1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsAlan and Helene Goldberg In Vitro Toxicology Grants is sponsored by Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT). This opportunity supports mission-aligned projects and measurable outcomes.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Grants + Awards - Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing The grants program is a centerpiece of our work, providing initial funding for scientists to develop alternatives to the use of animals in biomedical research and product safety testing. To date, the center has funded over 300 grants (including renewals) for a total of more than $6 million.
relatively small individually, these grants offer critical seed money that allows researchers to demonstrate the value of a particular area of study. This helps them gain support from the NIH and other sources. We have a stringent, peer-reviewed process for selecting the recipients of these grants.
This process consists of sending each application to at least two experts in the field from academic, industrial, and government institutions. These reviewers evaluate the applications regarding scientific merit, budget appropriateness, suitability to CAAT’s mission, and expertise of the investigators. They also assign a priority score based on the NIH’s scoring system.
At the CAAT annual advisory board meeting, board members review these applications. Board members constitute the voting contingent for the grant applications. They assign priority scores in a secret ballot format based on a synopsis of the outside reviews and the board reviewers.
The applications are then ranked in order of priority score. Those that receive fundable scores are awarded funds based upon availability of money for the fiscal year. We continue to monitor the long-term progress of the Research Grant Program.
We require our grant recipients to submit copies of publications resulting from the CAAT grant-funded work. We maintain a list of publications and an archive of journal reprints. For any questions relating to any of our grants, please feel free to reach us at caat@jhu.
edu. Alan and Helene Goldberg In Vitro Toxicology Grants The Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) is soliciting projects that focus on the implementation of the NAS Report: Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy in the following areas: Proposals Relating to Toxicology : Maximum grant amount is $40,000 USD. The objective should be to significantly reduce or replace laboratory animal use.
Examples of acceptable projects include: providing mechanistic understanding of in vitro responses to toxicants in human cells, developing AOPs, or conducting systematic reviews. Consideration should be given to the translation of this new method to evaluate/predict health outcomes. Proposals Relating to Refinement are awarded through a different funding mechanism.
See Science-Based Refinement Awards – funded separately. For past awardees and project descriptions, please visit: https://caat. publichealth.
jhu. edu/grants-awards/alan-and-helene-goldberg-in-vitro-toxicology-grants-2/ CAAT Humane Education and Reduction Awards CAAT’s Beyond Classical Refinement Program, led by Kathrin Herrmann, PhD, has been awarding two annual grants for Reduction of animal experiments and for humane education.
The Reduction Award is given to a research project that helps reduce animal use by identifying areas of research and testing where animal models lack reproducibility and translational value. The Humane Education Award is awarded for the development of animal-free training resources for veterinary, medical, or laboratory courses. Each grant includes prize money of $6,000 USD .
The jury consists of five members of the Beyond Classical Refinement Program’s Advisory Board. They had to decide among numerous excellent proposals. For complete application instructions, as well as past awardees and project descriptions, please visit: https://caat.
publichealth. jhu. edu/caat-humane-education-and-caat-reduction-grants/
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Scientists at academic, industrial, and government institutions are eligible. These grants offer critical seed money for researchers to demonstrate the value of a study area. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows maximum $40,000 USD. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
Alan and Helene Goldberg In Vitro Toxicology Grants is funded by Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
NIH launched Complement-ARIE with $150M to develop organ-on-chip, AI models, and other NAMs that simulate human biology. What biotech researchers and grant seekers need to know.
Read articleThe Complement-ARIE program funds seven technology centers to develop human-based models that complement animal research. What it means for drug developers, academic researchers, and the regulatory pipeline.
Read articleJohns Hopkins is committing $60 million a year to a new Research Resilience Fund for faculty hit by federal grant terminations and delays — and it is not alone. As termination-for-convenience authority expands under the 2026 OMB rules, institutional bridge funding is becoming a structural feature of the research economy. Here is what these funds actually cover, why they are not a substitute for federal money, and how researchers should think about diversifying before the call comes.
Read article