1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsDeworming Innovation Fund is sponsored by The END Fund. Supports innovative techniques to eliminate schistosomiasis and intestinal worms in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, and Zimbabwe.
Get alerted about grants like this
Get emailed when new opportunities from “The END Fund” or related funders appear. Free, weekly, unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Nonprofits, NGOs, and community organizations in the specified countries. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Deworming Innovation Fund is funded by The END Fund. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
NCI Continuing Umbrella of Research Experiences (CURE) Academic Career Excellence (ACE) Award (K32) is a grant from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) that funds early postdoctoral fellows from diverse backgrounds, including underrepresented groups, to pursue research training in cancer-related fields. The K32 award supports fellows within 12 months prior to transitioning into, or within the first two years of, a postdoctoral position. The program, operated through NCI's Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (CRCHD), aims to enhance the pool of qualified diverse cancer researchers. Beginning with the June 12, 2025 due date, the CURE ACE Award is available in both Independent Clinical Trial Required and Independent Clinical Trial Not Allowed versions. Eligible applicants must be U.S. citizens or permanent residents at time of award.
Innovation Grant is a grant from the Delta Dental of Arizona Foundation that funds nonprofit organizations pursuing unique, high-impact projects that improve health and wellness in Arizona communities. This two-year award supports original initiatives with measurable real-world impact, including programs serving underserved and uninsured populations through oral health education, disease prevention, and nutritional access. Projects must demonstrate the potential to make a meaningful difference in the community and stand apart from conventional approaches. Eligible applicants are Arizona-based nonprofit organizations. Awards total $100,000 per recipient over two years. The 2026 application cycle closed October 16, 2025, with recipients notified in late 2025 and funding made available shortly after.
The headlines on OMB's May 29 rewrite of 2 CFR Part 200 have focused on §200.205's political pre-issuance review. The structurally larger change is a single sentence in §200.205(d) that says peer review recommendations 'remain advisory and are not ministerially ratified' by the federal agency. That language demotes the peer-review-driven funding model that has defined the NIH, NSF, NEH, and DOE Office of Science research portfolios for fifty years to one input among several — replacing a presumption that scored panels drive funding decisions with a presumption that political appointees do. Comment deadline July 13, effective October 1.
Read articleOMB's proposed rewrite of 2 CFR — the Uniform Guidance that governs nearly every federal grant — would let agencies terminate awards 'for convenience,' strip recipients of hearing rights, mandate E-Verify, and add political review to funding decisions. Comments close July 13, 2026, with an October 1 effective date. Here's what every active grantee needs to understand and do now.
Read articleThe Office of Management and Budget published a 400-plus-page proposed rule on May 29, 2026 rewriting the government-wide Uniform Guidance for the first time since 2013. Comments are due July 13. Effective date is October 1. The rule codifies political appointee pre-issuance review of every discretionary grant, broadens termination-for-convenience authority to the federal contracting standard, bans publication fees and conference registration as allowable costs, prohibits DEI-coded activities, eliminates fixed-amount awards, extends Wolf Amendment-style foreign collaboration restrictions across all federal financial assistance, and rebrands the guidance itself as the Uniform Grants Regulation. Every active and prospective federal grantee should read the NPRM. Here is the section-by-section breakdown, the realistic comment strategy, and the operational changes universities, nonprofits, and state and local governments need to be making now.
Read article