1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsOCHA Humanitarian Research and Innovation Grant Program is sponsored by United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). This program provides small grants to encourage and support original research and writing on issues and trends related to humanitarian needs.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Displaced children in Burkina Faso access education through radio-based learning, funded by the Regional Humanitarian Fund, offering an alternative path to schooling. Photo: OCHA/Alassane Sarr We work with humanitarian partners around the world to identify the most critical humanitarian needs, plan responses and determine the budgets needed to address them.
We help drive humanitarian action by encouraging new, more effective funding and financing mechanisms that respond to and reflect the changing nature of humanitarian crises. OCHA funds humanitarian assistance to people caught up in crises to save lives, alleviate suffering and maintain human dignity through its two multi-donor pooled funds: Central Emergency Response Fund and Country-Based Pooled Funds.
Humanitarian pooled funds UN Central Emergency Response Fund Country-Based Pooled Funds OCHA-managed pooled funds are effective ways to support humanitarian action. They allow Governments and private donors to pool their contributions into common, unearmarked funds to deliver life-saving assistance to people who need it most.
There are two types of pooled funds: CERF, which can fund an emergency anywhere in the world, and the CBPFs, which are country specific. These funds represent a relatively small portion of global humanitarian funding, but they are critical to the delivery of life-saving assistance.
They strengthen the collective humanitarian response, empower leadership and improve coordination The UN Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) enables humanitarian organizations to kick-start urgent aid operations worldwide within just hours of a sudden-onset emergency, and to reach crisis-affected people who are not receiving the attention and funding they need.
It can also scale up and expand assistance when a situation deteriorates suddenly, and it sustains critical assistance in crises that fail to attract sufficient resources . CERF receives contributions year-round from donors – mainly Governments but also foundations, companies, charities and individuals – into a single global fund.
CERF allocations are available to UN agencies, funds and programmes, and they are informed by joint needs assessments, expert advice from aid workers and priorities set out in country-level plans. CERF has a US$1 billion annual funding target and is fully unearmarked to ensure funds meet the most urgent, life-saving needs. In a humanitarian crisis, organizations on the ground assess and prioritize needs together.
UN funds, programmes and specialized agencies are eligible for CERF funding. They work with local, national and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs), host governments and Red Cross/Red Crescent Societies to implement grants. Resident and Humanitarian Coordinators can apply for CERF funding when the country’s needs exceed UN organizations’ capacity to respond.
CERF is guided by the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality and impartiality. It provides funding based on needs, risks and collective priorities. Humanitarian partners work together to identify and prioritize activities for a CERF request, based on evidence, assessments of need and, in sudden-onset disasters, projections and forecasts.
Then the Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) and UN Country Team/ Humanitarian Country Team develop applications for the funding based on these priorities. They are guided by CERF’s Life-Saving Criteria . The RC/HC submits a prioritized proposal to the CERF secretariat, which reviews it and supports the Emergency Relief Coordinator in deciding on the allocation of funding to partners on the ground.
Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPFs) are established when an emergency occurs or when an existing crisis deteriorates. They are managed by OCHA under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinators (HCs) or UN Resident Coordinators (RCs) and in close consultation with the humanitarian community. Contributions are collected into single, unearmarked funds.
These funds support high-priority projects being undertaken by those best placed to respond (including international and national NGOs and UN agencies) through an inclusive and transparent process that supports priorities set out in Humanitarian Response Plans. This ensures funding is available and prioritized locally by those closest to people in need.
Donors – countries, individuals, or foundations – contribute money to a specific CBPF. The RC/HC in each country leads the decision-making and allocation processes to distribute the money to local, national and international organizations to help people in need. A localized response is a critical objective of the funds.
Local non-governmental organizations and aid workers are often the backbone of humanitarian response. They bring unique networks, approaches and skills, including language which helps them identify the people most in need. CBPFs’ country presence and broad partnership networks enables them to strengthen local and national actors’ engagement in humanitarian responses.
The funds are managed by OCHA at the country level under the UN humanitarian leadership. They empower humanitarian leadership and promote coordination among humanitarian actors. Advisory Boards support the management of the CBPFs by making key decisions.
Visit the Pooled Funds Data Hub Pooled funds frequently asked questions UN's Global Emergency Fund (CERF) FAQ Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPFs) FAQ Regional Humanitarian Pooled Funds (RHPF) FAQ Global Humanitarian Overview At the country level, we work with partners to build common strategies and implementation plans for joint funding appeals.
This ensures collective resource mobilization and financing based on a common needs evaluation, making aid more effective, efficient and predictable. At a global level, this work culminates in the annual Global Humanitarian Overview . Financial Tracking Service Our financial-tracking tools and services – including the Financial Tracking Service (FTS) – help manage humanitarian funding.
FTS provides information to support our advocacy, policymaking and humanitarian financing work. It also helps improve strategic and operational decision-making by enabling effective field coordination. Strategic Humanitarian Financing We also ensure more responsive, predictable and strategic humanitarian financing through OCHA’s leadership of the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) and Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPFs).
COUNTRY AND REGIONAL FUNDS GUIDANCE ON ALLOCATION MODALITIES FOR THE U.S. AWARD A. INTRODUCTION This note outlines the parameters and process for allocating resources received through the U.S. Award... Letter from the Emergency Relief Coordinator “As local as possible, as international as necessary.
” The Pooled Funds are the most effective tool for locally led humanitarian action. They empower... Letter from the Emergency Relief Coordinator If CERF didn’t exist, we would have had to invent it.
We are in the midst of a funding crisis the likes of which we have never seen before. Governments... Executive Summary Building on the inaugural report on 2023 CERF-funded climate action, this year’s edition provides a comprehensive overview of CERF’s climate action portfolio in 2024.
It details... Letter from the Emergency Relief Coordinator 2023 was an undeniably arduous year marked by unremitting global challenges. From Ukraine and Sudan, to the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), the...
Letter from the Emergency Relief Coordinator We thought 2022 was an unforgiving year for people caught up in crises. 2023 turned out to be even worse. From the Occupied Palestinian Territory to...
Introduction These Global Guidelines aim to ensure a coherent and harmonised approach to the governance and operations of Country-based Pooled Funds (CBPFs). These Global Guidelines set out... Using the CERF Handbook The Handbook is a reference tool to find quick answers on the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) as well as a guide to applying for and maximizing the impact of CERF...
Lean season pushes millions of people to the brink in north-east Nigeria DR Congo: Why aid isn’t reaching people How OCHA-managed funds help women leaders transform their communities
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Open to people of any nationality interested in improving humanitarian assistance. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows up to US$4,000. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
OCHA Humanitarian Research and Innovation Grant Program is funded by United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
NSF 26-508 (TechAccess: AI-Ready America) funds a single AI coordination hub per state at $1M/year for three years. Round 1 closes July 16, 2026, and only 10 of 56 hubs get decided first. Here's who can realistically win the backbone role and how to build a proposal that survives review.
Read articleNSF 26-508 (TechAccess: AI-Ready America) puts up to $224 million behind as many as 56 statewide coordination hubs — $1 million a year for three years each — to make businesses, governments, and workers AI-ready. Here is what a hub actually does, who can lead one, why round one is the round to win, and how to approach the July 16 deadline.
Read articleNSF's TechAccess program will fund up to 56 statewide AI coordination hubs at $1M per year for three years. Round 1 letters of intent are due June 16 and full proposals July 16. Here is who can win the single slot in each state, what a hub is actually supposed to do, and why the convening-capacity requirement is the real filter.
Read article