1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
Grant Preparation Funds: For Center, Training, and Collaborative Research Project Proposals is sponsored by Cornell Center for Social Sciences (CCSS). These funds support the administrative portion of preparing major external funding proposals with substantial and/or complex processes, typically for center grants, training grants, or other large collaborative research grants with budgets of at least $1 million.
Funds can be used for project managers, administrative assistants, grant-writing consultants, and visits with funding agencies.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: PI-eligible faculty at Cornell University. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows up to $95,000. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
Grant Preparation Funds: For Center, Training, and Collaborative Research Project Proposals is funded by Cornell Center for Social Sciences (CCSS). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
NSF's Arctic Research Opportunities solicitation funds roughly 75 awards a year — up to $50 million — across six program areas from natural sciences to social sciences to the Arctic Observing Network. The July 15, 2026 target date is not a hard deadline, and understanding that distinction is the first strategic decision an Arctic researcher makes. Here is how the six doors differ and how to choose the right one.
Read articleNSF's Archaeology Program Senior Research Awards fund $200K–$350K projects with a refreshingly open scope: no priorities by geography, time period, or theoretical orientation. That openness shifts the entire burden onto one question — can you justify your research as anthropologically significant? Here is why that single test decides most proposals, and how to pass it before the July 1 target date.
Read articleThe U.S. Government Policy for Stopping High-Risk Life Sciences Research, released July 28, 2026 under EO 14292 and implemented at NIH through NOT-OD-26-101, replaces mitigation with prohibition. It bans dangerous gain-of-function research outright, gates potential DGOF behind government-wide review, and creates International Research of Concern — a research-security regime wearing biosafety clothing. Penalties run to five-year debarment and False Claims Act exposure.
Read article