1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
"Emerging Voices in AI and Society Fellowship" is currently closed and not accepting applications.
Emerging Voices in AI and Society Fellowship is sponsored by Center for Humane Technology. This six-month remote fellowship is for mid-career experts who can bring empirical, philosophical, or interdisciplinary perspectives to what AI is doing to human cognition and its implications for individuals and society.
Fellows are expected to complete a flagship output (research piece, essay, or report), write op-eds, and participate in CHT's content and media ecosystem.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Emerging Voices in AI and Society Fellowship CHT’s Emerging Voices in AI and Society Fellowship Center for Humane Technology (CHT) is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to realign the most consequential technologies with humanity’s best interests. CHT works to make sense of how consequential technologies are impacting society — and what can be done about it.
We interpret and bring clarity to a fast-moving landscape, raise the questions that technology forces us to confront, and connect day-to-day harms to the deeper systemic incentives driving them. Our role is not just to sound the alarm, but to elevate the conversation, shaping the urgent ideas of our time, and to advance solutions so that people feel equipped to act.
Our newly-launched Emerging Voices in AI and Society Fellowship exists because this work requires more voices than CHT currently has. We have identified five focus areas for applicants to choose from and will choose three fellows, representing unique focus areas, for our inaugural cohort. Applicants are welcome to apply for up to two focus areas.
AI and Cognition AI and Relationships AI and Surveillance AI and Spirituality Inside the Machine: AI From a Technologist’s Perspective As AI tools become embedded in how we learn, work, and make decisions, fundamental questions about human cognition are coming into focus.
At the heart of this is a simple question: is AI more like a calculator — a tool that extends what we can do without fundamentally changing how we think — or is it something qualitatively different? AI may enable us to do more, but does it actually improve our thinking? What happens to judgment, critical thinking, and intellectual independence when entire thinking processes can be offloaded to machines?
Does it matter which cognitive tasks we delegate, and which we retain? Is the same true of adults versus kids? What does it actually mean to think, and where does the boundary between human cognition and machine assistance begin to blur?
When hundreds of millions of people rely on the same small set of models, what does that mean for the diversity of thought at scale? What aspects of human cognition are critical to retain?
CHT is seeking a fellow to help build rigorous understanding of these questions — bringing empirical, philosophical, or interdisciplinary perspective to bear on what AI is actually doing to human cognition, and what that means for individuals and society over time. As AI tools become embedded in how we learn, work, and make decisions, fundamental questions about human cognition are coming into focus.
At the heart of this is a simple question: is AI more like a calculator — a tool that extends what we can do without fundamentally changing how we think — or is it something qualitatively different? AI may enable us to do more, but does it actually improve our thinking? What happens to judgment, critical thinking, and intellectual independence when entire thinking processes can be offloaded to machines?
Does it matter which cognitive tasks we delegate, and which we retain? Is the same true of adults versus kids? What does it actually mean to think, and where does the boundary between human cognition and machine assistance begin to blur?
When hundreds of millions of people rely on the same small set of models, what does that mean for the diversity of thought at scale? What aspects of human cognition are critical to retain?
CHT is seeking a fellow to help build rigorous understanding of these questions — bringing empirical, philosophical, or interdisciplinary perspective to bear on what AI is actually doing to human cognition, and what that means for individuals and society over time.
Fellowship Size: 3 fellows (pilot cohort) Duration: 6 months, beginning Sept 14, 2026 through March 18, 2027 Commitment: 15 hours a week, 10 hours overlapping with EST, remote Compensation: Fixed stipend of $30,000 paid based on the completion of three milestones Application Deadline: Sunday, July 12 11:59pm EST As part of the completion of the fellows program, fellows are expected to: Complete one flagship output — a research piece, long-form essay, or report intended for public impact that will be leveraged across formats (video, social, etc.) Write 1–3 op-eds placed in target outlets and/or published on CHT's Substack Participate in one podcast episode on Your Undivided Attention or another CHT platform, where a good fit Participate in CHT's broader content and media ecosystem Attend three mandatory cohort meetings and mandatory bi-weekly check-ins with the Senior Director of Strategy and Impact CHT is looking for mid-career experts from interdisciplinary backgrounds with media experience and excitement to apply to our fellowship program.
You might be: A researcher or junior faculty member in psychology, sociology, philosophy, cognitive science, communications, or science and technology studies who has been studying the human impacts of technology A policy analyst or former government official who has been working on AI governance, digital rights, or platform accountability A journalist or writer who covers technology and society A civil society advocate or organizer who has been working on tech accountability, digital rights, or community impacts of AI and brings the perspective of the people most affected Someone who came up inside the tech industry who has insight on how these systems are built and what drives the decisions behind them You're a good fit if you: Published op-eds, essays on Substack, or peer-reviewed work that you can also explain to a general audience Have spoken at conferences where your ideas reach people outside your immediate field Mid-career, with a focus on the impacts of technology on society — you understand that the most important AI questions are not just technical Comfortable operating in an interdisciplinary setting, at the intersection of technology, human psychology, and social structures Delivery-oriented research mindset: you have proven experience advancing rigorous research while reliably shipping concrete deliverables on time; able to navigate trade-offs between depth and timeliness Intellectually honest enough to distinguish between what we know, what we suspect, and what remains genuinely open Communication and Public Presence A natural communicator who is already active and engaged on the issues you care about Able to bring complex ideas to diverse audiences through writing, speaking, or an active public presence Willing to adjust message delivery in order to effectively meet a diverse range of audiences Perspective on AI and Society Understand that AI harms are predictable products of specific business models, design choices, and institutional incentives Believe that the trajectory of AI is not inevitable — that design, policy, and cultural norms can shift outcomes — and bring that constructive orientation to their work Understand the importance of addressing near-, mid-, and longer-term harms and you do not fall into the binary of AI Ethics vs. AI Safety Demonstrate a healthy questioning of the information and narratives put forth by technology companies, always investigating why companies may be incentivized to say or do what they’re saying or doing Equally demonstrate a nuanced perspective of the issues at hand while also knowing when decisive action needs to be taken to move the needle Prioritize impact over performative actions Fellows will receive a $30,000 stipend based on the completion of key milestones for the program.
Additionally, fellows will receive: Bi-weekly guidance from the Senior Director of Strategy and Impact Light support from CHT's Research Team Editorial, communications, and graphic design support across deliverables Media training and media placement support via CHT's PR agency A CHT email address and access to select CHT Slack channels for the duration of the fellowship Listing on CHT's public fellows page In order to apply, you will need to submit: A 1-2 page research proposal for each topic ( you may apply for up to two ) describing your proposed research, why the questions are worth answering, and how it aligns with CHT’s framing A CV or resume (2 pages max) A two-minute video recording of yourself describing why you are a good fit for the position A writing sample demonstrating research and analysis (a paper, working paper, or blog post) Who is eligible to apply?
The CHT Fellows Program is open to mid-career researchers, writers, journalists, practitioners, and thinkers with demonstrated expertise in AI and its societal implications. We welcome applicants from a range of disciplines and backgrounds — what matters most is the quality of your thinking, your ability to communicate publicly, and your alignment with CHT's frame. The fellowship is open to applicants outside the United States.
In addition to a $30,000 stipend based on the completion of key milestones, fellows will receive: Bi-weekly guidance from the Senior Director of Strategy and Impact Research support from CHT's Research Team Editorial, communications, and graphic design support across deliverables Media training and media placement support via CHT's PR agency A CHT email address and access to select CHT Slack channels for the duration of the fellowship Listing on CHT's public fellows page What is the timeline?
When does it start? The inaugural cohort begins on September 14, 2026 and runs for six months through March 19, 2027. The application window opens in June 2026 and closes Sunday, July 12, 2026.
Offers will be extended in mid-August 2026, with onboarding materials and Slack access provided ahead of the September start date. Are there in-person requirements, or is this fully remote? The fellowship is fully remote.
Fellows are expected to work 15 hours a week, overlapping with Eastern Time for at least 10 hours per week. There may be one in-person gathering at the close of the fellowship term — format and location to be confirmed. What are fellows expected to contribute as part of their fellowship?
Fellows are expected to deliver: One flagship output – a research piece, long-form essay or report for public impact and for CHT to leverage this content further (video content, social posts, etc) 1-3 op-eds placed in target outlets and/or Substack posts One podcast episode (YUA or other CHT platform), where a good fit Participation in CHT's broader content and media ecosystem – these will be tied to some KPIs for BG to find opportunities for fellows How does CHT plan to promote and showcase the work of fellows to a wider audience?
CHT is committed to actively amplifying fellows' work throughout and beyond their term.
This includes: Working with fellows to place 1–3 op-eds in target outlets and/or CHT's Substack Facilitating at least one podcast appearance on Your Undivided Attention as aligned Listing on CHT's public fellows page for the duration of the fellowship and beyond Integration of fellows' research into CHT's broader public communications, policy work, and media appearances where relevant How is the fellowship compensated?
The fellowship stipend is $30,000, distributed across three milestones tied to the flagship deliverable: Milestone 1: Project proposal finalized Milestone 2: First draft submitted Milestone 3: Final version delivered If a fellow exits the program before completing their fellowship, the stipend will be based on the milestones completed. Can I publish work independently during my fellowship term that is unrelated to my CHT project? Yes.
Fellows retain full freedom to publish and speak independently on work unrelated to their CHT fellowship. We do ask that any work that could represent a clear conflict of interest be disclosed to the Senior Director of Strategy and Impact in advance. Who owns the work I produce during my fellowship?
IP terms are governed by the fellowship agreement. Will CHT have editorial input on my flagship output? Yes.
CHT will provide editorial guidance to help shape all flagship deliverables for public impact and quality standards. This guidance is meant to strengthen fellows’ work by helping elevate their thinking and research, not constraining or determining the outcomes. Fellows remain the authors of their deliverables based on the intellectual property terms of the agreement.
How are fellows selected and who makes the final decision? Fellows are selected based on the criteria outlined in the program description. The final selection decision is made by the CHT leadership team.
Can I apply for a future cohort if I am not selected this round? Yes. We encourage strong candidates who are not selected for the inaugural cohort to apply again in a future cycle.
Can I apply for more than one topic area? Yes. Fellows are welcome to apply for up to two topic areas.
Please indicate both in your application and submit two separate research proposals. What happens if I need to exit the fellowship early? We understand that circumstances change.
If you need to exit before completing your fellowship, your stipend will be based on the milestones you have completed at the time of exit. That said, we ask that all applicants be thoughtful about their capacity and commitments before applying. Help us design a better future at the intersection of technology and humanity
Key questions and narrative sections extracted from the solicitation.
1-2 page research proposal per focus area (applicants may submit for up to two focus areas)
CV/resume (2 pages maximum)
Two-minute video explaining fit for position
Writing sample demonstrating research ability
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Mid-career researchers, writers, journalists, practitioners, and thinkers with demonstrated expertise in AI and its societal implications. Applicants from a range of disciplines and backgrounds are welcome. Open to applicants outside the United States. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows $30,000 (fixed stipend). Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
The published deadline was July 12, 2026, which has passed. Check the official notice for any future application windows before investing time in a proposal.
Emerging Voices in AI and Society Fellowship is funded by Center for Humane Technology. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This listing is flagged as international in scope. Check the official notice for country-specific restrictions before applying.
Applications go through the funder's official portal — the Apply Now link on this page goes there directly.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
The Hewlett Foundation's Emerging Technology and Security Initiative commits $20 million a year through 2031 across AI, biotechnology, and quantum computing security. Its 2026 exploratory grants went to thirteen named institutions with no open call. For organizations outside that list, the path in runs through a specific set of moves — and the five-year term starting in 2027 is the window.
Read articleOn August 26, 2026, NSF named the STC class of 2026: TEMPEST at Michigan State, GENIE at Northwestern, and a human-robot co-adaptation center at UT Austin. $90 million total, $6 million a year each. The 2023 class was four centers and $120 million. The award size is intact; the shelf space shrank 25 percent — and that is the number that should reshape how you plan a center proposal.
Read articleOn July 22, 2026 the White House committed more than $5 billion to expand the Genesis Mission — the government-wide 'AI for science' effort — announcing 278 first projects and 14 National Science and Technology Challenges spanning health, energy, infrastructure, manufacturing, and national security. More than 15 federal agencies are contributing awards, datasets, and facilities. Here is how the pieces fit, why it reorganizes the science-funding map, and how to position for the awards flowing out of it.
Read article