1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsManufactured Food Program is sponsored by State of Rhode Island. Maternal and Child Health, Center for <a href="/emergencies/med Category: Health.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “State of Rhode Island” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Manufactured Food Program | Department of Health Manufactured Food Program To ensure the safety of food processed in Rhode Island Review and approve applications for new food processing operations. Inspect food processing facilities regularly to ensure the safety of operations. Perform inspections on behalf of the US Food, and Drug Administration of businesses that sell out-of-state.
If you are starting a new food processing business in Rhode Island please review the applications types below and this New Food Processor Guidance Document that outlines the process for starting a new food processing firm, the regulations, and provides resources for each commodity. Please reach out to the Center for Food Protection with any questions. Food Processors and Distributors: Wholesale and Retail .
This license applies to food processors manufacturing baked goods, processors of seafood, meat/poultry, cheese, and miscellaneous food items, as well as processors repacking products.
Food Processor - Retail, In-State Food Processor - Wholesale, In-State Food Processor - Wholesale, Out of State o Food Distributor -In-State Food Distributor - Out of State Food Processor: Apple Cider Food Processor: Bottler, Canner Food Processor: Meat and Poultry Farm Warehouse ( Meat Products ) License allows farmers to take their animals to a USDA slaughter house and then to a licensed meat packing plant, where the meat must be packaged and frozen.
Shellfish Business “ Dealers License ” for shipper, reshipper, repacker, shucker/packer. Dairy Business Permit: Milk Producer . Dairy Business Permit: Milk Processor .
Food Service Mobile License allows for the sale of food by food truck operators . Retail Food Peddlers License allows for the movement of product from an approved source ( licensed retail or wholesale facility ) for direct sale to the consumer at another site.
The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), a federal law enacted in 2011, requires firms that manufacture, process, pack or hold human food, and that must register with FDA, follow the Preventive Controls for Human Food (PCHF) rule’s new food safety requirements found in 21 CFR Part 117. The PCHF rule is final, and compliance dates for some businesses began as early as September 2016.
The Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) adopts the new federal regulations as dictated by the Food Safety Act (3 Pa. C. S.
A. §5733(f)) and will enforce all applicable provisions. As Rhode Island regulation, all RIDOH licensed firms will be expected to comply with the applicable portions of the PC rule regardless of FDA registration status, unless specifically exempted in the rule.
During inspection of food establishments, RIDOH will evaluate the required food safety plans and make sure the plans are being implemented properly. PCHF requires eligible food establishments to follow updated good manufacturing practices (Modernized GMPs), and to establish and implement a comprehensive PCHF food safety plan.
PCHF Food Safety Plan Requirements Firms that are subject to the full requirements of PCHF must establish and implement a food safety system that includes an analysis of hazards and identification of risk-based preventive controls.
This Food safety system includes a written food safety plan that covers: Hazard analysis: What are the known or reasonably foreseeable biological, chemical, and physical hazards that occur naturally, are unintentionally introduced, or are intentionally introduced, that could affect the safety of the food.
Preventive controls: Measures that are required to minimize or prevent the identified hazards, including: Process controls: procedures, practices, and processes to control parameters during operations. Examples of process controls are cooking and refrigeration, and product formulation.
Food allergen controls: procedures, practices, and processes to control allergen cross-contact within a facility and procedures to ensure all food allergens are correctly labeled. Sanitation controls: procedures, practices, and processes to make sure the facility is maintained in a sanitary manner to control hazards such as environmental pathogens.
Environmental monitoring is required if contamination of a ready-to-eat food with an environmental pathogen such as Listeria monocytogenes is a hazard requiring a preventive control. Supplier-chain controls: a risk-based approach to ensure suppliers are not providing food establishments with raw materials or ingredients that pose a significant risk to the final product made by the firm.
Other appropriate controls: preventive control procedures that are not process, food allergen, or sanitation controls, but are necessary to ensure that a hazard requiring a preventive control will be significantly minimized or prevented. Oversight and management of preventive controls: Monitoring: These procedures are designed to provide assurance that preventive controls are consistently performed.
Monitoring is conducted as appropriate to the preventive control. For example, monitoring of a heat process to kill pathogens would include recording temperature values. Monitoring must be documented.
Corrections: These are steps taken, in a timely manner, to identify and correct a minor, isolated problem that occurs during food production.
Corrective Actions: These include actions to identify and correct a problem implementing a preventive control, reduce the likelihood the problem will recur, evaluate affected food for safety, and prevent that food from entering commerce if you cannot ensure that the affected food is not adulterated. Corrective actions must be documented with records.
Verification: These activities are required to ensure that preventive controls are consistently implemented and effective in minimizing hazards.
Examples of verification activities include scientifically validating process preventive controls to ensure that the control measure is capable of effectively controlling an identified hazard and calibrating (or checking the accuracy of) process monitoring and verification instruments such as thermometers.
Verification activities also include reviewing records to ensure that monitoring and corrective actions (if necessary) are being conducted. Verification activities must be documented. Product testing and environmental monitoring are also possible verification activities, required as appropriate to the food, facility, nature of the preventive control, and the role of that control in the facility’s food safety system.
Environmental monitoring is required if the contamination of a ready-to-eat food with an environmental pathogen is a hazard the facility identified as requiring a preventive control. Record-keeping: Documentation of compliance with the written food safety plan to include but not limited to monitoring, corrective actions, corrections and verification activities.
Required records shall be made available to the regulatory authority (which will include RIDOH and FDA).
Recall Plan: If the hazard analysis identifies a hazard that requires a preventive control, you must have a written recall plan that includes the procedures that describe the steps to perform the recall and at minimum assigns responsibility for: Notifying the direct consignees of the food being recalled, including how to return or dispose of the affected food; Notifying the public about hazards in the food; Conducting effectiveness checks; and Appropriately disposing of the recalled product.
Exemptions (from Subparts C, D, and G) Food establishments covered by separate regulations including juice, seafood, dietary supplements, alcoholic beverages, or Low-acid canned foods (for C. botulinum control ONLY as regulated by Part 113). Establishments such as grain elevators and warehouses that are solely engaged in storing agricultural commodities (other than fruits and vegetables) intended for further processing.
Establishments, such as warehouses, that only store packaged foods that are not exposed to the environment and for which refrigeration is not required for safety (Dry Warehouses).
Establishments that are Small or Very Small On-Farm businesses that conduct certain low-risk manufacturing and processing, packing, or holding activities (e.g., making jams/jellies, honey, maple syrup, candy, soft drinks and carbonated water, etc.); see more information in 117. 5(g)(3) and 117.
5(h)(3) NOTE: A Farm is not covered by the new requirements, unless it is a mixed-type facility which is an establishment that is a Farm, but also conducts activities outside the farm definition that require the establishment to be registered as required under section 415 of the Federal FD&C Act. (See Definition in 21 CFR 117.
3 ) Firms Subject to the Modified Requirements and Attestation Requirements Very Small businesses as defined in 21 CFR 117. 3 Qualified facilities as defined in 21 CFR 117.
3 to which both of the following apply: During the 3-year period preceding the applicable calendar year, the average annual monetary value of the food manufactured, processed, packed or held at such facility that is sold directly to qualified end-users (as defined in this part) during such period exceeded the average annual monetary value of the food sold by such facility to all other purchasers; AND The average annual monetary value of all food sold during the 3-year period preceding the applicable calendar year was less than $500,000, adjusted for inflation.
(See modified requirements that apply to qualified facilities in § 117. 201 Qualified facilities must submit the following attestations to FDA: An attestation that the facility is a qualified facility as defined in § 117.
3; AND (i) An attestation that you have identified the potential hazards associated with the food being produced, are implementing preventive controls to address the hazards, and are monitoring the performance of the preventive controls to ensure that such controls are effective; OR (ii) An attestation that the facility is in compliance with RIDOH regulations based on licenses/permits, inspection reports, or other evidence of oversight.
A qualified facility must submit these notifications to FDA during the same two-year timeframe that the facility is required to update its facility registration. An otherwise Qualified Facility that does not notify FDA may be subject to the requirements for Hazard Analysis and Preventive Controls. Attestations can be submitted to FDA either electronically at www.
fda. gov/furls or by mail using FDA Form 3942a. Click HERE for more information.
Establishments that are solely engaged in the storage of refrigerated unexposed packaged foods when temperature controls are necessary to prevent pathogen growth. These firms must: (See complete requirements in § 117.
206 ) Establish and implement temperature controls adequate to significantly minimize or prevent pathogen growth, and toxin formation, Monitor the temperature controls at adequate frequency, Take appropriate corrective actions when there is loss of temperature control, Verify temperature controls, Establish and maintain records.
NOTE: Warehouse and distribution establishments engaged in the storage of any exposed food products and/or engaged in any processing/ manufacturing activities or “value added services” (e.g. blast freezing, roasting, tempering, labeling, repacking), may be subject to the PC rule requirements where they need to conduct a hazard analysis and may need to implement preventive controls.
Updated Good Manufacturing Practices (Current GMPs) The PCHF Rule also updates the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements. All food establishments (regardless of exemption status) are subject to current GMP regulations. The new updates include: Training: Management is required to ensure that all employees who manufacture, process, pack or hold food are qualified to perform their assigned duties.
The employees must be trained in the principles of food hygiene and food safety, including the importance of employee health and hygiene as appropriate to the food, the facility, and the individual’s assigned duties. Records of training must be maintained. Allergen cross-contact: Allergen cross-contact is now explicit in the regulatory text.
You are required to employ practices and procedures to control allergen cross-contact. Human food by-products used for animal foods: The updated cGMPs contain provisions for holding and distributing human food by-products that are used for animal food. Guidance for Industry - Human Food By-Products for Use as Animal Food How does the Preventive Controls Plan compare to a HACCP plan?
The general concepts are very similar. However, a “preventive controls plan” also covers monitoring, records, and corrective actions for items that are generally considered pre-requisite programs in HACCP plans, including food allergen controls, sanitation controls, and a recall plan. The table below compares the requirements for both plans: biological, chemical, physical hazards Biological, Physical & Chemical.
Chemical hazards include radiological hazards. Also, consideration of economically motivated adulteration (21 CFR 117. 130(b)) Process CCPs + controls at other points that are not CCPs (21 CFR 117.
135(a)(2)) Parameters and minimum/maximum values (equivalent to critical limits for process controls) (21 CFR 117. 135(c)(1)) Required as appropriate for preventive controls (21 CFR 117. 145) Corrective Actions and Corrections Corrective actions or corrections as appropriate (21 CFR 117.
150(a)) Verification (including validation) Verification as appropriate for all preventive controls; validation for process controls; supplier verification required when supplier controls a hazard (21 CFR 117. 155, 117. 160) As appropriate for all preventive controls (21 CFR 117.
190) Not required for the plan Required when a hazard requiring a preventive control is identified (21 CFR 117.
139) Resources for Preventive Controls Key Facts about Preventive Controls for Human Food 21 CFR Part 117- GMPs & PC Regulation Understanding the Current GMP, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-based preventive controls for Human Food PCHF Draft Guidance for Industry Potential Hazards for Food & Processes Frequently Asked Questions on FSMA FDA Small Entity Compliance Guide More Guidance on Supporting Material FDA has developed several guidance documents and is still working on many others on subjects that include Hazard Analysis, Preventive Controls, Food Allergen Controls, Sanitation Controls, Validation of Process Controls, and guidelines for small and very small firms.
FDA has developed a Food Safety Plan Builder (FSPB) which is a tool designed to assist owners/operators of food facilities with the development of food safety plans that are specific to their facilities and meet the requirements of the PCHF regulation (21 CFR Part 117).
Northeast Center to Advance Food Safety (NECAFS) is one of four FDA/USDA funded regional centers tasked with coordinating training, education and outreach related to the FSMA Produce Safety Rule and the FSMA Preventive Controls for Human Foods Rule. FDA FSMA Technical Assistance Network The FDA FSMA Technical Assistance Network (TAN) is now operational and providing technical assistance regarding overall FSMA regulatory aspects.
Inquiries may be submitted through a web form. FSCPA Technical Assistance Network For technical assistance to industry, academia and others regarding training and scientific/ technical questions related specifically to FDA’s PC for Human Food and Animal Food regulations, the Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance (FSPCA) Technical Assistance Network (TAN) is now operational and inquiries can be submitted online.
If you are a facility subject to the cGMP & PC rule and no exemptions from Subparts C (Hazard Analysis and Risk-based Preventive Controls) and G (Supply-Chain Program) apply to you, then you are required to have a Preventive Controls Qualified Individual (PCQI) develop and implement your facility’s food safety plan (21 CFR 117. 180(a)).
A PCQI is a qualified individual who has successfully completed training in the development and application of risk-based preventive controls at least equivalent to that received under a standardized curriculum recognized as adequate by FDA or be otherwise qualified through job experience to develop and apply a food safety system.
Job experience may qualify an individual to perform these functions if such experience has provided an individual with knowledge at least equivalent to that provided through the standardized curriculum( 21 CFR 117. 180 (c)(1) ). FSPCA has developed a standardized curriculum recognized by FDA; and successfully completing this course is one way to meet the requirements for a PCQI.
These courses are taught by Lead Instructors trained by the FSPCA, who have been instructed in how to teach the FDA-recognized standardized curriculum. Food Safety Education (uri. edu) Upcoming Courses & Registration Information FSPCA Alliance Training Opportunities FSPCA PC for Human Participant Manual jarrod.
olbres@health. ri. gov Farm Warehouse (Meat Products) Food Farm Home Manufacturer Food Processor Bottler Apple Cider Food Processor Non-Profit Employee Illness Screening Form Guidance, Recommendations Food Processing: Guidance for Rhode Island State and Federal Regulatory Requirements ( Spanish )
Based on current listing details, eligibility includes: See the Rhode Island grants portal for complete eligibility requirements. Applicants should confirm final requirements in the official notice before submission.
Current published award information indicates Not specified Always verify allowable costs, matching requirements, and funding caps directly in the sponsor documentation.
The current target date is rolling deadlines or periodic funding windows. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, attachments, and final submission checks.
Federal grant success rates typically range from 10-30%, varying by agency and program. Build a strong proposal with clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and a well-justified budget to improve your chances.
Requirements vary by sponsor, but typically include a project narrative, budget justification, organizational capability statement, and key personnel CVs. Check the official notice for the complete list of required attachments.
Yes — AI tools like Granted can help research funders, draft proposal sections, and check compliance. However, always review and customize AI-generated content to reflect your organization's unique strengths and the specific requirements of the solicitation.
Review timelines vary by funder. Federal agencies typically take 3-6 months from submission to award notification. Foundation grants may be faster, often 1-3 months. Check the program's timeline in the official solicitation for specific dates.
Many federal programs offer multi-year funding or allow competitive renewals. Check the official solicitation for continuation and renewal policies. Non-competing continuation applications are common for multi-year awards.