1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
Minerva Research Initiative is sponsored by U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). The Minerva Research Initiative is the DoD's flagship basic research program for the social sciences, designed to deepen understanding of social, cultural, political, economic, informational, and technological forces shaping global security outcomes.
It supports rigorous, multidisciplinary academic inquiry into how societies behave, how information moves, and how conflict emerges. Research areas include strategic competition, geopolitical alignment, cross-cultural influence, political behavior, and information ecosystems.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
The Department of Defense today announced $46. 8 million in grants to 19 university-based faculty teams under its Minerva Research Initiative. These three- to five-year awards support basic research in social and behavioral sciences on topics relevant to U.S. national security.
"In a rapidly changing world, social science is essential for making sense of human behavior, guiding informed decisions, and understanding societal progress," said Dr. David Montgomery, director of social science in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering "We need to explore and better understand the complex social dynamics that shape our world and provide insights useful to policymakers and others concerned with the social context of security."
Through its network of faculty investigators, the Minerva Research Initiative builds strong connections to the social science community to help DoD better understand and prepare for future challenges, guided by priorities established in the National Defense Strategy.
R&E and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy selected 19 university awardees from over 150 applicants in eight categories, using merit-based metrics that evaluated proposals for their potential to make foundational contributions to basic social science, alignment with the National Defense Strategy, and potential impact. The awarded projects include: 1.
**Social Cohesion in Action: How Collectivists and Interdependent Communities React to Adverse Events** Topic Area: Societal Cohesion in Crisis Principal Investigator: Delia Baldassarri, New York University 2. **How Is Organized Crime Organized?
Understanding the Political Economy, Industrial Organization, and Recruitment Into Organized Crime in Colombia** Topic Area: Societal Cohesion in Crisis Principal Investigator: Christopher Blattman, University of Chicago 3. **China's Rise and Societal Cohesion in the Indo-Pacific: Concepts, Measures, Implications** Topic Area: Societal Cohesion in Crisis Principal Investigator: Allen Hicken, University of Michigan 4.
**Mapping Societal Cohesion, Disinformation, and Adversary Influence Operations, and Group Formation in African Crisis Regions** Topic Area: Societal Cohesion in Crisis Principal Investigator: Jacob Lewis, Washington State University 5.
**Conflict Resilience Across Scales: Theory and Data to Evaluate Societal Resilience to Water and Climate Shock** Topic Area: Considering Societal Resilience at Multiple Scales Principal Investigator: Kate Brauman, University of Alabama 6.
**Modelling Scales of Societal Resilience to Concurrent Shocks in the Asia-Pacific Region** Topic Area: Considering Societal Resilience at Multiple Scales Principal Investigator: Michael Frachetti, Washington University in St. Louis 7. **"Un"Resilience: Drawing Insights from Societal Collapse** Topic Area: Considering Societal Resilience at Multiple Scales Principal Investigator: Jose Padilla, Old Dominion University 8.
**Anticipating Coastal Population Mobility: Path to Maladaptation or Sociopolitical Stability** Topic Area: Sociotechnical Adaptation to Climate, Food, and Water Stress Principal Investigator: Anamaria Bukvic, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 9.
**Modeling Climate-Induced Societal Adaptation and Population Displacement** Topic Area: Sociotechnical Adaptation to Climate, Food, and Water Stress Principal Investigator: Erik Wibbels, University of Pennsylvania 10. **Harmonizing Research Into AI Futures and Governance** Topic Area: Social Impact of Technological Change Principal Investigator: Nicholas Evans, University of Massachusetts, Lowell 11.
**Machine-Moderated Moral Injury: Exploring the Double-Edged Sword of Algorithmic Decision-Making in National Security** Topic Area: Social Impact of Technological Change Principal Investigator: Neil Shortland, University of Massachusetts, Lowell 12. **Randomized Controlled Trials to Examine the Impact of Generative AI** Topic Area: Social Impact of Technological Change Principal Investigator: Alexander Volfovsky, Duke University 13.
**The Language of Parasocial Influence and the Emergence of Extremism** Principal Investigator: Joshua Plotkin, University of Pennsylvania 14. **Beyond the Clock: Understanding Cross-Cultural Temporal Orientation of Military Officers** Topic Area: Temporal Orientation and Strategic Considerations Principal Investigator: Erika Frydenlund, Old Dominion University 15.
**TimeBase: Systematically Mapping and Modeling Temporal Differences in Strategic Thinking, Signaling, (Inter-) Acting between the U.S., Russia, and China, and How They Matter** Topic Area: Temporal Orientation and Strategic Considerations Principal Investigator: Adam Stulberg, Georgia Institute of Technology 16.
**Cooperation and Conflict Dynamics in Deterrence Networks** Topic Area: Evolving Contexts of Deterrence Principal Investigator: Michael Gabbay, University of Washington 17. **Empirical Study of Deterrence in the Context of Great Power Competition** Topic Area: Evolving Contexts of Deterrence Principal Investigator: Renard Sexton, Emory University 18.
**Military Adaptation and War Termination** Topic Area: War Termination Processes and Prospects Principal Investigator: Jacob Aronson, University of Maryland 19. **What Sustains and Ends Wars: Will to Fight to Secure Ontological Significance Versus Material Capacity to Pursue Power** Topic Area: War Termination Processes and Prospects Principal Investigator: Scott Atran, University of Oxford
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: U.S. and international universities, nonprofit research institutes, academic consortia, and, in cases where methodological or analytical value is clear, qualified for-profit entities. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows $150,000 to multi-million dollars. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
Minerva Research Initiative is funded by U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
The memorandum of agreement was signed August 4 and 5, disclosed by House appropriators on September 3, and runs through 2036. It names no dollar figure. Here is what is actually established, what is still speculation, and what researchers holding or planning NIAID biodefense awards should do before September 30.
Read articleCDMRP reissued the FY26 BCRP Breakthrough Award Levels 1 and 2 and the Clinical Research Extension Award on September 3, 2026, with a November 4 pre-application deadline and a November 18 full application deadline. Round one closed July 8. The arithmetic across both windows accounts for nearly the entire FY26 appropriation — which tells you what kind of second chance this is.
Read articleThe Department's FY26 SBIR/STTR Release 3 opened June 24 with roughly 37 topics across DARPA, the Navy, the Air Force, and the defense components, all closing July 22. The compressed four-week window is unforgiving, but the bigger mistake founders make is treating every component the same. Here is how to read the release, the eligibility rules that disqualify good companies, and why the component you target matters more than the topic you pick.
Read article