1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsCommunity-Based Reentry Grant (Florida) is sponsored by Banking Institution (details for specific funder not provided in search results, but state of Florida prioritizes these grants). This opportunity supports mission-aligned projects and measurable outcomes.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Opportunity Listing - Community Reentry Settings Initiative Community Reentry Settings Initiative Agency: National Institute of Corrections Assistance Listings: 16. 602 -- Corrections Research and Evaluation and Policy Formulation Last Updated: May 13, 2026 View version history on Grants. gov The release decision-making process is crucial to the criminal justice system and should be intentional and deliberate.
Reentry decisions should consider factors such as the inmate’s risk, needs and responsivity (RNR) principles and community safety concerns. There has been some attention surrounding the utilization of halfway houses but, additional assessment and review is needed to understand the current state of halfway house utilization and make transformational changes that supports successful reentry outcomes in halfway houses.
The questions to explore are simple and complex.
For example, what and how is criteria (risk assessments, protective factors, etc.) used in the decision-making process from prison to halfway house; how are case managers planning for halfway house release with their residents; what does the “hand-off” from prisons officials to halfway house organizations entail; how are the community, business, education and other public or non-profit entities involved in this release process to halfway house and; what is the continuum of support/care provided during their reentry/transition period at half-way houses (e.g., employment, life skills, mental health, substance use).
These are some of the broad questions this work seeks to answer. One notable dynamic to explore in the decision-making processes involves the tension between discretionary authority and standardized procedures. Multiple sources highlight that release decisions involve "discretionary judgment", and key actors like wardens, community corrections managers, and case managers are the final decision makers.
How each of these actors makes decisions varies, leaving the possibility of subjective judgment in the process. Simultaneously, there are explicit legal mandates, state statutes, and zoning requirements that outline specific criteria, timelines, and procedures for release to halfway houses.
While policies and assessment tools aim for consistency, fairness, and evidence-based decision making, the space where discretion exists can lead to variations in which individuals are being considered for release. This human factor introduces the potential for inconsistencies in eligibility determinations, or deviations from the policy and program criteria/design or inconsistent application of policy and procedures.
This points to the dilemma between discretionary release practices versus standardized releasing decision-making. Therefore, a process evaluation created should be conducted to understand currently how discretion is applied within defined policy parameters.
Dynamics to understand include: are policies consistently applied across different unit teams, case managers, or community corrections boards; are there informal norms or unwritten rules that influence decisions more than formal policy; what are the perceived trade-offs between strict adherence to policy and the flexibility needed for individualized case management?
The primary objective is to systematically examine the current decision-making point governing the process of prison residents release to halfway houses. This process evaluation should aim to illuminate the operational realities and challenges in order for NIC to discern how those underlying factors can be changed and improved upon.
By focusing on the “why” and “how” of this decision point, we will better understand halfway house placement implementation. Please note, this is NOT a funding opportunity to plan, establish, revise, fund, staff or build a halfway house in any community.
NIC invites applications from nonprofit organizations (including faith-based, community, and tribal organizations), for-profit organizations (including tribal for-profit organizations), and institutions of higher education (including tribal institutions of higher education). Recipients, including for-profit organizations, must agree to waive any profit or fee for services.
Foreign governments, international organizations, and non-governmental international organizations/institutions are not eligible to apply. Proof of 501(c) (3) status as determined by the Internal Revenue Service or an authorizing tribal resolution is required. NIC welcomes applications that involve two or more entities; however, one eligible entity must be the applicant, and the others must be proposed as subrecipients.
The applicant must be the entity with primary responsibility for administering the funding and managing the entire program. Only one application will be accepted from a submitting organization. Grantor contact information Grant Management Specialist Form and application information File name Description Last updated 26CS06_-_Community_Reentry_Settings_Initiative_FINAL1.
pdf 26CS06 - NOFO Community Reentry Settings Initiative Mar 11, 2026 02:19 PM UTC Link to additional information Funding opportunity number : Cost sharing or matching requirement : Funding instrument type : Opportunity Category Explanation : Establish a process evaluation framework tailored for state Department of Corrections agencies to facilitate a systematic and in-depth examination of the decision-making involved in releasing incarcerated individuals to halfway houses and reentry centers.
Category of Funding Activity : Establish a process evaluation framework specifically tailored for state Department of Corrections (DOC) agencies to facilitate a systematic and in-depth examination of the decision-making processes involved in releasing incarcerated individuals to halfway houses and reentry centers. Your account requires additional identity verification.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Organizations providing evidence-based reentry services, including job training, housing support, and mental health services in Florida. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Community-Based Reentry Grant (Florida) is funded by Banking Institution (details for specific funder not provided in search results, but state of Florida prioritizes these grants). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Florida. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
NIH released a draft policy on August 27, 2026 that would require every NIH-supported clinical study to offer participants a plain-language summary of results — clinical trials within one year of completion, all other clinical research by the end of the funding period. It covers observational and behavioral research that ClinicalTrials.gov never touched. Here is the scope, the four requirements nobody has budgeted for, and what to say before the October 26 deadline.
Read articleUSDA-NIFA-HEP-011737 puts $14 million behind roughly 28 awards of up to $705,000 for graduate fellowships in food and agricultural sciences. No match is required. But two eligibility rules — the new-graduate-student definition and the citizenship requirement — disqualify most of the students a department would naturally nominate.
Read articleHeather Gerken presents a revamped Ford Foundation strategy to trustees this fall. In January, staff split into three units — one refining the new strategy, one maintaining current grants, and one designing tie-off funding for grantees who are not in Ford's future. The new strategy runs from January 2028. Here is what that 24-month gap means for grantees and everyone who wanted to become one.
Read article