1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsAnnual Grantmaking (Economic Empowerment and Leadership for Women and Girls) is sponsored by The Women's Fund of Central Ohio. This opportunity supports mission-aligned projects and measurable outcomes.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Grants and Investments - The Women's Fund of Central Ohio Since our founding, we have invested over $6 million in social change programs focused on helping women and girls to build wealth and become leaders. Our trust-based and participatory approach sets us apart from other funders. Our grants are more than a check.
They are investments in the leadership and vision of women who know what they and their communities need to thrive. Every year, the Women’s Fund of Central Ohio makes grants to innovative programs that focus on economic empowerment and leadership for women and girls. Enduring Progress Initiative Through the Enduring Progress Initiative, we invest $50,000 in the transformational vision and leadership of women of color.
We quickly and nimbly mobilize funds in response to urgent needs, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the reversal of Roe v. Wade. In alignment with our research, we provide strategic multi-year grants to address systemic issues women face, such as childcare access and the ability to run for office.
Our Commitment to Trust-Based and Participatory Grantmaking At The Women’s Fund, we incorporate practices from both trust-based philanthropy and participatory grantmaking frameworks to make our process as equitable and effective as possible. Trust-based philanthropy is a grantmaking framework that puts community needs and expertise first.
It means actively pursuing equity and anti-racism, listening to grant partners, and reducing barriers to funding. Women are the experts of their own lived experiences and they deserve our trust. Participatory grantmaking is another framework that focuses on decentralizing philanthropic decision making.
Those most impacted by systemic inequity are best equipped to create solutions. By elevating their voices, stronger and more equitable funding decisions are made. Here are a few examples of what sets our grantmaking process apart We streamline paperwork and limit administrative hurdles.
We fund operations. We know that social change takes people, so we invest in building staff capacity and supporting their needs. We actively seek and incorporate feedback from partners and applicants.
We have crucial conversations about gender, race, and intersectionality. We decentralize funding decisions through our annual Community Grant Reading Day and our Grants Committee. We ensure that our community grant readers represent the diversity of our community.
We offer support beyond the check and continually collaborate with grant partners. Gender inequity is driven by rigid gender norms. By breaking down gender norms and the biases associated with them, we can transform the lives of not only women and girls—but all people.
Gender norms are the implicit or explicit rules and expectations that society places on individuals. These rules dictate how people should act, dress, speak, and show up in the world. Gender norms inform implicit biases, the attitudes and stereotypes that we unconsciously develop about people and their identities based on how we perceive them.
The intersection of gender norms and implicit bias often leads to gender discrimination, which is even more harmful when it intersects with other systems of oppression like racism. When we review grant applications, we look for programs that disrupt gender norms and use an intersectional gender lens in their work.
This ensures that our investments drive social change and contribute to a world where everyone can thrive no matter their gender. Your donation makes our mission possible. Donate today to support our grantmaking, research, and advocacy.
DONATE NOW (opens in new tab) Join the movement to make gender equity a reality.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Innovative programs focused on economic empowerment and leadership for women and girls. (Implied for non-profit organizations or organizations with programs benefiting women and girls). Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Annual Grantmaking (Economic Empowerment and Leadership for Women and Girls) is funded by The Women's Fund of Central Ohio. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
USDA-NIFA-WAMS-011117 posted September 4, 2026 with $1,905,210 across an estimated 12 awards of $25,000 to $200,000, closing September 14, 2026. The opportunity title is now simply "Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Fields." Assistance listing 10.318 still reads "Women and Minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Fields" — and NIFA's own program page says the program is not funded for FY2026.
Read articleNSF has $8.8 billion appropriated and is holding roughly $1 billion of it in a central account earmarked for a White House initiative called Grand Research Challenges. Core programs cannot reach the money. Roughly 400 peer-reviewed, recommended proposals are sitting at the Office of Award Management. Here is what the mechanism actually is, why it is different from the terminations story, and how to plan a submission calendar around it.
Read articleNSF 26-517 replaces the core solicitations of Environmental Biology, Integrative Organismal Systems and Molecular and Cellular Biosciences with a single directorate-wide opportunity. Proposals are accepted anytime, sorted centrally by NSF rather than targeted by the PI, and reorganized under three inquiry areas. Here is what the $280 million actually buys, why the loss of program targeting cuts both ways, and what to do before the September 16 webinar.
Read article