1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsAntibody-Based Therapeutics for Infectious Diseases is sponsored by NIH NIAID. Funds research on antibody-based therapeutics targeting infectious diseases.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “NIH NIAID” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Emerging antibody-based products for infectious diseases: Planning for metric ton manufacturing - PMC As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. .
2021 Jul 14;18(2):1930847. doi: 10. 1080/21645515.
2021. 1930847 Emerging antibody-based products for infectious diseases: Planning for metric ton manufacturing a Mapp Biopharmaceutical, San Diego, CA, USA b ZabBio, San Diego, CA, USA Find articles by Kevin J Whaley a Mapp Biopharmaceutical, San Diego, CA, USA b ZabBio, San Diego, CA, USA Find articles by Larry Zeitlin a Mapp Biopharmaceutical, San Diego, CA, USA b ZabBio, San Diego, CA, USA ✉ CONTACT Kevin J Whaley kevin.
whaley@mappbio. com Mapp Biopharmaceutical, San Diego, CA, USA Received 2021 Feb 11; Accepted 2021 May 13; Collection date 2022. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License ( http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4. 0/ ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. PMCID: PMC9103258 PMID: 34259613 This review focuses on the emerging monoclonal antibody market for infectious diseases and the metric ton scale manufacturing requirements to meet global demand.
Increasing access to existing antibody-based products coupled with the unmet need in infectious disease will likely exceed the current existing global manufacturing capacity. Further, the large numbers of individuals infected during epidemics such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic emphasizes the need to plan for metric ton manufacturing of monoclonal antibodies by expanding infrastructure and exploring alternative production systems.
KEYWORDS: Monoclonal, passive immunization, manufacturing, scale Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have shown impressive therapeutic benefit for a range of diseases including cancer, autoimmune disease and infectious disease. As such, they are the fastest growing sector in the biopharmaceutical market, with over $100B in sales each year and a projection to double that within the next several years.
1 Today, the market for mAbs is overwhelming high-income countries. 2 Almost no mAb products are registered in low-income countries, and the few registered in middle-income countries are often unavailable within their public health systems. This accessibility gap will only widen as mAbs continue to become an increasingly large proportion of pharmaceutical company pipelines.
A global call to action recently issued by IAVI and the Wellcome Trust seeks to expand access to these potentially life-saving monoclonal antibody (mAb) products 2 and to prioritize their more equitable distribution. Perhaps the most critical factor controlling wide accessibility is the cost of goods (COGS) associated with mAb manufacturing.
A consensus target for the COGS for mAbs to enable global access to these products is ~$10/g, 3 far from the current COGS ranging from $95-200/g. 2 The metric ton manufacturing scale required to meet anticipated demand may be as great a challenge as cost reduction, but when achieved, would be expected to further lower costs.
The total mass of mAbs manufactured worldwide is estimated at 30 metric tons annually 2 , 4 and as evidenced by the limited global access to mAb-based antivirals during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, will not be sufficient for rapidly addressing broad scale public health infectious disease threats. The majority of the more than 500 mAbs now in clinical testing 5 are for oncology and autoimmune indications.
However, with the recent clinical success and regulatory approvals of mAbs for Ebola virus disease and COVID-19, neglected infectious diseases are anticipated to represent a significant percentage of the future therapeutic antibody market. Currently, there are over 75 clinical trials of mAbs against ~20 infectious pathogens and mAbs for ~70 pathogens in preclinical development.
2 These include mAbs against SARS-CoV-2, HIV, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), filoviruses, viral enteric pathogens and gram negative bacterial enteric pathogens, including E. coli, Klebsiella, Shigella and Salmonella .
2 This review focuses on an overview of existing anti-infective mAb products, the emerging antibody market for infectious diseases, and the metric ton scale manufacturing requirements necessary to meet the future demand of this growing class of products.
Although different antibody formats are being explored clinically (antibody-drug conjugates, antibody-protein fusions, antibody fragments, single-chain antibodies, camelid IgG), this review is limited to fully assembled, monoclonal antibodies (IgG, IgA, and IgM, including multispecific formats) that have high avidity due to multivalency and also have functional Fc regions that can be engineered for extended half-life and/or varying levels of effector functions.
6 Licensed antibody-based products for infectious diseases Of the 100+ mAbs licensed for use ( https://www. antibodysociety. org/resources/approved-antibodies/ ), only nine have infectious disease indications: palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), raxibacumab and obiltoxaximab for anthrax, bezlotoxumab for C.
difficile , ibalizumab for HIV, Rabishield and Rabimabs for rabies, and inmazeb and ebanga for Ebola virus. A brief overview of these products, none of which currently require metric ton manufacturing, is provided here. Palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus immunoprophylaxis RSV is a ubiquitous pneumovirus, infecting nearly all children by 2 years of age.
7 In the U.S., RSV is the leading cause of lower respiratory tract disease in young children and has been associated with asthma and wheezing throughout childhood. 8 Among children less than 5 years of age, RSV is estimated to account for 132,000 to 172,000 hospitalizations in the U.S. annually. 9 Globally, RSV is responsible for 3.
2 million hospital admissions and 48,000–75,000 deaths each year for children younger than 5 years of age, 10 and it is estimated to cause 6. 7% of all deaths for children between 1 month and 1 year of age. 11 In the U.S., RSV has a disease burden similar to that of non-pandemic influenza A for elderly (>65 years of age) and high-risk adults (congestive heart failure or chronic pulmonary disease).
12 It is estimated that in this population RSV is responsible for 125,000 hospitalizations and 10,000 deaths per year. 13 Palivizumab, a humanized murine IgG1 antibody, is indicated for immunoprophylaxis in neonates; however, its high cost and frequent administration requirements (monthly dosing throughout the RSV season) have restricted its use to high-risk infants.
It has been estimated that 16–18 preterm infants need to be treated with palivizumab to prevent a single RSV-related hospitalization. 14 In order to provide prophylactic protection during the 4 to 5-month annual peak in RSV circulation, neonates are treated monthly with 15 mg/kg intramuscular administrations, necessitating ~200 mg of drug for a 3 kg neonate.
As this single course can cost in excess of $5,000 per infant, the resulting cost-effectiveness analysis is debated. Moreover, due to this high cost, palivizumab is inaccessible to children in developing nations and is unavailable in 4 of the 5 most populous countries – more than half the world’s population does not have access to this life-saving drug.
Opportunities for expanding the accessibility of RSV immunoprophylaxis are discussed below in the next section (Emerging Antibody Products for Infectious Diseases). Raxibacumab and obiltoxaximab for prophylaxis and treatment of inhalational anthrax Bacillus anthracis , the causative agent of anthrax, is classified as a Category A bioterror agent.
Multiple countries developed anthrax as a weapon during the 20 th century and fears remain that a nation state or terrorist organization could deploy weaponized anthrax. Raxibacumab, a human IgG 1 against protective antigen (PA), one of the toxins secreted by the bacteria, received FDA approval in 2012. Obiltoxaximab is a humanized anti-PA mAb that was licensed in 2016 by the FDA.
Both products are indicated for patients with inhalational anthrax and administered in combination with antibiotics. These products are also recommended for prophylaxis of inhalational anthrax if alternative options are not available. Dosing is 40 mg/kg dose intravenously for raxibacumab and 16 mg/kg for obiltoxaximab.
15 While the U.S. stockpile requirements for these products are not publicly available, a conservative estimate given a number of factors is approximately 1 million doses. Assuming 60 kg as the average weight of a potential patient, 0. 96–2.
4 metric tons of mAb are needed to supply 1 million doses. Factoring in the additional consideration of expiration dates associated with any drug and using a 5-year shelf-life as an example here, this translates to manufacturing of 0. 19–0.
48 metric tons per year. Bezlotoxumab for preventing recurrence of C. difficile infection Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the main cause of infectious diarrhea in patients following hospitalization and antibiotic treatment.
16 In developed countries, C. difficile has become the most common cause of nosocomial diarrhea. 16 , 17 Treatment usually involves initial antibiotic therapy with either vancomycin, metronidazole, or fidaxomicin.
However, up to 35% of the patients have recurrent infections, 18 which are more difficult to treat and associated with increased hospitalization time. Further, subsequent infections can have more severe outcomes and higher costs than the first infection, in addition to a 50–60% chance of a continuing recurrent infection. 19 In 2018, there were 36 million hospital admissions in the US for CDI.
Bezlotoxumab is a fully human IgG1 mAb that binds and neutralizes C. difficile toxin B. In two global Phase 3 trials, the observed safety and efficacy of 10 mg/kg intravenous treatment with bezlotoxumab was supportive of licensure; however, the incidence of recurrence remained stubbornly at ~20% in the treatment groups, indicating that additional intervention may be required to eliminate recurrences altogether.
There is no evidence of access to bezlotoxumab in low- and middle-income countries. 2 With the underwhelming clinical adoption of bezlotoxumab, and more efficacious treatments on the horizon, 20 current manufacturing capacity is likely sufficient to meet demand for this drug.
Ibalizumab for multi-drug resistant HIV infection The use of mAbs for HIV therapy offers unique mechanisms of action and the potential for an improved safety profile compared to standard antiretrovirals. Further, mAb therapy may be especially appropriate for multi-drug resistant (MDR) HIV infection.
21 Ibalizumab is a licensed humanized IgG4 mAb product that acts as a CD4-directed post-attachment inhibitor and is currently approved for patients with MDR HIV infection. Patients receive a 2 g loading dose followed by 800 mg maintenance doses every 2 weeks, or approximately 20 g on an annual basis.
With the disadvantages of intravenous administration, biweekly dosing, and high cost, the use of Ibalizumab is limited to heavily treated adults with multidrug-resistant infection failing their current antiretroviral therapy regimen. 22 Pharmacoeconomic analysis suggests a 90% reduction in price would be necessary to make this a cost-effective therapy. 23 Current manufacturing capacity is sufficient to meet current demand for this drug.
Rabishield and Rabimabs for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis Rabies virus is prevalent in 150 countries around the globe. The virus is transmitted through the bite of a rabid animal and infects the central nervous system of the host, causing encephalopathy and, if untreated before symptoms appear, ultimately results in death.
It is estimated that 30 million people undergo rabies post-exposure prophylaxis each year 24 with polyclonal antibody preparations in combination with post-exposure vaccination. Treatment prior to the appearance of symptoms is highly efficacious, yet WHO reports that rabies infections claim the lives of more than 55,000 people each year. India suffers the biggest impact with approximately 35% of the world’s rabies deaths.
The majority of deaths occur in rural and resource poor areas where physical and/or economic access to treatment is limited. In the U.S., domestic animals like dogs and cats, and wildlife like bats, raccoons, and skunks are the major carriers of rabies. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates that 30,000 to 60,000 persons in the U.S. are treated for rabies exposure each year.
Although human or equine polyclonal immunoglobulins are the most commonly used products for exposures, supplies are limited and the quality variable. India has recently begun use of two human monoclonal products for rabies exposure, Rabishield, a single human IgG1 mAb product, and RabiMabs, a murine dual mAb (IgG1 and IgG2b) product. 24 These products are dosed intramuscularly at fractions of a mg/kg.
With 30 million people receiving post-exposure prophylaxis annually, to completely replace animal-derived polyclonal products with mAb products would require on the order of 50 kg of mAb per year. Inmazeb and ebanga for Ebola virus immunotherapy Ebolavirus, one of several filoviruses that infects humans, causes hemorrhagic fever disease with a high mortality rate (40–90%).
25 Sporadic outbreaks in Africa historically have ranged from 1 to 28,000+ patients, with the 2013–2016 West African outbreak being the largest.
26 Recently, two human IgG1 intravenous mAb products, inmazeb (3 mAb cocktail) and ebanga (single mAb), were demonstrated in a clinical trial conducted during an outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 27 to be superior to ZMapp, a three mAb cocktail used as a benchmark based on its previously characterized activity in a truncated trial in West Africa. 28 Both products were approved by the FDA in late 2020.
With inmazeb dosed at 150 mg/kg and Ebanga at 50 mg/kg, fulfilling the U.S. Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) goal of 750,000 courses of treatment, economics aside, would require approximately 3–9 metric tons of mAb. With a 5-year shelf-life as an example, this translates to manufacturing of 0. 6–1.
8 metric tons per year. Emerging antibody-based products for infectious diseases With the recent clinical successes of mAbs for highly virulent and lethal infections, 27 , 29 anti-infectious disease mAbs as a product class are expected to grow dramatically.
In this section, we focus on several disease targets for which mAb therapeutics or prophylactics are expected to significantly and positively impact public health, with the caveat that widespread deployment will require significant reductions in manufacturing cost and an expansion of existing manufacturing capacity to be feasible from a pharmaco-economic standpoint.
Assuming global access to these emerging antibody-based products, metric ton needs are estimated in Table 1 . The metric ton requirements for emerging antibody-based products are substantially greater than licensed products for infectious diseases because of larger unmet needs. Establishing unmet need and estimating market share is complex, so the metric ton requirements are presented as per one million users/year.
The estimates for emerging products are based on clinical trial doses, but generally assume the lowest dose evaluated. A mass of 60 kg per individual is used for calculations, as it is the mean global weight for a potential user. Overall, conservative assumptions are used so that the requirements are likely underestimates.
Potential indications, antibody doses and estimates of metric ton (MT) requirements (per 1 M Users) Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prophylaxis (healthy infants) 600 M > 65 years old globally High-risk individuals; difficult to estimate 2 mAb cocktail at 1 mg/kg each and 3 doses/year > 80 M infected; >1.
8 M deaths 5 mg/kg; 3 times per year High-risk individuals; difficult to estimate ~10 M hospitalizations/yr Mucosal MPT (HIV, Sperm, HSV) ~140 M (for contraception)**** 4 Abs (2 HIV Abs, 1 HSV antibody, 1 contraceptive antibody); 50 doses/year X 40 mg total per dose MDR = multi-drug resistant; MPT = multipurpose prevention technology. *emphasis on mAb product concepts that have been through a Phase 1 clinical trial.
**based on a global average weight of 60 kg. *** https://www. who.
int/data/gho/data/themes/malaria . **** Because people are good at estimating their risk for unintended pregnancy but underestimate risk for STI acquisition, contraceptive activity is likely to be a major driver for use of a multipurpose prevention technology (MPT). Respiratory syncytial virus Currently, there is no approved RSV prophylaxis for healthy infants (140 million births per year globally), a significant unmet need.
Palivizumab’s requirement for monthly intramuscular administration, the emergence of escape mutants, and its high-cost limit its clinical usefulness for prophylaxis in high-risk infants. 30 Most of the approximately 100,000 young children in the United States who are hospitalized annually for RSV infection have no recognized risk factors and do not qualify for monthly palivizumab prophylaxis.
This partially explains why palivizumab has had a minimal effect on the overall burden of RSV infection. An alternative approach would be the administration of a long-lasting mAb to all infants born shortly before or during the RSV season. 30 If a single intramuscular dose at birth could provide several months of protection, the burden of infection would be shifted to older children who are at lower risk for hospitalization.
Several mAbs are in clinical development with enhanced neutralizing activity compared with palivizumab and containing point mutations in the Fc region to promote extended half-life. These potential products would support a vaccine-like strategy to protect infants from RSV with doses administered once per RSV season (which typically spans 5 months of the fall and winter).
A 50 mg single intramuscular dose of one of these mAbs, MEDI-8897, has been evaluated in a Phase 2 trial in healthy preterm infants entering their first RSV season. 31 The incidence of medically attended, RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection was 70% lower than with placebo (2. 6% vs. 9.
5%) through 150 days after administration, and the incidence of hospitalization for RSV was 78% lower (0. 8% vs. 4. 1%).
31 These data provide excellent proof of concept for a healthy infant approach and the product is now being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials. Assuming a 50 mg dose, 0. 05 metric tons would be required annually for protecting 1 M newborns ( Table 1 ).
Ignoring accessibility issues, with 140 million births per year, and limiting use to the half of newborns born prior to onset or during the RSV season, 3. 5 metric tons would be required to protect all at-risk newborns. RSV infection is now recognized as a significant health burden in elderly adults.
For example, 5–10% of elderly patients in long-term care facilities develop RSV infections per year with rates of pneumonia and death of 10–20% and 2–5%, respectively. 32 The total number of annual RSV infections is 3% to 7% of healthy elderly patients, or 1. 4 to 3.
3 M RSV infections among the elderly (using 2015 population). There are 1. 4 million adults living in nursing care facilities in the U.S. Use in these populations could range from treatment of diagnosed infections, to immunoprophylaxis in nursing care facilities when an RSV index case is identified, to universal dosing of the elderly once per RSV season.
For context, the indication currently being explored for anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAb LY-CoV555 in a Phase 3 study is prophylaxis in long-term care facilities (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT04497987 ). For a 10 mg/kg dose, 0.
6 metric tons would be required for 1 million users ( Table 1 ). mAb products in clinical development may offer safety and efficacy benefits that dramatically expand the patient populations from the current limited population for which ibalizumab is indicated. For example, leronlimab (previously known as PRO 140) is a humanized IgG4 against CCR5, an HIV co-receptor, that has reemerged as a potential novel agent for HIV treatment.
Leronlimab is only under consideration for patients with CCR5 tropic virus; however, the majority of patients harbor this HIV tropism. In a Phase 2b trial, weekly leronlimab administered subcutaneously to patients who discontinued antiretroviral therapy (ART) was found to maintain viral suppression in 56% of the patients for 12 weeks.
33 In a subsequent Phase 3 trial, the results of which have yet to be published, the sponsor reported that 81% of the subjects who completed the trial (leronlimab + ART) achieved viral suppression without any increased safety risk observed ( https://www. cytodyn. com/pipeline/hiv ).
The primary mechanism of resistance is the emergence of CXCR4 or mixed tropism; however, this observation has reportedly been rare to date, with some patients having over 4 years of ongoing use of leronlimab. Leronlimab is administered as a weekly 0. 35 g subcutaneous injection (18.
2 g/patient/year = 18. 2 metric tons/million users). A Phase 3 study evaluating leronlimab as a monotherapy is planned.
Potential use of this drug could range from the approximately 5% of all HIV patients having MDR infections to first-line monotherapy. With approximately 38 million people living with HIV ( https://www. unaids.
org/en/resources/fact-sheet ), treating the entire global MDR population would require manufacturing of 34. 6 metric tons of mAb annually and treating all HIV infected individuals would require 690 metric tons per year.
HIV prevention (systemic delivery) With serum half-life of 2–4 months observed clinically with Fc-modified mAbs, 34–37 the use of systemically delivered mAbs for the prevention of HIV acquisition in high-risk individuals has become technically feasible.
Parenteral antibody dosages required for protection against SHIV mucosal challenge in non-human primates, 38 and the serum concentrations of broadly neutralizing Abs (bnAbs) needed to provide complete protection against viral challenge in the SHIV model have been reviewed.
39 Comparison of in vitro neutralization with in vivo protection across different SHIV studies has indicated that a serum concentration roughly 200-fold above the neutralization IC 50 measured in vitro is generally needed to ensure 100% protection against viral challenge in passive transfer non-human primate (NHP) studies. Two large Phase 2B clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.
gov Identifier: NCT02568215 ; NCT02716675 ), referred to as the antibody-mediated prevention (AMP) study ( www. ampstudy. org ), evaluated the efficacy of the first generation broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) VRC01 in reducing acquisition of HIV-1 infection in high-risk populations.
The mAb was infused intravenously at doses of either 10 or 30 mg/kg bimonthly for a total of eight infusions, and participants are tested for HIV infection through 80 weeks after initiation of mAb treatment.
Since VRC01 infusions were found to protect against HIV acquisition of strains most susceptible to VRC01, 40 this validates the concept and will facilitate the study of second-generation bnAbs that have longer half-lives requiring less frequent dosing, the ability to neutralize a broader array of HIV strains, and/or increased potency leading to lower dosing and allowing for more user-friendly dosing in the form of subcutaneous delivery; second-generation HIV bnAbs require 5–10x lower doses (~1 mg/kg) for protection in passive immunization studies than first-generation bNAbs.
39 Combinations of HIV bnAbs targeting different epitopes might have even more potent, potentially synergistic effects; 41 NIAID and IAVI have partnered to develop antibody-based products for HIV prevention and treatment ( https://www. niaid. nih.
gov/news-events/antibodies-hiv-prevention ). The collaboration (including the Serum Institute of India) will develop combinations of HIV bnAbs that can be produced at low cost to prevent and possibly treat HIV. The consortium will identify the best bnAb combinations to develop a product designed to be efficacious against the widest variety of circulating HIV strains.
New potent and broad-acting antibody combinations could be administered by subcutaneous injection rather than intravenous infusion. Estimated 1. 7 million individuals worldwide acquired HIV in 2019; the size of the at-risk population is challenging to define.
Assuming a 2 mAb cocktail at 1 mg/kg each and 3 doses/year, the manufacturing need is 0. 36 metric tons per year per 1 million users ( Table 1 ). HIV prevention (mucosal delivery) With sexual transmission being the primary route of HIV acquisition, there is interest in developing products for topical use.
Indeed, there is an entire field devoted to the development of multipurpose prevention technologies (MPT) for the prevention of sexual transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Several studies have demonstrated that topical administration of anti-HIV mAbs can protect macaques from SHIV mucosal (vaginal) challenge.
38 A mAb-based prototype of an MPT, containing the HIV bnAb VRC01 and a mAb specific for the herpes simplex virus (HSV) was formulated as a vaginal film (10 mg of each mAb), and evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial. 42 The film product was found to be safe and well accepted. Cervico-vaginal lavage samples collected 24 hours after film insertion significantly neutralized both HIV-1 and HSV-2 ex vivo .
To enhance efficacy, a next-generation MPT may contain additional mAbs, such as more potent bNAbs and mAbs that block cell-associated HIV transmission. To increase product desirability, mAbs that agglutinate and trap sperm in mucus may be included to provide contraceptive protection. A prototype MPT vaginal ring for sustained release of mAbs has been developed and tested in macaques.
43 Sustained release of mAbs from a vaginal ring could improve user compliance and decrease antibody doses. Assuming a 40 mg dose (10 mgs each of two HIV Abs, one HSV antibody and one human contraceptive antibody; 50 doses per person per year; one million users/year), ~2. 0 metric ton is required for a mucosal MPT product that is regularly used by one million couples.
In addition to manufacturing scale requirements, cost is a clear constraint for such a product. We estimate that COGs for a dose would need to be no more than $0. 25, 44 translating to $6.
25 per gram, a goal not yet achieved by existing manufacturing platforms. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a striking and timely example of both the potential mAbs offer for infectious diseases as well as the current limitations that exist with manufacturing capacity. MAbs have the potential to be used for both prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection.
45 Even though effective vaccines are now available, the weeks of time required to generate an effective immune response emphasizes the benefits of passive immunity in a variety of circumstances including health-care settings and facilities where outbreaks have been common and devastating.
MAbs with Fc mutations to extend serum half-life could be administered to nursing home residents during an outbreak and might also serve to limit the progression of disease during undetected early infection. In addition, older individuals and those with underlying comorbid conditions might not mount a robust protective response after vaccination and may need mAb prophylaxis.
Multiple clinical trials are underway evaluating the efficacy of mAbs for prophylaxis, post-exposure prophylaxis and therapy. Based on preliminary clinical trial results, bamlanivimab 46 and the cocktail consisting of casirivimab and imdevimab 29 are currently available under Emergency Use Authorization in the U.S. for pediatric and adult patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.
These two products are authorized for patients with positive results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing who are 12 years of age and older, and who are at risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization. Bamlanivimab was not found to be effective in hospitalized patients.
47 Casirivimab and imdevimab are actively being evaluated in hospitalized patients; the trial has been modified to focus on patients receiving low flow-oxygen and excluding the most critical patients requiring high-flow oxygen or mechanical ventilation at baseline, following a recommendation by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee. 48 Globally >150 M have been infected with COVID-19, and >3 M have died.
With the existence of circulating strains with mutations that increase transmissibility, 49 for capacity calculations, we assume a two mAb cocktail with a single 10 mg/kg/mAb dose, or a 1. 2 g total dose (via infusion); this drug would require 1. 2 metric tons per million users.
Alternative delivery formulations such as subcutaneous or intramuscular injection may be required to increase uptake of these drugs, especially in non-hospitalized patients – health-care systems are not well equipped to provide infusions to non-hospitalized patients on a large scale.
50 Indeed, a Phase 3 trial with subcutaneously delivered casirivimab and imdevimab is currently underway looking at prophylaxis in people who are household contacts to an RT-PCR positive individual (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT04452318 ). Alternatively, should it prove effective in clinical trials, mucosal delivery via inhalation ( e.
g . nebulizer) could be a drug delivery option (assuming 10–50 mg X 5 doses, 2 Abs) with lower manufacturing scale requirements of 0. 2 to 1.
0 metric tons per 1 M users. It had been estimated 51 that over the next year in the U.S. alone, hospitalized patients would require 0. 71 million doses of neutralizing mAbs, non-hospitalized symptomatic patients 12.
8 million doses, and people with close exposure to confirmed cases would need about 55 million doses. The proposed 70 million systemic doses 51 would require a staggering >80 metric tons of manufacturing for the U.S. alone, more than doubling the current global mAb manufacturing capacity. Influenza spreads globally in yearly outbreaks, resulting in ~10 million hospitalizations and >145,000 deaths during a typical non-pandemic year.
52 A global influenza pandemic remains one of the biggest infectious disease public health concerns. Similar to the HIV and COVID-19 long-acting mAbs being developed for prophylaxis in high-risk individuals, mAbs may be appropriate for prevention of influenza in cases where an effective influenza vaccine is not accessible in a pandemic scenario, when an influenza vaccine cannot be provided to the individual ( i. e .
in children under 6 months), or when a vaccine will not offer protection in time to prevent infection ( i. e . after exposure to an infected individual).
24 , 53 , 54 In these cases, the relative costs and benefits of mAb use for prevention will need to be compared to other interventions that can potentially be used in this situation. With highly potent mAbs and a long serum half-life, 2 mg/kg is a reasonable estimate for a two mAb dose, suggesting 0. 24 metric tons/million users would be required for a single-use product.
Influenza mAbs in clinical development are primarily focused on therapy of active infection. 55 Given the annual variation in circulating strains, the majority of mAbs being developed target the highly conserved stem region of the HA molecule. 55 Similar to what has been observed clinically with mAbs for COVID-19, efficacy of anti-influenza mAbs is likely going to depend on intervening early enough in the course of disease.
Clinical trials of antibody-based therapies for influenza tend to use 1–8 g doses per patient, suggesting a need for 1–8 metric tons/million users. Globally, the WHO estimates that 1. 1 billion people are at high risk (>1 in 1000 chance in a year) of acquiring malaria.
56 There were over 200 million cases of malaria in 2018 and over 400,000 malaria deaths. There are approximately 8. 5 million cases of recurrent malaria every year and it is the most common form of the disease outside of sub-Saharan Africa; the dormancy of the parasite means it can avoid eradication by most antimalarial agents used against blood-stage parasites.
The greatest unmet need is among children and pregnant women. Indeed, in 2018, children younger than 5 years of age accounted for 67% of malaria deaths worldwide. 56 Children born to infected women are at higher risk of low birthweight and become susceptible when acquired immunity from the mother wanes.
Half of pregnant women with severe malaria will die from the infection, often from anemia; this group has been left behind in traditional drug development. Based on promising
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: Nonprofits, Universities, State/local governments, For-profits Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates Varies Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.
-Purpose. This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) encourages Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant applications from small business concerns (SBCs) that propose to develop, standardize, and validate new and innovative assays, integrated strategies, or batteries of assays that determine or predict specific organ toxicities (e.g., ocular, dermal, hematotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, olfactory loss, bladder toxicity, neurotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, endocrine toxicity, and pancreatic beta cell toxicity), resulting from both acute and chronic exposures to various chemicals, environmental pollutants, biologics and therapeutic molecules or drugs. In addition, this FOA encourages the development, standardization, and validation of new models of arthritis, convulsion, infection and shock. New approaches for high throughput toxicity screening that involves the use of molecular endpoints, computer modeling, proteomics, genomics and epigenomics and the development of virtual tissues are also encouraged as are development of 3-dimensional organ models for toxicity evaluation. -Mechanism of Support. This FOA will utilize the SBIR (R43/R44) grant mechanisms for Phase I, Phase II, and Fast-Track applications and runs in parallel with a FOA of identical scientific scope, PA-09-007, which encourages applications under the Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) (R41/R42) grant mechanisms. Funding Opportunity Number: PA-09-006. Assistance Listing: 93.113,93.173,93.361,93.389,93.837,93.846,93.847,93.848,93.849,93.859,93.867. Funding Instrument: G. Category: ED,ENV,FN,HL.
Purpose. This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), issued by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), invites Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) cooperative agreement applications from small business concerns (SBCs) that propose to develop new, or to improve existing application(s) of nanotechnology-based therapeutics or/and in vivo diagnostics. This FOA will specifically support pre-clinical optimization and testing of these cancer-relevant nanotechnology applications against the intended cancer type. The proposed projects must be milestone-driven and must be clearly directed toward development of an ultimate commercial product. The outcomes are expected to advance the discovery and pre-clinical optimization phase so that an Investigational New Drug (IND) or Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) application could be submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by the end or shortly after completion of the Phase II project period. To facilitate these steps, the NCI will assist the awardees in various ways, including the support through the NCI-sponsored Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory. This FOA will NOT support basic research projects, studies on disease mechanisms, and clinical trials. Mechanism of Support. This FOA will utilize the SBIR (U43/U44) cooperative agreement mechanisms for Phase I and Phase II applications. Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards. Awards issued under this FOA are contingent upon the availability of funds and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications. The total amount awarded and the number of awards will depend upon the quality, duration, and costs of the applications received. Funding Opportunity Number: PAR-10-286. Assistance Listing: 93.393,93.394,93.395,93.396. Funding Instrument: CA. Category: ED,HL. Award Amount: Up to $150K per award.