1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
The purpose of this notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) is to support research that advances understanding of the natural history of radiation or chemical exposures; develops relevant injury models; identifies and validates diagnostic tools, biomarkers, or triage technologies; and supports the development of effective medical countermeasures (MCMs) to mitigate or treat acute and/or delayed injuries resulting from radiological/nuclear or chemical public health emergencies.
Funding Opportunity Number: RFA-AI-27-014. Assistance Listing: 93.233,93.279,93.837,93.838,93.839,93.840,93.846,93.853,93.855,93.867. Funding Instrument: CA. Category: HL.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Eligible applicants: State governments; County governments; City or township governments; Special district governments; Independent school districts; Public and State controlled institutions of higher education; Native American tribal governments (Federally recognized); Public housing authorities / Indian housing authorities; Native American tribal organizations (other than Federally recognized); Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education; Nonprofits that do not have a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education; Private institutions of higher education; For-profit organizations other than small businesses; Small businesses; Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification). Refer to Section III. Eligibility Information in the NOFO for additional information on eligibility.Foreign Organizations/International CollaborationsNon-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.NIH will no longer issue awards (i.e., new, renewal, or non-competing continuation) to domestic or foreign entities that involve foreign subawards/subcontracts. All NIH-funded research involving foreign subawards/subcontracts must be submitted in response to a NOFO that is specifically designated for funded international collaborations. See NIH Grants Policy Statement 16.8 Collaborative International Research Awards.Applications involving foreign subawards/subcontracts submitted in response to this NOFO will be deemed noncompliant and will not be considered for funding. This policy applies to all monetary international collaborations resulting in foreign subawards/subcontracts, however, it does not preclude unfunded international collaborations or foreign components, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Applications for Development of Candidate Medical Countermeasures (MCMs) and Technologies Against Radiological/Nuclear or Chemical Threats (U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed) are due October 9, 2028. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, and final submission checks.
Yes — Development of Candidate Medical Countermeasures (MCMs) and Technologies Against Radiological/Nuclear or Chemical Threats (U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed) is offered by National Institutes of Health and this listing comes from Grants.gov, an official U.S. federal source. Federal applications generally require registrations (for example SAM.gov or an agency submission portal), so allow extra lead time.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
Sustainable Gender Equality Champions is sponsored by European Commission — Horizon Europe. Specific Challenge: The “EU Award for Gender Equality Champions” is a recognition prize scheme designed as a booster and a complement to the Gender Equality Plans (GEP) eligibility criterion in Horizon Europe [1] , and as a tool for advancing inclusive GEPs and policies within the framework of the ERA Policy Agenda. Expected Outcomes : Recognition of organisations with the most significant impact resulting from the implementation of their GEP, serving as role models for others; Strengthened gender equality and inclusiveness in the European Research Area. The Prize will be awarded to four organisations, and contestants can apply to one of the following three prize categories: Sustainable Gender Equality Champions: Organisations that can demonstrate a significant and sustained record of activity and a high level of achievement through the implementation of their GEP(s); Newcomer Gender Equality Champions: Organisations without a sustained record of activity in gender equality that have recently completed the implementation of their first GEP and can demonstrate the most progress achieved through its implementation; Inclusive Gender Equality Champions: Organisations that have developed the most innovative inclusive GEP – namely a GEP addressing intersectionality, meaning links between gender and at least two other social categories, including for example racial or ethnic origin, social origin, sexual orientation and gender identity (LGBTIQ) or disability – and can demonstrate concrete results obtained through its implementation. In addition to the complete application, contestants may be asked at a later stage to provide further documents (for legal entity validation, bank account validation, ethics review, declaration of honour, etc.) or to submit a short video message on their achievements in the chosen Prize category. This video will be used for communication purposes only. Essential award criteria : Eligible applications will be evaluated in each category by a jury consisting of a group of independent experts. The prize will be awarded, after closure of the contest, to the contestants who in the opinion of the jury best address the following cumulative award criteria: Sustainable Gender Equality Champions : Criterion 1: Sustainable Impact; Criterion 2: Inspirational Model; Newcomer Gender Equality Champions : Criterion 1: Progress Achieved; Criterion 2: Stakeholder Engagement; Inclusive Gender Equality Champions : Criterion 1: Progress achieved; Criterion 2: Innovative Inclusiveness. Eligibility criteria : Contestant must be private entities, public bodies, non-profit or for-profit organisations, including research organisations and higher education establishments, located in a Member State, an Associated Country, or a candidate country for the accession to the EU [2] , and must have a current GEP, as well as the GEP on which the application is based (if these are different) that comply with minimum process-related requirements set for GEPs in Horizon Europe General Annexes. Applicants that have already received an EU or Euratom prize cannot receive a second prize for the same activities. The specific rules of the contest will be published by the European Commission (on the Funding & Tenders Portal but also actively publicised elsewhere to maximise participation), which will directly launch and manage the contest and award the prize based on the judgement of independent experts. [1] See General Annexes to the Horizon Europe Work Programme (Gender equality plans and gender mainstreaming in Annex Part B – Eligibility). [2] https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/eu-enlargement_en . Programme areas: Widening Participation and Strengthening the European Research Area, Reforming and enhancing the European R&I System, Gender equality, Horizon Europe (HORIZON)
Newcomer Gender Equality Champions is sponsored by European Commission — Horizon Europe. Specific Challenge: The “EU Award for Gender Equality Champions” is a recognition prize scheme designed as a booster and a complement to the Gender Equality Plans (GEP) eligibility criterion in Horizon Europe [1] , and as a tool for advancing inclusive GEPs and policies within the framework of the ERA Policy Agenda. Expected Outcomes : Recognition of organisations with the most significant impact resulting from the implementation of their GEP, serving as role models for others; Strengthened gender equality and inclusiveness in the European Research Area. The Prize will be awarded to four organisations, and contestants can apply to one of the following three prize categories: Sustainable Gender Equality Champions: Organisations that can demonstrate a significant and sustained record of activity and a high level of achievement through the implementation of their GEP(s); Newcomer Gender Equality Champions: Organisations without a sustained record of activity in gender equality that have recently completed the implementation of their first GEP and can demonstrate the most progress achieved through its implementation; Inclusive Gender Equality Champions: Organisations that have developed the most innovative inclusive GEP – namely a GEP addressing intersectionality, meaning links between gender and at least two other social categories, including for example racial or ethnic origin, social origin, sexual orientation and gender identity (LGBTIQ) or disability – and can demonstrate concrete results obtained through its implementation. In addition to the complete application, contestants may be asked at a later stage to provide further documents (for legal entity validation, bank account validation, ethics review, declaration of honour, etc.) or to submit a short video message on their achievements in the chosen Prize category. This video will be used for communication purposes only. Essential award criteria : Eligible applications will be evaluated in each category by a jury consisting of a group of independent experts. The prize will be awarded, after closure of the contest, to the contestants who in the opinion of the jury best address the following cumulative award criteria: Sustainable Gender Equality Champions : Criterion 1: Sustainable Impact; Criterion 2: Inspirational Model; Newcomer Gender Equality Champions : Criterion 1: Progress Achieved; Criterion 2: Stakeholder Engagement; Inclusive Gender Equality Champions : Criterion 1: Progress achieved; Criterion 2: Innovative Inclusiveness. Eligibility criteria : Contestant must be private entities, public bodies, non-profit or for-profit organisations, including research organisations and higher education establishments, located in a Member State, an Associated Country, or a candidate country for the accession to the EU [2] , and must have a current GEP, as well as the GEP on which the application is based (if these are different) that comply with minimum process-related requirements set for GEPs in Horizon Europe General Annexes. Applicants that have already received an EU or Euratom prize cannot receive a second prize for the same activities. The specific rules of the contest will be published by the European Commission (on the Funding & Tenders Portal but also actively publicised elsewhere to maximise participation), which will directly launch and manage the contest and award the prize based on the judgement of independent experts. [1] See General Annexes to the Horizon Europe Work Programme (Gender equality plans and gender mainstreaming in Annex Part B – Eligibility). [2] https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/eu-enlargement_en . Programme areas: Widening Participation and Strengthening the European Research Area, Reforming and enhancing the European R&I System, Gender equality, Horizon Europe (HORIZON)
Inclusive Gender Equality Champions is sponsored by European Commission — Horizon Europe. Specific Challenge: The “EU Award for Gender Equality Champions” is a recognition prize scheme designed as a booster and a complement to the Gender Equality Plans (GEP) eligibility criterion in Horizon Europe [1] , and as a tool for advancing inclusive GEPs and policies within the framework of the ERA Policy Agenda. Expected Outcomes : Recognition of organisations with the most significant impact resulting from the implementation of their GEP, serving as role models for others; Strengthened gender equality and inclusiveness in the European Research Area. The Prize will be awarded to four organisations, and contestants can apply to one of the following three prize categories: Sustainable Gender Equality Champions: Organisations that can demonstrate a significant and sustained record of activity and a high level of achievement through the implementation of their GEP(s); Newcomer Gender Equality Champions: Organisations without a sustained record of activity in gender equality that have recently completed the implementation of their first GEP and can demonstrate the most progress achieved through its implementation; Inclusive Gender Equality Champions: Organisations that have developed the most innovative inclusive GEP – namely a GEP addressing intersectionality, meaning links between gender and at least two other social categories, including for example racial or ethnic origin, social origin, sexual orientation and gender identity (LGBTIQ) or disability – and can demonstrate concrete results obtained through its implementation. In addition to the complete application, contestants may be asked at a later stage to provide further documents (for legal entity validation, bank account validation, ethics review, declaration of honour, etc.) or to submit a short video message on their achievements in the chosen Prize category. This video will be used for communication purposes only. Essential award criteria : Eligible applications will be evaluated in each category by a jury consisting of a group of independent experts. The prize will be awarded, after closure of the contest, to the contestants who in the opinion of the jury best address the following cumulative award criteria: Sustainable Gender Equality Champions : Criterion 1: Sustainable Impact; Criterion 2: Inspirational Model; Newcomer Gender Equality Champions : Criterion 1: Progress Achieved; Criterion 2: Stakeholder Engagement; Inclusive Gender Equality Champions : Criterion 1: Progress achieved; Criterion 2: Innovative Inclusiveness. Eligibility criteria : Contestant must be private entities, public bodies, non-profit or for-profit organisations, including research organisations and higher education establishments, located in a Member State, an Associated Country, or a candidate country for the accession to the EU [2] , and must have a current GEP, as well as the GEP on which the application is based (if these are different) that comply with minimum process-related requirements set for GEPs in Horizon Europe General Annexes. Applicants that have already received an EU or Euratom prize cannot receive a second prize for the same activities. The specific rules of the contest will be published by the European Commission (on the Funding & Tenders Portal but also actively publicised elsewhere to maximise participation), which will directly launch and manage the contest and award the prize based on the judgement of independent experts. [1] See General Annexes to the Horizon Europe Work Programme (Gender equality plans and gender mainstreaming in Annex Part B – Eligibility). [2] https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/eu-enlargement_en . Programme areas: Widening Participation and Strengthening the European Research Area, Reforming and enhancing the European R&I System, Gender equality, Horizon Europe (HORIZON)
PA-27-037 consolidates the Predoctoral to Postdoctoral Transition Award into a single parent announcement across 20 NIH components, with the next deadline December 8, 2026. The eligibility gate is not the science — it is a mandatory change of institution and mentor between the F99 and K00 phases.
Read articleA draft executive order would have put OMB Director Russell Vought on a commission with final say over NIH awards after peer review. Sen. Collins killed it by pointing at a provision Congress already passed. Here is what the episode teaches applicants about the December 11 cliff.
Read articlePA-27-034, PA-27-035 and PA-27-036 replace the institute-specific R25 announcements that research education programs have been built around for a decade. NCI, NIDA and NIGMS have already expired theirs early. Here is what the consolidation actually changes: an 8% indirect cost ceiling, a US-citizens-and-permanent-residents participant rule, a cooperative agreement variant that only exists on one of the three, and no clinical-trial-allowed companion anywhere.
Read article