1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
The MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium (MGAIC) is an MIT-wide initiative bringing together industry partners and MIT faculty to advance generative AI research with high real-world impact.
The consortium awards seed grants to MIT-led research teams across priority areas including: multimodal tactile sensing for robotics, real-time collaborative AI agents (e.g., jam_bots for live human-AI musical improvisation), understanding how LLM agents deviate from human choices and decision-making, foundation models for scientific discovery, generative AI for design and engineering, AI for healthcare and biology, and AI-augmented education.
Each consortium funding cycle issues call for proposals from MIT faculty, with industry partner alignment guiding priority areas. Industry members include Analog Devices, Coca-Cola, OpenAI, Tata, Cisco, TWG Global, SK Telecom, McKinsey, Citi, and Verizon. Selected projects benefit from industry collaboration, data sharing, compute access through partner companies, and pathway to commercialization or real-world deployment.
The consortium is hosted by MIT Schwarzman College of Computing in partnership with MIT Sloan and benefits from cross-MIT participation including CSAIL, Media Lab, and MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab.
Get alerted about grants like this
Get emailed when new opportunities from “MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium (Founding Members: Analog Devices, Coca-Cola, OpenAI, Tata, Cisco, TWG Global, SK Telecom, McKinsey, Citi, Verizon)” or related funders appear. Free, weekly, unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: MIT faculty (principal investigators) across schools, departments, and labs (especially MIT Schwarzman College of Computing, CSAIL, Media Lab, EECS, Sloan, Aeronautics and Astronautics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab). Postdocs and graduate students participate through faculty PIs. External research partners and consortium industry members can be co-investigators. Strong preference for interdisciplinary teams and projects with clear pathway to industry application or societal impact. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows individual seed grants typically $50,000 to $250,000 USD per project for MIT faculty. Multi-project cohorts funded annually across consortium priority areas. The consortium operates with a $40M+ industry commitment supporting both seed grants and larger cohort initiatives. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium Seed Grants for Foundation Models and Multimodal AI is funded by MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium (Founding Members: Analog Devices, Coca-Cola, OpenAI, Tata, Cisco, TWG Global, SK Telecom, McKinsey, Citi, Verizon). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in MA. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Empire AI is New York State's answer to the compute-access problem, and this is the Cornell route into it. The consortium operates two machines: Alpha+, with 144 NVIDIA H100 GPUs, and Beta, which brings 288 B200 GPUs plus Grace CPU nodes online from December 2025. Allocations are denominated in Service Units, where one SU buys an hour of H100 time and B200 time costs two SU per hour - a pricing structure worth modelling carefully, since the newer hardware is not automatically the better value for every workload. The economics are the most consequential detail: the Cornell Provost underwrites the cost of allocations through November 2026, after which SUs carry a $0.50 charge. Applicants should therefore plan around that transition rather than assume indefinite free access. The current call covers the December 2025 to November 2026 allocation year and closes 17 September at midnight Eastern. Eligibility is narrow by design - faculty holding PI status at Cornell University, Cornell Tech or Weill Cornell Medicine - so this is not a national programme, but the same Empire AI resource is accessible through parallel calls at the other consortium institutions, and researchers at Columbia, NYU, RPI, SUNY and CUNY campuses should look for their own institution's route. The application is two-part: a Cornell-specific form plus an Empire AI-hosted form covering project details and compute requirements. Because the consortium is backed by state money and philanthropy rather than a commercial provider, there are no equity, credit-expiry or vendor-lock conditions attached.
The CU System Sprint Grant is a small, fast-turnaround internal award supporting faculty who want to develop and implement AI-driven pedagogical strategies within a single course. At up to $20,000 with an explicit allowance for one course buyout, it is designed around the real obstacle facing most faculty experimenting with generative AI in teaching - not equipment or data, but protected time. The single-course framing is a deliberate scoping decision and applicants should respect it: proposals aimed at curriculum-wide or program-level transformation are a poor fit, while a concrete plan to redesign one course around AI tools and measure the effect on student learning outcomes matches what the program is asking for. Eligibility extends to tenured and tenure-track faculty as well as full-time and instructional series faculty across all CU campuses, which is broader than many internal research awards and deliberately includes teaching-focused appointments who are often closest to the pedagogical questions at issue. This is the second of three planned cycles, so faculty who miss the October 16, 2026 deadline should expect a third round. For a grants database this entry is narrower in eligibility than a federal or foundation program - it is open only to CU faculty - but it is a useful example of the institutional micro-grant tier that has grown rapidly as universities respond to generative AI in the classroom, and comparable programs now exist at many university systems. Faculty at other institutions who find this relevant should check whether their own provost or academic affairs office runs an equivalent scheme, since these internal AI teaching grants are frequently under-advertised and undersubscribed relative to external competitions.
The OpenAI Foundation is putting $100 million behind Breakthroughs to Follow-Through, a Common Health Coalition initiative aiming to at least double hepatitis C cure rates in eight states and localities within two years. Alabama, Illinois, Louisiana and Massachusetts go first, money flows to local collaboratives and nonprofits, and the grants are deliberately not tied to any one AI vendor. Here is what makes an organization fundable under it.
Read articleNIH proposed on August 14 to withhold overall impact scores and percentiles from applicants, replacing them with three bands: Most competitive, Competitive, Not discussed. Paylines already vanished in January. Here is what applicants actually lose, what survives in the summary statement, and how to rebuild a resubmission decision rule without a number.
Read articleNSF's new AI Datasets solicitation puts up to $100 million behind a specific bet: that the bottleneck in AI-for-science is not models but data. Here is how the three award tiers work — Flagship up to $5M, Impact up to $2M, Planning up to $200K — who is eligible, why voluntary cost sharing is banned, and how to build a proposal that survives review before the November 4, 2026 deadline.
Read article