1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsArchival Project Grants (Utah) is sponsored by Utah State Historical Records Advisory Board (USHRAB). This opportunity supports mission-aligned projects and measurable outcomes.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the opportunity page linked on this listing to help you evaluate fit faster.
USHRAB Grant Application and Instructions USHRAB is funded through a State Board Programming Grant awarded by the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC), the grant-making body of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
NARA has been operating without an appointed and Senate-confirmed Archivist of the United States since the former Archivist of the United States, Dr. Colleen Shogun, resigned in early 2025. Without this position filled, the NHPRC has been unable to meet and approve grant applications for over a year, including USHRAB’s Programming Grant application that was submitted in May of last year.
The NHPRC has access to the grant funds, but the funds are being left unspent due to the delay in filling this position.
This means that as of June 30, 2026 USHRAB no longer has federal grant funding to support its programs, and we will be unable to offer Archival Project Grants or Professional Development Microgrants to support Utah’s cultural heritage organizations’ valuable work in preserving and providing access to our state’s historical records. You can help!
If you’ve received a grant from USHRAB or planned on applying for one, you can reach out to Utah’s US Senators and let them know how impactful USHRAB’s federally-funded grants are to organizations that protect Utah’s history, especially in rural Utah.
Even if you have not used USHRAB’s services, if you believe that our mission to “help archives, libraries, museums, and other organizations protect your community’s history and provide public access to historical records” is important, please consider contacting the US Senators and letting them know that they should prioritize confirming the next Archivist of the United States.
Although USHRAB’s grant programs will be on hiatus, other services, such as Archives Fundamentals training, Ins and Outs of Access training, Digital Project Planning training, consultation services, and Utah Archives Month resources will continue to be available. Application and Instructions Utah Archives Month highlights and promotes the importance of preserving and accessing Utah’s historical records.
Our annual grant round opens on August 1 . Applicants are required to submit the Archival Project Grant Application PDF, the Project Plan, Staff, and Budget Worksheet , and other supplementary documents via email by September 15 . Guidelines, supplementary documentation forms (digitization agreements, document owner permission forms), as well as the rubric that the Board will use to score your applications are available on ushrab.
org/forms . The Board will meet in late September and provide a feedback document to each applicant. Applicants are highly encouraged to incorporate this feedback when they revise their applications.
Applicants should also reach out to the executive secretary if they need clarification or have questions about feedback or revisions. The deadline to submit the final application is October 15 . The Board will make its final funding decisions at its official fall board meeting in late October.
Applicants will be notified of the results in the fall. USHRAB accepts applications through email. Please send the completed the application form, Worksheet form, and supplemental documentation (if applicable) to the USHRAB executive secretary USHRAB @utah.
gov USHRAB Archival Project Grant Application Form Download USHRAB Project Plan, Staff, and Budget Worksheet Download USHRAB Archival Project Grant Guidelines Download After opening the Worksheet document, use the tabs on the bottom of the window to navigate between each form. Share on X (Opens in new window) Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Cultural heritage organizations in Utah, which may include universities. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows up to $7,500. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
Archival Project Grants (Utah) is funded by Utah State Historical Records Advisory Board (USHRAB). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Utah. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
The May 29, 2026 OMB proposed rewrite of 2 CFR 200 is being read primarily as a cost-principles document. The structural change that will reshape how federal grants get decided is proposed §200.205, which requires senior political appointees to conduct a pre-issuance review of all discretionary awards — and the companion provision that makes peer-review recommendations 'advisory only' and not binding on agency decision-makers. The combined effect is the subordination of merit review to political review across NSF, NIH, DOE, USDA, and every other agency that runs peer-reviewed grant competitions. Why this is structurally different from prior administrations' political influence, what the 45-day comment window means for affected institutions, and the strategy for applicants whose proposals will be reviewed under the new framework starting October 1, 2026.
Read articleThe headlines on OMB's May 29 rewrite of 2 CFR Part 200 have focused on §200.205's political pre-issuance review. The structurally larger change is a single sentence in §200.205(d) that says peer review recommendations 'remain advisory and are not ministerially ratified' by the federal agency. That language demotes the peer-review-driven funding model that has defined the NIH, NSF, NEH, and DOE Office of Science research portfolios for fifty years to one input among several — replacing a presumption that scored panels drive funding decisions with a presumption that political appointees do. Comment deadline July 13, effective October 1.
Read articleThe FY 2026 Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Program carries $6,526,269 across 22 awards, closing October 15 in Grants.gov and October 22 in JustGrants. A single statutory clause disqualifies most applicants before the narrative is written.
Read article