1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
Letter of Intent (2,500–3,000 words) due July 1, 2026; selected finalists invited to submit full proposals by September 30, 2026; funding decisions expected before year-end 2026
"Humane Fish Slaughter Research/Prototypes Request for Proposals" is currently closed and not accepting applications.
Humane Fish Slaughter Research/Prototypes Request for Proposals is sponsored by Coefficient Giving (Farm Animal Welfare Fund). Supports work to develop technologies and prototypes that materially improve the welfare of fish at capture and slaughter.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Request for proposals: Humane fish slaughter research and prototypes ($7M available) — EA Forum Request for proposals: Humane fish slaughter research and prototypes ($7M available) Animal welfare Opportunities to take action Fish welfare Request for proposal Announcements and updates Frontpage Request for proposals: Humane fish slaughter research and prototypes ($7M available) Who/what we're looking for Over 100 billion farmed fish are slaughtered each year.
At Coefficient Giving, where I (Michelle Lavery) work as a Senior Program Associate, we estimate that only ~0. 5% of them are reliably stunned before slaughter. For the more than a trillion wild-caught fish killed annually, conditions are even worse: most are left to suffocate slowly in air or in low-oxygen water, a process that can take minutes to hours.
Though fish slaughter represents only a few hours in an animal's life, we believe the pain it causes is excruciating — especially when done poorly, which is most of the time. This problem is both urgent and tractable: the suffering is immense, the moment of slaughter is discrete and identifiable, and people are genuinely horrified when they learn about current practices. So why hasn't it been solved?
The answer lies in a combination of technical complexity, limited competition in the equipment market, and a critical skills gap between the biologists who study the problem and the engineers who could solve it. That's why we're launching this RFP : to bridge that gap and catalyze the engineering innovation this problem demands.
If you've never thought about how fish are killed at industrial scale, you might assume the problem is straightforward: just stun them before slaughter, the way we do with cattle or pigs. But fish present unique engineering challenges that make solutions far more complex than they first appear. The diversity of fish species creates fundamental design challenges.
Consider percussive stunning — delivering a precise blow to the head to instantly render the animal insensible. This works well for salmon, but fish skulls vary dramatically: some are thick and bony, others thin and cartilaginous. Some species have differently shaped heads that make accurate strikes difficult.
A device calibrated for salmon anatomy might deliver glancing blows to sea bass, leaving them conscious and in pain. Even methods that seem promising have hidden failure modes. Take electrical stunning: its effectiveness depends on fish size, orientation in the water or on a conveyor belt, electrode spacing, and water conductivity, among other things.
In practice, some individuals in a batch receive sub-threshold electrical fields — they appear immobilized but remain conscious. Recent studies have revealed another problem: for several commercially important species, the duration of unconsciousness from electrical stunning is shorter than previously thought. Fish may appear stunned but regain consciousness during the killing process.
And then there are operational constraints. Wild-caught fish are processed on seagoing vessels with limited power and space. Farmed fish are killed in marine cages or freshwater systems with different environmental conditions.
Small fish caught in enormous quantities need different solutions than large, individually handled fish. Equipment must handle near-continuous throughput without disrupting processing lines, remain safe for workers, and be maintainable in harsh conditions. These problems require expertise in electrical systems, mechanical design, sensor technology, process engineering, and more.
We fund many biologists who are excellent at identifying when and why interventions fail. Now, we're hoping to fund engineers who can solve those failures. Who/what we're looking for We're seeking proposals for technologies and prototypes that materially improve fish welfare at capture and slaughter.
We're particularly interested in: Practical solutions for fishing vessels with limited power and space Methods that work for small wild fish caught in large quantities (currently no humane options exist) Alternatives to or improvements upon electrical stunning for farmed fish Outside-the-box approaches we haven't considered You don't need to be a fish welfare expert to apply.
We're targeting electrical engineers, mechanical engineers, maritime engineers, process engineers, and interdisciplinary teams who can bring fresh thinking to these problems. We've prepared technical context to help you understand the current state of the field, and we've created an evaluation rubric that explains how we'll assess proposals. We want to see projects with a plausible path to commercial adoption.
Early-stage “crazy” ideas are welcome, as long as they’re grounded in feasible near-term innovation. We want to see how your solution could realistically be integrated into existing fishing or aquaculture operations. Applications remain open until July 1, 2026.
Start by submitting a 2,500–3,000-word Letter of Intent covering your approach, research plans, organizational structure, timeline, and budget. We're offering a $4,000 honorarium to applicants whose submissions meet a minimum standard or rank among the top 125, whichever comes first. From this group, we'll invite 5–30 candidates to submit full proposals by September 30, 2026, with funding decisions expected before year-end.
We expect to allocate approximately $7 million to the most promising projects, with additional funding available for exceptional proposals. (Honorarium payments are subject to eligibility under applicable law and completion of any required due diligence/compliance screening.)
We welcome applications from: Academic and industry researchers Engineers and technologists from any sector Whether you're an expert in aquaculture technology or an engineer from a completely different field who sees a novel solution, we encourage you to apply: https://coefficientgiving. org/funds/farm-animal-welfare/request-for-proposals-humane-fish-slaughter-research-prototypes .
1 Most impactful posts on Effective Altruism forum from 13th January to 11th February No comments on this post yet. More from Coefficient Giving Curated and popular this week
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Academic and industry researchers, engineers and technologists from any sector, startups, nonprofits, and interdisciplinary teams. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows approximately $7 million available; exceptional proposals may receive additional funding. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
The published deadline was July 1, 2026, which has passed. Check the official notice for any future application windows before investing time in a proposal.
Humane Fish Slaughter Research/Prototypes Request for Proposals is funded by Coefficient Giving (Farm Animal Welfare Fund). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This listing is flagged as international in scope. Check the official notice for country-specific restrictions before applying.
Applications go through the funder's official portal — the Apply Now link on this page goes there directly.
The grantmaker formerly known as Open Philanthropy has two open calls that invert normal grant craft: Project Tailwind backs AI safety founders with $200k to $200M on a rolling basis, and Launchpad Funds seeds new global health funds led by a single accountable general manager. Expressions of interest close October 2, 2026.
Read articleUSDA and HHS announced Harvest to Hallways on August 24, 2026: $50M in new cafeteria infrastructure funding on top of $20M in Equipment Assistance Grants, up to $25M more in Patrick Leahy Farm to School awards for FY2026, and $30M in HHS nutrition research. Each pot has a different applicant, a different route, and a different timeline. Here is how to position for all three before the notices post.
Read articleH.R. 7567 preserves $14 billion in IRA conservation funding, launches new programs for rural childcare and forest easements, and reshapes SNAP — a grant seeker's breakdown.
Read article