Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA): Enhancing Health Disparities Research at Undergraduate Institutions

Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA): Enhancing Health Disparities Research at Undergraduate Institutions is sponsored by National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD). Supports small-scale research projects at undergraduate institutions to enhance health disparities research.

Expired RFA-MD-15-002: NIMHD Academic Research Enhancement Award: Enhancing Health Disparities Research at Undergraduate Institutions (R15) This notice has expired. Check the NIH Guide for active opportunities and notices. Department of Health and Human Services Part 1.

Overview Information Participating Organization(s) National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) of Participating Organizations National Institute on Minority Health and Health Funding Opportunity Title NIMHD Academic Research Enhancement Award: Enhancing Health Disparities Research at Undergraduate Institutions (R15) R15 Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) October 29, 2014 - See Notice NOT-MD-15-001 .

Notice of Correction of AIDS Application Due Date for RFA-MD-15-002 "NIMHD Academic Research Enhancement Award: Enhancing Health Disparities Research at Undergraduate Institutions (R15)" Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Number Companion Funding Opportunity Additional Information on Eligibility .

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s) Funding Opportunity Purpose The NIMHD encourages institutions that are eligible to apply for support through the NIH Academic Research Enhancement Awards (AREA) program to submit applications for innovative research projects focused on minority health and health disparities.

Awards are intended to support small-scale projects proposed by faculty members at eligible institutions to expose students to meritorious research and to strengthen the research environment of participating institutions. This initiative also seeks to stimulate interest in health disparities research careers among undergraduate students through hands-on participation in original research.

Open Date (Earliest Submission Date) Letter of Intent Due Date(s) January 12, 2015, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization. All types of non-AIDS applications allowed for this funding opportunity announcement are due on this date. Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.

AIDS Application Due Date(s) January 12, 2015, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization. All types of AIDS and AIDS-related applications allowed for this funding opportunity announcement are due on this date. Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.

Required Application Instructions It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in (R&R) Application Guide , except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts ). Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced.

Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV . When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions. Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

Part 1. Overview Information Part 2. Full Text of the Announcement Section I.

Funding Opportunity Description Section II. Award Information Section III. Eligibility Information Section IV.

Application and Submission Section V. Application Review Information Section VI. Award Administration Information Section VII.

Agency Contacts Section VIII. Other Information Full Text of Announcement Section I. Funding Opportunity Description Although scientific and technological discoveries have improved the health of the U.S. population overall, racial/ethnic minority populations, socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, and rural populations continue to experience a disproportionate burden of disease.

As the Nation’s steward of biomedical and behavioral research, NIH has devoted considerable resources to characterize the root causes of health disparities. These efforts have uncovered a complex, multi-factorial web of interconnected and overlapping risk and protective factors (biological, behavioral, environmental, and societal).

As an important next step, research is needed that capitalizes on knowledge about causal pathways to directly and demonstrably contribute to the elimination of health disparities. The AREA program supports research in educational institutions that provide baccalaureate or advanced degrees for a significant number of the Nation's research scientists but are not major recipients of NIH support.

This initiative is intended to enable qualified scientists at eligible institutions to receive support for research projects that align with the mission and scientific interests of the NIMHD.

Awards will also provide an opportunity for NIMHD to leverage its investments in research infrastructure and capacity building at many of the AREA-eligible institutions that have participated in the NIMHD Building Research Infrastructure and Capacity (BRIC) program and its precursor, the Research Infrastructure in Minority Institutions (RIMI) program.

However, it is not necessary for institutions to be BRIC/RIMI awardees in order to apply to this FOA.

It is anticipated that investigators supported under this program will benefit from the opportunity to conduct independent research; that the grantee institution will benefit from a research environment strengthened through AREA grants and furthered by participation in NIMHD's extramural research programs; and that students at recipient institutions will benefit from exposure to and participation in scientific research focused on minority health NIMHD awards research project grants in two broad areas: (1) Basic and Applied Biomedical Research; and (2) Social, Behavioral, Health Services, and Policy Research.

For both areas, projects must include a focus on one or more health disparity populations, which include Blacks/African Americans, Hispanics/Latinos, American Indians/Alaska Natives, Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders, socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, and rural populations.

This focus can be on health disparity populations as a whole, a single health disparity population, or a subgroup within a health disparity population. Studies that utilize model or in vitro systems should examine risk or protective factors that underlie observed differences in health outcomes between health disparity populations and the general population.

Additional information about potential topics of interest can be found at http://www. nimhd. nih.

gov/programs/extra/iir. html .

Studies examining diseases or conditions that happen to be more prevalent or associated with greater morbidity or mortality in one or more health disparity populations, without the proposed work itself being directly focused on specific risk or protective factors that underlie observed disparities (e.g., earlier disease onset, faster progression, poorer treatment response, or poorer health outcomes) are not a priority for support by NIMHD and will be considered non-responsive to this FOA.

Because the AREA program is a research grant program, not a training or fellowship program, applications should include plans to involve undergraduate students in research experiences but should not include formal training plans.

While it is expected that research experiences will be open to all students at recipient institutions, awardees are encouraged to conduct targeted outreach efforts to raise awareness about the opportunities afforded by this initiative among students from backgrounds that are underrepresented in the biomedical and behavioral sciences (persons from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, people with disabilities, and people from disadvantaged backgrounds; http://www.

nsf. gov/statistics/showpub. cfm?

TopID=2&SubID=27 ). Partnerships with undergraduate institutions that do not confer baccalaureate degrees (e.g., community colleges, tribal colleges) are encouraged to enhance the pool of students available to participate in AREA activities. Section II.

Award Information Grant: A support mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity.

Application Types Allowed Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards NIMHD intends to commit $5,000,000 in FY 2015 to fund approximately 10-12 awards, contingent on the availability of funds and receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.

Applications may request up to $300,000 in direct costs plus applicable Facilities & Administrative (F&A) costs for the entire project period of up to 3 years. Note: When a consortium is involved, the $300,000 direct cost limit is exclusive of consortium F&A costs; these can be requested in addition to the $300,000 direct costs limit. The scope of the proposed project should determine the project period.

The maximum project period is 3 years. described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA.

Higher Education Institutions Public/State Controlled Institutions of Higher Education Private Institutions of Higher Education The following types of Higher Education Institutions are always encouraged to apply for NIH support as Public or Private Institutions of Higher Education: Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs) Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions American Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institutions (AANAPISIs) In addition, all organizations must meet the following two 1.

The applicant organization must offer baccalaureate or advanced degrees in biomedical or behavioral sciences. 2. The applicant organization may not receive research support from the NIH totaling more than $6 million per year (in both direct and F&A/indirect costs) in each of 4 of the last 7 years.

Note that the following activity codes are excluded: C06, S10, and all activity codes starting with a G.

with Multiple Schools or Colleges For institutions composed of multiple schools or colleges, the criterion of financial eligibility is based on the amount of NIH research grant monies received, not by the institution (university or college) as a whole, but by the individual school/college or aggregation of "other academic components" (as defined in this section) where the PD/PI has an appointment (e.g., School of Medicine, College of Nursing, etc.).

Thus, each of the following should be considered independently when determining the financial eligibility of the applicant organization. professional school/college: Accredited public or non-profit private school that provides training leading to a degree related to the health sciences granted by that school (e.g., PhD, MD, DDS, MPT, DC, ND, RN, or equivalent degree).

The term "accredited" means a school or program that is accredited by a recognized body or bodies approved for such purpose by the Secretary of schools or colleges of medicine, dentistry, osteopathy, pharmacy, nursing, veterinary medicine, public health, optometry, allied health, chiropractic, naturopathy and podiatry.

academic component: Once the health professional schools have been excluded, other academic components refers to all remaining schools, colleges, and free-standing institutes of the institution taken as a single To determine the eligibility of an institution, applicants should consult the list of ineligible institutions on the AREA program website at http://grants. nih. gov/grants/funding/area.

htm . If the name of the school does not appear on the list, it is likely eligible to apply for AREA grants. Applicants should check with their own An AREA grant is permitted to have a subcontract to a non-AREA-eligible institution.

However, applicants should keep the goals of the AREA program in mind when preparing the application, which include strengthening the research environment of the institution and exposing students Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) are Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement , are not allowed.

Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the SF 424 (R&R) Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted.

Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as Policy on Late Submission of Grant Applications states that failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a Universal Numbering System (DUNS) - All registrations require that applicants be issued a DUNS number.

After obtaining a DUNS number, applicants can begin both SAM and eRA Commons registrations. The same DUNS number must be used for all registrations, as well as on the grant application. System for Award Management (SAM) (formerly CCR) Applicants must complete and maintain an active requires renewal at least annually .

The renewal process may require as much time as the initial registration. SAM registration includes the assignment of a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code for domestic organizations which have not already been assigned a CAGE Code.

Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code Foreign organizations must obtain an NCAGE code (in lieu of a CAGE code) in order to register in must have an active DUNS number and SAM registration in order to complete the eRA Commons registration. Organizations can register with the eRA Commons as they are working through their SAM or Grants. gov registration.

eRA Commons requires organizations to identify at least one Signing Official (SO) and at least one Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) account in order to Applicants must have an active DUNS number and SAM registration in order to complete the Grants. gov registration. Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s)) All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account.

PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.

Eligible Individuals (Program Director/Principal Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with his/her organization to develop an application for support.

Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply for NIH support. For institutions proposing multiple PDs/PIs, all PD/PIs must have a primary faculty appointment at an AREA-eligible institution.

To be eligible for an AREA grant, the PD(s)/PI(s) must meet the following additional criteria: The PD(s)/PI(s) must have a primary faculty appointment at an AREA eligible institution. The PD(s)/PI(s) may not be the PD(s)/PI(s) of an active NIH research grant, including another AREA grant, at the time of award of an AREA grant (although he or she may be one of the project personnel for an active NIH grant held by another PD/PI).

The PD(s)/PI(s) may not be awarded more than one AREA grant at a time (although he or she may hold successive new or competing renewal AREA Note: These eligibility criteria only apply to the PD(s)/PI(s) of the application, not to other key personnel such as collaborators This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement . 3.

Additional Information on Eligibility Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct. The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time.

This means that the NIH will A new (A0) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of an overlapping new (A0) or resubmission A resubmission (A1) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of the previous new (A0) application.

An application that has substantial overlap with another application pending appeal of initial peer review (see NOT-OD-11-101 ). In addition, the NIH will not accept a resubmission (A1) application that is submitted later than 37 months after submission of the new (A0) application that it follows.

The NIH will accept submission: To an RFA of an application that was submitted previously as an investigator-initiated application but not paid; Of an investigator-initiated application that was originally submitted to an RFA but not paid; or Of an application with a changed grant activity code. Section IV.

Application and Submission Information Applicants must download the SF424 (R&R) application package associated with this funding opportunity using the Apply for Grant Electronically button in this FOA or following the directions 2.

Content and Form of Application Submission It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in (R&R) Application Guide , including Supplemental Grant Application Instructions except where instructed in this funding opportunity announcement to do otherwise. Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced.

Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

For information on Application Submission and Receipt, visit Frequently Asked Questions Application Guide, Electronic Submission of Grant Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and By the date listed in Part 1.

Overview Information , prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information: Descriptive title of proposed activity Name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of the PD(s)/PI(s) Names of other key personnel Participating institution(s) Number and title of this funding opportunity The letter of intent should be sent to: Maryline Laude-Sharp, PhD National Institute on Minority Health & Health Disparities 6707 Democracy Blvd.

, Suite 800, MSC 5465 All page limitations described in the SF424 Application Page Limits must be followed.

Instructions for Application Submission The following section supplements the instructions found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide and should be used for preparing an All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide SF424(R&R) Project/Performance Site Locations All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide SF424(R&R) Other Project Information All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions: Attachments: Provide the following information as a single PDF file with the name Other Attachments.

pdf. A profile of available students of the applicant school/academic component and any information or estimate of the number who have obtained a baccalaureate degree and gone on to obtain an academic or professional doctoral degree in the health-related sciences during the last five years.

A description of the special characteristics of the school/academic component that make it appropriate for an AREA grant, where the goals of the AREA program are to: (1) provide support for meritorious research; (2) strengthen the research environment of schools that have not been major recipients of NIH support; and (3) expose available undergraduate and/or graduate students in such environments to research.

Include a description of the likely impact of an AREA grant on the PD(s)/PI(s) and the research environment of the school/academic component. Although it is expected that the majority of the research will be directed by the applicant investigator and conducted at the grantee institution, limited use of special facilities or equipment at another institution is permitted.

For any proposed research sites other than the applicant institution, provide a brief description of the resources. Collaborations with other investigators are also permitted if complementary expertise is required to accomplish the proposed specific aims.

If relevant, a statement of institutional support for the proposed research project (e.g., equipment, laboratory space, release time, SF424(R&R) Senior/Key Person Profile SF424 (R&R) Senior/Key Person Profile Expanded All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions: Sketch: The PD(s)/PI(s) should include a summary of his or her previous and/or current experience in supervising students in research in the Personal Statement.

The PD(s)/PI(s) should indicate which peer-reviewed publications involved students under his or her supervision All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions: The total budget for all years of the proposed project must be requested in Budget Period 1. Do not complete Budget Periods 2 or 3.

They are not required and will not be accepted with the Complete only Budget Period 1 of either the PHS 398 Modular Budget component or the R&R Budget component. Applicants submitting an application with direct costs of $250,000 or less (total for all years, excluding consortium Facilities and Administrative [F&A] costs) must use the PHS 398 Modular Budget component.

Applicants submitting an application with direct costs of $250,001 - $300,000 (total for all years) must use the Research & Related PHS 398 Modular Budget Component (direct costs of $250,000 or less): Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, noting the following specifications for R15 applications. Costs less Consortium F&A: Select the appropriate dollar amount from the drop-down list.

This number must NOT EXCEED $250,000. F&A: If applicable, enter the actual consortium F&A (e.g., $3,271). Direct Costs: This field auto-calculates so no data entry is required.

Period 1: Indirect Costs: F&A rate agreement has been established, indicate the type of agreement and the date. All appropriate exclusions must be applied in the calculation of the F&A rate has not been established, enter None-will negotiate and include information for a proposed rate. Use the budget justification if additional space is needed.

Justification : Please attach the Personnel Justification and Consortium Justification. If the requested budget requires any additional justification, attach an Additional Narrative Justification. Personnel Justification: Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

Since a primary objective of the AREA program is to expose students to meritorious research, PDs/PIs should include undergraduate (preferably, if available) and/or graduate students in the proposed research to the extent practical. If students are available and will be involved in the research, indicate aspects of the proposed research in which they will participate.

If participating students have not yet been individually identified, the number and academic level of those to be involved should be provided.

If there are any Consultants for the project, provide their names, organizational affiliations, and the services Consortium Justification : Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, but note that the Letter of Intent to establish a consortium must also be included in the Consortium Justification attachment.

R&R Budget Component (direct costs of $250,001 to $300,000): Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, noting the following specifications for R15 applications. Costs less Consortium F&A: This number must NOT EXCEED $300,000. F&A: If applicable, enter the actual consortium F&A (e.g., Period 1: Indirect Costs: F&A rate agreement has been established, indicate the type of agreement.

All appropriate exclusions must be applied in the calculation of the F&A F&A rate has not been established, enter None-will negotiate and include information for a proposed rate. Use the budget justification if additional space is needed. Justification : Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

Since a primary objective of the AREA program is to expose students to meritorious research, PDs/PIs should include undergraduate (preferably, if available) and/or graduate students in the proposed research to the extent practical. Indicate aspects of the proposed research in which students will participate.

All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide PHS 398 Cover Page Supplement All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions: Sharing Plan : Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans (Data Sharing Plan, Sharing Model Organisms, and Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS)) as provided in the SF424 Do not use the Appendix to circumvent page limits.

Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the SF424 (R&R) Planned Enrollment Report When conducting clinical research, follow all instructions for completing Planned Enrollment Reports as described in the SF424 (R&R) PHS 398 Cumulative Inclusion Enrollment Report When conducting clinical research, follow all instructions for completing Cumulative Inclusion Enrollment Report as described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

3. Submission Dates and Times Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates.

Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. Organizations must submit applications to Grants. gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies).

Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons , NIH’s electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants. gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission.

Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants. gov on or before the application due date. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late.

are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission. Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. 4.

Intergovernmental Review This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Requirements and Information Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.

Paper applications will not be accepted. Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III.

Eligibility Information contains information about registration. For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile Component of the SF424(R&R) Application Package .

Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this FOA for information on registration requirements.

The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide. tips for avoiding common errors.

Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by NIMHD , NIH. Applications that are incomplete and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed. Post Submission Materials Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in NOT-OD-13-030.

Section V. Application Review Information Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process.

As part of the NIH mission , all applications submitted to the NIH in support of biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer For this particular announcement, note the following: The objectives of this NIMHD R15 initiative are to (1) provide support for meritorious research focused on the science of health disparities, (2) strengthen the health disparities research environment at schools that have not been major recipients of NIH support, and (3) expose available undergraduate and graduate students in such environments to meritorious health disparities research.

Preliminary data are not required for an R15 application; however, they may be included if available.

Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to make an important scientific contribution to the research field(s) involved, to provide research opportunities to students, and to strengthen the research environment of the institution, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).

Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.

Does the project address an important problem to progress in the field? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?

If funded, will the AREA award have a substantial effect on the school/academic component in terms of strengthening the research environment and exposing students to research? Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or New Investigators, or in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training?

If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project? Do the PD(s)/PI(s) have suitable experience in supervising students in research?

Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense?

Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed? Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented?

If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed?

Does the application provide sufficient evidence that the project can stimulate the interests of students so that they consider a career in the biomedical or If consortium/contractual arrangements with non-AREA eligible institutions are proposed, how will the consortium/contractual activities contribute to achieving the NIMHD R15 program objectives to strengthen the health disparities research environment at schools that have not been major recipients of NIH support and expose students in such environments to meritorious health disparities research.

If the project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, are the plans to address 1) the protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex/gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion or exclusion of children, justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed?

Does the application demonstrate the likely availability of well-qualified students to participate in the research project? Does the application provide sufficient evidence that students have in the past or are likely to pursue careers in the biomedical or behavioral sciences?

Additional Review Criteria As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.

Protections for Human Subjects For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the