1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsThese grants fund research into the ethical implications and regulatory frameworks of artificial intelligence, addressing challenges such as algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and accountability of automated systems.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Academic institutions, nonprofit organizations, and occasionally individual researchers. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
AI Ethics and Regulation Grants is funded by Various, including Open Philanthropy Project, Mozilla Foundation. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
An AI Foundation Toxicology Model and Framework to Support Waiving a Second Species in Drug Safety Studies is sponsored by European Commission — Horizon Europe. Expected Impact: The action under this topic is expected to achieve the following impacts: Faster and more informed decision-making through the use of an AI-driven NAM (AI Foundation Toxicology Model) and increased efficiency through rapid processing of vast amounts of data [1] . Increased consistency and standardisation in a NAM-based approach, specifically an AI model, used by industry in the efficient development, testing and production of safe and effective innovative health technologies, improving industrial competitiveness. Regulatory adoption of a NAM-enabled second species waiver model (AI Foundation Toxicology Model) and weight-of-evidence framework, in line with recommendations and more consistent global decision-making on waiving second species testing. Reduction in animal use, accelerated timelines and lower costs, enhancing the competitiveness of the European health industry through economical and ethical benefits. Improved public health as patients will benefit from safe and effective medicines developed faster using validated NAMs. The action is expected to contribute to the EU Directive (2010/63/EU) [2] on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and the implementation of the 3Rs principles to replace, reduce and refine the use of animals. The action is expected also to consider and contribute to EU programmes, initiatives and policies on New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) such as the future European Research Area (ERA) action on accelerating NAMs to advance biomedical research and testing of medicinal products and medical devices. [1] Transforming animal study toxicology reports into structured, harmonized data using large language models [2] European Directive on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes Expected Outcome: The action under this topic must contribute to all of the following outcomes: A validated Artificial Intelligence (AI) Foundation Toxicology Model* that provides transparent probabilistic predictions for industry and regulator stakeholders to determine when a second species in chronic (>90 days) and sub-chronic (90 days) small molecule medicine repeat-dose studies is unlikely to provide additional safety relevant information, including risks of missed toxicity, organ-specific findings, and divergence in No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL). The goal would be to enable waiving the need for two species chronic testing for small molecules and other modalities e.g. oligonucleotides. A standardised, transparent weight-of-evidence framework for industry, regulator and academic stakeholders that enables reproducible assessment of evidence quality, consistency, relevance, and uncertainty across regulatory submissions, supporting the wider adoption of the AI Foundation Toxicology Model and New Approach Methodology (NAM)-based toxicology strategies in general. Functional tools, templates, and training materials that support the real-world implementation, sustainability and evolution of the foundation model and weight-of-evidence framework including guidance on explainability, provenance, governance, ethical use, and alignment with AI requirements, tailored to industry, regulator and academic stakeholder needs. Enhanced industry and regulator stakeholder confidence in second species waiver applications , particularly for small molecule medicines, supported by empirical, calibrated evidence and a framework enabling predictable adjudication, more consistent global waiver decision-making and timely progression of medicine development without compromising patient safety. This confidence should be gained through the model and framework’s application for regulator validation and acceptance, with the longer-term goal, beyond the action’s scope, of a revision of the regulatory guidelines ICH M3(R2) [1] taking onboard the future project’s outcomes. This topic should provide the opportunity to extend this confidence to waiving chronic testing in a single species beyond small mole Programme areas: Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness, Health, Innovative Health Initiative, Horizon Europe (HORIZON) Keywords: Animal welfare, Artificial Intelligence & Decision support, Artificial intelligence, Safety Pharmacology, Toxicology, An AI Foundation Toxicology Model and Framework to Support Waiving a Second Species in Drug Safety Studies, IHI, IHI JU, Innovative Health Initaitive, Innovative Health Initaitive Joint Undertaking, Joint Undertaking Deadline stages: 2026-10-08, 2027-04-21
The Globethics Emerging Leaders in Ethical AI Governance Fellowship 2026 is a fully funded, in-person fellowship program based in Geneva, Switzerland (Geneva Residency 6-10 July 2026) for early- and mid-career professionals working at the intersection of AI ethics, governance, and policy. Selected fellows receive full coverage of travel, accommodation, meals, and programme participation costs, plus engagement with UNESCO's Global AI Ethics and Governance Observatory and the international AI governance community. The fellowship includes intensive workshops on the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, AI policy drafting, multistakeholder governance, AI risk assessment methodologies, and applied AI ethics across sectors (health, education, justice, labor). Particular emphasis on building capacity among AI governance practitioners from the Global South (Africa, Asia, Latin America, MENA, Pacific Islands), women in AI policy, and Indigenous and marginalized communities. Follow-on funding available for selected fellows to implement small AI governance projects in their home countries or institutions. Program complements UNESCO's broader capacity-building initiatives in Latin America (with CENIA), Africa, and Asia.
The Mozilla Foundation Democracy x AI Cohort offers $50,000 grants for 10 projects building AI tools that protect civic life. Top performers can earn up to $300,000. Deadline: March 16, 2026.
Read articleThe ten-foundation Humanity AI collaborative opened applications September 10, 2026, with an October 21 deadline, three funding tiers from $75,000 to $1 million, and a Lever for Change two-phase review. Its out-of-scope list eliminates AI literacy training, AI adoption, and research-only projects. Here is what actually qualifies.
Read articleThe FY2026 MEP Center State Competition ran in two rounds: eight states worth $139.1 million, then fourteen more worth $232.4 million, both closing August 21, 2026. That's 43 percent of the national network recompeted in twelve months, under a 50 percent non-federal cost share, while the administration's own budget request proposed eliminating the program. Here's what the award tables reveal, why incumbents are genuinely at risk, and how to position for the FY2027 wave.
Read article