1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
Innovation in Regulatory Science Awards is sponsored by Burroughs Wellcome Fund. This program supports academic investigators developing new methodologies or innovative approaches in regulatory science that will ultimately inform regulatory decisions made by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other agencies.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Innovation in Regulatory Science - Burroughs Wellcome Fund Innovation in Regulatory Science Share this Grant Apply Now BWF’s Innovation in Regulatory Science Awards provides up to $500,000 over five years to academic investigators developing new methodologies or innovative approaches in regulatory science that will ultimately inform the regulatory decisions the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and others make.
We especially encourage applications from those seeking to advance regulatory science approaches that will expedite the realization of equitable clinical outcomes. The following videos were recorded in 2020 and 2023 and are being shared for informational purposes because they contain a wealth of information about the IRSA program. Note that some deadlines within the videos reference past award cycles.
Progress and financial reports are required of all BWF grants and are due on the date(s) specified in the award letter or agreement. The Advisory Committee and staff depend heavily upon progress and financial reports to evaluate progress. Late reports inconvenience advisory committee reviewers and impede BWF's evaluation of its programs.
Failure to submit progress or financial reports in a timely fashion will result in payments being withheld, and if submissions are missed repeatedly, the award will be terminated. BWF provides the following progress report guidelines to assist in preparing and submitting progress reports in an acceptable manner. The progress report and financial updates are to be submitted through Proposal Central .
You can find the required deliverables listed on the home page after logging in to Proposal Central. Failure to submit any portion of the report by the due date will result in an interruption or cancellation of your funds. If you need help using Proposal Central, please follow the instructions on their Customer Service webpage to contact their tech support team.
Awardees may request a no-cost extension (i.e., no additional grant funds to be provided) at least 30 days before the grant end date. To begin a no-cost extension request, please email our Program Associate, Eliza Gary ( egary@bwfund. org ) with a short description of the purpose for which the extension is requested.
The request for a no-cost extension must be copied to the investigator and the appropriate representative of the investigator’s institution. The BWF team will then add an official no-cost extension request to your award on Proposal Central; there, the awardee should include a detailed explanation of the purposes for which the extension is requested.
Directions are outlined in the award contract/agreement “General Terms and Conditions” and included in Proposal Central. In general, extensions do not exceed 24 months. The Fund reserves the right to deny a request in whole or in part.
If the request is approved, it will be incumbent upon the named investigator and his/her institution to provide annual progress and expenditure reports each year of the no-cost extension period and final progress and financial reports at the end of the no-cost extension period. BWF will request a return of all no-cost extension funds if progress report requirements and deadlines are unmet.
Progress Reporting for Awardees The progress report requires the awardee to submit a written report on the progress of the original or approved update to research project aims, an updated biographical sketch, a summary of research progress, and any recent publications. Details regarding each section are in Proposal Central. The progress report must be submitted annually on November 1st.
Awardees are required to update award spending in the Proposal Central budget summary; awardees should report spending in the “expenses” column. Details regarding financial reporting are in Proposal Central. Financial reports are due annually on November 1st.
All progress and financial reporting materials should be submitted through Proposal Central. If you have questions, please contact our Program Coordinator, Lama Haidar ( lhaidar@bwfund. org ).
Can I submit more than one application? Do I need to be nominated by my institution to submit a proposal? No. You may self-nominate for the proposal.
All applications must be approved by an official responsible for sponsored programs at the institution where the work will be performed (generally from the institution’s grants and contracts office, office of research, or sponsored programs office). Is the BWF application deadline firm? Yes, the application deadline is firm.
Do I need to submit a preproposal prior to submitting a full application? No. We are no longer requesting a preproposal for the Innovation in Regulatory Awards program. Can I submit a paper application?
No. BWF requires that all applications for this program be submitted electronically. Paper applications will not be accepted. The eligibility requirements mention that the primary investigator must be based at a non-profit institution [501(c3) or equivalent] in the U.S. or Canada.
What is a 501(c)(3)? According to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, a 501(c)(3) organization is an American tax-exempt, nonprofit organization. Almost all degree-granting institutions are classified as such, as are most research institutes and teaching hospitals.
You must check with your institutional officials, usually called the grants and contracts office or the sponsored programs office, etc., to confirm your institution’s classification. BWF cannot make this determination for you. I am a permanent resident.
What documentation is required to verify my residency status? BWF does not require documentation of your permanent residency for the proposal. Your institution must verify your permanent residency status by certifying the eligibility of your application upon signing the proposal.
Can I include cover letters or supplemental materials with my proposal? Do not include a cover letter or supplemental materials. If extra materials are included, your proposal will be rejected out of fairness to all applicants.
Can co-investigators be located at different institutions? Yes. However, the primary investigator must be based at a non-profit institution [501(c3)] in the U.S. or Canada, which will be the administering institution for the award.
The primary investigator must meet all eligibility requirements for the program. Can I change my application once it is submitted? After a proposal has been submitted, applicants have the option to unsubmit it to make changes, if necessary, only if: 1.
The application deadline hasn’t passed; 2. BWF has not already routed the application to a committee for review. If an applicant needs to edit an application, please review the instructions on page 27 for “Unsubmitting An Application” in the “How to Create an Application Using Proposal Central” guide accessible at this link https://docs.
proposalcentral. com/CreateApp. pdf .
Can I contact BWF to determine my eligibility? Applicants are responsible for reading the published guidelines and FAQs to determine eligibility. The FAQs are updated regularly in response to questions received.
BWF staff will do their best to respond to every inquiry but will prioritize questions not already clearly addressed in the published guidelines. Please do not contact BWF to ask if we can make an exception to clearly stated guidelines. To ensure a timely response, please email your questions to the program contacts provided.
I do not have a tenure-track position. Am I eligible for this award? Possibly, as long as you hold a faculty appointment or adjunct faculty appointment at a non-profit institution in the U.S. or Canada, which may include degree-granting institutions, research institutes, and teaching hospitals affiliated with academic degree-granting institutions.
You do not need to hold a tenure-track position. I’m currently a postdoc. Am I eligible for this award?
I am a temporary resident of the United States. Am I eligible for this award? Possibly.
Temporary residents of the U.S. who are legally qualified to work in the U.S. are eligible. Candidates who are temporary U.S. residents must hold a valid U.S. visa (J-1, H1B, F-1 or O-1 visas). If a grant is awarded and your visa does not allow for such a stay, BWF may terminate the grant.
BWF will not intercede on behalf of non-citizens whose stay in the U.S. may be limited by their visa status. I am a temporary resident of Canada. Am I eligible for this award?
Possibly. Temporary residents of Canada who are legally qualified to work in Canada are eligible. Temporary Canadian residents must hold a valid Canadian visa (Study Permit, C-43, C44, C-10, or C-20 work permits/visas).
If a grant is awarded and your visa does not allow for such a stay, BWF may terminate the grant. BWF will not intercede on behalf of non-citizens whose stay in the U.S. may be limited by their visa status. I’m at an independent research institute.
Am I eligible for this award? Possibly. You must be based at a non-profit institution [501(c)(3) or equivalent] in the U.S. or Canada, and hold a faculty appointment, or adjunct faculty appointment, at the institution.
If you have such an appointment and your research institute is a non-profit institution [501(c)(3) or equivalent] in the U.S. or Canada, you are eligible. Examples of such institutions may include but are not limited to degree-granting institutions, research institutes, and teaching hospitals affiliated with academic degree-granting institutions. I’m a past BWF grantee.
Am I eligible for this award? Yes, as long as you meet all the eligibility requirements for the program. What internet browsers are compatible with the BWF Grant Submission System?
Most internet browsers are compatible with the Grant Submission System including, Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Safari (for Mac), and Google Chrome. I forgot my user ID/password. What should I do?
For a forgotten password or user ID, access the grant submission system log-in screen and click the forgotten password link. Do I need to complete an application in one session? No, you can start an application and return later to complete it.
When beginning a new application, you are required to establish a login and password. At any time during the application process, you may click the "save and close" button, exit the application, and return later.
Physics-Informed Digital Twin for the Delivery of Biotherapeutics Addressing Regulatory Science Needs in a Global Environment University of California-San Francisco Advancing Methods to Inform Regulatory Action for Equitable Pulse Oximeter Performance Michelle Rengarajan, MD, PhD Massachusetts General Hospital Developing a Surrogate Biomarker for Dystrophin-Restoring Therapy in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy University of California-Los Angeles “Phase 0” Human Clinical Safety Trials in a Dish Artificial intelligence to support pharmacogenetics in under-studied populations Development of optical and digital microscopy hardware, software, and statistical methods to enable assessment of computational pathology University of Maryland-Baltimore Advancing regulatory science to assure COAs reflect diverse patient experiences Veronica Rotemberg, MD, PhD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Developing an independent audit framework for artificial intelligence in medicine: Using skin lesion analyzers as a use case Duke University School of Medicine An innovative approach using real-world data (RWD) for the assessment of risk disparities and clinical risk factors of drug-associated acute liver injury University of California-San Francisco Developing a Toxicity Framework using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health Advancing methods for measuring patient preferences in regulatory science A screening tool for predicting immune response to polymers designed for soft implantable devices Innovative Biostatistical Methods for Analysis and Assessment of Clinical Trials Augmented by Real World Data Revolutionizing mutagenicity testing and assessment through the use of a novel error-corrected sequencing technology University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio Unlocking and Evaluating Real-World Data for Use in Regulatory Decision Making Jessica Myers Franklin, PhD Evaluating the validity of real world data for regulatory decision-making through replication of randomized controlled trials Brigitte Gomperts, MD, PhD University of California-Los Angeles Developing a screen to test the toxicity of new and emerging tobacco products on the airway epithelium Christoph Hornik, MD, PhD Real world data to support pediatric drug labeling University of California-Los Angeles High-throughput detection of carcinogenic aflatoxins in agricultural food products through terahertz pulsed imaging Innovative methods to inform regulatory action on tobacco product marketing University of California-San Diego Florence T.
Bourgeois, MD, MPH Pediatric regulatory policy: advancing timely and rigorous evaluation of medicines for children University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Development of an in vitro platform for the evaluation of genetic susceptibility factors associated with adverse drug response Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Statistical methods and automated software tool for stress-testing adaptive clinical trial designs University of California-San Francisco Advancing new methodologies to measure patient preference for regulatory approval of devices Incorporating smartphone research applications into clinical trials Massachusetts Institute of Technology A model system to evaluate the dynamics and safety of gene drive applications Microsimulation modeling to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of novel cancer therapies Andrew Douglas Maidment, PhD University of Pennsylvania VICTRE - Virtual Clinical Trials in The Regulatory Environment Oregon Health and Science University Mitochondrial replacement therapy University of California-Los Angeles Application of novel approaches towards germline toxicity assessment Methods to assess biofilm prevention on medical devices Duke University School of Medicine Provenance Laboratory for Auditable Regulatory Science (POLARIS): auditable antibiotic development with the clinical trials transformation initiative California Institute of Technology A microfluidic diagnostic platform to advance regulatory science Sara Lynn Van Driest, MD, PhD Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Leveraging big data for small patients Stanford University School of Medicine Accelerating drug discovery with iPS cells and small molecule screen Dana Farber Cancer Institute Development of a Biomarker Enriched Adaptive Trial for Patients with Glioblastoma University of Wisconsin-Madison Organoid Microarrays for pan-Hindbrain and Spinal Cord Screening Duke University Medical Center Administrative Claims-based Efficiencies for the Advancement of Regulatory Sciences A chemical-genetic library of human cell lines for evaluating pharmacologic inhibition of protein kinases Evaluation of nutrient profiling methods for nutrition regulation University of British Columbia Refreshing the regulatory approach to ensuring the safety and efficacy of blood transfusion products University of California-San Francisco Systems pharmacology approaches to understanding drug-induced weight gain University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Advancing regulatory science through translational pharmacogenomics Calum MacRae, MB, ChB, PhD Brigham and Women’s Hospital Building structure-related prediction algorithms for organ-specific drug toxicity through iterative modeling in novel zebrafish reporter lines Brigham and Women’s Hospital Mapping the biology of a damaged kidney cell University of Wisconsin-Madison When politics intrudes on science: regulatory policymaking at the FDA Special Advisor, Past President and CEO Vice President, Clinical Development Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup, DHSc, MSc, MA Research Director, Real World Evidence Duke-Robert J.
Margolis Institute for Health Policy Professor Emerita and former Chair Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Wendy R. Sanhai, PhD, MBA General Partner, Hatteras Venture Partners Managing Director, Hatteras Discovery Co-Chair, Forum on Drug Discovery, Development and Translation National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Jonathan Watanabe, PharmD, PhD Jere E.
Goyan Presidential Chair for the Advancement of Pharmacy University of California San Francisco Alastair J. J. Wood, M.
B. , Ch. B, FRCP, FACP (Chair) Professor of Medicine, Emeritus Professor of Pharmacology, Emeritus Director, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute Simon Stertzer Professor of Medicine Additional members may be added to the committee.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Academic investigators at degree-granting institutions in the United States and Canada. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows up to $500,000 over five years. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
The published deadline was December 4, 2025, which has passed. Check the official notice for any future application windows before investing time in a proposal.
Innovation in Regulatory Science Awards is funded by Burroughs Wellcome Fund. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Yes — this listing is flagged as national in scope, so applicants across the U.S. may apply, subject to the sponsor's other eligibility criteria.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
Discovery Awards went always-open on September 23, 2026. Five weeks later, lead applicants outside the UK and three LMIC regions lose eligibility. The rolling system also turns one old rule into a trap.
Read articleAs of September 12, NSF had obligated $6.3 billion across 6,200 grants versus $8.1 billion and 8,600 last year. AHRQ has made 61 awards. Judge Allison Burroughs ordered the government to report by September 28 on whether IES will obligate $180 million before it expires. Here is what actually happens to the money on October 1 — and what it means for your FY2027 application.
Read article