On Eagles Wings

On Eagles Wings (EIN 33-1819283, Hooksett, NH) is a private grantmaking foundation (NTEE T20, foundation code 04) whose IRS determination letter dates to May 2025 — meaning it is, for practical purposes, a brand-new funder. Its own website, oneagleswings.org, currently loads as an unfinished template: placeholder Lorem ipsum copy, a stock New York City address, and a generic "800-123-456" phone number and "contact@example.com" email, with only an Isaiah 40:31 scripture reference and a self-description as "A Catholic Blog" as substantive content. No mission statement, programs, grant guidelines, staff names, or past grantee list are recorded in IRS Business Master File data or on the site itself. That combination — a single ~$4 million asset base reported in one lump, no officer compensation on file, and no public grant history — is the classic signature of a small family or donor-directed private foundation that has just been funded and has not yet begun (or publicized) active grantmaking.

For a grant seeker, the realistic approach here is patience and direct outreach rather than a portal-based application. Do not treat the `accepting_applications: true` flag or the placeholder contact details as confirmation of an open, unsolicited-proposal process — private foundations at this stage overwhelmingly give through the founder's or trustees' personal networks and by invitation, at least until a public program is formalized. The first move should be verification, not submission: pull the foundation's actual Form 990-PF from ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer or Candid once filed (a 2024 return should post there), which will reveal the true trustees, any compensation, and — critically — the first cohort of grants, which is the single best signal of what this funder actually supports. Cross-reference the Hooksett address against New Hampshire's Attorney General Charitable Trusts Unit registry, which requires active-charity filings and often lists a current registered agent or contact.

Until that verification is done, first-time applicants should assume this is not a cold-LOI funder. A short, respectful introductory letter to the registered address, asking whether the foundation has a giving program open to outside applicants, is more appropriate than a full proposal package.

The only hard numbers on file are from a single fiscal-year-2024 snapshot: total assets of $4,000,010 and total revenue of $4,000,110, with grants paid, officer compensation, contributions received, and net investment income all unreported (null). The near-exact match between assets and revenue — roughly $100 apart — strongly suggests the $4 million figure represents a single founding contribution or transfer into the foundation in its first reporting year, not several years of accumulated investment growth. That is consistent with the May 2025 IRS ruling date: this foundation likely has not yet completed a full grantmaking cycle that would show up in public filings.

No grantee data exists in the record (`total_grants: 0`, `avg_amount: null`, `total_amount: null`), so there is no median grant size, program-area split, or geographic pattern to report from this foundation's own history — and none should be inferred or estimated as fact. The one figure that can be responsibly projected is a regulatory benchmark: private non-operating foundations must distribute roughly 5% of net investment assets annually to maintain tax-exempt status. Applied to a $4 million base, that implies a plausible future qualifying-distribution floor of approximately $180,000–$200,000 per year once the foundation begins active grantmaking (net of typical investment-asset averaging) — small enough that it likely translates into either a handful of larger grants (2-5 grants in the $40,000-$100,000 range) or a broader set of smaller ones (10-20 grants of $10,000-$20,000), not both. Applicants should treat this only as a sizing benchmark, not a confirmed grant range, since no actual disbursement has been recorded yet. Watch ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer or Candid for the foundation's first 990-PF, which will convert this projection into real figures for grant size, payout ratio, and recipient count.

On Eagles Wings sits inside a distinct cluster of very small, recently formed private foundations, all filed under the same Philanthropy & Grantmaking NTEE category and clustered tightly around a $4.0 million asset base:

The near-identical asset figures across all six organizations (within a few hundred dollars of exactly $4.0 million) is itself a notable pattern — it suggests these are all recently established vehicles funded at a common threshold, quite possibly using similar formation advice or a shared administrative structure, rather than foundations that grew organically through investment returns. Only Origami Works Foundation has a live public website among the peer set, making it the single most useful comparison point for what a mature version of this class of foundation eventually publishes; applicants targeting On Eagles Wings should check Origami Works' site for clues about how this cohort typically structures its (likely still informal) giving process.

No news coverage, press release, grant announcement, or social-media activity tied specifically to this foundation (EIN 33-1819283, Hooksett, NH) surfaced in web research. Search results for "On Eagles Wings" are dominated by at least five unrelated organizations of similar name — including On Eagles Wings International (a relationship-based Christian ministry funder giving to grantees like Christ for All Nations and Joyce Meyer Ministries), an On Eagles Wings Foundation in Arlington, WA, an On Eagles Wings Inc. in Mishawaka, IN supporting families affected by childhood cancer, and separate entities in Dallas, TX and Lansdale, PA — none of which share this foundation's EIN, state, or asset profile.

The most recent and most reliable "activity" signal in hand is administrative rather than programmatic: the IRS ruling date of May 2025, marking this foundation's formal recognition as a 501(c)(3) private foundation, and a database record last updated July 25, 2026. The foundation's own website (oneagleswings.org) is visibly still under construction — it displays a "Work in PROGRESS" notice alongside placeholder Lorem ipsum text and a stock contact block, with no evidence yet of a published program, board announcement, or grant cycle. For grant seekers, the practical read is that this organization has generated no public activity to react to; the next milestone to watch for is its first Form 990-PF filing (covering fiscal year 2024), which should appear on ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer or Candid and will be the first authoritative record of trustees, giving amounts, and any grantees.

Because no application form, LOI process, deadline, or program description has been published by this foundation, generic "grant-writing best practices" would be dishonest to present as funder-specific advice. What can be said concretely: first, do not rely on the phone number (800-123-456) or email (contact@example.com) currently associated with the foundation's record — both have the structure of unfilled template placeholders rather than a working line, and reaching out via them is likely to fail or go nowhere. Instead, use the physical mailing address on file with the IRS — 9 Meadowcrest Rd, Hooksett, NH 03106 — for a first written inquiry, and separately search the New Hampshire Attorney General's Charitable Trusts Unit database, which requires registered charities and foundations operating in the state to file an annual report listing a current contact and, often, an attorney or accountant of record.

Second, treat the foundation's first Form 990-PF (for tax year 2024, matching the $4,000,010 asset figure already on file) as the single most valuable document you can obtain before applying. Once posted to ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer or Candid/Foundation Directory Online, it will disclose the trustees' names, any paid staff, and — most importantly — whether the foundation has already made its first round of grants and to whom. That grantee list, once it exists, is the only reliable signal of subject-matter and geographic fit; applying blind before it is published risks wasting an approach on a funder whose real priorities (health, education, faith-based work, a specific U.S. state, etc.) are still unknown.

Third, given the pattern seen across its five near-identical-asset peer foundations (Iowa, Florida, Connecticut, Illinois, Virginia), assume this is very likely a closed, relationship-driven family or donor foundation rather than one that solicits unsolicited proposals — plan a warm introduction through a shared board connection or professional advisor (attorney, accountant, or philanthropic advisor who set up the foundation) rather than a cold submission. Finally, revisit oneagleswings.org periodically — its current "Work in PROGRESS" state suggests a real program page, mission statement, or contact update could go live with little notice.