1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsFostering Harassment-Free STEM Education, Research, and Workplace Environments is sponsored by NSF. Encourages proposals that address all forms of harassment in STEM education and research settings.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Fostering Harassment-Free STEM Education, Research, and Workplace Environments | NSF - U.S. National Science Foundation Important information for proposers and award recipients All proposals must be submitted in accordance with the requirements specified in the funding opportunity and in the Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) and its supplements .
All NSF grants and cooperative agreements are subject to the applicable set of NSF award terms and conditions . NSF has updated its research security policies for NSF funded projects. This document has been archived.
Fostering Harassment-Free STEM Education, Research, and Workplace Environments Invites proposals that advance fundamental knowledge about the nature and dynamics of sexual or other harassment in STEM environments and inform anti-harassment efforts or facilitate culture and policy changes to ensure safe, harassment-free STEM environments.
Invites proposals that advance fundamental knowledge about the nature and dynamics of sexual or other harassment in STEM environments and inform anti-harassment efforts or facilitate culture and policy changes to ensure safe, harassment-free STEM environments. It is the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) policy to foster safe and harassment-free environments wherever STEM research, technology development, and education is conducted.
NSF views harassment-free science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) environments as necessary for an innovative science enterprise.
To that end, NSF has undertaken a number of initiatives, including implementation of its harassment notification award term and condition, code of conduct prerequisites for NSF-funded conferences and travel, and requirements for plans for safe and inclusive work environments for proposals involving off-campus and off-site research. NSF also continually promotes the sharing of promising practices to address harassment in science.
NSF Important Notice 144 , states: “The NSF does not tolerate sexual harassment, or any kind of harassment, within the agency, at grantee organizations, field sites, or anywhere NSF-funded science and education are conducted. The 2,000 American colleges, universities and other institutions that receive NSF funds are responsible for fully investigating complaints and for complying with federal non-discrimination law.
” Nevertheless, harassment in general, and sexual harassment in particular, continues to persist widely in STEM education and research settings and workplaces. 1 The focus of this Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) includes all forms of harassment, whether based on gender or any other aspects of identity.
The 2018 NASEM report, Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture and Consequences in Academic Science, Engineering, and Medicine , classifies (sexual) harassment in three categories: (1) gender harassment (verbal and nonverbal behaviors that convey hostility, objectification, exclusion, or second-class status about members of one gender), (2) unwanted sexual attention (verbal or physical unwelcome sexual advances, which can include assault), and (3) sexual coercion (when favorable professional or educational treatment is conditioned on sexual activity).
These categories can be either direct (targeted at an individual) or ambient (a general level of harassment in an environment).
With this DCL, NSF encourages two types of proposals: Research projects that a) advance fundamental knowledge about the nature and underlying dynamics of sexual and other forms of harassment in STEM environments and b) inform anti-harassment efforts in STEM; and Implementation projects to facilitate culture change and organizational policy structures to ensure safe and harassment-free STEM environments. I.
Research on Anti-Harassment in STEM Education and Research Settings and Workplaces Several programs across the Foundation may be appropriate for proposals that have theoretically driven research goals and advance generalizable knowledge about sexual or other forms of harassment in STEM environments.
Areas for potential research are included in the 2018 NASEM report and, in addition, research areas of interest to NSF include: The nature and dynamics of harassment, including underlying social and behavioral processes, and factors unique to STEM environments, such as: the hierarchical and isolating nature of scientific training; the influential and exclusive social and professional networks, cultures and climates in STEM fields and subfields; STEM reward and recognition structures; power dynamics with respect to ethics, diversity, equity, and inclusivity in STEM; and power dynamics between senior/early-career faculty, faculty/students/postdocs, researchers/personnel at all research sites, facilities, and vessels, and employees/interns in industry.
The impacts of the prevalence of harassment in STEM contexts on diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM, the responsible conduct of research, research ethics, research productivity, the quality of STEM research, technology development, and education. The mechanisms for assessing and evaluating harassment prevalence, impacts of prevention efforts, and organizational responses across a range of organization types and levels.
The strengths and weaknesses of organizational models, policies, and infrastructure for reporting, investigating, and addressing harassment. The development and testing of new models and processes for reporting and investigating harassment that are transparent and accessible and include accountability for organizations and organizational leadership.
The intersection of identity harassment and sexual harassment and how this can be addressed in the design of reporting and investigation systems and anti-harassment work to ensure effectiveness for all. II.
Culture Change and Organizational Policy Structure Projects to Create Harassment-Free STEM Education and Research Settings and Workplaces Current research findings suggest that the most potent predictor of harassment is organizational culture and climate. 2 Culture can be generally defined as a set of beliefs, traditions, and accepted behaviors that are learned, shared, and viewed as the “norm” within a group of people.
Climate refers to the perceptions and attitudes of individuals, including leaders, in that culture. Norms are often reinforced over generations and are rarely examined for continued added value to the community. Resistance to changing norms is strong and, unfortunately, some norms continue to create environments that enable harassment, including sexual harassment.
Fortunately, all individuals and organizations within these communities - particularly those with power, influence, and reputational standing - have the capacity to foster change by taking explicit actions and implementing policies to improve the culture and climate of STEM education, research, and workplace settings for all.
Projects might implement evidence-based actions such as: Creating or adopting organizational changes to promote anti-harassment, including but not restricted to training, communication, and policy changes. Empowering change agents, and current and future leaders, to foster harassment-free STEM education, research, and workplace environments.
Partnering with STEM professional societies to establish professional expectations related to both acceptable individual behavior and organizational policies and practices. Developing, implementing, evaluating, and communicating promising practices for all types of STEM education, research, and workplace environments, such as practices to repair harassment related harm and promote reintegration.
Creating clear, effective, transparent, consistent, and accessible harassment reporting and investigation processes that can be implemented without fear of retribution or regard to the power dynamics involved in the incident(s). Developing individual and organizational performance and accountability structures in support of harassment-free environments.
With this DCL, NSF welcomes creative and potentially transformative proposals that will facilitate the broader adoption of these evidence-based actions and policies by individuals and organizations.
Projects may establish academic and non-academic coalitions to jointly implement promising practices, encourage researcher and practitioner partnerships, develop and test scalable pilot programs, build and leverage existing efforts such as the NASEM Action Collaborative on Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education , and/or scale-up adoption of evidence-based programs or policies that will lead to curtailing harassment of all forms.
For culture change projects, proposals should be submitted to the Directorate that best represents the sector and disciplines of science and engineering whose culture would be impacted by the proposed activities. Proposers should follow the solicitation-specific instructions, or if no solicitation specific guidance is provided, proposers should follow the guidance in the PAPPG.
Many programs across NSF may support projects to encourage culture change ( https://www. nsf. gov/od/broadeningparticipation/bp_portfolio_dynamic.
jsp ). Some of the programs that accept proposals to do this work include: BIO: NSF 22-542 Leading Culture Change Through Professional Societies of Biology (BIO-LEAPS) ENG: NSF 22-514 Broadening Participation in Engineering (BPE), Tracks 1, 2, and 3. EDU: NSF 20-554 ADVANCE Organizational Change for Gender Equity in STEM Academic Professions through the Partnership track.
Proposals focused on any one or more STEM disciplines are accepted. GEO: NSF 23-539 Cultural Transformation in the Geoscience Community (CTGC) SBE: NSF 22-526 Ethical and Responsible Research (ER2) CISE: NSF 21-571 Broadening Participation in Computing (BPC) TIP: Proposers are encouraged to contact the cognizant Program Director (PD) in their related TIP office or division.
Once invited by the TIP PD, a proposal may be submitted pursuant to the current NSF PAPPG. In addition, the NSF welcomes submission of planning proposals ( PAPPG Chapter II. F.
1 ), conference proposals ( PAPPG Chapter II. F. 9 ), or Research Coordination Network ( RCNs ) proposals where accepted.
Proposals involving international collaboration, in which NSF supports the U.S. component of the collaborative activities, may also be considered. Please direct any questions pertaining to this DCL to: Dan Marenda, Program Director (BIO), dmarenda@nsf. gov Allyson Kennedy, Program Director (CISE), aykenned@nsf.
gov Jessie DeAro, Program Director (EDU), jdearo@nsf. gov Christine Grant, Program Director (ENG), cgrant@nsf. gov Brandon Jones, Program Director (GEO), mbjones@nsf.
gov Alison Peck, Program Director (MPS), apeck@nsf. gov Rebecca Ferrell, Program Director (SBE), rferrell@nsf. gov Rebecca Morss, Program Director (OIA), reellis@nsf.
gov Paul Raterron, Program Director (OISE), praterro@nsf. gov Debora F. Rodrigues, Program Director (TIP/TI), derodri@nsf.
gov Linda Molnar, Program Director (TIP/ITE), lmolnar@nsf. gov Individuals at NSF-funded organizations who experience, or witness harassment should either contact their Title IX Coordinator or NSF's Office of Equity and Civil Rights . Visit NSF.
gov for more information on NSF's policy on the prevention of harassment .
Directorate for Biological Sciences Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering Directorate for STEM Education Directorate for Engineering Directorate for Geosciences Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Acting Assistant Director Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Office of Integrative Activities Office of International Science and Engineering Directorate of Technology, Innovation and Partnerships 1 DiDio, L.
2021. Sexual Harassment, Bias Against Women Persist in STEM Professions. Communications of the ACM .
For example. 2 Sexual Harassment of Women Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, 2018 NASEM ( https://nap. nationalacademies.
org/catalog/24994/sexual-harassment-of-women-climate-culture-and-consequences-in-academic ) Directorate for Technology, Innovation and Partnerships (TIP) Directorate for STEM Education (EDU) Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) Directorate for Engineering (ENG) Directorate for Geosciences (GEO) Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (CISE/OAC) Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE) Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) Office of International Science and Engineering (OD/OISE) Office of Integrative Activities (OD/OIA) U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Nonprofit institutions of higher education, including universities and colleges. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Fostering Harassment-Free STEM Education, Research, and Workplace Environments is funded by NSF. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
TCUP lists eight funding tracks and roughly $10.3M a year, but the October 14, 2026 deadline applies to only three of them — CHAI, Pre-TI, and TCUP Partnerships — and each carries a restriction that disqualifies most applicants. Here is the track-by-track math.
Read articleNSF 26-513 makes roughly $100 million available for up to 10 State and Regional AI Infrastructure Hubs at $4M to $12M each over five years. One award per state or multi-state region. One proposal per organization. And NSF is not buying you GPUs — it funds the coordination, the workforce and the faculty training, while the compute has to come from partners you have to already have.
Read articleAs of September 12, NSF had obligated $6.3 billion across 6,200 grants versus $8.1 billion and 8,600 last year. AHRQ has made 61 awards. Judge Allison Burroughs ordered the government to report by September 28 on whether IES will obligate $180 million before it expires. Here is what actually happens to the money on October 1 — and what it means for your FY2027 application.
Read article