1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsExperience Matters Grant is sponsored by National Society for Experiential Education (NSEE). Supports collaborative scholarship advancing the field of experiential learning through research, assessment, program innovation, or knowledge synthesis.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Vision, Mission, and Goals Institutional & Sustaining Members Travel and Accommodations Conference Planning Committee Experiential Education Academy SEE Definitions/Principles Project Research & Scholarship Grant Program The Experience Matters Grant Program supports collaborative scholarship from practitioners, faculty, and other scholars that advances the field of experiential learning.
Experiential education transforms learning by engaging students as active participants in authentic experiences followed by reflection and meaning-making. As institutions demonstrate their value to students, families, government, and the public, experiential learning stands as a critical bridge between academic preparation, applicable skills, and meaningful career and civic outcomes.
However, significant questions remain about long-term impacts of EL, causal linkages between specific pedagogies and outcomes, and effective implementation strategies. This grant program addresses these gaps by funding collaborative inquiry that generates evidence, advances practice and strengthens the rationale for investing in experiential learning across higher education. Experience Matters grants fund projects.
Collaborative projects are recommended and consist of two or more scholars working together to advance experiential learning through research, assessment, program innovation, or knowledge synthesis that contributes to the field's evidence base and theoretical foundations.
Total Annual Funding: Up to $15,000 USD per annual cycle Individual Award Amounts: $3,000 - $5,000 per project Number of Awards: 3-5 funded projects per annual cycle Project Duration: 15-18 months (potentially ranging across 2 academic years; shorter durations acceptable) Open to practitioners, researchers, and educators engaged in experiential learning.
Applicants must be affiliated with a non-profit organization or educational institution. One member of a collaborative team must be a SEE member. SEE board members may not receive funds from this grant.
While proposals on any aspect of experiential learning are welcome, we particularly encourage projects addressing: Long-term Impact Studies: Examining career outcomes, civic engagement, and life trajectories following experiential learning, building on foundational work while addressing unanswered questions about sustained effects Causal Linkages and Effectiveness: Investigating whether specific pedagogies lead to particular outcomes and under what conditions (e.g., Does community-engaged learning enhance civic identity?
Does undergraduate research improve critical thinking?)
Justification and Investment Rationale: Developing frameworks that support policy decisions, campus strategy, accreditation alignment, and state/national workforce initiatives related to experiential learning Pedagogical Innovation and Comparison: Studying how specific approaches work, including community-engaged learning, undergraduate research, internships, work-integrated learning, micro-internships, project-based and place-based learning, capstones, clinical placements, mentoring, and time-on-task requirements Assessment and Benchmarking: Creating tools, metrics, and benchmarks for evaluating experiential learning quality, equity, and outcomes across institutions Institutional Implementation: Examining campus-wide strategies, platforming approaches, and organizational change processes that support sustainable experiential learning programs Emerging Contexts: Exploring experiential learning's future in relation to higher education transformation, artificial intelligence integration, competency-based education, and evolving student needs Value Demonstration: Building evidence for how experiential education contributes to higher education's public value, including positive externalities for society beyond individual student benefit Proposals (maximum 2,500 words) must include: Research question(s) or project focus, including significance to field priorities Connection to existing literature and how the project advances knowledge Collaborative structure and team member roles/expertise (recommended, not required) Methodology, data sources, or implementation plan Timeline and specific deliverables Plan for knowledge sharing (required - choose at least one item from list below) Training/preparation of scholars/researchers (short narrative; CV/Resume may be attached but is not sufficient) Guidelines for Use of Funds Funds can be used for a variety of purposes that advance research activity, including but not limited to: Hiring a student assistant Paying for training materials or time (Train the trainer is acceptable; personal professional development is not) Travel to conferences to present research/findings Travel to experiential learning sites Educational programming/intervention (if the research requires an educational intervention) Refreshments (if refreshments are a key element of a program or intervention) Important: Funds cannot be used for indirect costs.
All funds go directly to the researcher/project as determined by the accepted application.
Knowledge Sharing Requirements Grantees must commit to at least one of the following knowledge-sharing activities: SEE Conference presentation of findings Publication submission to relevant journals (Journal of Experiential Education, International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, International Journal for Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, Metropolitan Universities, Experiential Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, or other relevant journals) Participation in SEE webinar series to share emerging findings Contribution to SEE's curated resource library (research briefs, frameworks, assessment tools, curricula) Development of training materials for shared use among SEE constituents Review Panel: Five-member committee including SEE board members, practitioners, and researchers Field significance and alignment with priorities (25%) Collaborative strength (20%) Methodological rigor/feasibility (20%) Dissemination potential (15%) Process: Blind review followed by panel discussion and consensus ranking.
Preference will be given to SEE members and/or active participants in a SEE committee.
Grant recipients will be required to: Submit a mid-project update (brief written update at 6-9 months) sharing progress and preliminary findings to the SEE Board Participate in three (3) required check-ins with the Research & Scholarship Committee EM Grant Liaison throughout the grant period Submit a comprehensive final report including methodology, findings, limitations, implications for practice, and recommendations for future research.
The final report must include accounting for all funds, and responses to a questionnaire about the EM Grant experience, usefulness, and areas for improvement. Submit a report of monies spent at end of grant period Applications must be submitted electronically by May 15, 2026.
Detailed submission instructions are provided with the application form: APPLICATION FORM Questions and Contact Information For questions about the Experience Matters Grant, please contact: Research & Scholarship Committee Society for Experiential Education We look forward to receiving proposals that advance the field of experiential learning!
Last Updated on Tuesday, March 31, 2026 01:24 PM Experiential Education Academy Experiential Education Campus Leadership Network SEE IGNITE Regional Collaborative
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Practitioners, researchers, and educators engaged in experiential learning, affiliated with non-profit organizations or educational institutions. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows $3,000 - $5,000 per project. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
Experience Matters Grant is funded by National Society for Experiential Education (NSEE). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
The UKRI Policy Fellowships 2025, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, offer 18-month placements for academics to co-design research with UK government and What Works Network host organizations. Awards range from £180,000 to £280,000 and support three fellowship tracks: core policy fellows, Natural Hazards and Resilience policy fellows, and What Works Innovation fellows. Applicants must hold a PhD or equivalent research experience, be based at a UKRI-eligible UK organization, and possess relevant subject matter or methodological expertise. Government-hosted positions target early to mid-career academics, while What Works fellowships welcome all career stages. Fellows work directly with policymakers to bridge academic research and policy development on pressing national and global challenges. The application deadline is July 15, 2025.
Model-to-Clinic is the translation arm of PRIMED-AI and sits one step downstream of the companion D2M-AIP announcement (RFA-RM-27-012). Where D2M-AIP funds the creation of AI-enabled multimodal clinical decision support tools, M2C funds the harder and less glamorous work of taking a tool that already exists as a validated prototype and getting it to function in real clinical settings - which means confronting workflow integration, site-to-site generalizability, clinician trust, regulatory pathway and sustainability all at once. The distinction matters for applicants because the two announcements share a deadline and a mechanism but reward very different evidence. A team with promising model performance and no deployment experience should apply to D2M-AIP; a team applying to M2C needs to arrive with a validated prototype and a credible clinical partner already in place. The UH3 cap here is $1,000,000 in direct costs per year, higher than D2M-AIP's $800,000, reflecting the cost of clinical implementation work. NIMH administers this announcement on behalf of the Common Fund, though the scope is not limited to mental health - PRIMED-AI as a whole targets significant health challenges broadly, with clinical imaging integrated with multimodal health data as the unifying technical thread. Awards are made under a phased UG3/UH3 cooperative agreement, so milestone definition governs whether a project advances past the exploratory phase. Successful tools developed under this and the other PRIMED-AI development announcements will be independently assessed by the program's Validation Center (RFA-RM-27-014), which applicants should anticipate in how they document performance and reproducibility. Foreign organizations are eligible, and the emphasis throughout is on tools that are not merely accurate but reliable, cost-effective and sustainable in routine care.
The Gates Foundation committed at least $1 billion over two years to equitable AI alongside its 10th Goalkeepers Report — 40% education, 40% health, 10% agriculture, 10% digital infrastructure. Five days later, 60 organizations signed a five-year goal to reach 3.4 billion speakers of underrepresented languages. Here is how implementing nonprofits should read both.
Read articleNIFA's Hispanic-Serving Institutions Education Grants Program (USDA-NIFA-HSI-011903) posted September 10, 2026 with $30.6 million, 40 anticipated awards, and a December 3 deadline. It uses the same 25 percent enrollment definition the Justice Department has declined to defend at the Department of Education. Here is the structure, the three grant types, and the caps that decide who wins.
Read articleBetween September 2025 and June 2026, ED published five Federal Register notices establishing seven Secretary's Supplemental Priorities — literacy, education choice, returning education to the states, meaningful learning, career pathways, AI in education, and patriotic education. They are not press releases. They are a scoring architecture, and FY2026 competitions are already using two and three at a time.
Read article