This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.

ActiveUniversity of Oklahoma · 2026

Generative AI in Children’s Maker Learning

Quick Facts

Agency: University of Oklahoma
Funding: $150,000
Deadline: Check Source
Status: Active
Eligibility: Universities and research institutions.

About This Grant

Generative AI in Children’s Maker Learning is sponsored by University of Oklahoma. Studies integration of generative AI into children’s maker-based learning in public libraries.

View Original RFP

Get a weekly digest of new grants like this

A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.

Or search similar grants →

Eligibility Requirements

Universities and research institutions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can apply for Generative AI in Children’s Maker Learning?

According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Universities and research institutions. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.

How much funding does Generative AI in Children’s Maker Learning offer?

The current listing shows $150,000. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.

Who funds Generative AI in Children’s Maker Learning?

Generative AI in Children’s Maker Learning is funded by University of Oklahoma. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.

How do I apply for Generative AI in Children’s Maker Learning?

Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.

Competitive Intelligence

Past winners and funding trends for this program

Full analysis

Funder Profile

Ready to start your proposal?

Granted drafts, reviews, and strengthens your grant application — saving weeks of work. Professional members win a grant in 12 months or get a full refund.

Browse More Grants

Backed by the Granted Guarantee

Similar Grants from Other Funders

European Commission — Digital Europe Programme

Horizon EuropeEUActive

Ensuring comprehensive geographical coverage of the Network of Safer Internet Centres (SICs)

Ensuring comprehensive geographical coverage of the Network of Safer Internet Centres (SICs) is sponsored by European Commission — Digital Europe Programme. Expected Outcome: Deliverables: Provision of the four key elements required of a Safer Internet Centre, namely: A centre for raising awareness among children, parents/carers, teachers and educators as well as other relevant professionals working with children about online opportunities and risks for the under 18s, producing and promoting localised age-appropriate resources to address current and emerging risks and opportunities. A helpline to give advice and support to parents and children on issues related to children's use of digital technologies and services; to provide assistance on mental health issues relating to the exposure to age-inappropriate content online, including pornographic and violent content; to strengthen support to victims of cyberbullying, close cooperation with the national Child Helpline 116111 service is required. A hotline for tackling the spread of online CSAM (i.e., receiving, analysing, and processing reports of such material). Closer cooperation with law enforcement and the private sector should be further explored in the context of the EU strategy for a more effective fight against child sexual abuse and the proposed Regulation to prevent and combat child sexual abuse and recast of the Directive 2011/93/EU on child sexual abuse. A youth panel to engage directly with children from different demographic groups, including the organisation of regular youth participation activities, allowing them to express their views and pool their knowledge and experience of using online technologies. Adequate turnover, geographic balance and an open selection of participants is required. Objective: The objective of the topic is to contribute to protection and empowerment of children online, a key EU priority, through comprehensive geographical coverage of national Safer Internet Centres (SICs) network in the EU. Notably: It seeks to enhance geographical coverage by engaging Safer Internet Centres that have not received EU funding under the previous call DIGITAL-2025-BESTUSE-08-NETWORKSICs. Only one Safer Internet Centre will be co-funded per country. SICs may be composed of one or more NGOs, government bodies/agencies, and/or private sector organisations and they provide online safety information, educational resources, public awareness tools and counselling and reporting services (through dedicated helplines and hotlines) for young people, teachers/educators, and parents/carers. The activities performed by the SICs help minors tackle online risks and become media-literate, resilient, digital citizens. The hotline work strand allows the public to anonymously report suspected online child sexual abuse material (CSAM) for assessment and takedown. The Safer Internet Centres also address the needs of children with specific or special needs, including those with disabilities and those hailing from disadvantaged and vulnerable backgrounds, to ensure no child is left behind. Considering the new role for the Commission as an enforcement body for the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Services Coordinators (DSCs), the Safer Internet Centres will strategically assist the Commission and cooperate with the DSCs in this role, in particular through data collection in the EU member states. Scope: The funding will ensure the continuation of the well-established European network of national SICs, by enabling the awarded consortia to provide at least: A centre for raising awareness among children, parents/carers, teachers and educators as well as other relevant professionals working with children about online opportunities and risks for the under 18s. The focus will be to identify and address: specific and general known risks (e.g. harmful and illegal content, cyberbullying, age-inappropriate content; sexual extortion, addictive design and manipulation, disinformation); specific and general emerging risks (e.g. new apps, games, online challenges and trends; AI and generative AI, including AI generated pornographic and viole Programme areas: DIGITAL Keywords: Artificial intelligence, intelligent systems, multi agent systems, Civil society organisations, Combating violence against children, young people and women, Communication, Communication network, Computer and information sciences, Computer sciences - Operating systems (software development only), Computing, Continuing professional training, Curriculum design and development, Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity Domains, Cybersecurity-aware culture (e.g. including children education), Data Security and Privacy, Data protection, Digital Rights Management (DRM), Education, Education and Training, Education-enterprises partnerships, Enhancing personal skills, Europe's innovation potential, Gamification, Gaming technology, Higher education, IT skills and competence, Identification of skills needs, Inclusive Education, Innovation, Involvement of children, Knowledge triangle between education, Learning outcomes, Media literacy, Network technologies / Internetworking, Networks (communication networks, sensor networks, networks of robots, etc.), New skills and competences for teachers, New technologies for Audio-Visual sector - Media, Personal development, Personalised prevention, Privacy, Privacy by design, Quality of education/educational products, Rights of the child, Social Media, Teaching materials, Telecommunications, Theories, techniques and tools for the identification, collection, attribution, acquisition, analysis and preservation of digital evidence, Training, Training of trainers (multiplication), Trust, Trust management architectures, mechanisms and policies, Trustworthy ICT, Virtual Reality, Vocational training, Youth policy, BIK+, Better Internet for Kids, CSAM, Digital Services Act, Network of safer Internet Centres, SICs, Safer Internet Centres, UN General Comment No. 25, awareness centre, carers, children, counsellingcyberbullying, educational resources, helpline, hotline, online child sexual abuse material, online safety, parents, professionals working with children, public awareness tools, special needs, special or specific needs, teachers and educators, victims of cyberbullying, xenophobia, youth

Deadline: Oct 1, 2026

University of Oklahoma Grant Writing Tips

DOE's ASPECT Solicitation Is Out — and the Award Range Starts at Zero

The full ASPECT NOFO (DE-FOA-0003647) posted September 4, 2026, eleven days later than the Notice of Intent predicted. The real document splits $58 million across two topic areas with anticipated award counts of 0-7 and 0-3, a cost share that jumps from 20 percent to 50 percent mid-project, a mandatory five-page concept paper due October 9, and a university eligibility restriction that decides team structure before anyone writes a word.

Read article

The Humana Foundation Put $12.2 Million Into Loneliness — and $1.75 Million of It Went to Universities. The Structure of the Slate Tells You More Than the Total Does.

The Humana Foundation's first 2026 slate funded 13 nonprofits and five university research teams around senior and veteran emotional health, with awards from $150,000 to $3 million concentrated in Texas, Florida, and Kentucky. A second health equity slate is planned for fall 2026. Here is what the portfolio structure reveals about how this funder decides, and how aging-services and behavioral health organizations should position.

Read article

DOE Just Put $10.75M Behind University Subsurface Research — and Made the Industry Partner Mandatory. Letters of Intent Are Due October 1.

The Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy Office's University Training and Research program funds coal, oil and gas, and geothermal R&D at U.S. colleges and universities — but every proposal must include a non-academic partner and must build training modules that outlive the award. The LOI deadline is October 1, 2026, with full applications 15 days later. Here is what that compressed window means and why the workforce framing changes what a competitive proposal looks like.

Read article