1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
Academy Project Funding 2026 is sponsored by Research Council of Finland. This call invites applications from individual research teams or consortia. It aims to promote the quality, scientific impact, societal impact, and scientific renewal and diversity of research.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Research Council of Finland” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
2026 Academy Project Fund - Research Council of Finland 12 Nov 2025 at 16. 15 Finnish time Update 26 Sep 2025: Who can apply? : Special terms and restrictions: Other ongoing RCF funding.
Clarification regarding the eligibility of directors, deputy directors and team leaders of Centres of Excellence.
Maximum funding €600,000 for four-year project, €1m for consortium project and €500,000 for consortium subproject; maximum funding proportional to project or subproject duration (calculated maximum grant for individual Academy Project €150,000 per year, €250,000 per year for consortium project and €125,000 per year for consortium subproject) funding to hire a research team and cover direct research costs applications invited from individual research teams or consortia composed of two or more teams Academy Project Funding is designed to promote the quality of research, scientific impact and impact beyond academia as well as scientific renewal and diversity.
The aim is to attain internationally as high a scientific standard of work as possible and to support scientific breakthroughs and top-tier international research collaboration. In addition to a doctoral degree, the applicant (the principal investigator (PI) of the proposed project) must also have other significant scientific merits. Usually the PI is a researcher at the professor or docent (adjunct professor) level.
Before you fill in your application in the online services (SARA) , carefully read the call text and the RCF's standard terms for funding . If the call text is in conflict with the standard terms, the terms should always be considered primary. If the translated English or Swedish version of the call text is in conflict with the Finnish call text, the Finnish version should always be considered primary.
Read the full call text on this page. Background and objectives At the core of the Research Council of Finland’s activities is to provide funding for excellent scientific research. The research we fund is also expected to have high scientific and societal impact and follow the principles of responsible science .
When you apply for Academy Project Funding, you apply for funding to hire a research team and cover the costs of the project. An Academy Project is built around an ambitious research plan of high scientific quality. The research plan is carried out by a high-level research team or consortium made up of several teams.
Academy Project Funding is designed to promote the quality and diversity of research, scientific impact and impact beyond academia as well as science self-renewal. The aim is to attain internationally as high a scientific standard of work as possible and to support scientific breakthroughs and top-tier international research collaboration.
In principle, the projects we fund must benefit Finnish research and society and international collaboration. The funding is granted primarily to teams of researchers who are working on their doctoral thesis and/or who have obtained their doctoral degree. We encourage researchers to engage in international mobility that will support the research, for example, so that researchers hired to the project work abroad for a fixed period.
The project may also hire foreign researchers who already work or who will work in the Finnish scientific community. The funding may also be used to hire researchers returning to Finland. We are setting aside funds from our 2026 research funding budget to boost doctoral training within Academy Projects.
The funding will further strengthen researcher training in RCF-funded research projects, and applicants are encouraged to include doctoral candidates in their project research teams. Increasing the funding for doctoral education is linked to our strategic goal of strengthening skills and competence.
The inclusion of doctoral education in a project is one of the criteria used, for example, when deciding between two projects judged to be of equal scientific quality. Applications are invited from individual research teams or consortia composed of two or more teams. The consortium parties may represent one or several research organisations.
A consortium application is an application built around a joint research plan, where each party to the consortium applies for funding. The RCF treats a consortium application as a single application, although the funding is granted to each subproject separately. Consortium compositions cannot be changed after the call deadline.
Read the guidelines for consortium applications. In addition to a doctoral degree, the principal investigator (PI) of the proposed project must also have other significant scientific merits. Usually the PI is a researcher at the professor or docent (adjunct professor) level.
These criteria also apply to subproject PIs in consortia. In addition, the applicant must have a close connection with Finland to support the implementation of a multi-year project. This connection must be evident from the application.
The PI of the application cannot be changed while the application is being processed (after the call has closed but before the decision). The only exception to this is if the PI dies. Special terms and restrictions Ongoing Academy Project Funding If you are the PI of an ongoing Academy Project (incl.
PI of consortium subproject), we will not consider (process) a new application for Academy Project Funding from you. However, you may apply for Academy Project Funding if you currently have an Academy Project (or a subproject in an Academy Project consortium), which ends by 31 December 2026.
Other ongoing RCF funding We will not consider (process) an application for Academy Project Funding in the following cases: you have ongoing Academy Professorship funding . However, an Academy Project application may be considered (processed) in the last year of the Academy Professor funding period provided that the funding periods will not overlap. You have ongoing Academy Research Fellowship funding .
However, an Academy Project application may be considered (processed) provided that the Academy Research Fellowship funding ends by 31 December 2026. You are the director, deputy director or research team leader of an RCF-funded Centre of Excellence . However, an Academy Project application may be considered (processed) provided that the CoE funding period (the last funding period of the CoE programme) ends by 31 December 2026.
How extensions of the funding period affects eligibility If the funding period of your current funding has been extended due to pregnancy, parental or childcare leave, military or non-military service or long-term illness, your eligibility will be determined by the original end date of the funding period. Table 1. Summary of eligibility restrictions in 2026 winter call.
See effects of extended funding period above. Can I apply for Academy Project Funding?
as a consortium subproject PI Academy Project PI/consortium PI/consortium subproject PI, funding period ends 1 Jan 2027 or later Academy Project PI/consortium PI/consortium subproject PI, funding period ends by 31 Dec 2026 Academy Research Fellowship, funding period ends 1 Jan 2027 or later Academy Research Fellowship, funding period ends by 31 Dec 2026 Academy Professorship, funding period ends by 31 Dec 2026 Centre of Excellence director, deputy director or team leader, funding period (the last funding period of the CoE programme) ends by 31 Dec 2026 PI, deputy PI or work package leader of SRC-funded project Other RCF funding (e.g. Academy Programme, Targeted Academy Project, international joint project, Finnish Flagship, mobility funding) Other conditions for and obstacles to the granting of funding We will not consider (process) your application if you have participated in the planning of the call to an extent likely to give you a comparative advantage over other applicants.
We will not consider (process) your application if you have been found guilty of a serious violation of research integrity in the previous three years. RCF funding will not be granted to a recipient located in Russia or Belarus.
In RCF-funded projects, cooperation with individual Russian or Belarusian researchers and research teams can only be carried out if the instructions of the site of research, the sanctions against Russia and Belarus, the export control provisions, the travel recommendations of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs or other guidelines by authorities do not prevent it.
Funding shall be granted and used in a way that respects the equal treatment of researchers, regardless of nationality. If you have failed to submit a report on a completed or ongoing RCF-funded project by the set deadline, we will not consider (process) your application.
Your application will not be considered (processed) if you or the application does not meet the competence requirements or other key requirements set for the call, if the application does not belong to the call, or if there some other respect are no conditions for processing the case. We will not consider (process) your application if you are a member of the RCF Board or scientific councils or the Strategic Research Council.
A positive funding decision can only be made if the conditions set by the RCF for funding are met. In addition to the eligibility criteria, another condition that must be met in order for the funding to be awarded is that you have in your application identified and assessed the risks related to research security and, where necessary, presented an adequate risk management plan.
You must also describe in the research plan how good scientific practice will be followed in the implementation of the project, how gender equality and nondiscrimination will be promoted in the implementation of the project, and how the RCF’s guidelines on open access to research results and on the responsible management of research data will be followed in the project.
The RCF Board decides the criteria for the RCF's funding decisions . Also see the policies of our scientific councils before you submit the application. You must immediately notify us if you receive funding from other sources for the same purpose after you have submitted your application to us.
How to draft an application The application consists of a form completed in the online services and its PDF appendices. As an applicant, you have the right to submit your application in Finnish or Swedish, but we ask that you to submit it in English to facilitate the international review. Read the section Who can apply?
to see whether you meet the eligibility criteria. Plan the contents of your application Start drafting your research plan and CV. Draft the above appendices on our templates (see ‘Application parts in the online services’).
Read the instructions on using the templates. You have access to the templates even before the call opens. Read the review guidelines and review form.
Write your research plan in such a way that reviewers can easily find the answer to the review questions. In the winter call, applicants must select a review panel for their application. Take time to familiarise yourself with the panel structure and selection guidelines.
Contact your collaborators. Request letters of collaboration from national and international collaborators that are relevant to the implementation of the project. The letters must be appended to the application before the call deadline.
Plan the funding of your project Contact your organisation’s support services now if you have any budget-related questions. Also read our standard terms for funding . If you are granted funding, you are also bound by the terms.
Instructions on how to fill in the application form are available in the online services. If you are applying as part of a consortium, read the consortium application guidelines before you start drafting the application. Application parts in the online services The different parts of the application are listed below.
A comprehensive A–Z index of application guidelines is available on our website. Instructions for filling in the application form are also on the tabs of the form. General description: topic, keywords and scientific disciplines of the project, details on the site of research Scientific council and review panel Consortium parties : In the consortium application, the consortium PI names the subproject PIs.
Public project description Project’s funding and commitment by site of research . For the 2026 winter call, the commitment must be given within 14 days of the closing date, or the application may be inadmissible. See section ‘Funding to be applied for and funding period’ in the call text.
Salary costs of principal investigator Collaborators: list of collaborators. The collaboration should be described in the research plan.
Mobility : list of research visits Affiliation with research infrastructures , Centres of Excellence and Finnish Flagships Short data management plan Progress report on all RCF-funded projects that have not yet submitted final reports Most relevant publications and other outputs: up to ten publications and ten other research outputs that are most relevant to the project; Detailed instructions available on the application form.
Appendices to be appended on dedicated tabs: The research plan is a mandatory appendix. Use the template provided. The CV is a mandatory appendix.
Use the template provided. The full list of publications is a mandatory appendix. If necessary, append a letter of collaboration .
Submitting the application in the online services You can submit the application when you have filled in or attached all the necessary information. A red warning triangle tells you that there is an error or information missing. The joint consortium application is submitted by the consortium PI.
They can submit the consortium application only after all subprojects have tagged their applications as complete. You can authorise a person to edit or view the application on the tab ‘Authorisation’. Submit your application in good time.
You can supplement and edit the application and change appendices until the call deadline. Funding to be applied for and funding period The Academy Project funding period starts on 1 September 2026. As a rule, the funding is granted for four years.
The maximum funding is 600,000 euros for a four-year project, up to 1 million euros for a four-year consortium project and up to 500,000 euros for consortium subproject. The maximum funding to be granted is proportional to the project or subproject duration (calculated maximum grant for individual Academy Project €150,000 per year, €250,000 per year for consortium project and €125,000 per year for consortium subproject).
When drafting the funding plan, pay particular attention to ensuring that the cost estimate is realistic and justified for the implementation of the research project. The funding is primarily intended towards the salaries of researchers who work full-time on the project and for other project costs.
The funding to be distributed through this call depends on the Finnish Parliament’s decision to allocate the necessary funds in the 2026 state budget. The funding is granted to a Finnish site of research (usually a university or research institute) through which the funding is paid. The PI of the funded project must have a close connection with Finland to support the implementation of a multi-year project.
The funded researchers may, however, spend time working abroad during their funding period. As a rule, research funding granted by the RCF is co-funding. The RCF’s contribution to the funding is up to 70% of the total costs, and the site of research (host organisation) will cover at least 30% of the total costs.
Before submitting the application, you must agree with the administration at your organisation on the contribution of the site of research to the funding of the project. You must check with your organisation whether the funding planned as the own funding contribution suits this purpose.
On the tab ‘Funding for the project’, provide the following information: cost estimate, including an estimate of the annual amount of funding needed, itemised by type of expenditure the annual instalment costs are spread equally (e.g. 70%/30%) over all funding years all funding granted for the project as well as funding that will be provided by the site of research if the project is launched.
Only costs that pass through the books of the site of the research must be included in the total costs. Pay particular attention to ensuring that the cost estimate is realistic and justified for the implementation of the research project. Justify the most significant research costs by type of expenditure in the free-text field.
You can apply for funding to cover, for example, the following direct research costs: PI’s salary costs (under certain limitations) salaries of researchers returning to Finland essential implementation costs collaboration and mobility in Finland international collaboration and mobility preparation of international projects.
Only for compelling reasons can government grants be awarded to cover salary costs in cases where the applicant has obstacles related to illegal employment, as referred to in section 7(2) of the Finnish Act on Discretionary Government Grants . As a rule, staff hired with RCF research funding must have an employment relationship.
We recommend that they be hired for a period of employment no shorter than the funding period, unless a shorter contract is necessary for special reasons dictated by the implementation of the research project. Short-term research, studies or other assignments (max. duration six months) may also be carried out in the form of outsourced services.
Instructions on job titles at different stages of the research career Doctoral education within Academy Project The tasks and roles of the doctoral researchers and the promotion of their research careers must be clearly set out in the research plan. The recruitment of doctoral candidates must be justified in terms of the research plan.
If the project involves doctoral training, use the category ‘Postgraduate student’ under ‘Salaries’ on the tab ‘Funding for the project’ in the online services. Salary costs of principal investigator RCF funding for research projects is primarily intended for the salaries of full-time researchers working on the projects and for other research costs.
As a rule, funding is not granted for the salary of the project PI. The PI’s salary costs may only under certain limitations and on justifiable grounds be incorporated into the total project costs. In order for the salary costs to be eligible, the PI’s tasks must be clearly specified and motivated.
Justify the salary on the tab ‘Salary of principal investigator’. The salary costs must not be significant in relation to the project’s total costs. A four-year research project must not include more than six months (equivalent to 1.
5 months/year) of the PI’s working hours for project management, doctoral thesis supervision and research work. The maximum amount of working time to be included is proportional to the duration of the project or subproject.
If the project includes salary costs for the PI, use the ‘Principal investigator’ category in the ‘Salaries’ section of the ‘Funding for the project’ tab in the RCF online services.
If the PI does not have an employment relationship If the PI does not have an employment relationship with, for example, a university or research institute for the duration of the funding period, they must explain how their salary will be covered during the funding period. Retired researchers can be granted funding on the same grounds as other researchers.
The mobility aid is applied for as research costs related to the implementation of the research plan. The aid is applied for in accordance with the practices of the site of research. To obtain further information, you should contact the personnel and financial administration of the site of research.
What is required from the site of research? The site of research is a Finnish research organisation such as a university or a research institute. We require that the site of research provides the research project with all necessary basic facilities .
These are determined based on the nature of the research and are the same as those available to other research staff at the site: office and laboratory premises, equipment (incl. computer equipment), and telecommunications, telephone, mailing, copying and library services. The costs of ensuring immediate open access to peer-reviewed articles are included in the overheads of the site of research.
The costs associated with storing and sharing research data are regarded as overheads for the project’s site of research. Only exceptionally and for justified reasons can they be accepted as research costs to be covered by RCF research funding.
The site of research also commits to ensuring that the data management plan can be implemented at the site of research, and that the measures to be taken comply with good data management practice. After a positive funding decision, the site of research will also approve the data management plan of the project.
When accepting the funding, the site of research is responsible for ensuring that necessary statements and permits from ethics committees have been obtained before the start of the project. The site of research shall also make sure that the applicant has not been found guilty of any serious violation of research integrity during the previous three years.
The application must include the overheads percentage, indirect employee costs and coefficient for effective working hours of the site of research. The site of research maintains these in the online services under the site’s details. The information is provided as percentages.
How applications are submitted and become pending, publicity of applications How to submit and supplement the application The non-negotiable call deadline also applies to consortia. We will not consider (process) an application that has not been submitted by deadline. The deadline for applications is 12 November 2025 at 16.
15 Finnish time. The joint consortium application is submitted by the consortium PI. The PI can submit the consortium application only after all subproject PIs have tagged their applications as complete.
While the call is open, the consortium PI may return the consortium’s subproject application to ‘incomplete’ status for supplementation. Make sure to submit the application in good time before the deadline. The system will only accept applications that contain all obligatory information.
The applicant is responsible for ensuring that the content of the application appendices is correct. You can edit and supplement the application until the deadline. For example, you can change the appendices to the application.
If you notice that your application lacks important information after the deadline, immediately get in touch with us via our helpdesk , so that the application can be reopened for supplementation. Once the review process has started, supplementations can no longer be taken into account. Typically, the review of an application starts 1–2 weeks after the call has closed.
We may ask you to supplement the application. In that case, you will receive a supplementation request by email. If you do not supplement the application by the given deadline, or if the application is substantially incomplete even after a request for supplementary information, we may declare it inadmissible (i.e. it will not be processed).
Make sure that your email address is up to date. How the application becomes pending According to section 17 of the Finnish Administrative Procedure Act and section 8 of the Act on Electronic Services and Communication in the Public Sector, the sender is responsible for the application arriving by the set deadline.
An application becomes pending when the online application and the obligatory appendices have been submitted in the online services. The system will confirm a successful submission by sending an email to the address you have provided. Publicity and data protection Except for the research plan, plan of intent, abstract and progress report, which are primarily confidential, the application and its appendices are public documents.
For example, the CV is a public document and as such must not include any secret information. This publicity is based on the Finnish Act on the Openness of Government Activities. We are committed to following regulations on data protection.
The applicant is responsible for the disclosure of the personal data contained in the application and, where appropriate, for requesting the consent of the parties concerned. The GDPR-compliant privacy notice concerning the research funding process is available on our website under Data protection . How the application is reviewed RCF funding is granted based on peer review.
We mainly use foreign experts as reviewers, and they make up the review panels. The review of applications follows a two-stage process. In the first stage, experts are asked to give at least two individual reviews on the application.
If at least one expert has given an overall rating of 5 or 6, the application will proceed to be reviewed by a panel. Applications that receive an overall rating of 5 or 6 from the review panel will be ranked. Review panels and panel selection Panel selection instructions How to select the review panel Examine several panel descriptions in your field and carefully read both the scope and keywords before choosing the panel.
Choose one panel and one scientific council for your application. None of the panels are linked to a particular scientific council as such. Submit your application to the most relevant panel.
We may reallocate applications, but only if there has been an obvious typographical or other clear error in the selection. The applicant will be informed in such cases. Any topic is welcome, regardless of whether it is explicitly stated in panel descriptions.
Panels are typically multidisciplinary. The keywords are not an exhaustive list of the topics that will be covered in the panels. They are intended to help applicants choose the most appropriate panel.
The panel structure does not represent any scientific classification as such. The numbering, names or descriptions of panels do not reflect any priorities. The panel descriptions have been revised after the previous winter call.
See the panel structure. Criteria affecting the review of the scientific quality of the application: Scientific quality, novelty and innovation of research Feasibility of research plan, including aspects of responsible science Expertise, human resources and cooperation, including aspects of responsible science.
In addition, the review panels and individual reviewers may, to support decision-making, draw attention to factors such as the societal effects and impact of the project. The research security appendix will not be peer-reviewed. See the review questions and guidelines on our website.
The review guidelines and forms and the review principles are only available in English. The body making the funding decisions takes into account the entirety of the applications to be decided upon in the call in relation to the objectives of the call, and the funding promotes a wide variety of scientific research. The decisions are based on the review reports and the rankings made by the panels.
If there are applications of equal merit, priority shall be given to the application that the decision-making body considers best advances the dismantling of gender stereotypes in research and the scientific community, promotes diversity in research and the scientific community as well as supports sustainable development. We are setting aside funds from our 2026 research funding budget to boost doctoral training within Academy Projects.
The inclusion of doctoral education in a project is one of the criteria used, for example, when deciding between two projects judged to be of equal scientific quality. In addition to the above factors, the RCF’s scientific councils also apply their own specific policies when making funding decisions. The updated policies will be made available on the RCF’s website before the call opens.
Read the scientific council's policies before submitting your application. The scientific councils will make the funding decisions in June 2026. How to receive the funding A positive funding decision is accompanied by the standard terms for funding .
They include instructions on how to receive the funding (section 1. 2). Contact us primarily via the helpdesk (select ‘Application guidance, non-thematic calls’).
Technical issues with the online services? Contact us via the helpdesk (select ‘Online services and other technical questions’). Also see our how-to guides for the online services .
Our telephone number (switchboard) is +358 295 335 000. See the Ask & Apply webinar schedule and materials. Also see the winter call FAQ .
Do you have questions or feedback for us?
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: Individual research teams or consortia. The principal investigator (PI) must have a doctoral degree and other significant scientific merits, usually at the professor or docent level. Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates Up to €600,000 for a four-year project, up to €1 million for a consortium project, and up to €500,000 for a consortium subproject. Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.
EPSCoR Research Infrastructure Improvement Program: Focused EPSCoR Collaborations Program (FEC) is sponsored by U.S. National Science Foundation. The FEC program builds interjurisdictional collaborative teams of EPSCoR investigators in STEM focus areas. Projects are investigator-driven and must include researchers from at least two EPSCoR eligible jurisdictions with complementary expertise to address challenges. The program aims to drive discovery and build sustainable STEM capacity. Tennessee is an EPSCoR-eligible jurisdiction.
Engineering of Biomedical Systems (EBMS) Program is sponsored by U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF). The EBMS program supports fundamental and transformative research at the interface of engineering and biomedical sciences to solve biomedical problems. Projects should focus on high-impact, transformative methods and technologies, including the development of validated models (living or computational) of normal and pathological tissues and organ systems, and advanced biomanufacturing of three-dimensional tissues and organs.