1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsAlignment Research Center Fellowship Program is sponsored by Alignment Research Center. Supports researchers dedicated to ensuring that advanced AI systems are aligned with human values and beneficial to humanity.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Alignment Research Center (ARC) at MATS: Autumn 2026 Alignment Research Center (ARC) Alignment Research Center (ARC) The Alignment Research Center is a small non-profit research group based in Berkeley, California, that is working on a systematic and theoretically grounded approach to mechanistically explaining neural network behavior. We are interested in scholars with a strong math background and mathematical maturity.
If you'd be excited to work on the research direction described in this blog post – then we'd encourage you to apply! ARC will be supervising projects that fit into our technical research agenda, which is outlined on our blog. See for example this post .
Most projects will be primarily theoretical in nature. These could involve developing mechanistic estimation algorithms (such for as the expected outputs of MLPs), or coming up with counterexamples to existing algorithm proposals. There are also a variety of high-level theoretical questions about the limits of broad classes of approaches that we are interested in.
A smaller number of projects may also involve some empirical work, such as implementing proposed algorithms to check their performance, or might study more philosophical questions about how our methods could be applied to produced aligned AI systems. Alignment Research Center (ARC) Jacob Hilton is a researcher at the Alignment Research Center (ARC), a nonprofit working on the theoretical foundations of mechanistic interpretability.
He previously worked at OpenAI on reinforcement learning from human feedback, scaling laws and interpretability. His background is in pure mathematics, and he holds a PhD in set theory from the University of Leeds, UK. Mike Winer is a researcher at the Alignment Research Center (ARC), where he studies how mechanistic estimates can beat black-box techniques in toy setups.
His background is in statistical physics, where he studies how many objects obeying simple rules can exhibit complex behaviors like magnetism, glassiness, or scoring 87% on GPQA. Center for AI Standards and Innovation I am a technical advisor at the Center for AI Standards and Innovation within NIST. I previously ran the Alignment Research Center and the language model alignment team at OpenAI .
Before that I received my PhD in statistical learning theory from UC Berkeley. You may be interested in my writing about alignment , my blog , my academic publications , or fun and games . Victor Lecomte is a researcher at the Alignment Research Center (ARC), which is working on a systematic and theoretically grounded approach to mechanistic interpretability.
He holds a PhD from Stanford University, where he did research in computational complexity and other areas of theoretical computer science before pivoting to AI safety research. Wilson Wu is a researcher at the Alignment Research Center (ARC), which is working on a systematic and theoretically grounded approach to mechanistic interpretability.
He has previously worked on alternate approaches to interpretability including compact proofs and applications of singular learning theory. Scholars will work out of ARC's offices in Berkeley. Each scholar will meet with their mentor at least once a week for an hour, though 2-3 hours per week is not uncommon.
Besides time with their official mentor, scholars will likely spend time working in collaboration with other researchers; a typical scholar will likely spend about 25% of their time actively collaborating or learning about others' research. Fellows we are looking for Mathematical maturity and a math, physics or computer science background at the level of a strong undergraduate at a top-20 university.
Good at communicating about technical topics. Interest in engaging with ARC's higher-level research agenda. Potentially interested in joining ARC full-time by September 2027.
Ability to do productive research in the absence of formal problem statements. Open to working at ARC from our office in Berkeley. Background in ML theory and/or theoretical CS.
Basic ML engineering experience, such as running experiments on small neural nets. Scholars are encouraged to collaborate with anyone at ARC, including full-time researchers and other scholars/visiting researchers. Scholars are also welcome to collaborate with researchers outside of ARC, and are encouraged to do so when outside researchers have expertise that we could benefit from.
Each scholar will be paired with the mentor that best suits their skills and interests. The mentor will discuss potential projects with the scholar, and they will decide what project makes the most sense, based on ARC's research goals and the scholar's preferences. Most scholars will work on multiple projects over the course of their time at ARC, and some scholars will work with multiple mentors.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Individuals with a strong background in AI safety, machine learning, or related fields. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Alignment Research Center Fellowship Program is funded by Alignment Research Center. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
The FY2026 federal funding map has tilted hard toward AI, critical minerals, energy, advanced manufacturing, and workforce development — while a new layer of political review asks whether each award advances administration priorities. Here is a strategic map of where the money is moving, and how to position a proposal for the new alignment screen without distorting the work.
Read articleBuried in the §200.340 termination provisions of the May 29 Uniform Grants Regulation rewrite is a fundamental restructuring of federal grant termination law. The new rule explicitly models grant termination on the Federal Acquisition Regulation's termination-for-convenience framework — agencies may terminate when termination is in the agency's interest, when an award no longer advances agency priorities, or when the national interest as it exists at the time of termination has shifted. Unlike federal contracts, the rule eliminates the objection, hearing, and appeal rights that have historically attached to termination decisions, and unlike federal contracts, it does not import the FAR's termination settlement framework. Multiyear grant recipients now bear contract-level cancellation risk without contract-level settlement protection.
Read articleSchmidt Sciences' 2026 Science of Trustworthy AI RFP closes May 17 with two funding tiers — up to $1M (Tier 1) and $1–5M+ (Tier 2) over 1–3 years, with a 10% indirect cost cap. The three research aims target misalignment under distribution shift, predictive-validity evaluations, and oversight of superhuman systems. Here is why the structure favors team-based proposals.
Read article