27 matching grants
HORIZON-CL4-2025-02-HA-01-1: Optimisation of resource usage in a circular economy
HORIZON-CL4-2025-02-HA-01-1: Optimisation of resource usage in a circular economy is sponsored by European Commission (Horizon Europe). Funds development of materials and processes minimizing Critical Raw Materials use and environmental footprint via Life Cycle Analysis, targeting circular economy in green tech including recycling. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat January 16, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates EUR 0.5 million - EUR 10 million Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: EU-based research consortia, businesses, universities focused on green technologies If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with HORIZON-CL4-2025-02-HA-01-1: Optimisation of resource usage in a circular economy.
Vast x Explorers Club Grant
Vast x Explorers Club Grant is sponsored by Vast and The Explorers Club. Supports researchers, technologists, and explorers advancing understanding of space environments including the Moon, with projects on human adaptation and space habitats that could encompass lunar regolith processing for manufacturing. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat February 15, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $20,000 – $25,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: Early-career and established researchers, technologists, explorers; laboratory or field-based projects with clear objectives If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Vast x Explorers Club Grant.
Defense University Research Instrumentation Program
Defense University Research Instrumentation Program is sponsored by Department of Defense. Awards equipment grants to universities for research in engineering fields including design and prototyping. Enhances capabilities in defense-related engineering. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat March 1, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $100,000 - $1,300,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: U.S. universities with DOD-funded engineering research programs If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Defense University Research Instrumentation Program.
High Altitude Community Observatory (HACO) Development Program
High Altitude Community Observatory (HACO) Development Program is sponsored by National Science Foundation (NSF). NSF supports development of high-altitude platforms for astronomical observations, including buoyant systems like aerostats for ultra-high altitude research applications. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat March 15, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $1,000,000 - $5,000,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: Universities, research institutions, consortia If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with High Altitude Community Observatory (HACO) Development Program.
EAIE Doctoral Research Grants
EAIE Doctoral Research Grants is sponsored by European Association for International Education (EAIE). Supports early-career doctoral scholars researching internationalization in higher education, potentially including design education aspects. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat March 31, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates €10,000 (approx. $10,800) Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: Doctoral students conducting research on higher education internationalization If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with EAIE Doctoral Research Grants.
Artificial Intelligence in Communication Sciences and Disorders Research Grant
Artificial Intelligence in Communication Sciences and Disorders Research Grant is sponsored by ASHFoundation. Supports interdisciplinary studies integrating artificial intelligence into communication sciences and disorders research to advance discovery, clinical practice, and access. Up to four grants available for researchers with PhD or equivalent. Official opportunity description and requirements excerpt: ASHFoundation - Apply for Grants, Scholarships, and Awards You are using an outdated browser! Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience. Clinical Achievement Awards Type your search query here Apply for Grants, Scholarships, and Awards The ASHFoundation Board Program Committee oversees the review process of all ASHFoundation research grants, scholarships, and clinical achievement awards. For program-related questions, please e-mail foundationprograms@asha.org . The research grant review criteria have been updated to be similar to the new NIH Simplified Peer Review Framework. For more details, visit the Frequently Asked Questions . NEW in 2026: Designated funding for cost savings research will support studies in any research grant program that propose to examine the cost savings of services (including assessment, screening, diagnosis, and/or treatment) within the CSD discipline. Policy makers are interested in the monetary value and cost savings of providing services on the long-term total cost of care. Historical advocacy arguments about quality of life, independence, functional status, and equity need to be enhanced by accurate data on the downstream costs that are avoided by upstream services provided by the professions. Some examples of possible outcomes include: total cost of care, length of stay, readmission rates, discharge setting, secondary and tertiary prevention, preventable adverse events, savings on discontinued medical interventions. Studies on all populations and health care settings are welcome while outpatient and developmental disorders will be prioritized. Now Open! Artificial Intelligence in Communication Sciences and Disorders Research Grant Supports interdisciplinary studies that investigate the integration of artificial intelligence into communication sciences and disorders research to advance discovery, research, clinical practice, and access. For: Researchers (with a PhD or equivalent research doctorate in CSD or related discipline) Award: Up to four grants of $25,000-$50,000 each Researcher-Practitioner Collaboration Grant Supports collaborative studies that will increase knowledge to improve services for individuals with communication disorders. For: Partnerships of researchers (with a PhD or equivalent research doctorate in CSD or related discipline) and practitioners (with a degree in audiology, speech-language pathology or related field) Award: Up to four grants of $35,000 for each team New Century Scholars Research Grant Supports innovative studies that foster new research ideas and directions for investigators, and that will advance knowledge, tools, and techniques in communication sciences and disorders. For: Researchers (with a PhD or equivalent research doctorate in CSD) Award: Up to four grants of $25,000 each New Investigators Research Grant Supports new investigators by funding preliminary studies that could launch larger-scale research investigations. For: Researchers (with a PhD or equivalent research doctorate earned within past five years) Application snapshot: target deadline April 22, 2026; published funding information $25,000–$50,000; eligibility guidance Researchers with PhD or equivalent research doctorate in CSD or related discipline Use the official notice and source links for final requirements, attachment checklists, allowable costs, and submission instructions before applying.
New Investigator Research Grant
New Investigator Research Grant is sponsored by ASHFoundation. Supports innovative studies fostering new research ideas in communication sciences and disorders, potentially applicable to AI-enhanced therapeutic approaches. Up to four grants for established investigators. Official opportunity description and requirements excerpt: New Investigators Research Grant You are using an outdated browser! Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience. Clinical Achievement Awards Type your search query here New Investigators Research Grant Winner Announcement: Applicants are notified of competition results by September. All research grant recipients will be announced and recognized in November. Past Recipients: View past New Investigators Research Grant recipients and learn more about their work. Required Report: Grant recipients are required to submit a final report of activities and outcomes to the ASHFoundation no later than December 31, 2026. The ASHFoundation will provide report requirements. The ASHFoundation strongly encourages recipients to submit their results to appropriate ASHA journals and to the ASHA Convention Program Committee, with appropriate acknowledgement of ASHFoundation funding. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation (ASHFoundation) invites new researchers to submit proposals in competition for up to 10 research grants of $10,000 each. The New Investigators Research Grant is designed to help further new investigators' research activities by funding one-year, preliminary studies that could launch larger-scale research studies. Research, while not limited in topic, should be focused on matching a one-year scope and should have clinical relevance to audiology and/or speech-language pathology. Note for 2026: In preparation for the grant submission and review processes, the ASHFoundation requests that potential investigators complete an Intent to Submit Form by March 4. This step must be completed before proceeding to the proposal submission process. Funding Opportunity for Child Language Studies One additional New Investigators Research Grant will be supported by the endowed Lois Bloom Language Development Research Fund , established by Dr. Lois and Robert Bloom, for the purpose of supporting research topics in the area of child language. Investigators must meet the following criteria to be eligible for the New Investigators Research Grant. The investigator must have completed a PhD or equivalent research doctorate in communication sciences and disorders within the past five years (since 2020). The ASHFoundation will consider requests to grant an extension to the 5-year eligibility timeframe due to life events such as family leave, medical leave, disability, natural disasters, or active-duty military service. To request an extension of the eligibility timeframe, email foundationprograms@asha.org prior to the submission deadline with an explanation of the reason for the eligibility extension. Note: Due to the availability of other student research grant and scholarship funds through the ASHFoundation, students currently enrolled in a degree program are not eligible for this research grant. The investigator must not yet have received external research funding since completion of the PhD; prior internal university funding Application snapshot: target deadline April 22, 2026; published funding information $25,000; eligibility guidance Researchers with PhD or equivalent research doctorate in CSD Use the official notice and source links for final requirements, attachment checklists, allowable costs, and submission instructions before applying.
Atmospheric and Stratospheric Balloon Program
Atmospheric and Stratospheric Balloon Program is sponsored by NASA. NASA funds scientific balloon missions and platform technologies at ultra-high altitudes, extending to hybrid aerostat systems using hydrogen for long-duration flights. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat April 30, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $500,000 - $4,000,000 Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: Universities, research organizations, industry partners If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Atmospheric and Stratospheric Balloon Program.
Collaborative Research and Training Experience Program
Collaborative Research and Training Experience Program is sponsored by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). Funds collaborative research and training experiences, potentially including design education in interdisciplinary contexts. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat May 1, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates $1.65M over six years Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: Canadian postsecondary researchers and their organizations If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with Collaborative Research and Training Experience Program.
NIH R01 Research Project Grant
NIH R01 Research Project Grant is sponsored by NIH. The Research Project Grant (R01) is the original and historically oldest grant mechanism used by NIH. The R01 provides support for health-related research and development based on the mission of the NIH. R01s can be investigator-initiated or can be solicited via a Request for Applications. This program should be reviewed carefully against your organization's mission, staffing capacity, timeline, and compliance readiness before you commit resources to a full application. Strong submissions usually translate sponsor priorities into concrete objectives, clear implementation milestones, and measurable public benefit. For planning purposes, treat June 15, 2026 as your working submission target unless the sponsor publishes an updated notice. A competitive project plan should include a documented need statement, implementation approach, evaluation framework, risk controls, and a realistic budget narrative. Even when a grant allows broad program design, reviewers still expect credible evidence that the proposed work can be executed within the grant period and with appropriate accountability. Current published award information indicates Up to $500,000 per year Organizations should verify the final funding range, matching requirements, and allowability rules directly in the official opportunity materials before preparing a budget. Finance and program teams should align early so direct costs, indirect costs, staffing assumptions, procurement timelines, and reporting obligations all remain consistent throughout drafting and post-award administration. Eligibility guidance for this opportunity is: Higher education institutions; Nonprofits with 501(c)(3) status; State and local governments; Small businesses; Independent research organizations If your organization has partnerships, subrecipients, or collaborators, define responsibilities and compliance ownership before submission. Reviewers often look for implementation credibility, so letters of commitment, prior performance evidence, and a clear governance model can materially strengthen the application narrative and reduce concerns about delivery risk. A practical approach is to begin with a focused readiness review, then build a workback schedule from the sponsor deadline. Confirm required attachments, registration dependencies, and internal approval checkpoints early. This reduces last-minute issues and improves submission quality. For the most accurate requirements, always rely on the official notice and primary source links associated with NIH R01 Research Project Grant.
Not sure which grants to apply for?
Use our free grant finder to search active federal funding opportunities by agency, eligibility, and deadline.
Researchers Grant Writing Guides
NOAA Coastal and Marine Grants: A Researcher's Guide for 2026
A comprehensive guide to NOAA funding for coastal resilience, marine debris, ocean science, and climate adaptation research in 2026.
Read articleThe Reasons Most NIH R01 Proposals Fail
Why most NIH R01 proposals fail and how to fix common mistakes. Avoid unclear aims, weak methodology, and insufficient preliminary data.
Read articleScholarship and Fellowship Application Guide
Comprehensive guide to top scholarships and fellowships including Rhodes, Fulbright, Marshall, Goldwater, and more with application strategies.
Read articleNSF Grant Writing Resources: Tools for Researchers
Essential NSF grant writing resources for academic researchers. From the Grant Proposal Guide to workshops and professional writing services.
Read articleNIH Grant Tips for Early-Career Researchers
NIH grant writing tips for early-career researchers: navigate FOAs, choose the right mechanism, and build a competitive first grant application.
Read articleNIH F31 Fellowship Application: A Graduate Student's Complete Guide
Step-by-step guide to the NIH F31 predoctoral fellowship covering eligibility, specific aims, training plans, sponsor selection, and scoring criteria.
Read article