1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsGHRAC Historical Records Grant Program is sponsored by Georgia Historical Records Advisory Council (GHRAC). This program offers grants to local historical repositories in Georgia to develop and/or implement projects to identify, preserve, and provide access to historical records.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Georgia Historical Records Advisory Council (GHRAC)” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
University System of Georgia NOTICE: Your web browser (Internet Explorer 8 or below) is out of date . It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites. If you are accessing this website on a computer you personally own, we strongly encourage upgrading the browser software or use the latest version of an alternate browser such as Firefox or Chrome .
The Georgia Archives will be closed on Friday, July 3, and Saturday July 4, in observance of the Independence Day holiday. Georgia Historical Records Advisory Council Formerly the Georgia Historical Records Advisory Board (GHRAB) The Georgia Historical Records Advisory Council (GHRAC) was created by statute during the 1993 Georgia General Assembly.
The Council has twelve members, appointed by the Governor, and representing citizens, educators, local governments, historical repositories, and professional organizations. GHRAC works to ensure that Georgians of all ages are made aware of the significant historical records located statewide, enhances the preservation and care of these treasures, and improves the access that Georgians have to their records.
The Georgia Historical Records Advisory Council (GHRAC) promotes the educational use of Georgia’s documentary heritage by all its citizens, evaluates and improves the condition of records, encourages statewide planning for preservation and access to Georgia’s historical records, and advises the Board of Regents and the Georgia Archives on issues concerning records.
Directory : The Directory of Historical Organizations contains information about more than 600 archives, libraries, and museums in Georgia. Use it to search by topic or location. Historical Records Grants Program : GHRAC offers grants of $2,500 to $5,000 to local historical repositories in Georgia to develop and/or implement projects to identify, preserve, and provide access to historical records.
This may be a local government, historical society, library, museum, or similar organization. Awards Program : This annual program recognizes outstanding efforts in archives and records work in Georgia. Find out about prior winners and how to nominate a person or organization for an award.
Award Winners Preferred Practices Manual and Self-Assessment Guide : Originally published by GHRAC in 1999 and revised in 2010.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Local historical repositories in Georgia, including non-profit organizations and local governments. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows $2,500 to $5,000. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
GHRAC Historical Records Grant Program is funded by Georgia Historical Records Advisory Council (GHRAC). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Georgia. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
Jerome Early-Career Project Grants is a grant from Forecast Public Art, funded by the Jerome Foundation, that funds the creation of new public art projects by early-career artists based in Minnesota. Two grants of $8,000 each are awarded annually to support temporary or permanent public artworks anywhere in Minnesota. Projects may be supported by public or nonprofit agencies but private commissions are not eligible, and a secured project site is required at the time of application. The program places special emphasis on supporting BIPOC and Native artists, LGBTQIA+ artists, women artists, immigrant artists, rural artists, and artists with disabilities. Eligible applicants are Minnesota-based individual artists with 2–10 years of generative experience. The application deadline was October 15, 2025.
The Local Cultural Council Program is a grant from the Massachusetts Cultural Council distributing $1,000 to $10,000 through a statewide network of 329 Local Cultural Councils (LCCs) representing every city and town in the Commonwealth. Each LCC awards funds based on local community cultural needs as assessed by council members. Eligible applicants include artists, nonprofits, schools, and organizations pursuing arts, humanities, and science projects. Applications are submitted directly to local councils and are typically due by October 16. Grants from most LCCs are reimbursement-based. Massachusetts Cultural Council funds the LCCs centrally, which then regrant to community projects.
The May 29, 2026 OMB proposed rewrite of 2 CFR 200 is being read primarily as a cost-principles document. The structural change that will reshape how federal grants get decided is proposed §200.205, which requires senior political appointees to conduct a pre-issuance review of all discretionary awards — and the companion provision that makes peer-review recommendations 'advisory only' and not binding on agency decision-makers. The combined effect is the subordination of merit review to political review across NSF, NIH, DOE, USDA, and every other agency that runs peer-reviewed grant competitions. Why this is structurally different from prior administrations' political influence, what the 45-day comment window means for affected institutions, and the strategy for applicants whose proposals will be reviewed under the new framework starting October 1, 2026.
Read articleThe headlines on OMB's May 29 rewrite of 2 CFR Part 200 have focused on §200.205's political pre-issuance review. The structurally larger change is a single sentence in §200.205(d) that says peer review recommendations 'remain advisory and are not ministerially ratified' by the federal agency. That language demotes the peer-review-driven funding model that has defined the NIH, NSF, NEH, and DOE Office of Science research portfolios for fifty years to one input among several — replacing a presumption that scored panels drive funding decisions with a presumption that political appointees do. Comment deadline July 13, effective October 1.
Read article