1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsFuture of Life Institute Digital Media Accelerator for AI Safety Content Creators is sponsored by Future of Life Institute. Provides grants to digital content creators raising awareness about AI safety and risks.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Digital Media Accelerator - Future of Life Institute Digital Media Accelerator The Digital Media Accelerator supports digital content from creators raising awareness and understanding about ongoing AI developments and issues. Go to your Applicant Portal to see your previous applications and any follow-ups. Don't have a login?
You should have received an invite link when you first applied. If not, reach out and let us know. With AI companies recklessly racing unchecked to build increasingly powerful AI - including artificial general intelligence (AGI), despite having no way to control it - the rest of humanity is being hurtled towards a dangerous and uncertain future.
Top AI experts agree that mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority - with AI company leaders themselves even explicitly addressing the dangers of the technology they're building. It is not too late to change trajectory however.
We can bring about a secure, prosperous future with controllable, reliable Tool AI - systems intentionally built to empower humans rather than replace us - if we're willing to take decisive action now. However, public awareness and understanding remains limited. The FLI Digital Media Accelerator program aims to help creators produce content, grow channels, spread the word to new audiences.
We're looking to support creators who can explain complex AI issues - such as AGI implications, control problems, misaligned goals, or Big Tech power concentration - in ways that their audiences can understand and relate to. By supporting various content formats across different platforms, we want to spark broader conversations about the risks of developing evermore powerful AI, and AGI.
We are keen to support creators who: Already have a following, and are interested in raising awareness about AI safety and risk; Have compelling ideas for impactful pieces of content to bring AI safety/risk awareness to new audiences; and, We are especially eager to support creators interested in discussing AI safety in their content on an ongoing basis, incorporating it into their regular output.
Please see below for examples of content we may be interested in funding: A series of YouTube explainer videos about AI safety topics A channel, such as a TikTok account, dedicated to daily AI news A Substack or newsletter dedicated to explaining new AI safety research papers An existing account with a specific focus (e.g. education) creating a short series exploring labor impacts of advanced AGI An existing tech updates channel sharing more about AI risk A podcast series for the general listener on progress towards AGI and its implications Please reach out to maggie@futureoflife.
org if you have any questions. We are accepting applications on a rolling basis. Due to the volume of submissions we receive, we're not able to give detailed feedback on all applications.
Other projects in this area We work on a range of projects across a few key areas. See some of our other projects in this area of work: Why the superintelligent AI agents we are racing to create would absorb power, not grant it | The latest study from Anthony Aguirre.
Statement on Superintelligence A stunningly broad coalition has come out against unsafe superintelligence: AI researchers, faith leaders, business pioneers, policymakers, National Security staff, and actors stand together. Join 70,000+ others receiving periodic updates on our work and focus areas.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Digital content creators with existing followings on platforms like YouTube, TikTok, blogs, podcasts, or newsletters. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows $5,000 - $50,000. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
Future of Life Institute Digital Media Accelerator for AI Safety Content Creators is funded by Future of Life Institute. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Future CoRe (NSF 25-543) advertises $280 million and 400 to 600 awards across 11 programs, with a September 10, 2026 target date. The directorate behind it is running 43 percent below its own four-year average, $1 billion of NSF's budget is locked in a central account, and the two-proposal cap is enforced with no exceptions. Here is how to read the gap between what the solicitation promises and what the directorate is actually paying for.
Read articleThe U.S. Government Policy for Stopping High-Risk Life Sciences Research, released July 28, 2026 under EO 14292 and implemented at NIH through NOT-OD-26-101, replaces mitigation with prohibition. It bans dangerous gain-of-function research outright, gates potential DGOF behind government-wide review, and creates International Research of Concern — a research-security regime wearing biosafety clothing. Penalties run to five-year debarment and False Claims Act exposure.
Read articleThe BlackRock Foundation has opened a $25 million national RFP — administered by JFF — for two-year grants of $500,000 to $1 million supporting apprenticeship, pre-apprenticeship, and skilled-trades workforce programs. Applications close July 10, 2026. Here is who is eligible, how the 'financial security' framing shapes what wins, why the systems-change track may be underused, and how to build a proposal that survives the review.
Read article