1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
April 1, 2026 at 3:00 PM EST via SmartSimple online portal.
Youth Service Improvement Grants (YSIG) is sponsored by William T. Grant Foundation. Youth Service Improvement Grants (YSIG) is a grant from the William T.
Grant Foundation that supports youth-serving community-based nonprofits in New York City's five boroughs to improve the quality of direct services for young people ages 5 to 25.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “William T. Grant Foundation” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Youth Service Improvement Grants - William T. Grant Foundation April 1, 2026 3:00 pm EST Youth Service Improvement Grants Guidelines Awarded Grants The Youth Service Improvement Grants (YSIG) program supports activities to improve the quality of direct services for young people ages 5 to 25 in the five boroughs of New York City.
The goal is to strengthen existing services by helping youth-serving nonprofit organizations address challenges or remedy problems at the point of service, where staff and youth interact. Download the complete 2026 Application Guidelines YSIG urges applicants not only to discuss their organizations’ promise and potential, but to identify gaps or challenges in the services they provide.
We ask applicants to be critical and reflective, to consider why and how complications exist, and to articulate how they intend to improve the ability of their programming to provide positive impact on youth. Examples of problem areas for improvement include: inadequate curriculum, gaps in the service skills of frontline staff, or a limitation in current services that adversely affects participants’ experiences.
Beyond these examples, we welcome other compelling needs for service improvement. Awards are $25,000 each and support projects lasting one year, starting on September 1 of the award year. The Foundation aims to award six new Youth Service Improvement Grants annually.
In addition to grant support, the Foundation also provides grantees access to technical assistance, including one-on-one support as your organization works toward successfully implementing the improvement project.
In addition, three cohort-wide “learning community” meetings allow for peer-based learning and coaching, as well as opportunities to discuss challenges, seek advice from peers and colleagues, and collaborate across projects in a supportive space.
The YSIG program awards grants only to youth-serving community-based nonprofit organizations physically located in any of the five boroughs of New York City whose staff have direct programmatic contact with youth at the point of service. Applicants must meet all organizational criteria to be eligible.
Organizations previously funded under either of the Foundation’s Youth Service Grant programs cannot apply again for at least 18 months after the end of their award. Serve youth ages 5 to 25. At least 80 percent of youth participating in the services targeted for improvement must be in this age range.
The applicant’s staff must have direct contact with youth at the point of service. Have their own 501(c)(3) tax-exemption. If operating under fiscal sponsorship, confirmation of fiscal sponsorship agreement is required.
If an applying organization is separately incorporated but tax-exempt through a group ruling (religious institutions), the applicant should supply the 501(c)(3) letter of the parent organization and documentation that is part of the group. The applying organization (not the fiscal sponsor) must have an operating budget between $250,000 and $5 million in the prior year (e.g., 2024), if the organization serves youth only.
If the applying organization serves youth and other populations, its operating budget must be less than $20 million and its youth services budget must be between $250,000 and $5 million. Have audited financial statements or certified financial statements, ideally 2024 or 2023, from the applying organization or from the fiscal sponsor if the organization is operating under fiscal sponsorship.
Have a 990 for the applying organization (or explain your exemption). Or, if operating under fiscal sponsorship, the fiscal sponsor much have a 990. Additional Considerations: Reducing Inequality Criteria The YSIG program is aligned with the Foundation’s broader focus on reducing inequality in youth outcomes.
Inequality in New York City is reflected in racial and economic segregation across boroughs and neighborhoods and in inadequate services for Mexican-descent youth and LGBTQ+ youth. We seek to help improve the quality of direct service programs provided by youth-serving non-profit organizations that confront these challenges. Meeting the criteria below is not a requirement for funding.
However, applicants who fulfill at least one reducing inequality criteria in addition to all organizational criteria described above will receive priority consideration.
Currently provide youth services in one of the eleven community districts identified as having the highest community risk to child well-being by the Citizens’ Committee for Children: Bronx CD 4 – Concourse/Highbridge CD 5 – University Heights CD 9 – Union Port/Soundview Any organization that fits the organizational eligibility criteria and has an established youth-serving program in one of the identified 11 community districts may apply for special consideration.
Serving some youth from the 11 community districts in locations outside of the community districts does not meet the priority consideration. Have existing well-defined programming tailored specifically to Mexican-descent youth or LGBTQ+ youth.
Many programs serve Mexican-descent and LGBTQ+ youth, but only those organizations with programming specifically designed for these populations are eligible for priority consideration under this criterion. The YSIG program does not support: Planning, needs assessment, and evaluation proposals. Program improvement activities not focused on changes at the point-of-service, such as board development or financial system updates.
Capital fund projects, scholarships, endowments, lobbying, real estate purchases, or awards to individuals. Expansions or additions to programming, including changes that simply increase the number of slots in a program or result in new programming. Public and private schools.
Organizations that are based outside the five boroughs of New York City. Applications for Youth Service Improvement Grants are reviewed by a dedicated volunteer committee of Foundation staff once a year. Committee members have a diverse range of expertise, including finance, communications, and nonprofit administration.
Thus, applications should be written to address an educated lay audience. If you use acronyms that may not be familiar to a lay audience, please be sure to spell them out the first time. If you use terms that are not commonly known, please provide relevant context and explanations.
Strong proposals will make the case that the quality of youth services would improve if the issue were resolved, and will clearly describe a feasible, sustainable, and appropriate improvement.
Clear description of the organization’s mission and current youth services The applicant provides a clear, compelling explanation of how the current program with direct point-of-contact services create positive and meaningful experiences for youth.
Compelling rationale for improvement The applicant clearly identifies a problem at the point of service and explains how the problem has adversely impacted the experiences of participants. The applicant details how they identified the problem and clearly articulates its likely causes. The applicant makes a strong case that the quality of services to youth would significantly improve if the problem were addressed.
Strength of the improvement plan The improvement plan effectively addresses the problem: it is targeted specifically at the causes of the problem, it is likely to be effective, and it is sustainable. The improvement activities can feasibly be implemented within the one-year grant period, which begins on September 1 of the award year.
The applicant identifies a capable staff member or manager to oversee the improvement plan and track progress across the timeline. This is different from staff working to implement the improvement. The applicant outlines a compelling plan to collect and use information to determine whether the improvement project is successful.
The applicant makes the case that the improvement can be sustained operationally and financially. If additional funds will be required to continue the improvement after the grant period, the applicant provides a feasible plan to achieve sustainability. Early-Career Reviewer Program Research Grants on Reducing Inequality Research Grants on Improving the Use of Research Evidence William T.
Grant Scholars Program Institutional Challenge Grant Youth Service Capacity-Building Grants Youth Service Improvement Grants Improving the use of Research Evidence conceptual use of research The William T. Grant Foundation invests in high-quality research focused on reducing inequality in youth outcomes and improving the use of research evidence in decisions that affect young people in the United States. Contact Us 60 E.
42nd Street, 43rd Fl. New York , NY 10165 Research Grants on Reducing Inequality Research Grants on Improving the Use of Research Evidence William T. Grant Scholars Program Institutional Challenge Grant Youth Service Capacity-Building Grants Youth Service Improvement Grants Improving the Use of Research Evidence Research-Practice Partnerships Resource Site Optimal Design with Empirical Information (OD+)
Key questions and narrative sections extracted from the solicitation.
Describe your organization's mission and how it positively impacts youth.
Identify a specific, documented service-delivery problem with evidence of how it was identified.
Provide explicit causation analysis for the identified problem.
Present a targeted, feasible, and sustainable improvement plan.
Designate capable staff for oversight (distinct from implementation staff).
Describe your data collection and evaluation methodology for measuring success.
Explain your financial and operational sustainability plan post-grant.
Scoring criteria used to review proposals for this grant.
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: Community-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations in NYC five boroughs with direct staff contact with youth ages 5-25. Budget $250K-$5M. At least 80% participants ages 5-25. Cannot have received YSIG funding within past 18 months. Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates $25,000 Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is April 1, 2026. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.