Cognitive Terrain Flight Assistance (Army SBIR/STTR Program)

Cognitive Terrain Flight Assistance (Army SBIR/STTR Program) is sponsored by U.S. Army. This program seeks the development of cognitive decision-aiding logic, utilizing machine learning and artificial intelligence constructs, to assist aviators in safely performing tactical flight very close to terrain.

Cognitive Terrain Flight Assistance – Army SBIR|STTR Program Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning, Army SBIR, Phase I Cognitive Terrain Flight Assistance Application Due Date: 03/26/2025 Development of cognitive decision aiding logic, utilizing machine learning and artificial intelligence constructs , to assist aviators in safely performing tactical flight very close to terrain.

Flying close to terrain and obstacles (i.e. hills, trees, wires, and buildings) is essential for Army Aviation’s survivability against modern anti-aircraft threat systems. Best available aircraft piloting sensors and pilot training can only help to a limited extent because aircrews cannot react to terrain and obstacles they cannot yet perceive.

Today, this capability is limited to what the aviators can see ahead of them (including with sensor assistance) or perceive from a map and hazards overlay. It takes significant resources to train Army Aviators to maneuver helicopters low and fast, but even with the best training they cannot replicate the performance achievable in their local well-understood training area when flying in unfamiliar locations.

In a high threat environment, with improvements to traditional threat systems and the advent of emerging threat systems, tens of feet make a significant survivability difference in threat exposure. Without solving the problem of flying fast and low over unfamiliar terrain, Army combat aircraft may not be able to accomplish their required missions.

This challenge extends to the Army’s Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS) which will similarly need to avoid exposures to reduce attritions. This topic is only accepting Phase I proposals for a cost up to $250,000 for a 6-month period of performance.

Phase I will demonstrate the feasibility to capture the required digital twin terrain at the fidelity required for accurate manned helicopter flight near terrain and obstacles, to integrate the digital terrain into a simulation flight model and be prepared to begin terrain flight cognitive machine learning to be accomplished in Phase II.

Phase II will develop a prototype Cognitive Terrain Flight Assistance capability, most likely through machine reinforcement learning, that will reduce risk of terrain and obstacle impacts through cognitive understanding of its terrain flight environment and aircraft performance. This terrain flight assistance model must show promise for continued maturation into the MAS 6. 3 program.

To accomplish this, the SBIR will demonstrate the improvement of the model first in a simulation environment with pilots flying without and then with the cognitive machine assistance of displaying safe flight paths. If proven in simulation, the terrain flight assistance model will then prove its ability in flight demonstration tests on the actual same terrain in real world conditions.

This will most likely be accomplished with uncrewed aircraft controlled by pilots. Air Travel: Pilots/airlines, helicopters, and air traffic control are likely adopters of said technology for various use cases Drone Economy: From delivery to eVTOL taxis , drones need to navigate difficult terrain in diverse environments (e.g., urban versus rural) that will require said co-pilot technology.

Agriculture, Forestry, and Energy/Critical Minerals: AI/ML systems can help navigate complex landscapes, avoiding obstacles while performing tasks like crop monitoring or forest fire detection. Moreover, this offering can aid mapping key areas rich in natural resources. For more information, and to submit your full proposal package, visit the DSIP Portal .

SBIR|STTR Help Desk: usarmy. sbirsttr@army. mil https://arxiv.

org/pdf/2402. 03947 https://armypubs. army.

mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN35749-TC_3-04. 4-000-WEB-1.

pdf KEYWORDS: Cognitive terrain flight model; machine reinforcement learning; terrain and obstacle avoidance; army helicopter; low and fast; Nap-of-the-earth (NOE); multi-aircraft coordinated flight; digital twin terrain Development of cognitive decision aiding logic, utilizing machine learning and artificial intelligence constructs , to assist aviators in safely performing tactical flight very close to terrain.

Flying close to terrain and obstacles (i.e. hills, trees, wires, and buildings) is essential for Army Aviation’s survivability against modern anti-aircraft threat systems. Best available aircraft piloting sensors and pilot training can only help to a limited extent because aircrews cannot react to terrain and obstacles they cannot yet perceive.

Today, this capability is limited to what the aviators can see ahead of them (including with sensor assistance) or perceive from a map and hazards overlay. It takes significant resources to train Army Aviators to maneuver helicopters low and fast, but even with the best training they cannot replicate the performance achievable in their local well-understood training area when flying in unfamiliar locations.

In a high threat environment, with improvements to traditional threat systems and the advent of emerging threat systems, tens of feet make a significant survivability difference in threat exposure. Without solving the problem of flying fast and low over unfamiliar terrain, Army combat aircraft may not be able to accomplish their required missions.

This challenge extends to the Army’s Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS) which will similarly need to avoid exposures to reduce attritions. This topic is only accepting Phase I proposals for a cost up to $250,000 for a 6-month period of performance.

Phase I will demonstrate the feasibility to capture the required digital twin terrain at the fidelity required for accurate manned helicopter flight near terrain and obstacles, to integrate the digital terrain into a simulation flight model and be prepared to begin terrain flight cognitive machine learning to be accomplished in Phase II.

Phase II will develop a prototype Cognitive Terrain Flight Assistance capability, most likely through machine reinforcement learning, that will reduce risk of terrain and obstacle impacts through cognitive understanding of its terrain flight environment and aircraft performance. This terrain flight assistance model must show promise for continued maturation into the MAS 6. 3 program.

To accomplish this, the SBIR will demonstrate the improvement of the model first in a simulation environment with pilots flying without and then with the cognitive machine assistance of displaying safe flight paths. If proven in simulation, the terrain flight assistance model will then prove its ability in flight demonstration tests on the actual same terrain in real world conditions.

This will most likely be accomplished with uncrewed aircraft controlled by pilots. Air Travel: Pilots/airlines, helicopters, and air traffic control are likely adopters of said technology for various use cases Drone Economy: From delivery to eVTOL taxis , drones need to navigate difficult terrain in diverse environments (e.g., urban versus rural) that will require said co-pilot technology.

Agriculture, Forestry, and Energy/Critical Minerals: AI/ML systems can help navigate complex landscapes, avoiding obstacles while performing tasks like crop monitoring or forest fire detection. Moreover, this offering can aid mapping key areas rich in natural resources. For more information, and to submit your full proposal package, visit the DSIP Portal .

SBIR|STTR Help Desk: usarmy. sbirsttr@army. mil https://arxiv.

org/pdf/2402. 03947 https://armypubs. army.

mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN35749-TC_3-04. 4-000-WEB-1.

pdf KEYWORDS: Cognitive terrain flight model; machine reinforcement learning; terrain and obstacle avoidance; army helicopter; low and fast; Nap-of-the-earth (NOE); multi-aircraft coordinated flight; digital twin terrain Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology ASA(ALT) releases contract opportunities on an ad-hoc basis to meet Army research and development needs.

Army Futures Command (AFC) releases topics during three specific solicitation periods throughout the fiscal year to address the Army’s current and anticipated war-fighting technology needs. Army STTR follows AFC’s topic release schedule but partners with a university, federally funded research and development center, or a qualified non-profit research institution as part of their contract.

Is the opportunity to establish the scientific, technical, commercial merit and feasibility of your proposed innovation. Is focused on the development, demonstration and delivery of your innovation from Phase I. Represents the commercialization phase of the program in which the company can market their products or services developed in Phase II, either to the government or in the commercial sector.

Allows small businesses to submit to Direct to Phase II applications if they performed the Phase I research through other funding sources. Provides funding to projects that require additional funding during their open Phase II contract. A Phase II Awardee may receive one additional, sequential Phase II award to continue the work of an initial Phase II award.

The sequential Phase II award has the same guideline amounts and limits as an initial Phase II award.

Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (supply chain management, logistics coordination, target identifications and simulation) Advanced Materials and Manufacturing (additive manufacturing) Autonomy (unmanned systems, drones, ground vehicle capabilities) Chemical and Biological (detection, defense) Cyber (biometric authentication, secure communications) Electronics (microelectronics, Very-Large-Scale Integration (VLSI)) Electronic Warfare (jamming, spoofing) Human Performance (wearables) Immersive (augmented reality, virtual reality, mixed reality) Network Technologies (antennas, radio frequency, communications systems) Position, Navigation, and Timing (GPS) Power (batteries, generators) Software Modernization (high performance computing, data management and visualization) Sensors (infrared sensing) Weapons Systems (hypersonics, munitions and projectiles, directed energy)