State Department Puts $2.96M Behind a Single Global Anti-Transnational-Repression Program — Applications Close August 12

July 26, 2026 · 5 min read

Granted Research Team · Editorial policy

Most federal funding notices reward you for spreading a program across many grantees. This one does the opposite. The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) has opened NOFO DFOP0019327 — the DRL Global Coalition Against Transnational Repression — a competition that will make one award of roughly $2 million to $2.96 million to a single organization capable of standing up a global program. Applications are due August 12, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. ET. This is a winner-take-all opportunity in one of the fastest-growing corners of the human-rights field, and the entire premise — one grantee, one coalition, one mandate — changes how a competitive proposal has to be built.

What transnational repression actually is

Transnational repression (TNR) is what happens when a government's campaign to silence its critics does not stop at its own border. It is the assassination or attempted assassination of dissidents on foreign soil. It is the harassment, surveillance, and intimidation of diaspora communities and their relatives back home. It is the abuse of Interpol Red Notices to have exiled activists detained abroad, the digital surveillance and spyware deployed against journalists in exile, and the coercion-by-proxy in which a regime threatens a dissident's family to control the dissident.

Human-rights researchers have documented a steady rise in these tactics over the past decade, and the phenomenon has moved from a niche concern to a named priority across multiple DRL funding lines. The July 2026 slate alone includes several related notices — initiatives to document TNR through academic and judicial bodies, and a global documentation-for-accountability effort — of which the Global Coalition NOFO is the flagship coordination piece.

What DRL is actually buying

Read the objective carefully, because it defines the whole proposal. DRL wants a program that will establish a new global coalition to counter transnational repression by strengthening coordination and building capacity among three constituencies: partner governments, law enforcement agencies, and civil society organizations.

That is a coordination-and-capacity mandate, not a direct-services one. The winning organization is not primarily being funded to provide legal aid to individual victims or to run its own advocacy campaign. It is being funded to be the connective tissue — the entity that convenes governments, trains and links law-enforcement counterparts across jurisdictions, equips frontline civil-society groups, and builds a durable multi-stakeholder coalition where today there is a patchwork of disconnected efforts.

The practical implication for applicants: your proposal has to demonstrate that you can operate credibly at three very different tables at once. You need standing with foreign governments, working relationships with law-enforcement and justice institutions, and trust among grassroots civil-society and diaspora organizations that are often wary of anything that looks like a government program. Few organizations sit naturally at all three tables, which is exactly why this is a hard, high-value award.

The terms, precisely

Two of those details deserve emphasis. First, this is a single award — there is no consolation tier, no partial funding for a strong runner-up. You either win the whole program or you win nothing. Second, the SAM.gov registration requirement is a hard gate that trips up first-time federal applicants every cycle. SAM.gov registration and UEI issuance can take days to weeks, and it cannot be rushed at the deadline. If your organization is not already registered and active, that is the very first thing to fix — before you write a word of the narrative.

Who realistically competes

The eligibility language — nonprofits, think tanks, civil-society and non-governmental organizations — is broad, but the substantive requirements narrow the field considerably. A competitive applicant will typically be an organization that already:

Both U.S.-based and foreign organizations that meet the not-for-profit definition and can register in SAM.gov are eligible, which widens the pool internationally — but the coordination mandate rewards incumbents with existing networks over newcomers, however worthy.

Strategy: how to build a winning proposal

Lead with your convening credibility, not your mission statement. The single most important thing you can prove is that governments, law enforcement, and civil-society groups will actually come to a table you host. Name the relationships. Attach letters of support from the constituencies you claim to connect. A coalition-building award is won or lost on the believability of the coalition you can already assemble.

Design the coalition as an institution, not an event. DRL is funding a program with a 24-to-36-month horizon and, implicitly, a hope that the coalition outlasts the grant. Show governance: how members join, how decisions get made, how the coalition sustains itself after federal funding ends. A proposal that reads as a series of convenings will lose to one that reads as the architecture of a lasting body.

Address the security and do-no-harm dimension head-on. This is human-rights work targeting the operations of hostile states. A serious proposal has a serious plan for protecting the activists, journalists, and diaspora members it works with — data security, participant confidentiality, and risk mitigation are not appendix material here. Reviewers in this field will look for it specifically, and its absence reads as inexperience.

Build a realistic monitoring and evaluation framework. Countering repression is notoriously hard to measure. Do not promise to "reduce transnational repression" as your outcome. Define what coordination and capacity actually look like when they improve — coalition membership growth, cross-border cases jointly worked, law-enforcement counterparts trained, civil-society tools deployed — and commit to metrics you can genuinely report against.

Start the SAM.gov clock today. It bears repeating because it is the most common avoidable failure. Confirm your UEI, confirm your SAM.gov registration is active and not expired, and give yourself a buffer. An unregistered applicant with a brilliant program is an ineligible applicant.

The bigger picture

The Global Coalition NOFO is small in dollars but significant in what it represents: transnational repression has graduated into a standing, funded priority for U.S. human-rights diplomacy, with a cluster of DRL notices — documentation, accountability, and now coalition-building — moving in parallel. For an organization already working at the intersection of governments, law enforcement, and civil society, this is a rare chance to become the recognized hub of a global effort rather than one voice among many. But it is a winner-take-all competition on a four-week clock, and the field of organizations that can credibly claim all three seats at the table is thin. If yours is one of them, the work of assembling letters, security plans, and a SAM.gov registration needs to start immediately — the August 12 deadline will not wait, and second place funds nothing.

Get AI Grants Delivered Weekly

New funding opportunities, deadline alerts, and grant writing tips every Tuesday.

Browse all EPA grants

More EPA Articles

The Labor Department's $50M Reskill Dislocated Worker Grants Are A Reindustrialization Bet — $2M To $8M Awards, An August 3 Deadline, And A New Rulebook For Workforce Nonprofits

DOL's Rapid Reskill Employment Recovery National Dislocated Worker Grants deploy about $50M in awards of $2M to $8M, close August 3, 2026, and explicitly tie funding to reindustrialization priorities — AI infrastructure, nuclear energy, shipbuilding, advanced manufacturing, and domestic mineral production. Here is who is eligible, what 'rapid reskill' actually requires, and how to build a competitive application in the weeks that remain.

Read article

$702 Million for Fire Departments: How AFG and SAFER Work, Who Wins, and Why the FY27 Increase Matters for Volunteer and Rural Departments

Congress set FEMA's fire grant programs at $702 million for FY27 — a 2.63% increase split evenly between the Assistance to Firefighters Grant and SAFER staffing program. Here is the definitive breakdown of how the two programs work, what they fund, who is eligible, and the strategy that separates funded departments from rejected ones.

Read article

EPA Just Waived $200,000 in WIFIA Fees for Small Communities Through FY2027 — Why the Cheapest Water Infrastructure Money in America Is Now Even Cheaper for Towns Under 25,000

On June 29, 2026, EPA announced it will waive the $25,000 WIFIA application fee and the credit processing fee — averaging roughly $156,000 per loan — for communities of 25,000 or fewer residents in fiscal years 2026 and 2027. Combined, that removes nearly $200,000 in upfront cost from the single most affordable federal water-infrastructure financing program, which carries roughly $11 billion in available capacity and can cover up to 80% of eligible project costs at Treasury-rate pricing. For small towns, rural utilities, and the nonprofits and districts that serve them, this is a rare instance of the federal government lowering the barrier to a program that has historically been out of reach for exactly the communities that need it most. Here is what changed, who qualifies, and how to move on a letter of interest before the window closes.

Read article

Not sure which grants to apply for?

Use our free grant finder to search active federal funding opportunities by agency, eligibility, and deadline.

Find Grants

Ready to write your next grant?

Draft your proposal with Granted AI. Professional members win a grant in 12 months or get a full refund.

Backed by the Granted Guarantee