1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsThese grants fund research into the ethical implications and regulatory frameworks of artificial intelligence, addressing challenges such as algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and accountability of automated systems.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Varies by specific funder; generally, academic institutions, non-profits, and interdisciplinary teams focused on AI ethics and regulation research are eligible. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows varies (up to $400,000 for specific NSF projects mentioned). Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
AI Ethics and Regulation Grants is funded by National Science Foundation (NSF), Open Philanthropy Project, Mozilla Foundation (Various). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
An AI Foundation Toxicology Model and Framework to Support Waiving a Second Species in Drug Safety Studies is sponsored by European Commission — Horizon Europe. Expected Impact: The action under this topic is expected to achieve the following impacts: Faster and more informed decision-making through the use of an AI-driven NAM (AI Foundation Toxicology Model) and increased efficiency through rapid processing of vast amounts of data [1] . Increased consistency and standardisation in a NAM-based approach, specifically an AI model, used by industry in the efficient development, testing and production of safe and effective innovative health technologies, improving industrial competitiveness. Regulatory adoption of a NAM-enabled second species waiver model (AI Foundation Toxicology Model) and weight-of-evidence framework, in line with recommendations and more consistent global decision-making on waiving second species testing. Reduction in animal use, accelerated timelines and lower costs, enhancing the competitiveness of the European health industry through economical and ethical benefits. Improved public health as patients will benefit from safe and effective medicines developed faster using validated NAMs. The action is expected to contribute to the EU Directive (2010/63/EU) [2] on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and the implementation of the 3Rs principles to replace, reduce and refine the use of animals. The action is expected also to consider and contribute to EU programmes, initiatives and policies on New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) such as the future European Research Area (ERA) action on accelerating NAMs to advance biomedical research and testing of medicinal products and medical devices. [1] Transforming animal study toxicology reports into structured, harmonized data using large language models [2] European Directive on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes Expected Outcome: The action under this topic must contribute to all of the following outcomes: A validated Artificial Intelligence (AI) Foundation Toxicology Model* that provides transparent probabilistic predictions for industry and regulator stakeholders to determine when a second species in chronic (>90 days) and sub-chronic (90 days) small molecule medicine repeat-dose studies is unlikely to provide additional safety relevant information, including risks of missed toxicity, organ-specific findings, and divergence in No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL). The goal would be to enable waiving the need for two species chronic testing for small molecules and other modalities e.g. oligonucleotides. A standardised, transparent weight-of-evidence framework for industry, regulator and academic stakeholders that enables reproducible assessment of evidence quality, consistency, relevance, and uncertainty across regulatory submissions, supporting the wider adoption of the AI Foundation Toxicology Model and New Approach Methodology (NAM)-based toxicology strategies in general. Functional tools, templates, and training materials that support the real-world implementation, sustainability and evolution of the foundation model and weight-of-evidence framework including guidance on explainability, provenance, governance, ethical use, and alignment with AI requirements, tailored to industry, regulator and academic stakeholder needs. Enhanced industry and regulator stakeholder confidence in second species waiver applications , particularly for small molecule medicines, supported by empirical, calibrated evidence and a framework enabling predictable adjudication, more consistent global waiver decision-making and timely progression of medicine development without compromising patient safety. This confidence should be gained through the model and framework’s application for regulator validation and acceptance, with the longer-term goal, beyond the action’s scope, of a revision of the regulatory guidelines ICH M3(R2) [1] taking onboard the future project’s outcomes. This topic should provide the opportunity to extend this confidence to waiving chronic testing in a single species beyond small mole Programme areas: Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness, Health, Innovative Health Initiative, Horizon Europe (HORIZON) Keywords: Animal welfare, Artificial Intelligence & Decision support, Artificial intelligence, Safety Pharmacology, Toxicology, An AI Foundation Toxicology Model and Framework to Support Waiving a Second Species in Drug Safety Studies, IHI, IHI JU, Innovative Health Initaitive, Innovative Health Initaitive Joint Undertaking, Joint Undertaking Deadline stages: 2026-10-08, 2027-04-21
The Globethics Emerging Leaders in Ethical AI Governance Fellowship 2026 is a fully funded, in-person fellowship program based in Geneva, Switzerland (Geneva Residency 6-10 July 2026) for early- and mid-career professionals working at the intersection of AI ethics, governance, and policy. Selected fellows receive full coverage of travel, accommodation, meals, and programme participation costs, plus engagement with UNESCO's Global AI Ethics and Governance Observatory and the international AI governance community. The fellowship includes intensive workshops on the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, AI policy drafting, multistakeholder governance, AI risk assessment methodologies, and applied AI ethics across sectors (health, education, justice, labor). Particular emphasis on building capacity among AI governance practitioners from the Global South (Africa, Asia, Latin America, MENA, Pacific Islands), women in AI policy, and Indigenous and marginalized communities. Follow-on funding available for selected fellows to implement small AI governance projects in their home countries or institutions. Program complements UNESCO's broader capacity-building initiatives in Latin America (with CENIA), Africa, and Asia.
TCUP lists eight funding tracks and roughly $10.3M a year, but the October 14, 2026 deadline applies to only three of them — CHAI, Pre-TI, and TCUP Partnerships — and each carries a restriction that disqualifies most applicants. Here is the track-by-track math.
Read articleNSF 26-513 makes roughly $100 million available for up to 10 State and Regional AI Infrastructure Hubs at $4M to $12M each over five years. One award per state or multi-state region. One proposal per organization. And NSF is not buying you GPUs — it funds the coordination, the workforce and the faculty training, while the compute has to come from partners you have to already have.
Read articleAs of September 12, NSF had obligated $6.3 billion across 6,200 grants versus $8.1 billion and 8,600 last year. AHRQ has made 61 awards. Judge Allison Burroughs ordered the government to report by September 28 on whether IES will obligate $180 million before it expires. Here is what actually happens to the money on October 1 — and what it means for your FY2027 application.
Read article