pennsylvania Department of Education releases school district annual financial information by May or June of each year.
For additional concerning the school district annual financial information, please contact: Benjamin Hanft | Division of Subsidy Data and Administration, Pennsylvania Department of Education – Bureau of Budget and Fiscal Management at 717-787 - 5423 or email: bhanft@state. pa. us | www.
education. state. pa.
us Appendix Section Explanation Factors Affecting the Weighted Vote Color coding was used on the spreadsheets to designate four possible factors affecting the weighed vote for a particular tax collection district. There is a color chart included in the appendix section showing these possible factors in four columns along side the 69 Tax Collection Districts.
Each factor affecting the weighted vote for a particular Tax Collection District is designated with a check mark ( √) on the specific Tax Collection District line. The following is a brief explanation of the possible factors affecting the weighted vote: 1. A municipality/school district that does not levy an EIT is not entitled to a vote pursuant to Act 32.
Population numbers have been set to zero for calculation purposes. These scenarios are denoted in yellow on the weighted vote calculation spreadsheet. 2.
Municipalities that did not levy an EIT as of January 1, 2008 will not have any revenue data available in the 2008 municipal state-wide download. These municipalities should show a zero in the “Municipal EIT Revenue” column. If an EIT is levied after January 1, 2008, EIT revenues will need to be included in future weighted vote calculations.
3. Municipalities that were divided among school districts within the same Tax Collection District are denoted in purple on the weighted vote calculation spreadsheet. While these appear as two separate weighted vote percentages on the spreadsheet, this was for calculation purposes only, and the values should be combined for one weighted vote percentage.
4. For ease of identification, municipalities located in more than one TCD were denoted in light blue along with a footnote identifying the other TCD where the municipality is located. 5.
Municipalities that did not submit a 2007 DCED Annual Financial Report were denoted in orange on the Weighted Vote Calculation Spreadsheet. In these cases the calculation was based on the latest Annual Financial Report submitted to the Department. You will need to check to make sure that these municipalities have submitted a 2008 DCED Annual Financial Report.
If they have not submitted a DCED 2008 Annual Financial report, you must use the most recently submitted data prior to 2008. Other Factors Affecting the Weighted Vote While the following factors are not shown in the color chart of the Appendix, they are important to note as they can affect the weighted vote calculation: 1.
The latest financial data available on the Department of Community and Economic Development’s web site is the 2008 municipal financial data. Municipalities that levied an EIT after this reporting year will have a weighted vote based on population, only. You will be required to update the revenue information for these municipalities in future years.
2. In instances where spreadsheet values are less than one one hundredth of a percent, Excel, with two designated decimal places, will assign a value of zero. This explains why the spreadsheet could conceivably show a value for EIT Revenue and a value for Population yet may show a zero in the Proportional columns or the Weighted Vote column.
APPENDIX TCD NAME Orange - Municipality did not file a 2007 Financial Report -EIT Revenue from the last filed report was used. Blue - Municipality is in multiple SDs and in different TCDs. Yellow - Municipality/SD does not levy an EIT and is not entitled to voting representation on the tax collection committee pursuant to Section 505(b)(1) of Act 32 of 2008.
Lavender - Municipality is in multiple SDs within the same TCD. Allegheny - Southwest √ √ Centre √ √TCD NAME Orange - Municipality did not file a 2007 Financial Report -EIT Revenue from the last filed report was used. Blue - Municipality is in multiple SDs and in different TCDs.
Yellow - Municipality/SD does not levy an EIT and is not entitled to voting representation on the tax collection committee pursuant to Section 505(b)(1) of Act 32 of 2008. Lavender - Municipality is in multiple SDs within the same TCD. Lackawanna TCD NAME Orange - Municipality did not file a 2007 Financial Report -EIT Revenue from the last filed report was used.
Blue - Municipality is in multiple SDs and in different TCDs. Yellow - Municipality/SD does not levy an EIT and is not entitled to voting representation on the tax collection committee pursuant to Section 505(b)(1) of Act 32 of 2008. Lavender - Municipality is in multiple SDs within the same TCD.
Susquehanna √ √TCD NAME Orange - Municipality did not file a 2007 Financial Report -EIT Revenue from the last filed report was used. Blue - Municipality is in multiple SDs and in different TCDs. Yellow - Municipality/SD does not levy an EIT and is not entitled to voting representation on the tax collection committee pursuant to Section 505(b)(1) of Act 32 of 2008.
Lavender - Municipality is in multiple SDs within the same TCD.
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: See the Pennsylvania grants portal for complete eligibility requirements. Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates See Pennsylvania state grant listing for funding details. Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.
2025 Agricultural Innovation Grant Program is a Pennsylvania state initiative that helps farmers and agriculture businesses implement new technologies, conservation practices, and renewable energy solutions to boost profitability and protect natural resources. Backed by $10 million in Governor Shapiro's 2025-26 budget, the program builds on an initial round that funded 88 projects statewide. Grants range from $5,000 to $2,000,000. The application deadline is April 18, 2026. Eligible applicants include Pennsylvania farmers with annual sales over $2,000, agricultural processors with sales over $10,000, agricultural service providers, and cooperatives utilizing agricultural commodities.
The Municipal Fire Department Capital Grant is a funding program from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Office of the State Fire Commissioner that provides ,000 to ,000 to eligible fire departments for capital improvements. Eligible expenses include establishing or modernizing facilities that house firefighting equipment, ambulances, or rescue vehicles; acquiring or renovating existing structures for those purposes; and repairing or purchasing firefighting, ambulance, or rescue equipment for training. Eligible applicants are municipal fire departments recognized by local ordinance and budgeted by the local government where the department is geographically located in Pennsylvania. Applications are due by May 29, 2026.