1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
April 1, 2026 at 3:00 PM EST via SmartSimple online portal.
"Youth Service Improvement Grants (YSIG)" is currently closed and not accepting applications.
Youth Service Improvement Grants (YSIG) is sponsored by William T. Grant Foundation. These grants help improve the quality of direct services for youth aged 5–25, particularly relevant for trauma-informed and mental health programming.
Get alerted about grants like this
Get emailed when new opportunities from “William T. Grant Foundation” or related funders appear. Free, weekly, unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Youth Service Improvement Grants - William T. Grant Foundation The next application cycle will open in January 2027. Application guidelines will be published at the same time.
Youth Service Improvement Grants Guidelines Awarded Grants The Youth Service Improvement Grants (YSIG) program supports activities to improve the quality of direct services for young people ages 5 to 25 in the five boroughs of New York City. The goal is to strengthen existing services by helping youth-serving nonprofit organizations address challenges or remedy problems at the point of service, where staff and youth interact.
Download the complete 2026 Application Guidelines YSIG urges applicants not only to discuss their organizations’ promise and potential, but to identify gaps or challenges in the services they provide. We ask applicants to be critical and reflective, to consider why and how complications exist, and to articulate how they intend to improve the ability of their programming to provide positive impact on youth.
Examples of problem areas for improvement include: inadequate curriculum, gaps in the service skills of frontline staff, or a limitation in current services that adversely affects participants’ experiences. Beyond these examples, we welcome other compelling needs for service improvement. Awards are $25,000 each and support projects lasting one year, starting on September 1 of the award year.
The Foundation aims to award six new Youth Service Improvement Grants annually. In addition to grant support, the Foundation also provides grantees access to technical assistance, including one-on-one support as your organization works toward successfully implementing the improvement project.
In addition, three cohort-wide “learning community” meetings allow for peer-based learning and coaching, as well as opportunities to discuss challenges, seek advice from peers and colleagues, and collaborate across projects in a supportive space.
The YSIG program awards grants only to youth-serving community-based nonprofit organizations physically located in any of the five boroughs of New York City whose staff have direct programmatic contact with youth at the point of service. Applicants must meet all organizational criteria to be eligible.
Organizations previously funded under either of the Foundation’s Youth Service Grant programs cannot apply again for at least 18 months after the end of their award. Serve youth ages 5 to 25. At least 80 percent of youth participating in the services targeted for improvement must be in this age range.
The applicant’s staff must have direct contact with youth at the point of service. Have their own 501(c)(3) tax-exemption. If operating under fiscal sponsorship, confirmation of fiscal sponsorship agreement is required.
If an applying organization is separately incorporated but tax-exempt through a group ruling (religious institutions), the applicant should supply the 501(c)(3) letter of the parent organization and documentation that is part of the group. The applying organization (not the fiscal sponsor) must have an operating budget between $250,000 and $5 million in the prior year (e.g., 2024), if the organization serves youth only.
If the applying organization serves youth and other populations, its operating budget must be less than $20 million and its youth services budget must be between $250,000 and $5 million. Have audited financial statements or certified financial statements, ideally 2024 or 2023, from the applying organization or from the fiscal sponsor if the organization is operating under fiscal sponsorship.
Have a 990 for the applying organization (or explain your exemption). Or, if operating under fiscal sponsorship, the fiscal sponsor much have a 990. Additional Considerations: Reducing Inequality Criteria The YSIG program is aligned with the Foundation’s broader focus on reducing inequality in youth outcomes.
Inequality in New York City is reflected in racial and economic segregation across boroughs and neighborhoods and in inadequate services for Mexican-descent youth and LGBTQ+ youth. We seek to help improve the quality of direct service programs provided by youth-serving non-profit organizations that confront these challenges. Meeting the criteria below is not a requirement for funding.
However, applicants who fulfill at least one reducing inequality criteria in addition to all organizational criteria described above will receive priority consideration.
Currently provide youth services in one of the eleven community districts identified as having the highest community risk to child well-being by the Citizens’ Committee for Children: Bronx CD 4 – Concourse/Highbridge CD 5 – University Heights CD 9 – Union Port/Soundview Any organization that fits the organizational eligibility criteria and has an established youth-serving program in one of the identified 11 community districts may apply for special consideration.
Serving some youth from the 11 community districts in locations outside of the community districts does not meet the priority consideration. Have existing well-defined programming tailored specifically to Mexican-descent youth or LGBTQ+ youth.
Many programs serve Mexican-descent and LGBTQ+ youth, but only those organizations with programming specifically designed for these populations are eligible for priority consideration under this criterion. The YSIG program does not support: Planning, needs assessment, and evaluation proposals. Program improvement activities not focused on changes at the point-of-service, such as board development or financial system updates.
Capital fund projects, scholarships, endowments, lobbying, real estate purchases, or awards to individuals. Expansions or additions to programming, including changes that simply increase the number of slots in a program or result in new programming. Public and private schools.
Organizations that are based outside the five boroughs of New York City. Applications for Youth Service Improvement Grants are reviewed by a dedicated volunteer committee of Foundation staff once a year. Committee members have a diverse range of expertise, including finance, communications, and nonprofit administration.
Thus, applications should be written to address an educated lay audience. If you use acronyms that may not be familiar to a lay audience, please be sure to spell them out the first time. If you use terms that are not commonly known, please provide relevant context and explanations.
Strong proposals will make the case that the quality of youth services would improve if the issue were resolved, and will clearly describe a feasible, sustainable, and appropriate improvement.
Clear description of the organization’s mission and current youth services The applicant provides a clear, compelling explanation of how the current program with direct point-of-contact services create positive and meaningful experiences for youth.
Compelling rationale for improvement The applicant clearly identifies a problem at the point of service and explains how the problem has adversely impacted the experiences of participants. The applicant details how they identified the problem and clearly articulates its likely causes. The applicant makes a strong case that the quality of services to youth would significantly improve if the problem were addressed.
Strength of the improvement plan The improvement plan effectively addresses the problem: it is targeted specifically at the causes of the problem, it is likely to be effective, and it is sustainable. The improvement activities can feasibly be implemented within the one-year grant period, which begins on September 1 of the award year.
The applicant identifies a capable staff member or manager to oversee the improvement plan and track progress across the timeline. This is different from staff working to implement the improvement. The applicant outlines a compelling plan to collect and use information to determine whether the improvement project is successful.
The applicant makes the case that the improvement can be sustained operationally and financially. If additional funds will be required to continue the improvement after the grant period, the applicant provides a feasible plan to achieve sustainability. Early-Career Reviewer Program Research Grants on Reducing Inequality Research Grants on Improving the Use of Research Evidence William T.
Grant Scholars Program Institutional Challenge Grant Youth Service Capacity-Building Grants Youth Service Improvement Grants Improving the use of Research Evidence conceptual use of research The William T. Grant Foundation invests in high-quality research focused on reducing inequality in youth outcomes and improving the use of research evidence in decisions that affect young people in the United States. Contact Us 60 E.
42nd Street, 43rd Fl. New York , NY 10165 Research Grants on Reducing Inequality Research Grants on Improving the Use of Research Evidence William T. Grant Scholars Program Institutional Challenge Grant Youth Service Capacity-Building Grants Youth Service Improvement Grants Improving the Use of Research Evidence Research-Practice Partnerships Resource Site Optimal Design with Empirical Information (OD+)
Key questions and narrative sections extracted from the solicitation.
Describe your organization's mission and how it positively impacts youth.
Identify a specific, documented service-delivery problem with evidence of how it was identified.
Provide explicit causation analysis for the identified problem.
Present a targeted, feasible, and sustainable improvement plan.
Designate capable staff for oversight (distinct from implementation staff).
Describe your data collection and evaluation methodology for measuring success.
Explain your financial and operational sustainability plan post-grant.
Scoring criteria used to review proposals for this grant.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Nonprofit organizations providing direct services to youth aged 5-25, with a focus on improving service quality in areas such as trauma-informed and mental health programming. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows up to $60,000 over two years. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
The most recent published deadline was April 16, 2025, which has passed. This is an annual program, so a new cycle should follow. Check the funder's website for the next application window.
Youth Service Improvement Grants (YSIG) is funded by William T. Grant Foundation. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Applications go through the funder's official portal — the Apply Now link on this page goes there directly.
The solicitation lists one required document: 2026 Application Guidelines (downloadable PDF). Check the official notice for formatting and page-limit rules.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
Research Grants on Reducing Inequality (William T. Grant Foundation) is sponsored by William T. Grant Foundation. This program supports research to build, test, or increase understanding of programs, policies, or practices to reduce inequality in the academic, social, behavioral, or economic outcomes of young people ages 5-25 in the United States.
The William T. Grant Foundation Research Grants on Improving the Use of Research Evidence is sponsored by William T. Grant Foundation. This program supports research on strategies focused on improving the use, usefulness, and impact of evidence in ways that benefit young people ages 5 to 25 in the United States.
The SCI Youth Grant Pitch Contest is a competitive program from Social Capital Inc. that funds youth-led community improvement projects in Greater Boston. Teams of high school students in grades 9 through 12 residing in Essex, Middlesex, Norfolk, or Suffolk counties develop project ideas through coaching from local professionals, then pitch their proposals to a live panel of judges. Winning teams receive $1,000 to $2,000 in grant funding to execute their community-strengthening visions. The program builds career skills including public speaking, project management, and team collaboration, while cultivating cross-socioeconomic connections among peers and mentors throughout the region.
The System Innovations Grant (Youth Opportunities Fund) is a multi-year funding opportunity from the Ontario Trillium Foundation that supports collaborative projects working to understand and strengthen systems so they function better for young people. Grants of up to $1,250,000 over five years fund collaboratives of two or more Ontario-based nonprofits aiming to create lasting systemic change that expands opportunities for youth ages 12 to 29, with a particular emphasis on Indigenous, Black, and other racialized youth facing systemic barriers. Eligible applicants are not-for-profit organizations incorporated for at least five years in Ontario with a mandate to serve youth, forming a formal collaborative. Indigenous- and Black-led organizations and collaboratives are prioritized. Applications were due March 11, 2026—check the Ontario Trillium Foundation website for upcoming intake cycles.
The William T. Grant Foundation's Research Grants on Reducing Inequality fund studies — $100K-$600K over 2-3 years — that test how to actually reduce disparities in youth outcomes, not just document them. The next Letter of Inquiry is due July 29, 2026, and a new one-application-per-cycle rule raises the stakes. Here's how the program is designed and how researchers should position a competitive LOI.
Read articleThe William Penn Foundation's May 2026 docket distributed $57.2M across 128 grants, with 41 percent flowing to Children and Families. The breakdown reveals which Philadelphia nonprofit categories are gaining institutional traction and which are being asked to make harder cases.
Read articleWilliam Penn's 128-grant, $57.2M May 2026 distribution reveals a Philadelphia-focused funder doubling down on children, arts education, and civic infrastructure as federal support recedes.
Read article